Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
[Skip to Navigation Landing]
Table 1.  Selected Characteristics of Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States, 2011-2017 National Survey of Family Growth
Selected Characteristics of Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States, 2011-2017 National Survey of Family Growth
Table 2.  Prevalence and Frequency of BPE and Pap Test Among Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States, 2011-2017 National Survey of Family Growtha
Prevalence and Frequency of BPE and Pap Test Among Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States, 2011-2017 National Survey of Family Growtha
Table 3.  Prevalence and Association of BPE and Pap Test in the Past 12 Months With Selected Characteristics Among Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States, 2011-2017 National Survey of Family Growtha,b
Prevalence and Association of BPE and Pap Test in the Past 12 Months With Selected Characteristics Among Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States, 2011-2017 National Survey of Family Growtha,b
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Original Investigation
    Less Is More
    January 6, 2020

    Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
    • 2Reproductive Statistics Branch, National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland
    • 3Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
    • 4Center for Healthcare Value, University of California, San Francisco
    JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(2):274-280. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5727
    Key Points

    Question  What is the prevalence of potentially unnecessary bimanual pelvic examinations and Papanicolaou tests among US women aged 15 to 20 years?

    Findings  In this population-based, cross-sectional study using data from 2011 to 2017, an estimated 2.6 million women aged 15 to 20 years in the United States (22.9%) received a bimanual pelvic examination in the past year, and 54.4% of these examinations were potentially unnecessary. An estimated 2.2 million young women (19.2%) received a Papanicolaou test in the past year, and 71.9% of these tests were potentially unnecessary.

    Meaning  The findings suggest that many young women receive potentially unnecessary bimanual pelvic examinations and Papanicolaou tests.

    Abstract

    Importance  Pelvic examination is no longer recommended for asymptomatic, nonpregnant women and may cause harms such as false-positive test results, overdiagnosis, anxiety, and unnecessary costs. The bimanual pelvic examination (BPE) is an invasive and controversial examination component. Cervical cancer screening is not recommended for women younger than 21 years.

    Objectives  To estimate prevalence of potentially unnecessary BPE and Papanicolaou (Pap) tests performed among adolescent girls and women younger than 21 years (hereinafter referred to as young women) in the United States and to identify factors associated with receiving these examinations.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  A cross-sectional analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth from September 2011 through September 2017 focused on a population-based sample of young women aged 15 to 20 years (n = 3410). The analysis used survey weights to estimate prevalence and the number of people represented in the US population. Data were analyzed from December 21, 2018, through September 3, 2019.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Receipt of a BPE or a Pap test in the last 12 months and the proportion of potentially unnecessary examinations and tests.

    Results  Responses from 3410 young women aged 15 to 20 years were included in the analysis with 6-year sampling weights applied. Among US young women aged 15 to 20 years represented during the 2011-2017 study period, 4.8% (95% CI, 3.9%-5.9%) were pregnant, 22.3% (95% CI, 20.1%-24.6%) had undergone STI testing, and 4.5% (95% CI, 3.6%-5.5%) received treatment or medication for an STI in the past 12 months (Table 1). Only 2.0% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.9%) reported using an IUD, and 33.5% (95% CI, 30.8%-36.4%) used at least 1 other type of hormonal contraception in the past 12 months. Among US young women aged 15 to 20 years who were surveyed in the years 2011 through 2017, approximately 2.6 million (22.9%; 95% CI, 20.7%-25.3%) reported having received a BPE in the last 12 months. Approximately half of these examinations (54.4%; 95% CI, 48.8%-59.9%) were potentially unnecessary, representing an estimated 1.4 million individuals. Receipt of a BPE was associated with having a Pap test (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 7.12; 95% CI, 5.56-9.12), testing for sexually transmitted infections (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.34-1.90), and using hormonal contraception other than an intrauterine device (aPR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.54). In addition, an estimated 2.2 million young women (19.2%; 95% CI, 17.2%-21.4%) reported having received a Pap test in the past 12 months, and 71.9% (95% CI, 66.0%-77.1%) of these tests were potentially unnecessary.

    Conclusions and Relevance  This analysis found that more than half of BPEs and almost three-quarters of Pap tests performed among young women aged 15 to 20 years during the years 2011 through 2017 were potentially unnecessary, exposing women to preventable harms. The results suggest that compliance with the current professional guidelines regarding the appropriate use of these examinations and tests may be lacking.

    Introduction

    The annual pelvic examination has long been performed in asymptomatic women as part of the well-woman visit.1,2 The bimanual pelvic examination (BPE) is palpation of the internal pelvic organs with the insertion of 2 fingers into the vagina accompanied by simultaneous abdominopelvic pressure. The Papanicolaou (Pap) test is a procedure used for cervical cancer screening by placing a speculum inside the vagina to collect cells from the cervix.

    Screening for cervical cancer is not recommended for women younger than 21 years, a consensus reached by the US Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and American Cancer Society.3-5 Leading professional organizations (ie, American College of Physicians, American Academy of Family Physicians) recommended against performing pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant women.6,7 In 2017, the US Preventive Services Task Force concluded that current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women.8 In 2018, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended that pelvic examinations be performed only when indicated by the medical history or symptoms.9 In addition, current recommendations agree that a pelvic examination is not necessary before initiating or prescribing contraception except for an intrauterine device (IUD) or to screen for sexually transmitted infections (STIs).9-12 Potential harms associated with unindicated tests include anxiety, false-positive findings, overdiagnosis, and unnecessary treatment. These harms are magnified in the screening setting when the tests in question have limited evidence of benefit, such as the BPE and Pap tests in women younger than 21 years. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of and examine factors associated with receipt of BPE and Pap tests among women younger than 21 years in the United States and to estimate the proportion of these examinations and tests that are potentially unnecessary.

    Methods

    We analyzed public use data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), a multistage, probability-based, nationally representative sample of men and women aged 15 to 44 years in the US household population for this cross-sectional analysis.13 The NSFG is conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics and supported by cosponsoring agencies. The NSFG gathers information on family life, marriage and divorce, pregnancy, infertility, use of contraception, and general and reproductive health. The survey is conducted in person by trained female interviewers using the computer-assisted personal interviewing system on laptop computers and the audio computer-assisted self-interviews that respondents completed on their own. The sample design and methods have been described elsewhere.14-16 Following procedures and forms approved by the National Center for Health Statistics research ethics review board, written informed consent was obtained from all adult survey participants, and signed parental permission and minor assent were obtained for all minor respondents aged 15 to 17 years. To ensure confidentiality, interviews were conducted in a room with only the respondent and the interviewer. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

    The population of this study included adolescent girls and young women (hereinafter referred to as young women) aged 15 to 20 years in the United States. The analysis combined NSFG data files for September 2011 to September 2013; September 2013 to September 2015; and September 2015 to September 2017. After excluding 7 individuals with a personal history of gynecologic cancers (cervical, endometrial, or ovarian), the final sample size for the analysis was 3410 respondents. The NSFG response rate for women was 70.4% in 2011 to 2017. The survey asked female respondents, “In the past 12 months, have you received a pelvic examination—where a doctor or nurse puts one hand in the vagina and the other on the abdomen?” As the question indicated, this analysis focused on the bimanual component of the pelvic examination, because it is the most invasive of the pelvic examination components and less likely to be confused with a speculum examination for cervical cancer or STI screening. Among those who reported not having a BPE in the past 12 months, a subsequent question asked about timing of their last BPE. We used both questions to determine whether a female respondent ever had a BPE. Receipt of a Pap test was determined using the question, “In the past 12 months, have you received a Pap test—where a doctor or nurse put an instrument in the vagina and took a sample to check for abnormal cells that could turn into cervical cancer?” The same method used for the BPE was used to determine whether a female respondent ever had a Pap test. Females who had ever received a BPE or a Pap test were asked about the main reason for their most recent BPE or Pap test, and the respondents could choose “part of a routine exam,” “because of a medical problem,” or “other reason.” Another question asked respondents whether the BPE was performed at the same visit as the Pap test.

    We classified BPE into medically indicated or potentially unnecessary types. Discernable medical indications for a BPE in the past 12 months were defined as (1) pregnancy in the past 12 months, (2) IUD use in the past 12 months, (3) receipt of a BPE because of a medical problem or other reason, and (4) receipt of treatment for STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, or genital herpes) in the past 12 months. If a female respondent had 1 or more of the indications above and received a BPE in the past 12 months, the examination was considered medically indicated; otherwise, the examination was considered potentially unnecessary. In other words, potentially unnecessary BPEs were those performed as part of a routine examination among female respondents who were not pregnant, did not use an IUD, and did not have STI treatment in the past year. Cervical cancer screening is not recommended for women younger than 21 years (except those who are HIV infected and sexually active17). Most Pap tests performed in this age group, therefore, will be unnecessary. Because HIV infection status is not available in the NSFG, we estimated prevalence of Pap tests performed as part of a routine examination and considered them potentially unnecessary.

    We estimated the prevalence of receiving a BPE or a Pap test in the past 12 months among young women aged 15 to 20 years overall, by medical indication, and by selected characteristics. Besides the respondent’s age, race/ethnicity, and health insurance type, we analyzed the following variables in the past 12 months: pregnancy, STI testing, STI treatment, IUD use, and use of other hormonal contraception methods. In the self-administered portion of the survey, respondents were asked whether they have been tested for an STI such as chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes, or syphilis and have been treated or received medication from a physician or other health care professional for an STI in the past 12 months. In addition, respondents answered questions about birth control methods used in the past 12 months. We analyzed 2 types of contraception that need a prescription using 2 separate variables: IUD use (a BPE is indicated) and other hormonal contraception use, including pills, hormonal implants, medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera), contraceptive patch, and contraceptive ring (a BPE is unnecessary unless medically indicated).

    To generate statistically valid results that represent young women aged 15 to 20 years in the United States, we used the 6-year sampling weights representing the female US population in 2014 and design variables to account for the NSFG’s complex sample design and differential response rates.15,16 Analyses were performed in SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc) and SUDAAN, version 11.0 (RTI International). We examined the association between selected respondent characteristics and receipt of a BPE in the past 12 months using multivariable logistic regression models and estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with 95% CIs. Similar multivariable analysis was performed for receipt of a Pap test as the outcome. Data were analyzed from December 21, 2018, through September 3, 2019.

    Results

    Responses from 3410 young women aged 15 to 20 years were included in the analysis with 6-year sampling weights applied. Among US young women aged 15 to 20 years represented during the 2011-2017 study period, 4.8% (95% CI, 3.9%-5.9%) were pregnant, 22.3% (95% CI, 20.1%-24.6%) had undergone STI testing, and 4.5% (95% CI, 3.6%-5.5%) received treatment or medication for an STI in the past 12 months (Table 1). Only 2.0% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.9%) reported using an IUD, and 33.5% (95% CI, 30.8%-36.4%) used at least 1 other type of hormonal contraception in the past 12 months.

    The prevalence of ever having received a BPE was 29.1% (95% CI, 26.7%-31.7%), representing an estimated 2.6 million individuals (Table 2). Nearly one-fourth (22.9%; 95% CI, 20.7%-25.3%) of young women aged 15 to 20 years in the United States, or an estimated 2.6 million individuals, received a BPE in the past 12 months. More than half of these examinations (54.4%; 95% CI, 48.8%-59.9%) were potentially unnecessary, representing an estimated 1.4 million individuals. One-fifth (19.2%; 95% CI, 17.2%-21.4%), or an estimated 2.2 million young women aged 15 to 20 years, received a Pap test in the past 12 months. About three-quarters (71.9%; 95% CI, 66.0%-77.1%) of all Pap tests performed in the past 12 months were potentially unnecessary, representing approximately 1.6 million young women in the United States. Almost all (97.7%; 95% CI, 94.8%-99.0%) potentially unnecessary BPEs were performed at the same visit with a screening (potentially unnecessary) Pap test.

    In multivariable analysis (Table 3), receipt of a BPE (regardless of medical indications) in the past 12 months was associated with being older (aPR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08-1.45). Young women who had a Pap test were 7 times more likely to also report receiving a BPE (aPR, 7.12; 95% CI, 5.56-9.12). Young women who had a pregnancy (aPR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.33-2.17), had STI testing (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.34-1.90), and used an IUD (aPR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.12-2.33) in the past 12 months were more likely to report receiving a BPE. In addition, those who used hormonal contraception methods other than an IUD were 31% more likely to receive a BPE compared with those who did not use those methods (aPR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.54). Young women with public insurance (aPR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97) or no insurance (aPR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.97) were less likely to report receiving a BPE than those with private health insurance. Race/ethnicity and STI treatment were not found to be associated with receipt of BPE when adjusting for other covariates.

    Similarly, receipt of a Pap test in the past 12 months was found to be associated with being older (aPR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.21-1.96), having a pregnancy (aPR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.71-3.11), and using an IUD (aPR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01-2.35). The prevalence of receiving a Pap test among young women who had STI testing was 4 times higher compared with those who did not have testing (aPR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.87-4.95). Young women who used hormonal contraception other than an IUD were 75% more likely to receive a Pap test compared with those who did not use those methods (aPR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.42-2.16).

    Findings were similar in a sensitivity analysis among young women who did not have discernable medical indications for a BPE. Receiving a potentially unnecessary BPE in the past 12 months was associated with being older (aPR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.09-1.72), having a Pap test (aPR, 12.44; 95% CI, 8.34-18.57), having STI testing (aPR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.37-2.30), and using hormonal contraception methods (other than IUD) in the past 12 months (aPR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07-1.87).

    Discussion

    We estimated that almost one-quarter (22.9%), or 2.6 million, of young women aged 15 to 20 years in the United States received a BPE in the past year, and more than half (54.4%), or 1.4 million, of these examinations were potentially unnecessary. In addition, 3 in 4 young women who had a Pap test in the past year, or an estimated 1.6 million individuals, received potentially unnecessary Pap tests. The Medicare payment was $37.97 for a screening pelvic examination and $44.78 for a screening Pap smear in 2014.18 Thus, assuming the Medicare payment roughly approximates cost, the potentially unnecessary BPEs and Pap tests cost more than $123 million in 1 year.

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recognizes that no evidence supports routine speculum examination or BPE in healthy, asymptomatic women younger than 21 years and recommends that these examinations be performed only when medically indicated. Our results showed that, despite the recommendation, many young women without discernable medical indication received potentially unnecessary BPE or Pap tests, which may be a reflection of a long-standing clinical practice in the United States.19 A 2013 nationwide survey among obstetricians and gynecologists20 found that 87% of them would perform a BPE in an asymptomatic 18-year-old woman. Many young women associate the examination with fear, anxiety, embarrassment, discomfort, and pain.21-24 Women with a history of sexual violence may be more vulnerable to these harms than those without such history.25 This factor is relevant to adolescent girls because 1 in 16 reproductive-aged women had a forced first sexual encounter (82% of females had ever had sexual intercourse by 21 years of age in NSFG),26 and there have been media reports about inappropriate gynecologic examinations in young women.27 In addition, studies have shown that adolescent girls may delay starting hormonal contraception or being screened for STIs because of fear of the pelvic examination. The traditional practice of conducting a pelvic examination for these purposes may act as a barrier to contraceptive use to prevent unintended pregnancies and may increase overall health risks.21,28,29

    Professional organizations recommend starting cervical cancer screening with Pap test at 21 years of age regardless of sexual behaviors and risk factors.3-5 Nonetheless, we found that 19.2% of women younger than the recommended age had a Pap test within the past year, and 71.9% of them were potentially unnecessary. The proportion of unnecessary Pap tests was likely to be higher than the estimates because of our conservative definition. Young women aged 15 to 20 years who received a Pap test were 7 times more likely to receive a BPE compared with those who did not receive a Pap test, and potentially unnecessary BPEs were almost always performed in conjunction with an unnecessary Pap test. Gynecologic cancers (cervical, ovarian, uterine, vaginal, or vulvar cancer) are rare among young women—in 2015, there were 152 cases (rate of 1.5 per 100 000 persons) among young women aged 15 to 19 years in the United States.30 Guidelines do not recommend pelvic examinations for cancer screening31-33; however, many health care professionals believe that the pelvic examination is a useful tool to screen for gynecologic cancers.20,34

    Pelvic examination has traditionally been performed among asymptomatic women to screen for STIs in the United States.35 Our findings suggest that this outdated practice may still be performed. Young women who had STI testing were more likely to receive a BPE or a Pap test compared with those who were not tested, and most young women who had STI testing also had a BPE in the past 12 months. Professional bodies agree that a pelvic examination is not necessary to screen for STIs among sexually active adolescents.9,11,36 Screening for STIs can be performed through highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid amplification tests using first-pass urine samples or self-collected vaginal swab specimens,10,11 obviating the need for a pelvic examination in asymptomatic women. These less intrusive options are preferred by adolescents and young women over pelvic examination.37,38

    We found that 42.4% of young women aged 15 to 20 years in the United States who used hormonal contraception (other than an IUD) received a BPE within the past year. Furthermore, hormonal contraception use (other than an IUD) was independently associated with receiving a BPE after adjusting for Pap test, IUD use, and other covariates. Historically, pelvic examination has often been performed as a prerequisite before initiation or receipt of hormonal contraception. However, guidelines from several health organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention12 and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,9 emphasized that most methods of hormonal contraception, with the exception of IUDs, can be safely prescribed without requiring a pelvic examination. Our findings suggest a lag in clinical practice following the recommendations and guidelines. For example, the notion linking access to hormonal contraception (other than an IUD) and pelvic examination is still common among obstetricians and gynecologists.39

    Studies examining women’s attitudes and beliefs regarding routine pelvic examination showed that one-half of the women 21 years or older did not know the purpose of the pelvic examination, and yet most women believed that routine pelvic examinations were necessary for STI screening, contraception initiation, and cancer detection and have value in reassuring the patient that she is in good health, particularly among older women.40,41 After education on the American College of Physicians’ recommendation advising against routine pelvic examinations, substantially fewer women wanted to have one.40,42 When asked about how often they think they will need to have a pelvic examination or a Pap test in the 2011-2017 NSFG, more than 71% of young women aged 15 to 20 years thought they need to have a BPE or a Pap test at least once every 2 years, contrary to guideline recommendations.

    Limitations

    This study has limitations. First, responses to these survey questions were reported to an interviewer or through a computer-assisted self-interviewing system, and answers may be subject to recall or social desirability bias. Further, as with many surveys, we could not verify the accuracy of the information reported. However, the survey questions included a distinct description of a BPE and Pap test and limited the time frame to 12 months before the date of survey, which could have helped reduce information bias. Second, female respondents were not asked directly about their symptoms. We considered female respondents symptomatic if they received their most recent BPE because of a medical problem or other reason. However, the question did not ask about specific problems, and the symptom status was unknown among female respondents who never received a BPE. Having such information could help better identify low-risk women who do not need a BPE. Last, this study focused on the bimanual component of the pelvic examination and did not examine external and speculum examinations. Because most health care professionals believe that pelvic examinations include a bimanual examination,34 the prevalence of overall pelvic examination is likely to be similar to our estimates if not higher.

    Conclusions

    This study found that a substantial number of US young women aged 15 to 20 years had received potentially unnecessary BPEs and Pap tests. In addition, our results indicated that the traditional clinical practices linking a pelvic examination or a Pap test with STI screening and prescription of hormonal contraception may still exist. These findings suggest the need for education for health care professionals, parents, and young women themselves to improve awareness of professional guidelines and the limitations and harms of routine pelvic examination and Pap test and to ensure that these tests and examinations are performed only when medically necessary among young women.

    Back to top
    Article Information

    Accepted for Publication: September 30, 2019.

    Corresponding Author: Jin Qin, ScD, Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Mail Stop S107-4, Atlanta, GA 30341 (jqin@cdc.gov).

    Published Online: January 6, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5727

    Author Contributions: Dr Qin had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

    Concept and design: All authors.

    Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

    Drafting of the manuscript: Qin.

    Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

    Statistical analysis: Qin, Martinez.

    Supervision: Saraiya.

    Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

    Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    References
    1.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.  ACOG practice bulletin: cervical cytology screening: number 45, August 2003.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(2):237-247. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00412-0PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    2.
    Committee on Gynecologic Practice.  Committee opinion No. 534: well-woman visit.  Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2, pt 1):421-424. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182680517PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    3.
    Moyer  VA; US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(11):852].  Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(12):880-891, W312. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    4.
    Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology.  ACOG practice bulletin number 131: screening for cervical cancer.  Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1222-1238. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318277c92aPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    5.
    Saslow  D, Solomon  D, Lawson  HW,  et al; ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Cervical Cancer Guideline Committee.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.  CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(3):147-172. doi:10.3322/caac.21139PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    6.
    Qaseem  A, Humphrey  LL, Harris  R, Starkey  M, Denberg  TD; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.  Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.  Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(1):67-72. doi:10.7326/M14-0701PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    7.
    American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP recommends against pelvic exams in asymptomatic women. https://www.aafp.org/news/health-of-the-public/20170425aafppelvicexam.html. Published April 25, 2017. Accessed October 23, 2018.
    8.
    Bibbins-Domingo  K, Grossman  DC, Curry  SJ,  et al; US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.  JAMA. 2017;317(9):947-953. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.0807PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    9.
     ACOG Committee opinion No. 754: the utility of and indications for routine pelvic examination.  Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(4):e174-e180. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002895PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    10.
    US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for gonorrhea: recommendation statement.  Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(3):263-267. doi:10.1370/afm.337PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    11.
    US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for chlamydial infection: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.  Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(2):128-134. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00172PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    12.
    Curtis  KM, Jatlaoui  TC, Tepper  NK,  et al.  US selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016.  MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(4):1-66. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    13.
    National Center for Health Statistics. National Survey of Family Growth. Hyattsville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Center for Health Statistics; 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/index.htm. Accessed January 3, 2019.
    14.
    Groves  RM, Mosher  WD, Lepkowski  JM, Kirgis  NG.  Planning and development of the continuous National Survey of Family Growth.  Vital Health Stat 1. 2009;(48):1-64. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_01/sr01_048.pdf.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    15.
    Lepkowski  JM, Mosher  WD, Davis  KE, Groves  RM, Van Hoewyk  J.  The 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth: sample design and analysis of a continuous survey.  Vital Health Stat 2. 2010;(150):1-36. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_150.pdf.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    16.
    Lepkowski  JM, Mosher  WD, Groves  RM, West  BT, Wagner  J, Gu  H.  Responsive design, weighting, and variance estimation in the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth.  Vital Health Stat 2. 2013;(158):1-52. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_158.pdf.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    17.
    Panel on Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in adults and adolescents with HIV: recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/adult_oi.pdf. Updated October 22, 2019. Accessed August 23, 2019.
    18.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Physician Fee Schedule Search Tool. https://www.cms.gov/apps/physician-fee-schedule/overview.aspx. Updated October 4, 2019. Accessed March 23, 2019.
    19.
    Sawaya  GF, Jacoby  V.  Screening pelvic examinations: right, wrong, or rite?  Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(1):78-79. doi:10.7326/M14-1205PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    20.
    Henderson  JT, Harper  CC, Gutin  S, Saraiya  M, Chapman  J, Sawaya  GF.  Routine bimanual pelvic examinations: practices and beliefs of US obstetrician-gynecologists.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(2):109.e1-109.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    21.
    Stewart  FH, Harper  CC, Ellertson  CE, Grimes  DA, Sawaya  GF, Trussell  J.  Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: current practice vs evidence.  JAMA. 2001;285(17):2232-2239. doi:10.1001/jama.285.17.2232PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    22.
    Fiddes  P, Scott  A, Fletcher  J, Glasier  A.  Attitudes towards pelvic examination and chaperones: a questionnaire survey of patients and providers.  Contraception. 2003;67(4):313-317. doi:10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00540-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    23.
    Harper  C, Balistreri  E, Boggess  J, Leon  K, Darney  P.  Provision of hormonal contraceptives without a mandatory pelvic examination: the first Stop Demonstration Project.  Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33(1):13-18. doi:10.2307/2673737PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    24.
    Kahn  JA, Chiou  V, Allen  JD, Goodman  E, Perlman  SE, Emans  SJ.  Beliefs about Papanicolaou smears and compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up in adolescents.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(10):1046-1054. doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.10.1046PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    25.
    Bloomfield  HE, Olson  A, Greer  N,  et al.  Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.  Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(1):46-53. doi:10.7326/M13-2881PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    26.
    Hawks  L, Woolhandler  S, Himmelstein  DU, Bor  DH, Gaffney  A, McCormick  D.  Association between forced sexual initiation and health outcomes among US women [published online September 16, 2019].  JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3500Google Scholar
    27.
    Barry  D, Kovaleski  SF, Macur  J. As FBI took a year to pursue the Nassar case, dozens say they were molested.New York Times. February 3, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/03/sports/nassar-fbi.html. Accessed March 06, 2019.
    28.
    Henderson  JT, Sawaya  GF, Blum  M, Stratton  L, Harper  CC.  Pelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraception.  Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1257-1264. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fb540fPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    29.
    Westhoff  CL, Jones  HE, Guiahi  M.  Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete?  J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(1):5-10. doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2349PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    30.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. United States cancer statistics, 1999-2015 incidence, WONDER online database. United States Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute. https://wonder.cdc.gov/cancer-v2015.html. Updated November 19, 2019. Accessed October 12, 2018.
    31.
    Committee on Gynecologic Practice, Society of Gynecologic Oncology.  Committee opinion No. 716: the role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer in women at average risk.  Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):e146-e149. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002299PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    32.
    Grossman  DC, Curry  SJ, Owens  DK,  et al; US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for ovarian cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.  JAMA. 2018;319(6):588-594. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21926PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    33.
    Smith  RA, Andrews  KS, Brooks  D,  et al.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.  CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):297-316. doi:10.3322/caac.21446PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    34.
    Stormo  AR, Cooper  CP, Hawkins  NA, Saraiya  M.  Physician characteristics and beliefs associated with use of pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women.  Prev Med. 2012;54(6):415-421. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.012PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    35.
    Stormo  AR, Hawkins  NA, Cooper  CP, Saraiya  M.  The pelvic examination as a screening tool: practices of US physicians.  Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(22):2053-2054. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.575PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    36.
    Workowski  KA, Bolan  GA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.  MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(RR-03):1-137. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6403.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    37.
    Chernesky  MA, Hook  EW  III, Martin  DH,  et al.  Women find it easy and prefer to collect their own vaginal swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.  Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(12):729-733. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000190057.61633.8dPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    38.
    Serlin  M, Shafer  MA, Tebb  K,  et al.  What sexually transmitted disease screening method does the adolescent prefer? adolescents’ attitudes toward first-void urine, self-collected vaginal swab, and pelvic examination.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(6):588-591. doi:10.1001/archpedi.156.6.588PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    39.
    Yu  JM, Henderson  JT, Harper  CC, Sawaya  GF.  Obstetrician-gynecologists’ beliefs on the importance of pelvic examinations in assessing hormonal contraception eligibility.  Contraception. 2014;90(6):612-614. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.06.038PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    40.
    Kling  JM, Vegunta  S, Al-Badri  M,  et al.  Routine pelvic examinations: a descriptive cross-sectional survey of women’s attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines.  Prev Med. 2017;94:60-64. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    41.
    Norrell  LL, Kuppermann  M, Moghadassi  MN, Sawaya  GF.  Women’s beliefs about the purpose and value of routine pelvic examinations.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):86.e1-86.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.031PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    42.
    Sawaya  GF, Smith-McCune  KK, Gregorich  SE, Moghadassi  M, Kuppermann  M.  Effect of professional society recommendations on women’s desire for a routine pelvic examination.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):338.e1-338.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
    ×