Risks of Myocardial Infarction, Death, and Diabetes in Identical Twin Pairs With Different Body Mass Indexes | Acute Coronary Syndromes | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Finucane  MM, Stevens  GA, Cowan  MJ,  et al; Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Body Mass Index).  National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants.  Lancet. 2011;377(9765):557-567.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Ng  M, Fleming  T, Robinson  M,  et al.  Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.  Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766-781.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Popkin  BM, Adair  LS, Ng  SW.  Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries.  Nutr Rev. 2012;70(1):3-21.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Pischon  T, Boeing  H, Hoffmann  K,  et al.  General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe.  N Engl J Med. 2008;359(20):2105-2120.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Mokdad  AH, Ford  ES, Bowman  BA,  et al.  Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001.  JAMA. 2003;289(1):76-79.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Lim  SS, Vos  T, Flaxman  AD,  et al.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.  Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224-2260.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
 Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation.  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Schmidt  M, Jacobsen  JB, Lash  TL, Bøtker  HE, Sørensen  HT.  25 Year trends in first time hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction, subsequent short and long term mortality, and the prognostic impact of sex and comorbidity: a Danish nationwide cohort study.  BMJ. 2012;344:e356.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Kesteloot  H, Sans  S, Kromhout  D.  Dynamics of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in Western and Eastern Europe between 1970 and 2000.  Eur Heart J. 2006;27(1):107-113.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Odden  MC, Pletcher  MJ, Coxson  PG,  et al.  Cost-effectiveness and population impact of statins for primary prevention in adults aged 75 years or older in the United States.  Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(8):533-541.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Flegal  KM, Kit  BK, Orpana  H, Graubard  BI.  Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  JAMA. 2013;309(1):71-82.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Gruberg  L, Weissman  NJ, Waksman  R,  et al.  The impact of obesity on the short-term and long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the obesity paradox?  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(4):578-584.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Romero-Corral  A, Montori  VM, Somers  VK,  et al.  Association of bodyweight with total mortality and with cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of cohort studies.  Lancet. 2006;368(9536):666-678.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Tobias  DK, Pan  A, Jackson  CL,  et al.  Body-mass index and mortality among adults with incident type 2 diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2014;370(3):233-244.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Banack  HR, Kaufman  JS.  The “obesity paradox” explained.  Epidemiology. 2013;24(3):461-462.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Strandberg  TE, Strandberg  AY, Salomaa  VV,  et al.  Explaining the obesity paradox: cardiovascular risk, weight change, and mortality during long-term follow-up in men.  Eur Heart J. 2009;30(14):1720-1727.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Song  C, Chang  Z, Magnusson  PK, Ingelsson  E, Pedersen  NL.  Genetic factors may play a prominent role in the development of coronary heart disease dependent on important environmental factors.  J Intern Med. 2014;275(6):631-639.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Carlsson  S, Andersson  T, de Faire  U, Lichtenstein  P, Michaëlsson  K, Ahlbom  A.  Body mass index and mortality: is the association explained by genetic factors?  Epidemiology. 2011;22(1):98-103.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Lichtenstein  P, De Faire  U, Floderus  B, Svartengren  M, Svedberg  P, Pedersen  NL.  The Swedish Twin Registry: a unique resource for clinical, epidemiological and genetic studies.  J Intern Med. 2002;252(3):184-205.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Medlund  P, Cederlöf  R, Flodérus-Myrhed  B, Friberg  L, Sörensen  S.  A new Swedish twin registry containing environmental and medical baseline data from about 14,000 same-sexed pairs born 1926-58.  Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1976;600:1-111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Ludvigsson  JF, Andersson  E, Ekbom  A,  et al.  External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register.  BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Köster  M, Asplund  K, Johansson  Å, Stegmayr  B.  Refinement of Swedish administrative registers to monitor stroke events on the national level.  Neuroepidemiology. 2013;40(4):240-246.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Royston  P, Parmar  MK.  Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.  Stat Med. 2002;21(15):2175-2197.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Fried  LP, Tangen  CM, Walston  J,  et al; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146-M156.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Buchwald  H, Estok  R, Fahrbach  K,  et al.  Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.  Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248-256.e5.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Sjöström  CD, Lissner  L, Wedel  H, Sjöström  L.  Reduction in incidence of diabetes, hypertension and lipid disturbances after intentional weight loss induced by bariatric surgery: the SOS Intervention Study.  Obes Res. 1999;7(5):477-484.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Wing  RR, Bolin  P, Brancati  FL,  et al; Look AHEAD Research Group.  Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2013;369(2):145-154.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Dahl  AK, Hassing  LB, Fransson  EI, Pedersen  NL.  Agreement between self-reported and measured height, weight and body mass index in old age—a longitudinal study with 20 years of follow-up.  Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):445-451.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Warburton  DE, Nicol  CW, Bredin  SS.  Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence.  CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801-809.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Sjöström  L, Narbro  K, Sjöström  CD,  et al; Swedish Obese Subjects Study.  Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects.  N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741-752.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Gradmark  AM, Rydh  A, Renström  F,  et al.  Computed tomography–based validation of abdominal adiposity measurements from ultrasonography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry.  Br J Nutr. 2010;104(4):582-588.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Yusuf  S, Hawken  S, Ounpuu  S,  et al; INTERHEART Study Investigators.  Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case-control study.  Lancet. 2005;366(9497):1640-1649.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Felson  J.  What can we learn from twin studies? a comprehensive evaluation of the equal environments assumption.  Soc Sci Res. 2014;43:184-199.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Öberg  S, Cnattingius  S, Sandin  S, Lichtenstein  P, Morley  R, Iliadou  AN.  Twinship influence on morbidity and mortality across the lifespan.  Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(4):1002-1009.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
October 2016

Risks of Myocardial Infarction, Death, and Diabetes in Identical Twin Pairs With Different Body Mass Indexes

Author Affiliations
  • 1Section of Geriatrics, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • 2Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 4Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1522-1529. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4104
Abstract

Importance  Observational studies have shown that obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death. The extent of genetic confounding in these associations is unclear.

Objective  To compare the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), type 2 diabetes, and death in monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs discordant for body mass index (BMI).

Design, Setting, and Participants  A cohort of 4046 MZ twin pairs with discordant BMIs (difference >0.01) was identified using the nationwide Swedish twin registry. The study was conducted from March 17, 1998, to January 16, 2003, with follow-up regarding incident outcomes until December 31, 2013.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The combined primary end point of death or MI and the secondary end point of incident diabetes were evaluated in heavier compared with leaner twins in a co-twin control analysis using multivariable conditional logistic regression.

Results  Mean (SD) baseline age for both cohorts was 57.6 (9.5) years (range, 41.9-91.8 years). During a mean follow-up period of 12.4 (2.5) years, 203 MIs (5.0%) and 550 deaths (13.6%) occurred among heavier twins (mean [SD] BMI, 25.9 [3.6] [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]) compared with 209 MIs (5.2%) and 633 deaths (15.6%) among leaner twins (mean [SD] BMI, 23.9 [3.1]; combined multivariable adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91). Even in twin pairs with BMI discordance of 7.0 or more (mean [SE], 9.3 [0.7]), where the heavier twin had a BMI of 30.0 or more (n = 65 pairs), the risk of MI or death was not greater in heavier twins (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.15-1.18). In contrast, in the total cohort of twins, the risk of incident diabetes was greater in heavier twins (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.61-2.84). Finally, increases in BMI since 30 years before baseline were not associated with the later risk of MI or death (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05) but were associated with the risk of incident diabetes (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26).

Conclusions and Relevance  In MZ twin pairs, higher BMI was not associated with an increased risk of MI or death but was associated with the onset of diabetes. These results may suggest that lifestyle interventions to reduce obesity are more effective in decreasing the risk of diabetes than the risk of cardiovascular disease or death.

×