In the Original Investigation titled “Estimated Quality of Life and Economic Outcomes Associated With 12 Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis,”1 published online May 13, 2019, there was an error in Table 2. Where it previously read “0.097” in the ninth row of the last column in the body of the table, it now correctly reads “0.97.” This article was corrected online.
1.Sawaya
GF, Sanstead
E, Alarid-Escudero
F,
et al. Estimated quality of life and economic outcomes associated with 12 cervical cancer screening strategies: a cost-effectiveness analysis [published online May 13, 2019].
JAMA Intern Med. doi:
10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0299PubMedGoogle Scholar