To the Editor.—We read with interest the recent report by Rajput and coworkers1 comparing the use of fiberoptic vs conventional pulmonary artery (PA) catheters. The authors remind us that measurements of mixed-venous oxygen (MvO2) levels may inadequately assess tissue oxy(Continued on p 2142.) (Continued from p 2139.) genation in the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in septic shock. They also report the wide fluctuations in MvO2 saturation detected with fiberoptic catheters during periods of agitation or suctioning. These fluctuations in MvO2 saturation have recently been reported to influence hemodynamics.2 These points may be directing our attention toward a more focused study of fiberoptic catheters. If continuous assessment of MvO2 saturation is not helpful in ARDS or in septic shock, fiberoptic catheters should not be used in these situations, but not necessarily abandoned entirely. Could the rapid detection of decreasing MvO2
ULSTAD DR, CAMILLI AE. Use of Fiberoptic vs Conventional Pulmonary Artery Catheters. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(9):2139–2142. doi:10.1001/archinte.1989.00390090151036
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: