Pharmacologic Therapy for Primary Restless Legs Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Review
April 8, 2013

Pharmacologic Therapy for Primary Restless Legs Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (Drs Wilt and Fink and Messrs MacDonald and Rutks) and Department of Psychiatry (Dr Khawaja), Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Minneapolis (Drs Wilt, Butler, and Fink, Messrs MacDonald and Rutks, and Ms Ouellette); Departments of Medicine (Drs Wilt and Fink) and Psychiatry (Dr Khawaja), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis (Drs Wilt, Butler, and Fink and Ms Ouellette); and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis (Dr Fink).

JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):496-505. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3733
Abstract

Importance Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder characterized by unpleasant sensations in the legs and a distressing, irresistible urge to move them. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate efficacy, safety, and comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments for primary RLS.

Evidence Acquisition We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English, reporting efficacy outcomes and harms of pharmacologic treatments for primary RLS of at least 4 weeks' duration. MEDLINE and other databases were searched through June 2012. Reviewers extracted outcomes and adverse events and rated the strength of evidence.

Results We identified 29 eligible RCTs. We found high-strength evidence that the proportion of patients who had a clinically important response (International Restless Legs Syndrome [IRLS] responders), defined as a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in mean IRLS symptom scale scores, was greater with dopamine agonist therapy compared with placebo (61% vs 41%) (risk ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.38-1.86]; 7 trials). Dopamine agonists also improved patient-reported sleep scale scores and quality-of-life measures. High-strength evidence demonstrated that calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands increased the proportion of IRLS responders compared with placebo (61% vs 37%) (risk ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.33-2.09]; 3 trials). Adverse events associated with dopamine agonists included nausea, vomiting, and somnolence. Alpha-2-delta ligands adverse events included somnolence and unsteadiness or dizziness.

Conclusions and Relevance On the basis of short-term RCTs that enrolled highly selected populations with long-term high-moderate to very severe symptoms, dopamine agonists and calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands reduced RLS symptoms and improved sleep outcomes and disease-specific quality of life. Adverse effects and treatment withdrawals due to adverse effects were common.

×