To the Editor. —
The editorial by Bone and Elpern1 points up the conflict between patients' expectations of care and their willingness to pay for this. It is unquestioned that the explosion in health care costs has been, at least in part, consumer driven. Equally, the liability situation makes physicians ever more eager to accede to the patient's every demand.Bone and Elpern make the statement that "explicitly rationing medical services" may become the norm unless a national health care policy is developed. However, what is a health care policy if not a de facto way of rationing health care? Is it not in truth rationing health care to deny a terminally ill patient the "benefit" of intensive or high-technology care by fiat?In addition, the authors seem discomfited by the fact that "high technology health care could become an option only for those who are able to pay
Maher JC. National Health Policy Without Rationing? Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(2):426. doi:10.1001/archinte.1992.00400140156041
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: