Primary Stroke Center Hospitalization for Elderly Patients With Stroke: Implications for Case Fatality and Travel Times | Cerebrovascular Disease | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Prevalence of stroke: United States, 2006-2010.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(20):379-382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Lloyd-Jones  D, Adams  RJ, Brown  TM,  et al; Writing Group Members; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.  Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association [published corrections appear in Circulation. 2010;121(12):e260 and 2011;124(16):e425].  Circulation. 2010;121(7):e46-e215. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192667.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Schellinger  PD, Köhrmann  M.  4.5-Hour time window for intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue–type plasminogen activator is established firmly.  Stroke. 2014;45(3):912-913.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Lichtman  JH, Jones  SB, Leifheit-Limson  EC, Wang  Y, Goldstein  LB.  30-Day mortality and readmission after hemorrhagic stroke among Medicare beneficiaries in Joint Commission Primary Stroke Center–certified and noncertified hospitals.  Stroke. 2011;42(12):3387-3391.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Lichtman  JH, Jones  SB, Wang  Y, Watanabe  E, Leifheit-Limson  E, Goldstein  LB.  Outcomes after ischemic stroke for hospitals with and without Joint Commission–certified Primary Stroke Centers.  Neurology. 2011;76(23):1976-1982.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Xian  Y, Holloway  RG, Chan  PS,  et al.  Association between stroke center hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke and mortality.  JAMA. 2011;305(4):373-380.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Birkmeyer  JD, Siewers  AE, Marth  NJ, Goodman  DC.  Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times.  JAMA. 2003;290(20):2703-2708.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Epstein  AM.  Volume and outcome: it is time to move ahead.  N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1161-1164.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Birkmeyer  JD.  Raising the bar for pancreaticoduodenectomy.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(9):826-827.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Daley  J.  Invited commentary: quality of care and the volume-outcome relationship: what’s next for surgery?  Surgery. 2002;131(1):16-18.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Schwamm  LH, Reeves  MJ, Pan  W,  et al.  Race/ethnicity, quality of care, and outcomes in ischemic stroke.  Circulation. 2010;121(13):1492-1501.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Albright  KC, Branas  CC, Meyer  BC,  et al.  ACCESS: acute cerebrovascular care in emergency stroke systems.  Arch Neurol. 2010;67(10):1210-1218.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Mullen  MT, Wiebe  DJ, Bowman  A,  et al.  Disparities in accessibility of certified Primary Stroke Centers.  Stroke. 2014;45(11):3381-3388.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Adeoye  O, Albright  KC, Carr  BG,  et al.  Geographic access to acute stroke care in the United States.  Stroke. 2014;45(10):3019-3024.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Higashida  R, Alberts  MJ, Alexander  DN,  et al; American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee.  Interactions within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.  Stroke. 2013;44(10):2961-2984.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Kelly-Hayes  M, Wolf  PA, Kase  CS, Brand  FN, McGuirk  JM, D’Agostino  RB.  Temporal patterns of stroke onset: the Framingham Study.  Stroke. 1995;26(8):1343-1347.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Song  Y, Skinner  J, Bynum  J, Sutherland  J, Wennberg  JE, Fisher  ES.  Regional variations in diagnostic practices.  N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):45-53.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Neuman  MD, Rosenbaum  PR, Ludwig  JM, Zubizarreta  JR, Silber  JH.  Anesthesia technique, mortality, and length of stay after hip fracture surgery.  JAMA. 2014;311(24):2508-2517.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Tan  HJ, Norton  EC, Ye  Z, Hafez  KS, Gore  JL, Miller  DC.  Long-term survival following partial vs radical nephrectomy among older patients with early-stage kidney cancer.  JAMA. 2012;307(15):1629-1635.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Stukel  TA, Fisher  ES, Wennberg  DE, Alter  DA, Gottlieb  DJ, Vermeulen  MJ.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.  JAMA. 2007;297(3):278-285.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
McClellan  M, McNeil  BJ, Newhouse  JP.  Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variables.  JAMA. 1994;272(11):859-866.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Valley  TS, Sjoding  MW, Ryan  AM, Iwashyna  TJ, Cooke  CR.  Association of intensive care unit admission with mortality among older patients with pneumonia.  JAMA. 2015;314(12):1272-1279.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Staiger  D, Stock  JH.  Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments.  Econometrica. 1997;65(3):557-586.Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Garabedian  LF, Chu  P, Toh  S, Zaslavsky  AM, Soumerai  SB.  Potential bias of instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research.  Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(2):131-138.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Leira  EC, Fairchild  G, Segre  AM, Rushton  G, Froehler  MT, Polgreen  PM.  Primary Stroke Centers should be located using maximal coverage models for optimal access.  Stroke. 2012;43(9):2417-2422.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2001.
27.
Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System Board on Health Care Services.  The Future of Emergency Care: Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2007.
28.
Alberts  MJ, Wechsler  LR, Jensen  ME,  et al.  Formation and function of Acute Stroke–Ready hospitals within a stroke system of care: recommendations from the Brain Attack Coalition.  Stroke. 2013;44(12):3382-3393.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Kulcsar  M, Gilchrist  S, George  MG.  Improving stroke outcomes in rural areas through telestroke programs: an examination of barriers, facilitators, and state policies.  Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(1):3-10.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Tirschwell  DL, Longstreth  WT  Jr.  Validating administrative data in stroke research.  Stroke. 2002;33(10):2465-2470.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Birman-Deych  E, Waterman  AD, Yan  Y, Nilasena  DS, Radford  MJ, Gage  BF.  Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors.  Med Care. 2005;43(5):480-485.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Ebinger  M, Winter  B, Wendt  M,  et al; STEMO Consortium.  Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial.  JAMA. 2014;311(16):1622-1631.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
September 2016

Primary Stroke Center Hospitalization for Elderly Patients With Stroke: Implications for Case Fatality and Travel Times

Author Affiliations
  • 1Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
  • 2The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire
  • 3Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
  • 4Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(9):1361-1368. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3919
Abstract

Importance  Physicians often must decide whether to treat patients with acute stroke locally or refer them to a more distant Primary Stroke Center (PSC). There is little evidence on how much the increased risk of prolonged travel time offsets benefits of a specialized PSC care.

Objectives  To examine the association of case fatality with receiving care in PSCs vs other hospitals for patients with stroke and to identify whether prolonged travel time offsets the effect of PSCs.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with stroke admitted to a hospital between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013. Drive times were calculated based on zip code centroids and street-level road network data. We used an instrumental variable analysis based on the differential travel time to PSCs to control for unmeasured confounding. The setting was a 100% sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims.

Exposures  Admission to a PSC.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Seven-day and 30-day postadmission case-fatality rates.

Results  Among 865 184 elderly patients with stroke (mean age, 78.9 years; 55.5% female), 53.9% were treated in PSCs. We found that admission to PSCs was associated with 1.8% (95% CI, −2.1% to −1.4%) lower 7-day and 1.8% (95% CI, −2.3% to −1.4%) lower 30-day case fatality. Fifty-six patients with stroke needed to be treated in PSCs to save one life at 30 days. Receiving treatment in PSCs was associated with a 30-day survival benefit for patients traveling less than 90 minutes, but traveling at least 90 minutes offset any benefit of PSC care.

Conclusions and Relevance  Hospitalization of patients with stroke in PSCs was associated with decreased 7-day and 30-day case fatality compared with noncertified hospitals. Traveling at least 90 minutes to receive care offset the 30-day survival benefit of PSC admission.

×