eTable. Journals and Impact Factors by Department
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Hart KL, Perlis RH. Trends in Proportion of Women as Authors of Medical Journal Articles, 2008-2018. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(9):1285–1287. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0907
Women remain underrepresented in academic medicine, especially among senior faculty.1 We examined trends in women’s representation as authors of medical journal articles, one key measure of academic success.2
For 9 medical specialties (pediatrics, radiology, anesthesiology, obstetrics and gynecology, neurology, general medicine, dermatology, psychiatry, and oncology), we identified original research articles published between January 1, 2008, and August 1, 2018, in the 15 journals with the highest impact factor for 2016 (eTable in the Supplement).3 We also included 4 additional general medical journals (New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, British Medical Journal, and The Lancet). We used validated software (Genderize.io [https://genderize.io]) to predict a gender and the probability of gender for an author’s first name and used a threshold of 60% to assign gender as has been implemented in previous work.4 For more information, see eMethods in the Supplement. Because this study analyzed public data, it was exempt from institutional review board approval.
We compared the change in proportion of female authors, female first authors, and female last authors among specialties using a 1-way analysis of covariance. We assessed the relationship between these proportions and journal impact factor using linear regression, adjusting for specialty. We determined the time to incident senior authorship among all authors who published in 2008 as a nonsenior author and used Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis to compare the time to transition to last author between men and women, censoring at the end of the study period. All analyses were completed in R version 3.5.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and all P values were 2-sided.
In the 274 764 articles analyzed, a gender was identified for 77.5% (1 536 026 of 1 981 454) of authors at the specified threshold. The proportion of women authors increased by 4.2%, women first authors increased by 3.6%, and women last authors increased by 7.8% from 2008 to 2018. There were significant differences in the rate of increase in women as authors (F9 = 7.71; P < .001), first authors (F9 = 5.73; P < .001), and last authors (F9 = 8.76; P < .001) between specialties over time.
The Figure shows the change in representation of women as authors, first authors, and last authors over time, separated by specialty. Cross-specialty journals and obstetrics/gynecology showed the greatest increase in proportion of women as first authors (cross-specialty: β = 1.32; P < .001; obstetrics and gynecology: β = 1.01; P < .001) and last authors (cross-specialty: β = 1.54; P < .001; obstetrics and gynecology: β = 1.59; P < .001). The Table shows the representation of women in authorship positions in 2008 and 2017, as well as the total percentage of women faculty in those years according to the Association of American Medical Colleges.5,6 Although the representation of women as authors in 2017 was similar to the representation of women as faculty overall in that year, some specialties, such as pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, dermatology, and psychiatry, had greater representation of women as faculty than as authors. The Table also shows the percentage change in female authorship per year by specialty. Cross-specialty and obstetrics and gynecology journals showed the greatest rate of increase in proportion of women as first authors and last authors (P < .001). There was a significant association between a higher impact factor for a journal and the proportion of women as authors (β = 0.11; P = .02), first authors (β = 0.12; P = .04), and last authors (β = 0.17; P = .002).
Articles with a woman as last author were 13.0% more likely to have a female first author than those with a male last author (χ2 = 2534.8; P < .001). Women also exhibited slower rates of transition to last author position (Kaplan-Meier log-rank P < .001): the time to 10% transition was 5 years for men, but more than 10 years for women.
We find continued increase in the representation of women as authors in academic medicine but demonstrate that disparity still exists, especially in the last author position. Several limitations to our study should be considered. First, our use of Genderize.io represents a tradeoff between accuracy and the comprehensiveness of the data analyzed. Second, these data are representative of publications, not of manuscript submissions. Finally, we have assumed a traditional first/last author distinction of seniority, which may not always hold. Overall, the variation between specialties suggests the need and the opportunity for continued efforts to support the advancement of women in academic medicine.
Accepted for Publication: March 4, 2019.
Corresponding Author: Roy H. Perlis, MD, MSc, Center for Quantitative Health, Division of Clinical Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St, Simches Research Building, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Published Online: May 28, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0907
Author Contributions: Both authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Perlis.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Both authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Both authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Perlis.
Statistical analysis: Hart.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Hart.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Perlis reported serving on advisory boards or providing consulting to Genomind, RID Ventures, and Takeda and holds equity in Psy Therapeutics and Outermost Therapeutics. No other disclosures were reported.
Disclaimer: Dr Perlis is an Associate Editor at JAMA Network Open but was not involved in any of the decisions regarding review of the manuscript or its acceptance.
Create a personal account or sign in to: