Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring After Discharge of Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure: The Better Effectiveness After Transition–Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) Randomized Clinical Trial | Cardiology | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Gheorghiade  M, Vaduganathan  M, Fonarow  GC, Bonow  RO.  Rehospitalization for heart failure: problems and perspectives.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):391-403.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Thom  T, Haase  N, Rosamond  W,  et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.  Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee [published corrections appear in Circulation. 2006;113(14):e696 and 2006;114(23):e630].  Circulation. 2006;113(6):e85-e151. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.171600.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Jencks  SF, Williams  MV, Coleman  EA.  Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2011;364(16):1582].  N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1418-1428.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital Compare. https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html. Accessed September 28, 2015.
5.
Krumholz  HM, Merrill  AR, Schone  EM,  et al.  Patterns of hospital performance in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality and readmission.  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(5):407-413.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Ong  MK, Mangione  CM, Romano  PS,  et al.  Looking forward, looking back: assessing variations in hospital resource use and outcomes for elderly patients with heart failure.  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(6):548-557.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Nielsen  GA, Bartely  A, Coleman  E,  et al.  Transforming Care at the Bedside How-to Guide: Creating an Ideal Transition Home for Patients With Heart Failure. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2008.
8.
Amoah  B, Boutwell  A, Schall  M, Sevin  C, Shapiro  E, Taylor  J.  Getting Started Guide: Improving Care for Patients With Heart Failure: Focus on Ambulatory Care. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2008.
9.
Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation. 2013 Measures Updates and Specifications Report: Hospital-Level 30-Day Risk-Standardized Readmission Measures for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia (Version 6.0). New Haven, CT. March 2013.
10.
Rau  J. Medicare fines 2,610 hospitals in third round of readmission penalties. Kaiser Health News. http://khn.org/news/medicare-readmissions-penalties-2015/. Published October 2, 2014. Accessed November 26, 2015.
11.
Naylor  MD, Brooten  D, Campbell  R,  et al.  Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial.  JAMA. 1999;281(7):613-620.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Naylor  MD, Brooten  DA, Campbell  RL, Maislin  G, McCauley  KM, Schwartz  JS.  Transitional care of older adults hospitalized with heart failure: a randomized, controlled trial.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(5):675-684.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Coleman  EA, Parry  C, Chalmers  S, Min  SJ.  The Care Transitions Intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial.  Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):1822-1828.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Jack  BW, Chetty  VK, Anthony  D,  et al.  A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial.  Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(3):178-187.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Feltner  C, Jones  CD, Cené  CW,  et al.  Transitional care interventions to prevent readmissions for persons with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(11):774-784.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Voss  R, Gardner  R, Baier  R, Butterfield  K, Lehrman  S, Gravenstein  S.  The Care Transitions Intervention: translating from efficacy to effectiveness.  Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1232-1237.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Katz  MH.  Interventions to decrease hospital readmission rates: who saves? who pays?  Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1230-1231.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Stauffer  BD, Fullerton  C, Fleming  N,  et al.  Effectiveness and cost of a transitional care program for heart failure: a prospective study with concurrent controls.  Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1238-1243.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Chaudhry  SI, Mattera  JA, Curtis  JP,  et al.  Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure.  N Engl J Med. 2010;363(24):2301-2309.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Desai  AS.  Home monitoring heart failure care does not improve patient outcomes: looking beyond telephone-based disease management.  Circulation. 2012;125(6):828-836.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Koehler  F, Winkler  S, Schieber  M,  et al; Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure Investigators.  Impact of remote telemedical management on mortality and hospitalizations in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure: the Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure study.  Circulation. 2011;123(17):1873-1880.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Inglis  SC, Clark  RA, Dierckx  R, Prieto-Merino  D, Cleland  JG.  Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(10):CD007228.Google Scholar
23.
Pandor  A, Gomersall  T, Stevens  JW,  et al.  Remote monitoring after recent hospital discharge in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.  Heart. 2013;99(23):1717-1726.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Pandor  A, Thokala  P, Gomersall  T,  et al.  Home telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes after recent discharge in patients with heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.  Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(32):1-207, v-vi.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Black  JT, Romano  PS, Sadeghi  B,  et al; BEAT-HF Research Group.  A remote monitoring and telephone nurse coaching intervention to reduce readmissions among patients with heart failure: study protocol for the Better Effectiveness After Transition–Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) randomized controlled trial.  Trials. 2014;15:124.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
DeWalt  DA, Malone  RM, Bryant  ME,  et al.  A heart failure self-management program for patients of all literacy levels: a randomized, controlled trial [ISRCTN11535170].  BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:30.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Howie-Esquivel  J, Carroll  M, Brinker  E,  et al.  A strategy to reduce heart failure readmissions and inpatient costs.  Cardiol Res. 2015;6(1):201-208. doi:10.14740/cr384w.Google ScholarCrossref
28.
White  M, Garbez  R, Carroll  M, Brinker  E, Howie-Esquivel  J.  Is “teach-back” associated with knowledge retention and hospital readmission in hospitalized heart failure patients?  J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;28(2):137-146.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Vasilevskis  EE, Kripalani  S, Ong  MK,  et al.  Variability in implementation of interventions aimed at reducing readmissions among patients with heart failure: a survey of teaching hospitals [published online November 17, 2015].  Acad Med.PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Rector  TS, Kubo  SH, Cohn  JN.  Patients self-assessment of their congestive heart failure, part 2: content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire.  Heart Fail. 1987;3:198-209.Google Scholar
31.
Lubben  J, Blozik  E, Gillmann  G,  et al.  Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations.  Gerontologist. 2006;46(4):503-513.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Desai  AS, Stevenson  LW.  Connecting the circle from home to heart-failure disease management.  N Engl J Med. 2010;363(24):2364-2367.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Zile  MR, Bennett  TD, St John Sutton  M,  et al.  Transition from chronic compensated to acute decompensated heart failure: pathophysiological insights obtained from continuous monitoring of intracardiac pressures.  Circulation. 2008;118(14):1433-1441.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Barnett  ML, Hsu  J, McWilliams  JM.  Patient characteristics and differences in hospital readmission rates.  JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(11):1803-1812.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    2 Comments for this article
    Medications
    G T A Morris | Retired
    I was struck by the absence of Statins from the medication list in the article. I would suppose it likely that all meds were studied but nothing of importance was found. Trying to assign a cause for the decompensation is a part of management that telemetry would be expected to help. It is disappointing that so many dropped out. Was atrial fibrillation found more often in the treated group?
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    No surprise
    Ken Ota |
    You mean monitoring complex patients with a machine doesn’t reduce readmissions?

    Huh.

    Interesting to me that healthcare organizations still spend money on technology like this.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    Original Investigation
    Health Care Reform
    March 2016

    Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring After Discharge of Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure: The Better Effectiveness After Transition–Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) Randomized Clinical Trial

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
    • 2Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
    • 3Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis
    • 4Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis
    • 5Office of Nursing Research and Development, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
    • 6Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
    • 7Department of Resource and Outcomes Management, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
    • 8Department of Health Policy & Management, University of California, Los Angeles
    • 9RAND Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California
    • 10Program in Nursing Science, University of California, Irvine
    • 11School of Nursing, University of California, Davis
    • 12Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego
    • 13Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
    • 14Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego
    • 15Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine
    • 16Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
    • 17Division of Public Health & Community Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles
    • 18Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles
    • 19Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles
    JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(3):310-318. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7712
    Abstract

    Importance  It remains unclear whether telemonitoring approaches provide benefits for patients with heart failure (HF) after hospitalization.

    Objective  To evaluate the effectiveness of a care transition intervention using remote patient monitoring in reducing 180-day all-cause readmissions among a broad population of older adults hospitalized with HF.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  We randomized 1437 patients hospitalized for HF between October 12, 2011, and September 30, 2013, to the intervention arm (715 patients) or to the usual care arm (722 patients) of the Better Effectiveness After Transition–Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) study and observed them for 180 days. The dates of our study analysis were March 30, 2014, to October 1, 2015. The setting was 6 academic medical centers in California. Participants were hospitalized individuals 50 years or older who received active treatment for decompensated HF.

    Interventions  The intervention combined health coaching telephone calls and telemonitoring. Telemonitoring used electronic equipment that collected daily information about blood pressure, heart rate, symptoms, and weight. Centralized registered nurses conducted telemonitoring reviews, protocolized actions, and telephone calls.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was readmission for any cause within 180 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes were all-cause readmission within 30 days, all-cause mortality at 30 and 180 days, and quality of life at 30 and 180 days.

    Results  Among 1437 participants, the median age was 73 years. Overall, 46.2% (664 of 1437) were female, and 22.0% (316 of 1437) were African American. The intervention and usual care groups did not differ significantly in readmissions for any cause 180 days after discharge, which occurred in 50.8% (363 of 715) and 49.2% (355 of 722) of patients, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.88-1.20; P = .74). In secondary analyses, there were no significant differences in 30-day readmission or 180-day mortality, but there was a significant difference in 180-day quality of life between the intervention and usual care groups. No adverse events were reported.

    Conclusions and Relevance  Among patients hospitalized for HF, combined health coaching telephone calls and telemonitoring did not reduce 180-day readmissions.

    Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01360203

    ×