Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Ly DP, Seabury SA, Jena AB. Hours Worked Among US Dual Physician Couples With Children, 2000 to 2015. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(10):1524–1525. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3437
Among physicians, women are more likely to work part time than men, and female physicians with children spend more time on parenting and domestic tasks.1,2 Little is known about how physicians within dual-physician couples adjust hours worked due to children or whether sex differences, if they exist, have changed over time, especially because physicians of both sexes have increasingly emphasized the importance of shared parenting responsibility.3
We estimated weekly hours worked for married, dual-physician couples from January 2000 to December 2015 using the American Community Survey, a nationally representative, United States Census Bureau–administered survey of approximately 3 million households annually. The survey is collected by mail, telephone, and personal-visit interviews.4 Response rates range between 90% and 98%.4 The Harvard institutional review board waived study review.
We included individuals whose self-reported occupation and that of their spouse were both physician or surgeon. Specialty was unavailable. We limited analyses to physicians age 25 to 50 years to focus on childbearing years. We excluded couples with children younger than 1 year as hours reported may reflect hours worked immediately after the child was born. Same-sex couples were excluded because of our focus on sex differences within couples.
We estimated a multivariable linear regression of weekly hours worked as a function of age of youngest child (categorical variable), ages of each spouse, races of each spouse, state, and time period. We estimated separate regressions for male and female physicians and computed adjusted hours worked by age of youngest child, holding other covariates at their mean values. We also examined trends in hours worked from 2000 to 2015 by physician sex and presence of children, adjusting for the characteristics above. Stata version 14.2 (StataCorp) was used for statistical analyses.
Our sample included 9868 physicians (4934 men and 4934 women in dual-physician couples). For men, mean age was 39.3 years and 37.6% were nonwhite; for women, mean age was 38.1 years and 40.1% were nonwhite (Table 1). Among couples without children, adjusted weekly hours worked were 57.0 hours for men and 52.4 hours for women (Table 2). Compared with couples without children, there was no statistically significant difference in adjusted hours worked among men whose youngest child was age 1 to 2 years (55.3 hours; difference, −1.7 hours; 95% CI, −3.6 to 0.3) but hours worked were significantly lower among women (41.5 hours; difference, −10.9 hours; 95% CI, −13.1 to −8.8). Among men, there was no significant difference in hours worked as age of youngest child increased compared with men without children. Among women, hours worked remained statistically lower compared to women without children as age of youngest child increased (Table 2). Older physician age was associated with fewer hours worked (data not shown). Among both male and female physicians, differences in hours worked between physicians without children and those with children were similar across the study period (data not shown).
In a national sample of dual-physician couples, weekly hours worked by women with children were lower than among women without children, whereas similar differences were not observed among men. Differences within sex in how physicians’ work hours respond to children did not narrow between 2000 and 2015. One possible reason for our results is that even within dual-physician couples, societal expectations for women to reduce hours worked to care for children still hold. Alternatively, women in certain specialties may be more likely to both work fewer hours and have children, which would confound our analysis due to our inability to adjust for physician specialty. In addition to lacking physician specialty information, this study used cross-sectional, rather than longitudinal, data.
Corresponding Author: Anupam B. Jena, MD, PhD, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (email@example.com).
Accepted for Publication: June 3, 2017.
Published Online: August 21, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3437
Author Contributions: Dr Ly had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Ly, Jena.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: All authors.
Obtained funding: Jena.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Jena.
Study supervision: Jena.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr. Seabury receives consulting fees unrelated to this work from Precision Health Economics and acknowledges funding from an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology from Research to Prevent Blindness. Dr Jena receives consulting fees unrelated to this work from Pfizer Inc, Hill Rom Services Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, as well as fees from Precision Health Economics, a company providing consulting services to the life sciences industry. No other disclosures are reported.
Funding/Support: This work is funded by a National Institues of Health Early Independence Award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (grant No. 1DP5OD017897-01 [Dr Jena]).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder/sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.