The Problem of Daily Imaging in the Intensive Care Unit: When You Care So Much It Hurts | Critical Care Medicine | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.236.187.155. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Views 4,231
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
Less Is More
July 27, 2020

The Problem of Daily Imaging in the Intensive Care Unit: When You Care So Much It Hurts

Author Affiliations
  • 1San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, California
  • 2Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(10):1369-1370. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2667

As the economic and clinical fragilities of the world make themselves known during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the importance of resource use rises to the forefront of health care professionals’ minds. How does one weigh patient safety against cost, especially when dealing with critically ill patients, for whom mistakes can cost lives? In this issue, Maley and Stevens1 present a compelling example of a case where routine diagnostic examinations turned into a near-miss event. They argue that not only are seemingly innocuous care practices, such as daily chest radiographs (CXRs), expensive and inefficient, but also that significant underappreciated harms, including inappropriate interventions based on inaccurate results, abound.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×