The Accuracy of Surrogate Decision Makers: A Systematic Review | End of Life | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.175.212.130. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
 Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990. www.fha.org/acrobat/Patient%20Self%20Determination%20Act%201990.pdf. Accessed January 4, 2006
2.
Sabatino  CP The legal and functional status of the medical proxy: suggestions for statutory reform.  J Law Med Ethics 1999;2752- 68PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Emanuel  EJEmanuel  LL Proxy decision making for incompetent patients: an ethical and empirical analysis.  JAMA 1992;2672067- 2071PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Tonelli  MR Substituted judgment in medical practice: evidentiary standards on a sliding scale.  J Law Med Ethics 1997;2522- 29PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Fagerlin  ADitto  PHDanks  JHHouts  RMSmucker  WD Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments.  Health Psychol 2001;20166- 175PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Ouslander  JGTymchuk  AJRahbar  B Health care decisions among elderly long-term care residents and their potential proxies.  Arch Intern Med 1989;1491367- 1372PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Principe-Rodriguez  KRodriguez-Cintron  WTorres-Palacios  ACasal-Hidalgo  J Substituted judgement: should life-support decisions be made by a surrogate?  P R Health Sci J 1999;18405- 409PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Coppolino  MAckerson  L Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research?  Chest 2001;119603- 612PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Gerety  MBChiodo  LKKanten  DNTuley  MRCornell  JE Medical treatment pREFERENCES of nursing home residents: relationship to function and concordance with surrogate decision-makers.  J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41953- 960PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Marbella  AMDesbiens  NAMueller-Rizner  NLayde  PM Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation pREFERENCES: effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention: Study to Understand Prognoses and PREFERENCES for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.  J Crit Care 1998;13140- 145PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Pearlman  RAUhlmann  RFJecker  NS Spousal understanding of patient quality of life: implications for surrogate decisions.  J Clin Ethics 1992;3114- 123PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Ditto  PHDanks  JHSmucker  WD  et al.  Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial.  Arch Intern Med 2001;161421- 430PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Hare  JPratt  CNelson  C Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions.  Arch Intern Med 1992;1521049- 1054PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Houts  RMSmucker  WDJacobson  JADitto  PHDanks  JH Predicting elderly outpatients' life-sustaining treatment pREFERENCES over time: the majority rules.  Med Decis Making 2002;2239- 52PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Layde  PMBeam  CABroste  SK  et al.  Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation pREFERENCES.  Arch Fam Med 1995;4518- 523PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Libbus  MKRussell  C Congruence of decisions between patients and their potential surrogates about life-sustaining therapies.  Image J Nurs Sch 1995;27135- 140PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Seckler  ABMeier  DEMulvihill  MParis  BE Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions?  Ann Intern Med 1991;11592- 98PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Smucker  WDHouts  RMDanks  JHDitto  PHFagerlin  ACoppola  KM Modal pREFERENCES predict elderly patients' life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients' chosen surrogates do.  Med Decis Making 2000;20271- 280PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Suhl  JSimons  PReedy  TGarrick  T Myth of substituted judgment: surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable.  Arch Intern Med 1994;15490- 96PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Sulmasy  DPHaller  KTerry  PB More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments.  Am J Med 1994;96432- 438PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Sulmasy  DPTerry  PBWeisman  CS  et al.  The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses.  Ann Intern Med 1998;128621- 629PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Tomlinson  THowe  KNotman  MRossmiller  D An empirical study of proxy consent for elderly persons.  Gerontologist 1990;3054- 64PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Uhlmann  RFPearlman  RACain  KC Physicians' and spouses' predictions of elderly patients' resuscitation pREFERENCES.  J Gerontol 1988;43M115- M121PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Zweibel  NRCassel  CK Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies.  Gerontologist 1989;29615- 621PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Matheis-Kraft  CRoberto  KA Influence of a values discussion on congruence between elderly women and their families on critical health care decisions.  J Women Aging 1997;95- 22PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Beland  DKFroman  RD Preliminary validation of a measure of life support pREFERENCES.  Image J Nurs Sch 1995;27307- 310PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forgo Life Sustaining Treatment: Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions.  Washington, DC US Government Printing Office1983;132- 136
28.
Bramstedt  KA Questioning the decision-making capacity of surrogates.  Intern Med J 2003;33257- 259PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Wendler  DPrasad  K Core safeguards for clinical research with adults who are unable to consent.  Ann Intern Med 2001;135514- 523PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Bravo  GDubois  M-FPaquet  M The conduct of Canadian researchers and institutional review boards regarding substituted consent for research.  IRB 2004;261- 8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Review
March 13, 2006

The Accuracy of Surrogate Decision Makers: A Systematic Review

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Mr Shalowitz and Dr Wendler); and Division of Biostatistics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (Dr Garrett-Mayer).

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):493-497. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.5.493
Abstract

Background  Clinicians currently rely on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates to make end-of-life treatment decisions for incapacitated patients. Surrogates are instructed to use the substituted judgment standard, which directs them to make the treatment decision that the patient would have made if he or she were capacitated. However, commentators have questioned the accuracy with which surrogates predict patients' treatment pREFERENCES.

Methods  A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and manuscript REFERENCES, to identify published studies that provide empirical data on how accurately surrogates predict patients' treatment pREFERENCES and on the efficacy of commonly proposed methods to improve surrogate accuracy. Two of us (D.I.S. and D.W.) reviewed all articles and extracted data on the hypothetical scenarios used to assess surrogate accuracy and the percentage of agreement between patients and surrogates.

Results  The search identified 16 eligible studies, involving 151 hypothetical scenarios and 2595 surrogate-patient pairs, which collectively analyzed 19 526 patient-surrogate paired responses. Overall, surrogates predicted patients' treatment pREFERENCES with 68% accuracy. Neither patient designation of surrogates nor prior discussion of patients' treatment pREFERENCES improved surrogates' predictive accuracy.

Conclusions  Patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates incorrectly predict patients' end-of-life treatment pREFERENCES in one third of cases. These data undermine the claim that reliance on surrogates is justified by their ability to predict incapacitated patients' treatment pREFERENCES. Future studies should assess whether other mechanisms might predict patients' end-of-life treatment pREFERENCES more accurately. Also, they should assess whether reliance on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates offers patients and/or their families benefits that are independent of the accuracy of surrogates' decisions.

×