Background
Late-life depression affects physical health and impedes recovery from physical disability. But whether milder symptoms that occur frequently in the general population increase the risk of developing a disability or decrease the likelihood of recovery remains unclear.
Objective
To examine the effect of mild symptoms of depression, assessed by a reduced version (10 items, ranging from 0-10) of the Center for Epidemiological Studies–Depression Scale, on the course of physical disability, assessed by items from the Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale, the Rosow-Breslau Functional Health Scale, and the Nagi Index.
Methods
A population-based longitudinal study was conducted, with 6 follow-up interviews of 3434 community-dwelling persons aged 65 years and older in East Boston, Mass.
Results
The likelihood of becoming disabled increased with each additional symptom of depression (for the Katz measure: odds ratio, 1.16 per symptom; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.19; for the Rosow-Breslau measure: odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.16; and for the Nagi measure: odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.19). As the number of depressive symptoms increased, the likelihood of recovering from a physical disability decreased (for the Katz measure: odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.99; for the Rosow-Breslau measure: odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.89; and for the Nagi measure: odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.91). This effect was not accounted for by age, sex, level of educational attainment, body mass index, or chronic health conditions.
Conclusion
Mild depressive symptoms in older persons (those aged ≥65 years) are associated with an increased likelihood of becoming disabled and a decreased chance of recovery, regardless of age, sex, and other factors that contribute to physical disability.
IT IS generally accepted that persons who are in poor physical health are more likely to experience depression.1-4 The converse, whether depression leads to greater risk of physical disability, is less clear and requires careful longitudinal investigation to distinguish depression that precedes physical disability from depression that may be consequent to the disability. The results of several prospective studies5-17 suggest that late-life depression of clinical significance (major depression, minor depression, or depressive syndromes) may affect subsequent physical health or impede recovery from physical disability. Mild depressive symptoms are much more common than more severe depression among persons of all ages,18,19 but their importance for changes in physical health and disability remains unclear.20,21 This issue is especially relevant to the health of older persons, who are at the highest risk of disability22 and who experience mild depressive symptoms the most frequently.6 This study examined whether mild depressive symptoms predicted subsequent disability and recovery from disability during a 6-year period in a defined population of older persons (those aged ≥65 years).
The participants in this longitudinal, population-based study were 3809 persons aged 65 years and older, 85% of the age-eligible residents of East Boston, Mass (N = 4485), 1 of 4 centers of the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly program.23 Data were collected at an in-home interview at baseline in 1982 and at up to 6 annual follow-up interviews. The third and sixth interviews were also in the home, and the other interviews were by telephone.
Mild depressive symptoms that do not meet the diagnostic categories for major depression, minor depression, or depressive syndromes were measured at baseline with a reduced 10-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies–Depression Scale (CES-D).24,25Physical disability, defined as difficulty in performing daily activities that are necessary for functioning independently, was assessed annually using 3 modified self-report measures that emphasize different aspects of the disability process. Six items from the Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale26 assess the ability to perform basic self-care tasks (bathing, dressing, eating, toileting, walking across a room, and transferring from a bed to a chair). Three items from the Rosow-Breslau Functional Health Scale27 assess mobility and lower extremity strength (climbing stairs, walking 0.8 km, and doing heavy work around the house). Four items from the Nagi Index28 assess upper and lower extremity strength and basic motor functions (bending, stooping or crouching, reaching above the shoulders, writing or handling small objects, and pushing or pulling an object like a chair). The measures demonstrated high test-retest reliability in the East Boston study (≥0.77 over 3 weeks),29 confirming that they are sufficiently stable for use in longitudinal analyses. Using the 3 measures allowed us to examine the effect of depressive symptoms on related, but distinct, domains of late-life disability. Information on age, sex, years of educational attainment, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), chronic health conditions, and cognitive function was obtained at baseline. Each of these factors has been found to predict disability in previous research.
Disability is a process in elderly persons that follows a course that includes restoration and recovery. Models are needed, therefore, that capture disability development and recovery. Markov models30,31 were used in this study to examine the overall effect of depressive symptoms on the likelihood of a transition from a nondisabled state to disability and from disability to a nondisabled state (recovery) during 6 years of observation. These models calculate the probability of transitions within an annual interval and average the effect across all 5 yearly intervals. They also adjust for gaps of 1 or more years because of missing data, allow for within-person correlation in the likelihood of becoming disabled or recovering from disability, and account for death rather than treat death as missing data. Transitions from disability and nondisability to death are modeled separately within the same model. Conditional on survival of the interval and the disability status at the beginning of the interval, the model then calculates the probability of either developing disability or recovering from disability. The coefficients can be interpreted in the same way as those in logistic regression analyses. In our analysis, all models were adjusted for age and sex, and the assumptions about linearity, interactions, and time-invariance were examined analytically using residual plots.
Whether depressive symptoms contributed to changes in disability status was tested in 3 ways. First, we examined the gradient effect of the number of symptoms on disability transitions to determine if there was a change in risk with each additional symptom. Probabilities of becoming disabled and recovering from disability over the full range of the CES-D items were calculated from the models. Then we grouped the depressive symptoms (1-3, 4-6, and ≥7) and examined whether risk of change in disability status was different for each group, relative to the referent category of having no symptoms. Last, we examined whether, compared with those reporting no symptoms, persons with even low levels of depressive symptoms experienced a change in the risk of developing a disability or recovering from a disability. The level of depressive symptoms was represented with individual indicators for consecutive numbers of depressive symptoms (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and ≥7).
We next examined the possibility that the effect of depressive symptoms on disability transitions was attributable in part to lower educational attainment, higher or lower body mass index, or the presence of chronic health conditions among those reporting more symptoms. A summary measure of 7 chronic health conditions (hypertension, chronic joint pain, diabetes, cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hip fracture) was constructed, representing major medical conditions that are significantly disabling among older persons. Finally, because we were concerned about the validity of self-report data among persons with significant cognitive impairment, we repeated the models after excluding those with poor memory performance, defined as those making 4 or more errors on immediate recall and 6 errors on delayed recall of the East Boston Memory Test.32
Participant characteristics
Of the 3809 participants, 3434 (90.2%) had data on baseline depressive symptoms and on at least 1 of the physical function measures for 2 or more years, permitting inclusion in the analysis (Table 1). At baseline, the number of depressive symptoms was associated with disability, older age, female sex, and the presence of chronic health conditions (P≤.001). During follow-up, at least 1 change of disability status was experienced by 1107 persons on the Katz measure, by 1744 persons on the Rosow-Breslau measure, and by 1672 persons on the Nagi measure.
Likelihood of becoming disabled
Examining the gradient effect of the number of symptoms on disability status showed that the risk of becoming disabled during each annual interval was affected by age, sex, and baseline level of depressive symptoms. For women at the youngest age in the study (65 years), the estimated probability of becoming disabled was fairly small: 3% on the Katz measure, 12% on the Rosow-Breslau measure, and 11% on the Nagi measure. For each additional year of age, the likelihood of becoming disabled increased by 9% for the Katz measure, 11% for the Rosow-Breslau measure, and 8% for the Nagi measure (Table 2). Men were 18% less likely to become disabled than women for the Rosow-Breslau measure and 41% less likely to become disabled than women for the Nagi measure. Depressive symptoms contributed substantially and independently to the risk of disability. For each depressive symptom, the likelihood of disability increased by 16% for the Katz measure, by 14% for the Rosow-Breslau measure, and by 17% for the Nagi measure. The models with grouped depressive symptoms indicated that the likelihood of disability steadily increased with increasing numbers of depressive symptoms on all 3 measures (Table 3). Figure 1 and Figure 2 summarize the annual probability of becoming disabled for a 65-, a 75-, and an 85-year-old woman and man, respectively. The models with individual indicators for number of symptoms (data not shown) indicated that, compared with having no symptoms, the presence of even 1 depressive symptom significantly (P≤.001) increased disability risk on the Rosow-Breslau measure (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.38) and the Nagi measure (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.46).
Likelihood of recovering from a disability
Recovery from a disability was frequent. The probability of recovering by the next year in the youngest women (aged 65 years) was 50% for the Katz measure, 32% for the Rosow-Breslau measure, and 38% for the Nagi measure. The likelihood of recovery was 25% higher for men on the Rosow-Breslau measure and 40% higher for men on the Nagi measure (P≤.001) (Table 4). For men and women, the likelihood of recovery on each of the 3 measures decreased by 3% to 6% with every year of age. Depressive symptoms contributed independently to a reduction in the likelihood of recovery. The likelihood of recovering decreased by 4% to 14% for every additional depressive symptom on the 3 measures; this effect was independent of the effects of sex and age. The analysis of the grouped number of symptoms also indicated that recovery was impaired with increasing numbers of depressive symptoms on the Rosow-Breslau and Nagi measures (Table 3). Figure 3 and Figure 4 summarize the annual probability of recovering for a 65-, a 75-, and an 85-year-old woman and man, respectively. The models with individual indicators for number of depressive symptoms showed that even 1 symptom impaired recovery on the Rosow-Breslau measure (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.92) (data not shown).
An examination of the interaction effects of age and sex on the relation between depressive symptoms and disability showed that mild depressive symptoms equally affected the probability of developing or recovering from a disability for men and women and across all age groups. Educational level and body mass index did not alter the effect of depressive symptoms on disability transitions. Chronic health conditions explained about 16% (range, 7%-25%) of the association of depressive symptoms with changes in disability. As expected, coefficients for depressive symptoms were reduced but remained significant (P≤.001). Only the effect on recovery from disability according to the Katz measure was reduced to a nonsignificant level (P = .08). Examining the effect of each chronic condition separately did not appreciably change the effect of depressive symptoms on change in disability status.
The results of omitting poor memory performers on the East Boston Memory Test indicated that the effect of depressive symptoms on disability status was not an artifact of significant cognitive impairment. Because information about disability in subsequent years was obtained from proxies in some cases, we restricted the analysis to self-reported disability, and the findings were essentially unchanged.
The results of this study suggest that depressive symptoms significantly affect the risk of becoming disabled or remaining disabled (not recovering) across the entire range of symptoms in community-living older adults. These effects are largely independent of factors that contribute to physical disability: level of educational attainment,5,33-37 body mass index,33,35,38 chronic health conditions,22 and significant cognitive impairment.39 The results also suggest that even low levels of depressive symptoms at baseline may impair daily function 6 years later.
The co-occurrence of disability and depression has been recognized in several cross-sectional studies40-43 and is usually thought to represent depressed mood due to the burdens of chronic disease and disability. Investigating the opposite relation, whether depression leads to impaired physical function, has been difficult, especially because it requires longitudinal studies of substantial duration to be sure that one is not observing merely the coincidence of chronic disease and depressed mood. Several longitudinal studies5,6,8,12-17 have reported that more severe forms of depression lead to increased risk of subsequent disability. Small studies9-11 have found that clinical depression decreases the chances of recovery. The relation of mild depressive symptoms to subsequent disability has been examined infrequently.6,20 Broadhead and colleagues6 found that persons with 2 or more symptoms of depression had 1.55 times greater risk of disability at 1-year follow-up than asymptomatic persons. Bruce and colleagues20 studied high-functioning adults aged 70 through 79 years and found that mild depressive symptoms predicted disability at 2.5 years of follow-up.
The central strengths of the study are use of data from a carefully defined population of older persons, a large sample size, and long duration of follow-up, with annual measurement of disability status. The relation of depressive symptoms and disability has been studied previously in the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly population.16,21 Our analysis differs from those analyses in 2 important ways. First, we focused on the entire range of depressive symptoms, not just on the most severe symptom levels. Second, we examined the development of disability and recovery from disability simultaneously to understand more completely the role of depressive symptoms in the disability process. As is typical in population-based, epidemiological studies, our measure of chronic health conditions was imperfect, as it relied on self-reports of previously diagnosed conditions and lacked detail on the severity of disease. However, the findings appear reasonably robust and suggest that the effect of mild depressive symptoms on changes in disability status is mostly independent of underlying physical health status. It is unlikely that nonresponse bias limits the interpretation of the study's results. A separate analysis showed that approximately 13% of the nonparticipants resembled participants in demographic, health, and social characteristics.44 Using the shorter form of the CES-D may have compromised the results. However, the 10-item form used in this study is strongly correlated with the original CES-D (r = 0.88).24 Internal consistency reliability of the 10-item form (Cronbach α = .80) is comparable to internal consistency estimates of the original CES-D (Cronbach α = .80-.90).24,40 The 20-item CES-D and the modified shorter versions are robust in samples of community-living older adults.45
The mechanisms by which depressive symptoms may lead to disability remain undefined. Feelings of discouragement and hopelessness may reduce willingness to attempt tasks that a person is otherwise capable of performing. Depressed feelings may interfere with maintaining proper nutrition and participating in health promotion and maintenance activities.
Disability is a major public health problem that greatly affects the quality of older persons' lives and requires substantial health care expenditures. Mild depressive symptoms are common and potentially responsive to low-risk interventions, such as supportive therapy and other psychosocial interventions.46 Trials of rigorous design and adequate size to investigate whether such interventions lower the risk of disability deserve serious consideration.
Accepted for publication February 11, 2000.
This study was supported by the American Association of Retired Persons' Andrus Foundation, and by contract N01-AG-02107 from the National Institute on Aging, Washington, DC.
We thank Charles Owen, MA, and Gita Ramnarayan, MS, for their help with statistical programming for the study.
Corresponding author: Diane Cronin-Stubbs, PhD, RN, FAAN, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611. Reprints: Denis A. Evans, MD, Rush Institute for Healthy Aging, 1645 W Jackson Blvd, Suite 675, Chicago, IL 60612.
1.Beekman
ATFDeeg
DJHSmith
JHvan Tilburg
W Predicting the course of depression in the older population: results from a community-based study in the Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 1995;3441- 49
Google ScholarCrossref 2.Kennedy
GJKelman
HRThomas
C The emergence of depressive symptoms in late life: the importance of declining health and increasing disability.
J Community Health. 1990;1593- 104
Google ScholarCrossref 3.Phifer
JFMurrell
SA Etiologic factors in the onset of depressive symptoms in older adults.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1986;95282- 291
Google ScholarCrossref 4.Prince
MJHarwood
RHThomas
AMann
AH A prospective population-based cohort study of the effects of disablement and social milieu on the onset and maintenance of late-life depression: the Gospel Oak Project.
Psychol Med. 1998;28337- 350
Google ScholarCrossref 5.Armenian
HKPratt
LAGallo
JEaton
WW Psychopathology as a predictor of disability: a population-based follow-up study in Baltimore, Maryland.
Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148269- 275
Google ScholarCrossref 6.Broadhead
WEBlazer
DGGeorge
LKTse
CK Depression, disability days, and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiologic survey.
JAMA. 1990;2642524- 2528
Google ScholarCrossref 7.Klerman
GLWeissman
MM The course, morbidity, and costs of depression.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49831- 834
Google ScholarCrossref 8.Von Korff
MOrmel
JKaton
JLin
EHB Disability and depression among high utilizers of health care.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;4991- 100
Google ScholarCrossref 9.Cummings
SRPhillips
SLWheat
ME
et al. Recovery of function after hip fracture.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988;36801- 806
Google Scholar 10.Mossey
JMKnott
KCraik
R The effects of persistent depressive symptoms on hip fracture recovery.
J Gerontol. 1990;45M163- M168
Google ScholarCrossref 11.Parikh
RJRobinson
RGLipsey
JRStarkstein
SEFedoroff
JPPrice
TR The impact of poststroke depression on recovery in activities of daily living over a 2-year follow-up.
Arch Neurol. 1990;47785- 789
Google ScholarCrossref 12.Gallo
JJRabins
PVLyketsos
CGTien
AYAnthony
JC Depression without sadness: functional outcomes of nondysphoric depression in later life.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45570- 578
Google Scholar 13.Ormel
JVon Korff
Mvanden Brink
WKaton
WBrilman
EOldehinkel
T Depression, anxiety, and disability show synchrony of change.
Am J Public Health. 1993;83385- 390
Google ScholarCrossref 14.Kouzis
ACEaton
WW Psychopathology and the development of disability.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997;32379- 386
Google Scholar 15.Morris
PLPRaphael
BRobinson
RG Clinical depression is associated with impaired recovery from stroke.
Med J Aust. 1992;157239- 242
Google Scholar 16.Penninx
BWJHLeveille
SFerrucci
Lvan Eijk
JTMGuralnik
JM Exploring the effect of depression on physical disability: longitudinal evidence from the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly.
Am J Public Health. 1999;891346- 1352
Google ScholarCrossref 17.Turner
RJNoh
S Physical disability and depression: a longitudinal analysis.
J Health Soc Behav. 1988;2923- 37
Google ScholarCrossref 18.Hays
RDWells
KBSherbourne
CD
et al. Functioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared with chronic general medical illness.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;5211- 19
Google ScholarCrossref 20.Bruce
MLSeeman
TEMerrill
SSBlazer
DG The impact of depressive symptomatology on physical disability: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging.
Am J Public Health. 1994;841796- 1799
Google ScholarCrossref 21.Penninx
BWJHGuralnik
JMFerrucci
LSimonsick
EMDeeg
DJHWallance
RB Depressive symptoms and physical decline in community-dwelling older persons.
JAMA. 1998;2791720- 1726
Google ScholarCrossref 22.Guralnik
JMFried
LPSalive
ME Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population.
Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;1725- 46
Google ScholarCrossref 23.Cornoni-Huntley
JedBrock
DBedOstfeld
AedTaylor
JOedWallace
RBed Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly Bethesda, Md: Resource Data Book.
National Institutes of Health 1986;NIH publication 86-2443
Google Scholar 24.Kohout
FJBerkman
LFEvans
DCornoni-Huntley
J Two shorter forms of the CES-D Depression Symptoms Index.
J Aging Health. 1993;5179- 193
Google ScholarCrossref 25.Radloff
LS The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population.
Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1385- 401
Google ScholarCrossref 28.Nagi
SZ An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1976;54439- 468
Google ScholarCrossref 29.Smith
LBranch
LGScherr
PA
et al. Short-term variability of measures of physical function in older people.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38993- 998
Google Scholar 30.Muenz
LRRubinstein
LV Markov models for covariate dependence of binary sequences.
Biometrics. 1985;4191- 101
Google ScholarCrossref 31.Beckett
LABrock
DBLemke
JH
et al. Analysis of change in self-reported physical function among older persons in four population studies.
Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143766- 778
Google ScholarCrossref 32.Albert
MSmith
LAScherr
PATaylor
JOEvans
DAFunkenstein
HH Use of brief cognitive tests to identify individuals in the community with clinical diagnosed Alzheimer's disease.
Int J Neurosci. 1991;57167- 178
Google ScholarCrossref 33.DiPietro
LAnda
RFWilliamson
DFStunkard
AJ Depressive symptoms and weight change in a national cohort of adults.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992;16745- 753
Google Scholar 34.Guralnik
JMLaCroix
AZAbbott
RD
et al. Maintaining mobility in late life, I: demographic characteristics and chronic conditions.
Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137845- 857
Google Scholar 35.Launer
LJHarris
TRumpel
CMadans
J Body mass index, weight change, and risk of mobility disability in middle-aged and older women.
JAMA. 1994;2711093- 1098
Google ScholarCrossref 36.Leveille
SGLaCroix
AZHecht
JAGrothaus
LCWagner
EH The cost of disability in older women and opportunities for prevention.
J Womens Health. 1992;153- 61
Google ScholarCrossref 37.Snowdon
DAOstwald
SKKane
RL Education, survival and independence in elderly catholic sisters, 1936-1988.
Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130999- 1012
Google Scholar 38.Galanos
ANPieper
CFCornoni-Huntley
JCBales
CWFillenbaun
CG Nutrition and function: is there a relationship between body mass index and the functional capabilities of community-dwelling elderly?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42368- 373
Google Scholar 39.Moritz
DJKasl
SVBerkman
LF Cognitive functioning and the incidence of limitations in activities of daily living in an elderly community sample.
Am J Epidemiol. 1995;14141- 49
Google Scholar 40.Berkman
LFBerkman
CSKasl
S
et al. Depressive symptoms in relation to physical health and functioning in the elderly.
Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124372- 388
Google Scholar 41.Blazer
DBurchett
BService
CGeorge
LK The association of age and depression among the elderly: an epidemiologic exploration.
J Gerontol. 1991;46M210- M215
Google ScholarCrossref 42.Gurland
BJWilder
DEBerkman
C Depression and disability in the elderly: reciprocal relations and changes with age.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1988;3163- 179
Google ScholarCrossref 43.Wells
KBStewart
AHays
RD
et al. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.
JAMA. 1989;262914- 919
Google ScholarCrossref 44.Adams
MEScherr
PABranch
LG
et al. A comparison of elderly participants in a community survey with nonparticipants.
Public Health Rep. 1999;105617- 622
Google Scholar 45.O'Hara
MWKohout
FJWallace
RB Depression among the rural elderly: a study of prevalence and correlates.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1985;173582- 589
Google ScholarCrossref 46.Scogin
FMcElreath
L Efficacy of psychosocial treatments for geriatric depression: a quantitative review.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;6269- 74
Google ScholarCrossref