Two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) encoding the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 induce the production of spike antibodies that neutralize SARS-CoV-21 and are clinically effective against COVID-19.2 These vaccines can elicit greater local and systemic reactions in persons with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.3 Whether symptoms following vaccination are associated with effectiveness is unknown, and, therefore, anxiety can arise in persons who did not develop a reaction following vaccination.4 We evaluated symptoms following vaccination and serum spike antibody levels in a cohort of hospital workers (HWs) who received either mRNA vaccine and had known status of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection to identify differences in symptoms and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against S1 spike protein.
In June 2020, HWs in the Johns Hopkins Health System provided oral informed consent to participate in a longitudinal study of S1 spike antibodies in which serum samples and survey responses were collected every 3 to 4 months. Ethical approval was obtained from the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board. The HWs who participated for a study visit between March 10 and April 8, 2021, were included in this analysis if their serum sample was collected 14 or more days after receiving dose 2 of either mRNA vaccine. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Euroimmun), IgG antibody measurements were determined based on optical density ratios with an upper threshold of 11 based on assay saturation.1 Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined as having (1) a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test result prior to 14 days after dose 2 or (2) S1 spike IgG measurement greater than 1.23 prior to vaccination.5 Participants self-reported symptoms following vaccination as none, mild (injection site pain, mild fatigue, headache), or clinically significant (fatigue, fever, chills). Logistic regression models were used to explore the association of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine type with symptoms following each dose, adjusting for sex and age. A linear regression model was used to explore the association between magnitude of antibody response (log-transformed) and age, sex, prior infection, vaccine type, symptoms, and time after 2 doses of vaccine. Analyses were performed in R, version 4.0.2 (R Foundation).
A questionnaire and serum sample were collected 14 or more days following dose 2 for 954 HWs. Clinically significant symptoms were reported by 52 of the 954 (5%) after dose 1 and 407 (43%) after dose 2. After adjusting for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, age, and sex, the odds of clinically significant symptoms following either dose were higher among participants who received the Moderna vs the Pfizer vaccine (dose 1: odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% CI, 0.96-3.50; dose 2: OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.73-3.40) (Table). Prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure was associated with increased odds of clinically significant symptoms following dose 1 (OR, 4.38; 95% CI, 2.25-8.55) but not dose 2 (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99), after controlling for vaccine type, age, and sex.
Regardless of symptoms, the vast majority of participants (953 of 954, greater than 99.9%) developed spike IgG antibodies 14 or more days following dose 2; 1 participant who was taking immunosuppressant medication did not develop IgG antibodies (Figure). Reporting clinically significant symptoms, age younger than 60 years, female sex, receipt of Moderna vaccine, and prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure were independently associated with higher median IgG measurements, after adjusting for time after dose 2.
Nearly 100% of HWs in this study mounted a strong antibody response to the spike protein after dose 2 of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine independent of vaccine-induced reactions. Clinically significant symptoms following dose 1 were associated with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, confirming prior reports.4 Clinically significant symptoms following vaccination were more frequent following dose 2 and receipt of the Moderna vaccine.3
This study included participants within a longitudinal cohort study, leading to 2 potential limitations. First, the timing of survey collection may have led to recall bias and affected symptom reporting. Second, immune response was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and not neutralizing antibody titers.
Spike IgG antibody measurements were higher in HWs who received the Moderna vaccine, had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and reported clinically significant reactions. The role of higher antibody levels in preventing COVID-19 and providing lasting immunity remains unknown, however. Overall, the findings suggest that regardless of vaccine reactions or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, either spike mRNA vaccine will provide a robust spike antibody response.
Accepted for Publication: June 26, 2021.
Published Online: August 16, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4580
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Debes AK et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.
Corresponding Author: Amanda K. Debes, PhD, MS, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, E5036, Baltimore, MD 21205 (adebes1@jhu.edu).
Author Contributions: Dr Milstone had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Debes, Colantuoni, Egbert, Caturegli, Milstone.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Debes, Xiao, Colantuoni, Egbert.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Debes, Xiao, Colantuoni, Caturegli.
Obtained funding: Milstone.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Debes, Egbert, Caturegli, Gadala.
Supervision: Colantuoni, Milstone.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Milstone reported receiving grant support from Merck outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health under award No. K24AI141580 (Dr Milstone) and through the generosity of the collective community of donors to the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins Health System for COVID-19 research.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Additional Contributions: The authors would like to thank LuAnn Rezavi, BS, and Brittney Howard, MS, and other members of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Clinical Immunology Laboratory, Danielle Koontz, MAA, MAS, and Annie Voskertchian, MPH, of the Johns Hopkins Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, and Shaun Truelove, PhD, from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. They did not receive compensation for these contributions.
1.Manisty
C, Treibel
TA, Jensen
M,
et al. Time series analysis and mechanistic modelling of heterogeneity and sero-reversion in antibody responses to mild SARS-CoV-2 infection.
EBioMedicine. 2021;65:103259. doi:
10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103259PubMedGoogle Scholar