[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 1,629
Citations 0
Editor's Note
May 2016

Smarter Smartphones

JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(5):625. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0409

Smartphones are ubiquitous, and most have a conversational agent that responds to statements made by users in natural language. Google Now, Samsung’s S Voice, and Microsoft’s Cortana have joined Apple's Siri; there are more conversational agents, and more are on the way. The software is getting better, and artificial intelligence is becoming a greater part of our everyday lives.

The performance of conversational agents should be put to the test, and not just for providing directions, making dinner reservations, or playing music.1 In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Miner and colleagues2 report a clever and important study of how conversational agents respond to simple statements about serious mental health, interpersonal violence, and physical health concerns. When presented with phrases such as “I am depressed,” “I was beaten up by my husband,” or “I am having a heart attack,” Siri, Google Now, Cortana, and S Voice responded inconsistently and incompletely. Sometimes they recognized a potential crisis; sometimes they did not. Sometimes they referred the user to an appropriate helpline or emergency services. Often, however, they did not.