Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Pelland K, Morphis B, Harris D, Gardner R. Assessment of First-Year Use of Medicare’s Advance Care Planning Billing Codes. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):827–829. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8107
Advance care planning (ACP) conversations occur infrequently among patients and their health care professionals, and when they do occur, the context is often a stressful clinical situation.1,2 Advance care planning conversations that occur too late (or not at all) can result in care that is invasive, expensive, and not aligned with patients’ wishes. To encourage health care professionals to initiate ACP discussions, Medicare began reimbursing for ACP services on January 1, 2016, under a separate billing code. Our study aims to characterize the first year of ACP code use and to describe beneficiary characteristics associated with receipt of ACP services.
Create a personal account or sign in to: