Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Lowe KE, Zein J, Hatipoğlu U, Attaway A. Association of Smoking and Cumulative Pack-Year Exposure With COVID-19 Outcomes in the Cleveland Clinic COVID-19 Registry. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(5):709–711. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8360
There is limited and contradictory evidence on the association of smoking status with adverse outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.1-3 Furthermore, current smoking status does not encompass the cumulative effect of smoking. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed the cumulative effect of smoking over time, as measured by pack-years, though a single study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a small cohort of 102 patients with lung cancer found that the patients with severe outcomes had a higher average pack-year history (30 vs 20 years).4 We hypothesize that there is an adverse association of cumulative smoking exposure, as measured by pack-years, with outcomes of patients with COVID-19.
The Cleveland Clinic initiated a COVID-19 registry starting on March 8, 2020, that includes all patients tested for COVID-19 within the Cleveland Clinic Health system in Ohio and Florida. Basic demographic information was collected during testing, including age, height, weight, self-reported gender, self-reported race, and select comorbidities. Additional data on comorbidities, medications, and outcomes were extracted from patient electronic medical records.5 The Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this study and waived the need for patient informed consent owing to use of deidentified database information on study participants.
Adults who tested positive for COVID-19 between March 8, 2020, and August 25, 2020, and who had full smoking information recorded were included in the cohort. We classified patients based on their cumulative recorded smoking exposure. Those who reported that they were never smokers were compared with patients reporting 0 to 10 pack-years, 10 to 30 pack-years, and more than 30 pack-years. Demographic differences between these groups and previous literature on the risk factors of adverse COVID-19 outcomes informed the study modeling.1,3,5,6 We used multivariable logistic regression models to determine the odds ratio for hospitalization given a positive test, admission to the intensive care unit given hospitalization, and death given a positive COVID-19 test for each pack-year cohort compared with never smokers. Regression models were run unadjusted, adjusted for identified confounders (age, race, and gender) and adjusted for mediators (adding coronary artery disease, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, use of angiotensin receptor blockers, and use of oral or inhaled corticosteroids). We used likelihood ratio tests to determine whether a given covariate would remain in the model.
Of the 7102 patients included in the cohort, 6020 (84.8%) were never smokers, 172 (2.4%) were current smokers, and 910 (12.8%) were former smokers. All demographics are summarized in Table 1, and the results of logistic regression analyses are summarized in Table 2. The findings showed a dose-response association between pack-years and adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Patients who smoked more than 30 pack-years had a 2.25 times higher odds of hospitalization (95% CI, 1.76-2.88), and these heavy smokers were 1.89 times more likely to die following a COVID-19 diagnosis (95% CI, 1.29-2.76) when compared with never smokers. The association between cumulative smoking and adverse COVID-19 outcomes is likely mediated in part by comorbidities. The odds ratios for all adverse outcomes were attenuated in the mediation models. There was no evidence of effect modification by smoking status; similar odds ratios were seen in both current and former smokers.
The results of this study suggest that cumulative exposure to cigarette smoke is an independent risk factor for hospital admission and death from COVID-19. Smoking is imperfectly classified in patient electronic medical records, and former smokers are potentially classified as never smokers, while pack-years may be underrecorded. However, this misclassification is likely to bias the present results toward the null, which would underestimate the association of cigarette smoking on adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The limitations on who has access to care at tertiary medical centers in the United States prevent generalizability to the whole population. The patients with complete data in this study are likely to be wealthier and have more consistent access to health care, as pack-years of smoking was typically collected during previous visits to the Cleveland Clinic. Nevertheless, we have demonstrated in this single central registry of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 that increased cumulative smoking was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization and mortality from COVID-19 in a dose-dependent manner.
Accepted for Publication: November 7, 2020.
Published Online: January 25, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8360
Correction: This article was corrected on March 8, 2021, to fix a data error in the Results section.
Corresponding Author: Katherine E. Lowe, MSc, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve, 9501 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Author Contributions: Ms Lowe had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Lowe, Hatipoğlu, Attaway.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Lowe, Zein, Attaway.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Hatipoğlu
Supervision: Zein, Hatipoğlu, Attaway.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Hatipoğlu reports receiving royalties from Wolters Kluwer Health for his work as section editor for UpToDate. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: Research support was provided through a grant from the National Institutes of Health’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL133381).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Create a personal account or sign in to: