[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
April 1985

Clinical Practice, Clinical Ethics

Author Affiliations

Cornell University Medical College 1300 York Ave New York, NY 10021

Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(4):627-628. doi:10.1001/archinte.1985.00360040045008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


There are physicians who make patient-care decisions as part of their everyday life, but who are still unconvinced of the importance of the "fuss" about ethics. It is understandably difficult for many physicians, raised on a belief in medical science and surrounded by the effective technology that is the hallmark of today's practice, to acknowledge that medicine as practiced is fundamentally a moral or moral-technical profession. Such an understanding, however, does not undermine scientific medicine nor detract from technology, but rather provides a basis for seeking help for those painful and difficult decisions that have always been the burden of physicians and the source of their grace.

To understand the moral nature of medicine and why the recent growth of medical ethics is so helpful, one has only to return to Otto Guttentag's simple and basic definition of the practice of medicine—in the setting of the threat to life inherent

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview