[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.238.248.103. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1988

Ethics, Economics, and Endocarditis: The Physician's Role in Resource Allocation

Author Affiliations

From the Section of Clinical Ethics, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Ill (Dr La Puma), and the Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago Hospitals (Drs La Puma, Cassel, and Humphrey).

Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(8):1809-1811. doi:10.1001/archinte.1988.00380080087023
Abstract

• Medical decisions are increasingly shaped by financial considerations. Biomedical ethicists have encouraged the practicing physician to remain the agent of the individual patient, sometimes pitting physicians against health care institutions. The limitation of medical resources has given rise to the need for a clear conceptual basis for allocating scarce resources. The role of resource gatekeeper may be used to the indigent patient's disadvantage when the principles of triage are used incorrectly in situations of relative scarcity. To allocate limited resources fairly under changing policy and economic conditions, health care institutions should ensure that systematic processes, such as those of ethics consultants and committees, are readily available to help resolve problematic cases and policies. Physicians with clinical judgment and a primary commitment to patient care must assume active roles in these processes in order to build an ethically sound framework for clinical decision making in times of relatively scarce resources.

(Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1809-1811)

×