Handwashing Compliance by Health Care Workers: The Impact of Introducing an Accessible, Alcohol-Based Hand Antiseptic | Cardiothoracic Surgery | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Semmelweis  I The etiology, the concept, and the prophylaxis of childbed fever. Pest  CAedMurphy  FPtrans. Hartleben's Verlag-Expeditious Birmingham, England Classics of Medicine Library1861;(republished 1981)Google Scholar
2.
Holmes  OW The contagiousness of puerperal fever. Darby,  PAed. Medical Essays 1842-1882 Boston, Mass Houghton, Mifflin1892; Arden Library Hampton, EnglandGoogle Scholar
3.
Garner  JSHospital Infection Control Pratices Advisory Committee, Guideline for isolation precautions in hopsitals.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;1753- 80Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Centers for Disease Control, Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1987;363- 18Google Scholar
5.
Centers for Disease Control, Update: universal precautions for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and other bloodborne pathogens in health-care settings.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1988;37377- 382387- 388Google Scholar
6.
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology Guidelines for Infection Control Pratice, APIC guidelines for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings.  Am J Infect Control. 1995;23251- 269Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Association of Operating Room Nurses, Recommended practices: surgical handscrubs.  AORN J. 1990;52830- 836Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Food and Drug Administration, Over-the-counter drugs generally recognized as safe, effective and not misbranded,  43 Federal Register. 12101978;Google Scholar
9.
Food and Drug Administration, Topical antimicrobial drug products for over-the-counter human use: tentative final monograph for health care antiseptic drug products—proposed rule,  59 Federal Register. 314411994;Google Scholar
10.
Preceval  A Wash hands, disinfect hands or don't touch? which, when, and why?  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1993;14273- 275Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Steere  ACMallison  GF Handwashing practices for the prevention of nosocomial infections.  Ann Intern Med. 1975;83683- 690Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Nyström  B Impact of handwashing on mortality in intensive care: examination of the evidence.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994;15435- 436Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Wenzel  RPPfaller  MA Handwashing: efficacy versus acceptance: a brief essay.  J Hosp Infect. 1991;18 ((suppl B)) 65- 68Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Kretzer  EKLarson  E Behavioral interventions to improve infection control practices.  Am J Infect Control. 1998;26245- 253Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Larson  EKretzer  EK Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions.  J Hosp Infect. 1995;30 ((suppl)) 88- 106Google ScholarCrossref
16.
Doebbeling  BNStanley  GLSheertz  CT  et al.  Comparative efficacy of aternative hand-washing agents in reducing nosocomial infections in intensive care units.  N Engl J Med. 1992;32788- 93Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Lund  SJackson  JLeggett  JHales  LDworkin  RGilbert  D Reality of glove use and handwashing in a community hospital.  Am J Infect Control. 1994;22352- 357Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Albert  RKCondie  F Hand-washing patterns in medical intensive-care units.  N Engl J Med. 1981;3041465- 1466Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Graham  M Frequency and duration of handwashing in an intensive care unit.  Am J Infect Control. 1990;1877- 80Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Quraishi  ZAMcGuckin  MBlais  FX Duration of handwashing in intensive care units: a descriptive study.  Am J Infect Control. 1984;1283- 87Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Simmons  BBryant  JNeiman  KSpencer  LArheart  K The role of handwashing in prevention of endemic intensive care unit infections.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11589- 594Google ScholarCrossref
22.
Zimakoff  JStormark  MOlesen Larsen  S Use of gloves and handwashing behaviour among health care workers in intensive care units: a multicentre investigation in four hospitals in Denmark and Norway.  J Hosp Infect. 1993;2463- 67Google ScholarCrossref
23.
LeClair  JMFreeman  JSullivan  BFCrowley  CMGoldman  DA Prevention of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infections through compliance with glove and gown isolation precautions.  N Engl J Med. 1987;317329- 334Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Conly  JMHill  SRoss  JLertzman  JLouis  TJ Handwashing practices in an intensive care unit: the effects of an educational program and its relationship to infection rates.  Am J Infect Control. 1989;17330- 339Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Emori  TGGaynes  RP An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory.  Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993;6428- 442Google Scholar
26.
Goldmann  DAFreeman  JDurbin  WA  Jr Nosocomial infection and death in a neonatal intensive care unit.  J Infect Dis. 1983;147635- 641Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Nettleman  MD Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefits analysis in infection control. Wenzel  RPed. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections 3rd ed. Baltimore, Md Williams & Wilkins1997;19- 32Google Scholar
28.
Leu  HSKaiser  DLMori  MWoolson  RFWenzel  RP Hospital acquired pneumonia: attributable mortality and morbidity.  Am J Epidemiol. 1989;1291258- 1267Google Scholar
29.
Bauer  TMOfner  EJust  HMJust  HDaschner  FD An epidemiological study assessing the relative importance of airborne and direct contact transmission of microorganisms in a medical intensive care unit.  J Hosp Infect. 1990;15301- 309Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Courington  KRPatterson  SLHoward  RJ Universal precautions are not universally followed.  Arch Surg. 1991;12693- 97Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Dubbert  PMDolce  JRichter  WMiller  MChapman  SW Increasing ICU staff handwashing: effects of education and group feedback.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11191- 193Google ScholarCrossref
32.
McGuckin  MBello  SKhan  FPorten  LMazer  S Did you wash your hands? a handwashing education model for patients.  Paper presented at: 7th Annual Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America April 28,1997 St Louis, MoAbstract M63
33.
McGuckin  MWaterman  RCaruso  MKrug  EJuzaitis  BOstrawski  S Handwashing compliance: the effect of a patient eductaion program.  Paper presented at: 7th Annual Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America April 28,1997 St Louis, MoAbstract M64
34.
Voss  AWidmer  AF No time for handwashing!? handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance?  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997;18205- 208Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Kaplan  LMMcGuckin  M Increasing handwashing compliance with more accessible sinks.  Infect Control. 1986;7408- 410Google Scholar
36.
Pittet  DMourouga  PPerneger  TV Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital.  Ann Intern Med. 1999;130126- 130Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Donowitz  LG Handwashing technique in a pediatric intensive care unit.  Am J Dis Child. 1987;141683- 685Google Scholar
38.
Larson  ELBryan  JLAdler  LMBlane  C A multifaceted approach to changing handwashing behavior.  Am J Infect Control. 1997;253- 10Google ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
April 10, 2000

Handwashing Compliance by Health Care Workers: The Impact of Introducing an Accessible, Alcohol-Based Hand Antiseptic

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Quality Health Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Virginia Campus of Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Dr Bischoff is now with the Institute for Medical Microbiology, Medical School Hanover, Hanover, Germany.

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(7):1017-1021. doi:10.1001/archinte.160.7.1017
Abstract

Context  Under routine hospital conditions handwashing compliance of health care workers including nurses, physicians, and others (eg, physical therapists and radiologic technicians) is unacceptably low.

Objectives  To investigate the efficacy of an education/feedback intervention and patient awareness program (cognitive approach) on handwashing compliance of health care workers; and to compare the acceptance of a new and increasingly accessible alcohol-based waterless hand disinfectant (technical approach) with the standard sink/soap combination.

Design  A 6-month, prospective, observational study.

Setting  One medical intensive care unit (ICU), 1 cardiac surgery ICU, and 1 general medical ward located in a 728-bed, tertiary care, teaching facility.

Participants  Medical caregivers in each of the above settings.

Interventions  Implementation of an education/feedback intervention program (6 in-service sessions per each ICU) and patient awareness program, followed by a new, increasingly accessible, alcohol-based, waterless hand antiseptic agent, initially available at a ratio of 1 dispenser for every 4 patients and subsequently 1 for each patient.

Main Outcome Measure  Direct observation of handwashing for 1575 potential opportunities monitored over 120 hours randomized for both time of day and bed locations.

Results  Baseline handwashing compliance before and after defined events was 9% and 22% for health care workers in the medical ICU and 3% and 13% for health care workers in the cardiac surgery ICU, respectively. After the education/feedback intervention program, handwashing compliance changed little (medical ICU, 14% [before] and 25% [after]; cardiac surgery ICU, 6% [before] and 13% [after]). Observations after introduction of the new, increasingly accessible, alcohol-based, waterless hand antiseptic revealed significantly higher handwashing rates (P<.05), and handwashing compliance improved as accessibility was enhanced—before 19% and after 41% with 1 dispenser per 4 beds; and before 23% and after 48% with 1 dispenser for each bed.

Conclusions  Education/feedback intervention and patient awareness programs failed to improve handwashing compliance. However, introduction of easily accessible dispensers with an alcohol-based waterless handwashing antiseptic led to significantly higher handwashing rates among health care workers.

×