Life is a journey, and the end of the journey has, for many people, become more difficult. Clinical conditions that just 25 years ago would have signified imminent death now prompt "life-sustaining treatment." On occasion, such treatment permits dramatic recovery. At other times, "life sustaining" becomes "death prolonging"; patients do not recover, nor do they die. Instead, they become prisoners of technology, despite the intentions of physicians, the hopes of families, or the fears of patients. Consider Nancy Cruzan.
In January 1983, an automobile accident on a deserted Missouri road almost ended Nancy Cruzan's life. A state police officer declared her dead, and when emergency personnel arrived she had no pulse. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation restored her respirations and heartbeat, but not consciousness. She existed in a persistent vegetative state supported by food and water given through a gastrostomy tube. After several years, all of her physicians and consultants agreed that she
Fairman RP. Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Lessons From Nancy Cruzan. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(1):25–27. doi:10.1001/archinte.1992.00400130051003
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: