[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 14,439
Citations 0
Editor's Note
August 18, 2020

Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2—Important Questions, Unclear Answers

Author Affiliations
  • 1NYC Health + Hospitals, New York, New York
  • 2Deputy Editor, JAMA Internal Medicine
JAMA Intern Med. Published online August 18, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4624

As clinicians struggling to care for patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we most want to read reports on randomized clinical trials of promising treatments or vaccines. However, descriptive epidemiologic studies can help us to develop those interventions.

In that spirit, I found the description of the development of neutralizing antibodies among patients with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection in China in this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine of interest.1 The authors describe substantial variability in the development of these antibodies. To the extent that these antibodies help patients to recover or protect against infection, it is important to understand why some patients develop a stronger antibody response than other patients. In this study, higher antibody levels were seen in men, older patients, and those with indicators of stronger immunologic response, as well as older persons; however, men, older patients, and those with stronger inflammatory response and older age have generally fared worse, suggesting that the higher titers of antibodies do not necessarily lead to higher recovery rate. As this study looked only at patients with mild disease who survived, it could not correlate antibody levels with prognosis, and so we do not know whether certain groups need higher antibody levels to overcome the illness. Equally unclear is whether higher levels of antibody production, generally seen as an intermediary indicator of vaccine success, will result in greater protection against the virus. In this study, 10 of 175 patients had undetectable antibody levels despite documented infection. Are these patients susceptible to future infection, or do they have protection based on their infection sensitizing killer T cells or memory B cells? Answers to these pointed questions can lead to better protection when faced with this still largely unknown adversary.

Back to top
Article Information

Published Online: August 18, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4624

Corresponding Author: Mitchell H. Katz, MD, NYC Health + Hospitals, 125 Worth St, Room 514, New York, NY 10013 (mitchell.katz@nychhc.org).

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
Wu  F, Liu  M, Wang  A,  et al.  Evaluating the association of clinical characteristics with neutralizing antibody levels in patients who have recovered from mild COVID-19 in Shanghai, China.   JAMA Intern Med. Published online August 18, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4616Google Scholar
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Immune responses clearing CoVID
    Camilo Colaco, PhD | ImmunoBiology Ltd
    Could it be that both nAb and non-nAb can clear viral infections and that both B- and T-cells are in the immune response against CoVID-19 and that either/both are capable of clearing a mild infection?
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    ×