Health Care Provider Satisfaction With a New Electronic Progress Note Format: SOAP vs APSO Format | Electronic Health Records | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.175.212.130. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011.  NCHS Data Brief. 2011;(79):1-822617322PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Hartzband P, Groopman J. Off the record—avoiding the pitfalls of going electronic.  N Engl J Med. 2008;358(16):1656-165818420497PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Payne TH, tenBroek AE, Fletcher GS, Labuguen MC. Transition from paper to electronic inpatient physician notes.  J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(1):108-11120064811PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C,  et al.  Missing clinical information during primary care visits.  JAMA. 2005;293(5):565-57115687311PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Fitzgerald FT. The emperor's new clothes.  Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):396-39722393138PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Brotzman GL, Guse CE, Fay DL, Schellhase KG, Marbella AM. Implementing an electronic medical record at a residency site: physicians' perceived effects on quality of care, documentation, and productivity.  WMJ. 2009;108(2):99-10319437936PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Shortliffe EH. Strategic action in health information technology: why the obvious has taken so long.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1222-123316162567PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach.  N Engl J Med. 1968;278(11):593-6005637758PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Research Letter
Jan 28, 2013

Health Care Provider Satisfaction With a New Electronic Progress Note Format: SOAP vs APSO Format

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Divisions of General Internal Medicine (Drs Lin and Pell and Ms McKenzie) and Rheumatology (Dr Caplan), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; and Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado (Dr Caplan).

JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(2):160-162. doi:10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.474

Many health care organizations are deploying electronic health records (EHRs).1 A health care provider's EHR progress notes are essential for effective communication. However, these notes may increase errors when they are difficult to read.2 Billing requirements, regulatory statements, and extensive inclusion of test results detract from progress note brevity and clarity.3 In our experience, EHR progress notes that include such elements can span 17 electronic pages, rendering actual clinical reasoning extraordinarily difficult to locate. Missing data can lead to lost productivity and increased cost.4 Health care providers' frustration with EHR progress notes may interfere with EHR adoption5,6 and deployment.7 Although the traditional SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) format8 mirrors the sequence of a clinical encounter, it translates poorly from paper medical charts to the EHR. Finding the Assessment and Plan requires considerable on-screen “scrolling.” We examined the adoption of an alternate APSO (Assessment, Plan, Subjective, Objective) format, which places the Assessment and Plan at the top of the note, where it is readily located when the EHR note is opened. We hypothesized it would improve readability and satisfaction and shorten the time to answer clinical questions.

×