[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.238.248.103. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
1.
Fischer  WA  II, Hynes  NA, Perl  TM.  Protecting health care workers from Ebola: personal protective equipment is critical but is not enough.  Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(10):753-754.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Williams  C, McGraw  P, Schneck  EE,  et al.  Impact of universal gowning and gloving on health care worker clothing contamination.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36(4):431-437.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Pessoa-Silva  CL, Dharan  S, Hugonnet  S,  et al.  Dynamics of bacterial hand contamination during routine neonatal care.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25(3):192-197.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Hayden  MK, Blom  DW, Lyle  EA, Moore  CG, Weinstein  RA.  Risk of hand or glove contamination after contact with patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus or the colonized patients’ environment.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(2):149-154.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Morgan  DJ, Liang  SY, Smith  CL,  et al.  Frequent multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii contamination of gloves, gowns, and hands of healthcare workers.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(7):716-721.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Morgan  DJ, Rogawski  E, Thom  KA,  et al.  Transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria to healthcare workers’ gloves and gowns after patient contact increases with environmental contamination.  Crit Care Med. 2012;40(4):1045-1051.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Landelle  C, Verachten  M, Legrand  P, Girou  E, Barbut  F, Brun-Buisson  C.  Contamination of healthcare workers’ hands with Clostridium difficile spores after caring for patients with C. difficile infection.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(1):10-15.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Lau  JT, Fung  KS, Wong  TW,  et al.  SARS transmission among hospital workers in Hong Kong.  Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(2):280-286.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Ofner-Agostini  M, Gravel  D, McDonald  LC,  et al.  Cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome among Toronto healthcare workers after implementation of infection control precautions: a case series.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(5):473-478.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Al-Tawfiq  JA, Memish  ZA.  Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: epidemiology and disease control measures.  Infect Drug Resist. 2014;7:281-287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Oboho  IK, Tomczyk  SM, Al-Asmari  AM,  et al.  2014 MERS-CoV outbreak in Jeddah: a link to health care facilities.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):846-854.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Johnston  CP, Qiu  H, Ticehurst  JR,  et al.  Outbreak management and implications of a nosocomial norovirus outbreak.  Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(5):534-540.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Iturriza-Gómara  M, Lopman  B.  Norovirus in healthcare settings.  Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014;27(5):437-443.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Arfons  L, Ray  AJ, Donskey  CJ.  Clostridium difficile infection among health care workers receiving antibiotic therapy.  Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(9):1384-1385.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Guo  YP, Li  Y, Wong  PL.  Environment and body contamination: a comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing.  Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(4):e39-e45.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Lai  JY, Guo  YP, Or  PP, Li  Y.  Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances.  Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(2):104-111.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Casanova  L, Alfano-Sobsey  E, Rutala  WA, Weber  DJ, Sobsey  M.  Virus transfer from personal protective equipment to healthcare employees’ skin and clothing.  Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(8):1291-1293.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Tamimi  AH, Carlino  S, Edmonds  S, Gerba  CP.  Impact of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer intervention on the spread of viruses in homes.  Food Environ Virol. 2014;6(2):140-144.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
O’Connell  KP, Bucher  JR, Anderson  PE,  et al.  Real-time fluorogenic reverse transcription-PCR assays for detection of bacteriophage MS2.  Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(1):478-483.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Casanova  LM, Rutala  WA, Weber  DJ, Sobsey  MD.  Effect of single- versus double-gloving on virus transfer to health care workers’ skin and clothing during removal of personal protective equipment.  Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(4):369-374.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Oberyszyn  AS, Robertson  FM.  Novel rapid method for visualization of extent and location of aerosol contamination during high-speed sorting of potentially biohazardous samples.  Cytometry. 2001;43(3):217-222.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Siegel  JD, Rhinehart  E, Jackson  M, Chiarello  L; Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.  2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings.  Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(10)(suppl 2):S65-S164.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Guidance on personal protective equipment to be used by healthcare workers during management of patients with Ebola virus disease in U.S. hospitals, including procedures for putting on (donning) and removing (doffing). http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html. Published October 20, 2014. Accessed March 12, 2015.
24.
Cohen  J.  A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.  Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):37-46.Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Landis  JR, Koch  GG.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.  Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Tomas  ME, Sunkesula  VCK, Kundrapu  S, Wilson  BM, Donskey  CJ.  An intervention to reduce healthcare personnel hand contamination during care of patients with Clostridium difficile infection.  Am J Infect Control. In press.Google Scholar
27.
Jinadatha  C, Simmons  S, Dale  C,  et al.  Disinfecting personal protective equipment with pulsed xenon ultraviolet as a risk mitigation strategy for health care workers.  Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(4):412-414.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Tomas  ME, Cadnum  JL, Jencson  A, Donskey  CJ.  The Ebola disinfection booth: evaluation of an enclosed ultraviolet light booth for disinfection of contaminated personal protective equipment [published online July 20, 2015].  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Edmond  MB, Diekema  DJ, Perencevich  EN.  Ebola virus disease and the need for new personal protective equipment.  JAMA. 2014;312(23):2495-2496.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
December 2015

Contamination of Health Care Personnel During Removal of Personal Protective Equipment

Author Affiliations
  • 1Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 2Research Service, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 3Infection Prevention and Control Department, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 4Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 5Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Division, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(12):1904-1910. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4535
Abstract

Importance  Contamination of the skin and clothing of health care personnel during removal of personal protective equipment (PPE) contributes to dissemination of pathogens and places personnel at risk for infection.

Objectives  To determine the frequency and sites of contamination on the skin and clothing of personnel during PPE removal and to evaluate the effect of an intervention on the frequency of contamination.

Design, Setting, and Participants  We conducted a point-prevalence study and quasi-experimental intervention from October 28, 2014, through March 31, 2015. Data analysis began November 17, 2014, and ended April 21, 2015. Participants included a convenience sample of health care personnel from 4 Northeast Ohio hospitals who conducted simulations of contaminated PPE removal using fluorescent lotion and a cohort of health care personnel from 7 study units in 1 medical center that participated in a quasi-experimental intervention that included education and practice in removal of contaminated PPE with immediate visual feedback based on fluorescent lotion contamination of skin and clothing.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcomes were the frequency and sites of contamination on skin and clothing of personnel after removal of contaminated gloves or gowns at baseline vs after the intervention. A secondary end point focused on the correlation between contamination of skin with fluorescent lotion and bacteriophage MS2, a nonpathogenic, nonenveloped virus.

Results  Of 435 glove and gown removal simulations, contamination of skin or clothing with fluorescent lotion occurred in 200 (46.0%), with a similar frequency of contamination among the 4 hospitals (range, 42.5%-50.3%). Contamination occurred more frequently during removal of contaminated gloves than gowns (52.9% vs 37.8%, P = .002) and when lapses in technique were observed vs not observed (70.3% vs 30.0%, P < .001). The intervention resulted in a reduction in skin and clothing contamination during glove and gown removal (60.0% before the intervention vs 18.9% after, P < .001) that was sustained after 1 and 3 months (12.0% at both time points, P < .001 compared with before the intervention). During simulations of contaminated glove removal, the frequency of skin contamination was similar with fluorescent lotion and bacteriophage MS2 (58.0% vs 52.0%, P = .45).

Conclusions and Relevance  Contamination of the skin and clothing of health care personnel occurs frequently during removal of contaminated gloves or gowns. Educational interventions that include practice with immediate visual feedback on skin and clothing contamination can significantly reduce the risk of contamination during removal of PPE.

×