[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Restrict food stamps to the purchase of healthy foods only
    David L. Keller, MD, MS, FACP | none
    Obesity rates are high among the poor of our country, and the Food Stamp program could do more to encourage good health among recipients. Food stamps should be restricted to the purchase of foods deemed healthy by a panel of nutritionists, dieticians and physician experts. Fresh vegetables, fruits, whole grains, fish, low fat meats and dairy products, nuts, legumes and so on could become the core diet of America's poor. With such nutritional support, they might lose weight, feel more confident, and perhaps be thus enabled to work their way up the socio-economic ladder. It can't hurt, might help and is certainly worth a try.
    Original Investigation
    March 2014

    Sociodemographic Differences in Fast Food Price Sensitivity

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
    • 2Department of Economics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
    • 3Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
    • 4Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg
    • 5Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
    • 6Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
    • 7Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
    JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):434-442. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13922

    Importance  Fiscal food policies (eg, taxation) are increasingly proposed to improve population-level health, but their impact on health disparities is unknown.

    Objective  To estimate subgroup-specific effects of fast food price changes on fast food consumption and cardiometabolic outcomes.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  Twenty-year follow-up (5 examinations) in a biracial US prospective cohort: Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) (1985/1986-2005/2006, baseline N = 5115). Participants were aged 18 to 30 years at baseline; design indicated equal recruitment by race (black vs white), educational attainment, age, and sex. Community-level price data from the Council for Community and Economic Research were temporally and geographically linked to study participants’ home address at each examination.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Participant-reported number of fast food eating occasions per week, body mass index (BMI), and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) from fasting glucose and insulin concentrations. Covariates included individual-level and community-level social and demographic factors.

    Results  In repeated measures regression analysis, multivariable-adjusted associations between fast food price and consumption were nonlinear (quadratic, P < .001), with significant inverse estimated effects on consumption at higher prices; estimates varied according to race (interaction P = .04), income (P = .07), and education (P = .03). At the 10th percentile of price ($1.25/serving), blacks and whites had mean fast food consumption frequency of 2.20 (95% CI, 2.07-2.33) and 1.55 (1.45-1.65) times/wk, respectively, whereas at the 90th percentile of price ($1.53/serving), respective mean consumption estimates were 1.86 (1.75-1.97) and 1.50 (1.41-1.59) times/wk. We observed differential price effects on HOMA-IR (inverse for lower educational status only [interaction P = .005] and at middle income only [interaction P = .02]) and BMI (inverse for blacks, less education, and middle income; positive for whites, more education, and high income [all interaction P < .001]).

    Conclusions and Relevance  We found greater fast food price sensitivity on fast food consumption and insulin resistance among sociodemographic groups that have a disproportionate burden of chronic disease. Our findings have implications for fiscal policy, particularly with respect to possible effects of fast food taxes among populations with diet-related health disparities.