Lifestyle modifications are first-line therapy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We applied an evidence-based approach to determine the efficacy of lifestyle measures for GERD management. We used PubMed and Ovid to perform a search of the literature published between 1975 and 2004 using the key words heartburn, GERD, smoking, alcohol, obesity, weight loss, caffeine or coffee, citrus, chocolate, spicy food, head of bed elevation, and late-evening meal. Each study was reviewed by 2 reviewers who assigned one of the following ratings: evidence A, randomized clinical trials; evidence B, cohort or case-control studies; evidence C, case reports or flawed clinical trials; evidence D, investigator experience; or evidence E, insufficient information. We screened 2039 studies and identified 100 that were relevant. Only 16 clinical trials examined the impact on GERD (by change in symptoms, esophageal pH variables, or lower esophageal sphincter pressure) of the lifestyle measure. Although there was physiologic evidence that exposure to tobacco, alcohol, chocolate, and high-fat meals decreases lower esophageal sphincter pressure, there was no published evidence of the efficacy of dietary measures. Neither tobacco nor alcohol cessation was associated with improvement in esophageal pH profiles or symptoms (evidence B). Head of bed elevation and left lateral decubitus position improved the overall time that the esophageal pH was less than 4.0 (evidence B). Weight loss improved pH profiles and symptoms (evidence B). Weight loss and head of bed elevation are effective lifestyle interventions for GERD. There is no evidence supporting an improvement in GERD measures after cessation of tobacco, alcohol, or other dietary interventions.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is characterized by symptoms of substernal burning or acid regurgitation produced by the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus.1According to US population surveys, 44% of all Americans experience heartburn at least once per month, 14% at least once per week, and up to 7% daily.2,3 The major mechanism for GERD is transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES).4 Recommendations for lifestyle modifications are based on the presumption that certain foods, body position, tobacco, alcohol, and obesity contribute to a dysfunction in the body's antireflux defense system. Accordingly, the American College of Gastroenterology recommends the use of lifestyle changes, including elevation of the head of the bed (HOB); decreased fat, chocolate, alcohol, peppermint, and coffee intake; cessation of smoking; and avoiding recumbency for 3 hours postprandially, in addition to antireflux medical treatment.1 However, the evidence to support such lifestyle modification recommendations has not been well substantiated. The purpose of this study is to apply an evidence-based approach to the literature to determine which lifestyle measures are most likely to benefit patients with GERD.
We performed a systematic review of the English-language literature relating to human subjects published between 1975 and 2004 using PubMed and Ovid to obtain data pertaining to the effects of lifestyle modifications on GERD. We included the following key words in the search: lifestyle modification, heartburn, GERD, reflux, smoking, alcohol, obesity, weight loss, caffeine or coffee, citrus, chocolate, mint, carbonated beverages, spicy food, fatty foods, head of bed elevation, and late-evening meal.
To be included in the study, trials had to contain a lifestyle intervention and outcomes of GERD measures, including heartburn symptoms, ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometric variables. Studies of the physiologic effects of lifestyle interventions only are included as introductory evidence for each lifestyle intervention.
We applied an evidence-based approach to the literature using a standard scoring system (Table 1).5After 2 of us (either T.K. and L.B.G. or S.C. and L.B.G.) independently reviewed each study, evidence-based ratings of A through E were assigned. A consensus was obtained through a second review if there was a difference of opinion on initial review.
Of 2039 trials screened for relevancy, 100 were included in this analysis. Only 16 trials examined the impact of lifestyle changes on GERD variables. The subsections that follow describe the physiologic evidence of lifestyle interventions on GERD measures (Table 2), followed by the available evidence on cessation of the lifestyle measure and the impact on GERD variables (Table 3).
Cigarette smoking has been associated with symptomatic GERD. Questionnaires have reported higher rates of reflux symptoms in tobacco smokers compared with nonsmokers.6-9 Multivariate analysis from a case-control study10 showed that duration of smoking was associated with increasing reflux symptoms, with an odds ratio (OR) for reflux of 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.0; P<.001) in daily smokers with a greater than 20-year tobacco use history compared with those who smoked daily for less than 1 year. Cigarette smoking has been shown to prolong acid clearance and decrease baseline LES pressure (LESP),96,97 with an abrupt decline in LESP at the start of smoking that returns to normal within minutes of completion of the cigarette.98 Abrupt increases in intra-abdominal pressure, such as with coughing or deep inspiration, have been associated with reflux symptoms in smokers.11 Studies12-14 that examined acid perfusion (using the Bernstein test) or esophageal pH have reported conflicting associations; for example, despite having more “reflux episodes,” smokers (compared with nonsmokers) do not show increased esophageal acid exposure time.15
No improvement was shown in 3 case-control studies (evidence B) that evaluated the effect of tobacco cessation on GERD outcomes. One study15 compared a cohort of 30 healthy volunteers (15 smokers and 15 nonsmokers) with 10 smokers with GERD and found that smokers had more reflux episodes than nonsmokers but that 24-hour smoking cessation did not reduce the total time that the esophageal pH was less than 4.0. Another study87 showed that 1-day cessation of smoking decreased the number of daily reflux episodes but did not significantly affect total esophageal acid exposure. On the contrary, Kadakia et al,88 after their evaluation of smokers with GERD who abstained from smoking for 48 hours, concluded that smoking significantly increased distal esophageal acid exposure. Although tobacco use has been associated with an adverse effect on the LES, the evidence to date does not support an improvement in GERD after cessation of tobacco use.
Alcohol consumption may precipitate GERD by increasing acid secretion through gastrin stimulation, reducing LESP, increasing spontaneous LES relaxations, and impairing esophageal motility and gastric emptying.18 Modest alcohol intake has been shown to induce reflux symptoms and decrease esophageal pH in healthy individuals without GERD symptoms19-21 despite normal overall 24-hour pH measurements.22 Randomized and cross-sectional studies16,23-26 have suggested an increased prevalence of symptomatic reflux in alcohol users. Wang et al16 reported reflux symptoms in 43% of heavy (≥210 g/wk) alcohol users compared with 16% of nondrinkers (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.67-4.49; P<.01); however, large American9 and multinational17 cross-sectional studies have not shown similar associations.
In a case-control study27 (evidence B) that examined GERD outcomes in symptomatic alcoholic patients compared with matched groups (without alcohol consumption) of controls, patients with GERD, and patients with nutcracker esophagus, most alcoholic patients demonstrated LES hypertension, high-amplitude esophageal contractions, or nonperistaltic esophageal contractions that improved after prolonged (>6 months) alcohol abstinence but were not accompanied by improvements in esophageal pH. Therefore, although esophageal motility abnormalities were shown to improve after the cessation of alcohol use, there is insufficient evidence to support the direct effect of alcohol abstinence on pH or GERD symptoms.
Obesity has been speculated to cause GERD symptoms because of multiple factors, including increased (1) gastroesophageal sphincter gradient,99 (2) incidence of hiatal hernia,100-102 (3) intra-abdominal pressure,103 and (4) output of bile and pancreatic enzymes.104 Although some studies28 have shown increased GERD in morbidly obese individuals, other studies29,30 did not demonstrate similar findings. Several population-based studies31-33 have found a significant relationship between increasing body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) and GERD symptoms. Murray et al31 reported an adjusted OR of 1.82 (95% CI, 1.33-2.5) for overweight patients with weekly heartburn symptoms compared with 1.5 (95% CI, 1.13-1.99) for individuals of average weight. Cross-sectional studies34-38 have similarly reported higher weekly reflux symptoms in obese patients. Another study39 showed that for every increment of body mass index of 5, the risk of GERD increased by 1.2. In a multivariate logistic regression model,32 women with a body mass index greater than 35 were shown to have an increased risk of GERD (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.4-4.7) compared with men with a similar body mass index (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.4-4.7; P<.001). Although some studies40-45 have reported a link between obesity and GERD by demonstrating abnormal pH and manometric measures, other studies46-51 have refuted such an association.
Bariatric surgery has been associated with improved GERD variables.105-112 Given that the surgical procedure has inherent antireflux properties, it is difficult to directly assess the effect of weight loss on GERD. Five studies89-93 have evaluated the independent effect of weight loss on GERD variables. Fraser-Moodie et al89 showed a significant correlation between weight loss and esophageal pH (OR, 0.55; P<.001) in an uncontrolled study of 34 obese patients with GERD. Mathus-Vliegen et al91-93 demonstrated a similar correlation with a decreased upright pH less than 4 (8.0% vs 5.5%; P<.05) and postprandial reflux episodes (49.0 vs 32.1; P<.05) in patients with a mean weight loss of 12.4 kg in 13 weeks. However, in another study90 that randomized 20 obese patients with reflux esophagitis to either a 430-kcal/d diet or an unrestricted diet, there was no significant difference in reflux symptoms between controls and patients with a 10% body weight loss after 6 months. Therefore, although weight loss seems to have a promising effect on pH measures and symptoms, further randomized controlled studies are warranted to determine its exact effect on GERD outcomes.
Citrus fruits are often cited as precipitants of heartburn symptoms. In a questionnaire of approximately 400 patients with GERD, 72% of respondents reported increased heartburn with ingestion of either orange or grapefruit juice.66 However, Price et al52 found that acid-sensitive patients (positive Bernstein test results) were sensitive to intraesophageal infusion of orange juice, even when the orange juice was adjusted to a pH of 7, suggesting that acidity is not the only factor determining the citrus effect on GERD. Cranley et al67 demonstrated that patients with GERD did not change their LESP when challenged with orange juice infusion; this was in contrast to controls who showed increased LESP. No studies, to our knowledge, have assessed the effect of avoidance of citrus on GERD.
Studies have postulated that carbonated beverages cause GERD.113 In one study,68 carbonated soft drink consumption was found to be a predictor of GERD symptoms in a multivariate analysis. Another small study69 of healthy individuals found equivalent decreases in LESP with ingestion of carbonated water, caffeinated cola, or caffeine-free cola compared with water ingestion. No cessation trials have been published to date, to our knowledge.
Despite the fact that intraesophageal infusion of coffee in patients with acid sensitivity has been shown to cause heartburn,52 2 large epidemiologic studies16,17 found no association between coffee drinking and GERD. A recent survey10 in Norway described a negative association between coffee drinking and GERD incidence. Although some studies53,54 have described increased LESP with regular and decaffeinated coffees, another trial55 showed no effect of coffee on the number of reflux episodes, total reflux time, or LESP in patients with GERD or controls. There is conflicting evidence regarding how different coffee preparations, roasting methods, and processing methods affect GERD variables.56-59 Decaffeinated compared with caffeinated coffee ingestion was associated with significantly less acid exposure time in some studies.60 Salmon et al61 noted that patients had lower postprandial LESP regardless of whether they were exposed to coffee, suggesting that the association between coffee and GERD may be confounded by the fact that people frequently drink coffee after meals. Another study62 reported that coffee decreased LESP in healthy individuals and in patients with reflux esophagitis when fasting or following a standard test meal. Given the conflicting reported data, the relationship between caffeine or coffee and GERD remains unclear. There is insufficient evidence to support the routine recommendation that patients with GERD avoid such beverages.
Chocolate is frequently implicated as a provoker of GERD. There are limited data that chocolate may affect esophageal pH and LES profiles. One early uncontrolled study63 found that ingestion of 120 mL of chocolate syrup by 9 controls caused LESP to significantly decrease compared with baseline measurements (P<.01). In 7 patients with typical GERD symptoms, Murphy and Castell64 found greater acid exposure time after chocolate ingestion compared with ingestion of a test drink of equivalent osmolality and caloric value (P = .04). No studies have addressed the effect of chocolate abstinence on GERD symptoms.
Although patients frequently cite spicy foods as an inciting agent in heartburn episodes, little data have been published regarding the effects of spicy food consumption on LESP or esophageal pH. Nebel et al3 conducted a survey of patients with GERD symptoms and found that 88% listed spicy foods as a precipitant of heartburn. One study65 found that in patients with GERD vs controls, onion intake increased the number of reflux episodes (P<.01) and the esophageal acid exposure time (P<.05). The results of this study have not been confirmed by other larger trials. Many patients who believe that spicy foods exacerbate their GERD symptoms may abstain from these foods although we found no published trials that studied the effect of abstinence on change in GERD symptoms.
It has been postulated that fat increases not only reflux but also the sensitivity of the esophagus to acid exposure. In a randomized clinical trial,70 8 patients with GERD and 11 controls received either an intragastric infusion of isotonic sodium chloride or a 20% lipid solution followed by an intraesophageal infusion of hydrochloric acid. There were no significant differences in acid sensitivity symptoms with respect to the fat infusion.70 Two studies71,72 reported significantly shorter onset to heartburn symptoms or reflux episodes with acid infusion regardless of whether patients were receiving intraduodenal infusions of a lipid solution or isotonic sodium chloride. Fat infusions have not been shown to affect LESP or the rate of transient LES relaxations.72
Nebel and Castell73 evaluated the LES response to ingestion of fat and protein meals with equivalent caloric value in healthy individuals and found that fatty meals decreased LES pressure significantly compared with protein meals, which increased LESP. Becker et al74 studied esophageal acid exposure after high- and low-fat meals and found that the fat content was not significantly associated with esophageal pH abnormalities. In a study75 of 20 healthy individuals in the supine position, those who consumed high-fat meals had significantly increased acid exposure compared with the low-fat group, but this study also found that acid exposure increased in patients who ingested a greater volume. Other randomized trials have found no difference comparing high- and low-fat meals with respect to LESP, transient LES relaxations,76 number of reflux episodes, or esophageal exposure to acid.77 There is conflicting evidence regarding whether caloric content of foods is more important than fat content.76,78
Based on the previously mentioned trials, there is limited evidence to suggest that the fat content of meals affects GERD outcomes. In fact, a recent review114 on this subject concluded that present evidence does not support any recommendations for patients with GERD to limit fat in their diets.
Peppermint and spearmint are plant extracts that are commonly used in foods and flavorings of toothpaste, mouthwash, and candy. Mint is commonly thought to relax the LES, and thus it is commonly recommended that patients with GERD avoid ingesting mint.115 We found only 1 study examining the effect of mint ingestion on GERD. Bulat et al79 conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which the LES tone of healthy volunteers was measured in response to spearmint, and they found no difference in symptoms, sphincter pressure, or reflux episodes with ingestion of spearmint. There were no studies published on the effect of cessation of mint intake on GERD symptoms.
Postprandial reflux is common in patients with GERD.116 Two studies that evaluated the effect of the timing of the evening meal on 24-hour intragastric acidity in healthy volunteers showed different effects on nocturnal pH. A study84 of early (6 PM) vs late (9 PM) dinner demonstrated lower intragastric pH (median pH, 1.39 vs 1.67; P<.001) in the later meal setting, but only between midnight and 7 AM. The second study85 in 10 healthy patients showed that nocturnal and 24-hour integrated intragastric acidity were unaffected by changes in the timing of the evening meal. In the only study in patients with GERD that examined the effect of late-evening meals, Orr and Harnish86 measured esophageal pH and symptoms in 20 patients during a late-evening meal on one night and a meal before 7 PM on another night. There was no difference between the 2 nights in terms of acid exposure, number of reflux episodes, and mean reflux episode duration.86 The evidence to routinely recommend avoidance of late-evening meals in patients with GERD remains incomplete.
Recumbent position and hob elevation
Counseling patients regarding HOB elevation is based on the theory that stomach contents containing acid will more likely reflux into the esophagus while patients are lying flat. Stanciu and Bennett80 compared the effect of different body positions (sitting, lying, and elevated HOB) in 63 patients with GERD symptoms using pH monitoring and showed that compared with patients who slept flat, patients who slept with an elevated HOB (using 28-cm blocks) had significantly fewer reflux episodes, shorter reflux episodes, faster acid clearing, and fewer reflux symptoms. Hamilton et al94 conducted a randomized clinical trial comparing sleeping on a wedge, sleep with HOB elevation, and sleeping in the horizontal position and found that sleeping on a wedge was associated with significantly less esophageal acid exposure compared with sleeping in the horizontal position. Sleeping with HOB elevation also showed improved acid exposure, but this difference was not statistically significant.94 In another randomized controlled trial95 of HOB elevation for 2 weeks in patients with reflux symptoms treated with proton pump inhibitors and cisapride, HOB elevation was not associated with a difference in symptoms or antacid use. The HOB elevation, therefore, seems to be an effective measure to improve the symptoms and physiologic variables in some patients with GERD.
Right lateral decubitus position
Several studies have shown that reflux is increased in patients in the right lateral decubitus position. The reason for this phenomenon is not completely clear, but it may be related to increased transient LES relaxations in the right position, or possibly that the gastroesophageal junction lies above the level of gastric acid in the left lateral position.113 Specifically, total reflux time, average acid clearance, and LES relaxations are significantly prolonged in patients lying on their right side compared with the left lateral decubitus position.81-83 Despite evidence that the right lateral decubitus position can aggravate reflux, the practical aspects of this lifestyle modification make it a challenge to implement in patients with GERD.
Despite articles in the literature emphasizing the insufficient evidence to support an association between lifestyle and dietary behaviors and GERD,113,117 such interventions continue to be recommended as first-line therapy.1,118 Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a chronic disease that affects health-related quality of life.119 The results of this evidence-based approach suggest that although there is physiologic evidence that smoking, alcohol, chocolate, or fatty or citrus food intake may adversely affect symptoms or esophageal pH, there is little evidence that cessation of these agents will improve GERD variables. Elevations in the HOB, left lateral decubitus positioning, and weight loss have been associated with improvement in GERD variables in case-control studies. Larger prospective controlled trials are warranted to conclusively recommend dietary and lifestyle modifications in the treatment of GERD.
Correspondence: Lauren B. Gerson, MD, MSc, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Room A149, Stanford, CA 94305-5202 (lgerson@stanford.edu).
Accepted for Publication: November 7, 2005.
Author Contributions: Dr Gerson had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Financial Disclosure: None.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by a Research Scholar Award from the American Gastroenterological Association (Dr Gerson).
Role of the Sponsor: The American Gastroenterological Association was not involved in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
1.DeVault
KRCastell
DO Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100190- 200
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 2.Gallup Organization, Heartburn Across America: A Gallup Organization National Survey. Princeton, NJ Gallup Organization1988;
3.Nebel
OTFornes
MFCastell
DO Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: incidence and precipitating factors.
Am J Dig Dis 1976;21953- 956
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 4.Dent
JDodds
WJFriedman
RH
et al. Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects.
J Clin Invest 1980;65256- 267
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 6.Watanabe
YFujiwara
YShiba
M
et al. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Japanese men.
Scand J Gastroenterol 2003;38807- 811
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 7.Tibbling
LGibellino
FMJohansson
KE Is mis-swallowing or smoking a cause of respiratory symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease?
Dysphagia 1995;10113- 116
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 9.Talley
NJZinsmeister
ARSchleck
CDMelton
LJ
III Smoking, alcohol, and analgesics in dyspepsia and among dyspepsia subgroups: lack of an association in a community.
Gut 1994;35619- 624
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 10.Nilsson
MJohnsen
RYe
WHveem
KLagergren
J Lifestyle related risk factors in the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Gut 2004;531730- 1735
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 12.Smit
CFCopper
MPvan Leeuwen
JASchoots
IGStanojcic
LD Effect of cigarette smoking on gastropharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;110190- 193
PubMedGoogle Scholar 13.Berenson
MMSontag
SRobinson
MGMcCallum
RM Effect of smoking in a controlled study of ranitidine treatment in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
J Clin Gastroenterol 1987;9499- 503
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 14.Pehl
CPfeiffer
AWendl
BNagy
IKaess
H Effect of smoking on the results of esophageal pH measurement in clinical routine.
J Clin Gastroenterol 1997;25503- 506
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 15.Schindlbeck
NEHeinrich
CDendorfer
APace
FMuller-Lissner
SA Influence of smoking and esophageal intubation on esophageal pH-metry.
Gastroenterology 1987;921994- 1997
PubMedGoogle Scholar 16.Wang
JHLuo
JYDong
LGong
JTong
M Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a general population-based study in Xi'an of Northwest China.
World J Gastroenterol 2004;101647- 1651
PubMedGoogle Scholar 17.Stanghellini
V Relationship between upper gastrointestinal symptoms and lifestyle, psychosocial factors and comorbidity in the general population: results from the Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST).
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1999;23129- 37
PubMedGoogle Scholar 20.Vitale
GCCheadle
WGPatel
BSadek
SAMichel
MECuschieri
A The effect of alcohol on nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux.
JAMA 1987;2582077- 2079
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 21.Rubinstein
EHauge
CSommer
PMortensen
T Oesophageal and gastric potential difference and pH in healthy volunteers following intake of coca-cola, red wine, and alcohol.
Pharmacol Toxicol 1993;7261- 65
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 22.Grande
LManterola
CRos
ELacima
GPera
C Effects of red wine on 24-hour esophageal pH and pressures in healthy volunteers.
Dig Dis Sci 1997;421189- 1193
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.Rosaida
MSGoh
KL Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, reflux oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease in a multiracial Asian population: a prospective, endoscopy based study.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;16495- 501
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 24.O'Leary
CMcCarthy
JHumphries
MShanahan
FQuigley
E The prophylactic use of a proton pump inhibitor before food and alcohol.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17683- 686
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 25.Avidan
BSonnenberg
ASchnell
TGSontag
SJ No association between gallstones and gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol 2001;962858- 2862
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 26.Talley
NJPiper
DW Comparison of the clinical features and illness behaviour of patients presenting with dyspepsia of unknown cause (essential dyspepsia) and organic disease.
Aust N Z J Med 1986;16352- 359
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 27.Grande
LMonforte
RRos
E
et al. High amplitude contractions in the middle third of the oesophagus: a manometric marker of chronic alcoholism?
Gut 1996;38655- 662
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 28.Behar
JSheahan
DGBiancani
PSpiro
HMStorer
EH Medical and surgical management of reflux esophagitis: a 38-month report of a prospective clinical trial.
N Engl J Med 1975;293263- 268
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 29.O'Brien
TF
Jr Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and esophageal function in obese humans.
J Clin Gastroenterol 1980;2145- 148
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 31.Murray
LJohnston
BLane
A
et al. Relationship between body mass and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: the Bristol Helicobacter Project.
Int J Epidemiol 2003;32645- 650
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 32.Nilsson
MJohnsen
RYe
WHveem
KLagergren
J Obesity and estrogen as risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.
JAMA 2003;29066- 72
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 33.Diaz-Rubio
MMoreno-Elola-Olaso
CRey
ELocke
GR
IIIRodriguez-Artalejo
F Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux: prevalence, severity, duration and associated factors in a Spanish population.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;1995- 105
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 34.Nandurkar
SLocke
GR
IIIFett
SZinsmeister
ARCameron
AJTalley
NJ Relationship between body mass index, diet, exercise and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in a community.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20497- 505
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 35.Locke
GR
IIITalley
NJFett
SLZinsmeister
ARMelton
LJ
III Risk factors associated with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Med 1999;106642- 649
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 36.Clements
RHGonzalez
QHFoster
A
et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms are more intense in morbidly obese patients and are improved with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Obes Surg 2003;13610- 614
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 37.El-Serag
HBJohanson
JF Risk factors for the severity of erosive esophagitis in
Helicobacter pylori–negative patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37899- 904
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 38.Foster
ARichards
WOMcDowell
JLaws
HLClements
RH Gastrointestinal symptoms are more intense in morbidly obese patients.
Surg Endosc 2003;171766- 1768
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 39.Ruhl
CEEverhart
JE Overweight, but not high dietary fat intake, increases risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease hospitalization: the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study.
Ann Epidemiol 1999;9424- 435
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 40.Hong
DKhajanchee
YSPereira
NLockhart
BPatterson
EJSwanstrom
LL Manometric abnormalities and gastroesophageal reflux disease in the morbidly obese.
Obes Surg 2004;14744- 749
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 41.Wajed
SAStreets
CGBremner
CGDeMeester
TR Elevated body mass disrupts the barrier to gastroesophageal reflux.
Arch Surg 2001;1361014- 1018
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 43.Hagen
JDeitel
MKhanna
RKIlves
R Gastroesophageal reflux in the massively obese.
Int Surg 1987;721- 3
PubMedGoogle Scholar 44.Di Francesco
VBaggio
EMastromauro
M
et al. Obesity and gastro-esophageal acid reflux: physiopathological mechanisms and role of gastric bariatric surgery.
Obes Surg 2004;141095- 1102
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 45.Suter
MDorta
GGiusti
VCalmes
JM Gastro-esophageal reflux and esophageal motility disorders in morbidly obese patients.
Obes Surg 2004;14959- 966
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 46.Lagergren
JBergstrom
RNyren
O No relation between body mass and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in a Swedish population based study.
Gut 2000;4726- 29
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 47.Lundell
LRuth
MSandberg
NBove-Nielsen
M Does massive obesity promote abnormal gastroesophageal reflux?
Dig Dis Sci 1995;401632- 1635
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 48.Raiha
IImpivaara
OSeppala
MKnuts
LRSourander
L Determinants of symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly.
Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;281011- 1014
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 49.Chang
CSPoon
SKLien
HCChen
GH The incidence of reflux esophagitis among the Chinese.
Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92668- 671
PubMedGoogle Scholar 50.Jaffin
BWKnoepflmacher
PGreenstein
R High prevalence of asymptomatic esophageal motility disorders among morbidly obese patients.
Obes Surg 1999;9390- 395
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 51.Talley
NJHowell
SPoulton
R Obesity and chronic gastrointestinal tract symptoms in young adults: a birth cohort study.
Am J Gastroenterol 2004;991807- 1814
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 52.Price
SFSmithson
KWCastell
DO Food sensitivity in reflux esophagitis.
Gastroenterology 1978;75240- 243
PubMedGoogle Scholar 53.Cohen
SBooth
GH
Jr Gastric acid secretion and lower-esophageal-sphincter pressure in response to coffee and caffeine.
N Engl J Med 1975;293897- 899
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 55.Boekema
PJSamsom
MSmout
AJ Effect of coffee on gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease and healthy controls.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;111271- 1276
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 56.DiBaise
JK A randomized, double-blind comparison of two different coffee-roasting processes on development of heartburn and dyspepsia in coffee-sensitive individuals.
Dig Dis Sci 2003;48652- 656
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 57.Brazer
SROnken
JEDalton
CBSmith
JWSchiffman
SS Effect of different coffees on esophageal acid contact time and symptoms in coffee-sensitive subjects.
Physiol Behav 1995;57563- 567
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 58.Van Deventer
GKamemoto
EKuznicki
JTHeckert
DCSchulte
MC Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, acid secretion, and blood gastrin after coffee consumption.
Dig Dis Sci 1992;37558- 569
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 59.Wendl
BPfeiffer
APehl
CSchmidt
TKaess
H Effect of decaffeination of coffee or tea on gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994;8283- 287
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 60.Pehl
CPfeiffer
AWendl
BKaess
H The effect of decaffeination of coffee on gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997;11483- 486
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 62.Thomas
FBSteinbaugh
JTFromkes
JJMekhjian
HSCaldwell
JH Inhibitory effect of coffee on lower esophageal sphincter pressure.
Gastroenterology 1980;791262- 1266
PubMedGoogle Scholar 64.Murphy
DWCastell
DO Chocolate and heartburn: evidence of increased esophageal acid exposure after chocolate ingestion.
Am J Gastroenterol 1988;83633- 636
PubMedGoogle Scholar 65.Allen
MLMellow
MHRobinson
MGOrr
WC The effect of raw onions on acid reflux and reflux symptoms.
Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85377- 380
PubMedGoogle Scholar 66.Feldman
MBarnett
C Relationships between the acidity and osmolality of popular beverages and reported postprandial heartburn.
Gastroenterology 1995;108125- 131
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 67.Cranley
JPAchkar
EFleshler
B Abnormal lower esophageal sphincter pressure responses in patients with orange juice–induced heartburn.
Am J Gastroenterol 1986;81104- 106
Google Scholar 68.Fass
RQuan
SFO'Connor
GTErvin
AIber
C Predictors of heartburn during sleep in a large prospective cohort study.
Chest 2005;1271658- 1666
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 69.Crookes
PHamoui
NThiesen
J
et al. Response of lower esophageal sphincter to ingestion of carbonated beverages.
Gastroenterology 1999;116G0608
Google Scholar 72.Holloway
RHLyrenas
EIreland
ADent
J Effect of intraduodenal fat on lower oesophageal sphincter function and gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Gut 1997;40449- 453
PubMedGoogle Scholar 73.Nebel
OTCastell
DO Inhibition of the lower oesophageal sphincter by fat: a mechanism for fatty food intolerance.
Gut 1973;14270- 274
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 74.Becker
DJSinclair
JCastell
DOWu
WC A comparison of high and low fat meals on postprandial esophageal acid exposure.
Am J Gastroenterol 1989;84782- 786
PubMedGoogle Scholar 75.Iwakiri
KKobayashi
MKotoyori
MYamada
HSugiura
TNakagawa
Y Relationship between postprandial esophageal acid exposure and meal volume and fat content.
Dig Dis Sci 1996;41926- 930
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 76.Pehl
CWaizenhoefer
AWendl
BSchmidt
TSchepp
WPfeiffer
A Effect of low and high fat meals on lower esophageal sphincter motility and gastroesophageal reflux in healthy subjects.
Am J Gastroenterol 1999;941192- 1196
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 77.Penagini
RMangano
MBianchi
PA Effect of increasing the fat content but not the energy load of a meal on gastro-oesophageal reflux and lower oesophageal sphincter motor function.
Gut 1998;42330- 333
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 78.Colombo
PMangano
MBianchi
PAPenagini
R Effect of calories and fat on postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;373- 5
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 79.Bulat
RFachnie
EChauhan
UChen
YTougas
G Lack of effect of spearmint on lower oesophageal sphincter function and acid reflux in healthy volunteers.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;13805- 812
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 82.van Herwaarden
MAKatzka
DASmout
AJSamsom
MGideon
MCastell
DO Effect of different recumbent positions on postprandial gastroesophageal reflux in normal subjects.
Am J Gastroenterol 2000;952731- 2736
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 83.Khoury
RMCamacho-Lobato
LKatz
POMohiuddin
MACastell
DO Influence of spontaneous sleep positions on nighttime recumbent reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol 1999;942069- 2073
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 85.Lanzon-Miller
SPounder
REMcIsaac
RLWood
JR The timing of the evening meal affects the pattern of 24-hour intragastric acidity.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1990;4547- 553
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 86.Orr
WCHarnish
MJ Sleep-related gastro-oesophageal reflux: provocation with a late evening meal and treatment with acid suppression.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;121033- 1038
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 87.Waring
JPEastwood
TFAustin
JMSanowski
RA The immediate effects of cessation of cigarette smoking on gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Gastroenterol 1989;841076- 1078
PubMedGoogle Scholar 88.Kadakia
SCKikendall
JWMaydonovitch
CJohnson
LF Effect of cigarette smoking on gastroesophageal reflux measured by 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.
Am J Gastroenterol 1995;901785- 1790
PubMedGoogle Scholar 89.Fraser-Moodie
CANorton
BGornall
CMagnago
SWeale
ARHolmes
GK Weight loss has an independent beneficial effect on symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients who are overweight.
Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34337- 340
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 90.Kjellin
ARamel
SRossner
SThor
K Gastroesophageal reflux in obese patients is not reduced by weight reduction.
Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;311047- 1051
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 91.Mathus-Vliegen
EMvan Weeren
Mvan Eerten
PV LOS function and obesity: the impact of untreated obesity, weight loss, and chronic gastric balloon distension.
Digestion 2003;68161- 168
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 92.Mathus-Vliegen
EMTygat
GN Gastro-oesophageal reflux in obese subjects: influence of overweight, weight loss and chronic gastric balloon distension.
Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;371246- 1252
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 93.Mathus-Vliegen
LMTytgat
GN Twenty-four-hour pH measurements in morbid obesity: effects of massive overweight, weight loss and gastric distension.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996;8635- 640
PubMedGoogle Scholar 94.Hamilton
JWBoisen
RJYamamoto
DTWagner
JLReichelderfer
M Sleeping on a wedge diminishes exposure of the esophagus to refluxed acid.
Dig Dis Sci 1988;33518- 522
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 95.Pollmann
HZillessen
EPohl
J
et al. Effect of elevated head position in bed in therapy of gastroesophageal reflux [in German].
Z Gastroenterol 1996;34
((suppl 2))
93- 99
PubMedGoogle Scholar 96.Kahrilas
PJGupta
RR The effect of cigarette smoking on salivation and esophageal acid clearance.
J Lab Clin Med 1989;114431- 438
PubMedGoogle Scholar 97.Dua
KBardan
ERen
JSui
ZShaker
R Effect of chronic and acute cigarette smoking on the pharyngo-upper oesophageal sphincter contractile reflex and reflexive pharyngeal swallow.
Gut 1998;43537- 541
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 99.Mercer
CDWren
SFDaCosta
LRBeck
IT Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and gastroesophageal pressure gradients in excessively obese patients.
J Med 1987;18135- 146
PubMedGoogle Scholar 100.Stene-Larsen
GWeberg
RFroyshov Larsen
IBjortuft
OHoel
BBerstad
A Relationship of overweight to hiatus hernia and reflux oesophagitis.
Scand J Gastroenterol 1988;23427- 432
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 102.Barak
NEhrenpreis
EDHarrison
JRSitrin
MD Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in obesity: pathophysiological and therapeutic considerations.
Obes Rev 2002;39- 15
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 103.Sugerman
HJDeMaria
EJFelton
WL
IIINakatsuka
MSismanis
A Increased intra-abdominal pressure and cardiac filling pressures in obesity-associated pseudotumor cerebri.
Neurology 1997;49507- 511
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 104.Wisen
ORossner
SJohansson
C Impaired pancreatico-biliary response to vagal stimulation and to cholecystokinin in human obesity.
Metabolism 1988;37436- 441
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 106.Angrisani
LIovino
PLorenzo
M
et al. Treatment of morbid obesity and gastroesophageal reflux with hiatal hernia by Lap-Band.
Obes Surg 1999;9396- 398
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 107.O'Brien
PEDixon
JBBrown
W
et al. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of life.
Obes Surg 2002;12652- 660
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 108.Smith
SCEdwards
CBGoodman
GN Symptomatic and clinical improvement in morbidly obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Obes Surg 1997;7479- 484
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 109.Frigg
APeterli
RPeters
TAckermann
CTondelli
P Reduction in co-morbidities 4 years after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.
Obes Surg 2004;14216- 223
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 110.Perry
YCourcoulas
APFernando
HCBuenaventura
POMcCaughan
JSLuketich
JD Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for recalcitrant gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbidly obese patients.
JSLS 2004;819- 23
PubMedGoogle Scholar 111.Raftopoulos
IAwais
OCourcoulas
APLuketich
JD Laparoscopic gastric bypass after antireflux surgery for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in morbidly obese patients: initial experience.
Obes Surg 2004;141373- 1380
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 112.Melissas
JChristodoulakis
MSpyridakis
M
et al. Disorders associated with clinically severe obesity: significant improvement after surgical weight reduction.
South Med J 1998;911143- 1148
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 113.Meining
AClassen
M The role of diet and lifestyle measures in the pathogenesis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol 2000;952692- 2697
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 115.Feldman
MFriedman
LSSleisenger
MH Sleisenger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co2002;
116.Johnson
LFDemeester
TR Twenty-four–hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: a quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Gastroenterol 1974;62325- 332
PubMedGoogle Scholar 117.Holtmann
GAdam
BLiebregts
T The patient with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: lifestyle advice and medication.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20
((suppl 8))
24- 27
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 118.Kitchin
LICastell
DO Rationale and efficacy of conservative therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151448- 454
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 119.Gerson
LBUllah
NHastie
TTriadafilopoulos
GGoldstein
M Patient-derived health state utilities for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100524- 533
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref