[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1. 
C1 esterase inhibitor prevents autoactivation of complement component C1, thus keeping the classic complement pathway quiescent. MAC indicates membrane attack complex.

C1 esterase inhibitor prevents autoactivation of complement component C1, thus keeping the classic complement pathway quiescent. MAC indicates membrane attack complex.

Figure 2. 
C1 esterase inhibitor inactivates factors XIIa and XIIf, plasmin, and kallikrein, thus preventing bradykinin production.

C1 esterase inhibitor inactivates factors XIIa and XIIf, plasmin, and kallikrein, thus preventing bradykinin production.

Figure 3. 
C1 esterase inhibitor modulates complement and contact (kallikrein-kinin) system activation, thus preventing bradykinin release and symptoms of hereditary angioedema. HMWK indicates high-molecular-weight kininogen; MAC, membrane attack complex.

C1 esterase inhibitor modulates complement and contact (kallikrein-kinin) system activation, thus preventing bradykinin release and symptoms of hereditary angioedema. HMWK indicates high-molecular-weight kininogen; MAC, membrane attack complex.

Table 1. 
Cases of Gastrointestinal Tract Angioedema Related to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor Therapy in the English-Language Literature*
Cases of Gastrointestinal Tract Angioedema Related to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor Therapy in the English-Language Literature*
Table 2. 
Classification and Distinguishing Features of Hereditary and Acquired Angioedema*
Classification and Distinguishing Features of Hereditary and Acquired Angioedema*
1.
Hedner  TSamuelsson  OLunde  HLindholm  LAndren  LWiholm  BE Angioedema in relation to treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.  BMJ. 1992;304941- 946Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Bork  KBarnstedt  SKoch  PTraupe  H Hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor activity in women.  Lancet. 2000;356213- 217Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Cicardi  MAgostini  A Hereditary angioedema.  N Engl J Med. 1996;3341666- 1667Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Quincke  H Über akutes umschriebenes Hautodem.  Monatsh Prakt Dermatol. 1882;1129- 131Google Scholar
5.
Osler  W Hereditary angioneurotic oedema.  Am J Med Sci. 1888;95362- 367Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Donaldson  VHEvans  RR A biochemical abnormality in hereditary angioneurotic edema: absence of serum inhibitor of C1-esterase.  Am J Med. 1963;3537- 44Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Borum  MLHoward  DE Hereditary angioedema: complex symptoms can make diagnosis difficult.  Postgrad Med. 1998;103 (251) 255- 256Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Cunningham  DSJensen  JT Hereditary angioneurotic edema in the puerperium: a case report.  J Reprod Med. 1991;36312- 313Google Scholar
9.
Frank  MMGelfand  JAAtkinson  JP Hereditary angioedema: the clinical syndrome and its management.  Ann Intern Med. 1976;84580- 593Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Sofia  SCasali  ABolondi  L Sonographic findings in abdominal hereditary angioedema.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1999;27537- 540Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Bork  KSiedlecki  KBosch  SSchopf  RKreuz  W Asphyxiation by laryngeal edema in patients with hereditary angioedema.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75349- 354Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Bork  K Hypovolemic shock caused by ascites in hereditary angioedema [in German].  Med Klin. 1998;93554Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Heymann  WR Acquired angioedema.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36611- 615Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Krause  KHRentrop  UMehregan  U Cerebral manifestations in angioneurotic edema [author's translation; in German].  J Neurol Sci. 1979;42429- 435Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Brettle  RPDunmow  REMilne  LAYap  PL Angioneurotic oedema in the elderly.  Scott Med J. 1982;27309- 311Google Scholar
16.
Thorvaldsson  SESedlack  REGleich  GJRuddy  SJ Angioneurotic edema and deficiency of C′1 esterase inhibitor in a 61-year-old woman.  Ann Intern Med. 1969;71353- 357Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Landerman  NS Hereditary angioneurotic edema.  J Allergy. 1962;33316- 329Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Ogston  DWalker  JCampbell  DM C1 inactivator level in pregnancy.  Thromb Res. 1981;23453- 455Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Cohen  AJLaskin  CTarlo  S C1 esterase inhibitor in pregnancy.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;90412- 413Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Nielsen  EWGran  JTStraume  BMellbye  OJJohansen  HTMollnes  TE Hereditary angio-oedema: new clinical observations and autoimmune screening, complement and kallikrein-kinin analyses.  J Intern Med. 1996;239119- 130Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Halbmayer  WMHopmeier  PMannhalter  C  et al.  C1-esterase inhibitor in uncomplicated pregnancy and mild and moderate preeclampsia.  Thromb Haemost. 1991;65134- 138Google Scholar
22.
Davis  AE C1 inhibitor and hereditary angioneurotic edema.  Annu Rev Immunol. 1988;6595- 628Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Frank  MM Urticaria and angioedema. Goldman  LBennett  JC Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 21st ed. Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co2000;1440- 1445Google Scholar
24.
Talavera  ALarraona  JLRamos  JL  et al.  Hereditary angioedema: an infrequent cause of abdominal pain with ascites.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90471- 474Google Scholar
25.
Oltvai  ZNWong  ECCAtkinson  JPTung  KSK C1-inhibitor deficiency: molecular and immunological basis of hereditary and acquired angioedema.  Lab Invest. 1991;65381- 388Google Scholar
26.
Zuraw  BLLotz  M Regulation of the hepatic synthesis of C1 inhibitor by the hepatocyte stimulating factors interleukin 6 and interferon gamma.  J Biol Chem. 1990;26512664- 12670Google Scholar
27.
Falus  ARokita  HWalcz  EBrozik  MHidvegi  TMeretey  K Hormonal regulation of complement biosynthesis in human cell lines, II: upregulation of the biosynthesis of complement components C3, factor B and C1 inhibitor by interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 in human hepatoma cell line.  Mol Immunol. 1990;27197- 201Google ScholarCrossref
28.
Dobo  JGal  PSzilagyi  K  et al.  One active C1r subunit is sufficient for the activity of the complement C1 complex: stabilization of C1r in the zymogen form by point mutations.  J Immunol. 1999;1621108- 1112Google Scholar
29.
Ziccardi  RJ Spontaneous activation of the first component of human complement (C1) by an intramolecular autocatalytic mechanism.  J Immunol. 1982;1282500- 2504Google Scholar
30.
Ziccardi  RJ A new role for C1-inhibitor in homeostasis: control of activation of the first component of human complement.  J Immunol. 1982;1282505- 2508Google Scholar
31.
Ziccardi  RJ The first component of human complement (C1): activation and control.  Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1983;6213- 230Google Scholar
32.
Bianchino  ACPoon  PHSchumaker  VN A mechanism for the spontaneous activation of the first component of complement, C1, and its regulation by C1 inhibitor.  J Immunol. 1988;1413930- 3936Google Scholar
33.
Colman  RWSchmaier  AH Contact system: a vascular biology modulator with anticoagulant, profibrinolytic, antiadhesive, and proinflammatory attributes.  Blood. 1997;903819- 3843Google Scholar
34.
Grunewald  T Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency [letter].  Ann Intern Med. 2000;133837Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Nussberger  JCugno  MAmstutz  CCicardi  MPellacani  AAgostoni  A Plasma bradykinin in angio-oedema.  Lancet. 1998;3511693- 1697Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Nussberger  JCugno  MCicardi  MAgostini  A Local bradykinin generation in hereditary angioedema.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;1041321- 1322Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Cugno  MCicardi  MBottaso  B  et al.  Activation of the coagulation cascade in C1-inhibitor deficiencies.  Blood. 1997;893213- 3218Google Scholar
38.
Shoemaker  LRSchurman  SJDonaldson  VHDavis  AE Hereditary angioneurotic edema: characterization of plasma kinin and vascular permeability–enhancing activities.  Clin Exp Immunol. 1994;9522- 28Google ScholarCrossref
39.
Curd  JGPrograis  LJCochrane  CG Detection of active kallikrein in induced blister fluids of hereditary angioedema patients.  J Exp Med. 1980;152742- 747Google ScholarCrossref
40.
Schapira  MSilver  LDScott  CF  et al.  Prekallikrein activation and high-molecular-weight kininogen consumption in hereditary angioedema.  N Engl J Med. 1983;3081050- 1053Google ScholarCrossref
41.
Nielsen  EWJohansen  HTGaudesen  O  et al.  C3 is activated in hereditary angioedema, and C1/C1-inhibitor complexes rise during physical stress in untreated patients.  Scand J Immunol. 1995;42679- 685Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Brickman  CMFrank  MMKaliner  M Urine-histamine levels in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE).  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988;82403- 406Google ScholarCrossref
43.
Carpenter  CBRuddy  SShehadeh  IHMuller-Eberhard  HJMerrill  JPAusten  KF Complement metabolism in man: hypercatabolism of the fourth (C4) and third (C3) components in patients with renal allograft rejection and hereditary angioedema (HAE).  J Clin Invest. 1969;481495- 1505Google ScholarCrossref
44.
Donaldson  VHHess  EVMcAdams  AJ Lupus-erythematosus–like disease in three unrelated women with hereditary angioneurotic edema.  Ann Intern Med. 1977;86312- 313Google ScholarCrossref
45.
Brickman  CMTsokos  GCBalow  JE  et al.  Immunoregulatory disorders associated with hereditary angioedema, I: clinical manifestations of autoimmune disease.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;77749- 757Google ScholarCrossref
46.
Pacheco  TRWeston  WLGiclas  PC Three generations of patients with lupus erythematosus and hereditary angioedema.  Am J Med. 2000;109256- 257Google ScholarCrossref
47.
Theriault  AWhaley  KMcPhaden  ARBoyd  EConnor  JM Regional assignment of the human C1-inhibitor gene to 11q11-q13.1.  Hum Genet. 1990;84477- 479Google ScholarCrossref
48.
Carter  PEDunbar  BFothergill  JE Genomic and cDNA cloning of the human C1 inhibitor: intron-exon junctions and comparison with other serpins.  Eur J Biochem. 1988;173163- 169Google ScholarCrossref
49.
Eck  SLMorse  JHJanssen  DAEmerson  SGMarkovitz  DM Angioedema presenting as chronic gastrointestinal symptoms.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88436- 439Google Scholar
50.
Agostini  ACicardi  M Hereditary and acquired C-1 inhibitor deficiency: biological and clinical characteristics in 235 patients.  Medicine (Baltimore). 1992;71206- 215Google Scholar
51.
Zuraw  BLHerschbach  BA Detection of C1 inhibitor mutations in patients with hereditary angioedema.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105541- 546Google ScholarCrossref
52.
Aulak  KSPemberton  PARosen  FSCarrell  RWLachmann  PJHarrison  RA Dysfunctional C1-inhibitor(At), isolated from a type II hereditary angio-oedema plasma, contains a P1 "reactive centre" (Arg444 → His) mutation.  Biochem J. 1988;253615- 618Google Scholar
53.
Parad  RBKramer  JStrunk  RCRosen  FSDavis  AE Dysfunctional C1 inhibitor Ta: deletion of Lys-251 results in acquisition of an N-glycosylation site.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;876786- 6790Google ScholarCrossref
54.
Levy  NJRamesh  NCicardi  MHarrison  PADavis  AE Type II hereditary angioneurotic edema that may result from a single nucleotide change in the codon for alanine-436 in the C1 inhibitor gene.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87265- 268Google ScholarCrossref
55.
Tosi  M Molecular genetics of C1 inhibitor.  Immunobiology. 1998;199358- 365Google ScholarCrossref
56.
Quastel  MHarrison  RCicardi  MAlper  CARosen  FS Behavior in vivo of normal and dysfunctional C1 inhibitor in normal subjects and patients with hereditary angioneurotic edema.  J Clin Invest. 1983;711041- 1046Google ScholarCrossref
57.
Melamed  JAlper  CACicardi  MRosen  FS The metabolism of C1 inhibitor and C1q in patients with acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;77322- 326Google ScholarCrossref
58.
Farkas  HCsepregi  ANemesanszky  E  et al.  Acquired angioedema associated with chronic hepatitis C.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103711- 712Google ScholarCrossref
59.
Grace  RJJacob  AMainwaring  CJMcVerry  BA Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency as manifestation of T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder [letter].  Lancet. 1990;336118Google ScholarCrossref
60.
Markovic  SNInwards  DJFrigas  EAPhyliky  RP Acquired C1 esterase deficiency.  Ann Intern Med. 2000;132144- 150Google ScholarCrossref
61.
Jackson  JSim  RBWhelan  AFeighery  C An IgG autoantibody which inactivates C1-inhibitor.  Nature. 1986;323722- 724Google ScholarCrossref
62.
Laurent  JGuinnepain  MT Angioedema associated with C1 inhibitor deficiency.  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 1999;17513- 523Google ScholarCrossref
63.
Csepregi  ANemesanszky  E Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency.  Ann Intern Med. 2000;133838- 839Google ScholarCrossref
64.
Chase  MPFiarman  GSScholz  FJMacDermott  RP Angioedema of the small bowel due to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;31254- 257Google ScholarCrossref
65.
Byrne  TJDouglas  DDLandis  MEHeppell  JP Isolated visceral angioedema: an underdiagnosed complication of ACE inhibitors?  Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;751201- 1204Google ScholarCrossref
66.
Farraye  FAPeppercorn  MASteer  MLJoffe  NRees  M Acute small-bowel mucosal edema following enalapril use [letter].  JAMA. 1988;2593131Google ScholarCrossref
67.
Mullins  RJShanahan  TMDobson  RT Visceral angioedema related to treatment with an ACE inhibitor.  Med J Aust. 1996;165319- 321Google Scholar
68.
Abdelmalek  MFDouglas  DD Lisinopril-induced isolated visceral angioedema: review of ACE-inhibitor–induced small bowel angioedema.  Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42847- 850Google ScholarCrossref
69.
Matsumura  MHaruki  KKajinami  KTakada  T Angioedema likely related to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.  Intern Med. 1993;32424- 426Google ScholarCrossref
70.
Jacobs  RLHoberman  LJGoldstein  HM Angioedema of the small bowel caused by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89127- 128Google Scholar
71.
Guy  CCathebras  PRousset  H Suspected angioedema of abdominal viscera [letter].  Ann Intern Med. 1994;121900Google ScholarCrossref
72.
Gregory  KWDavis  RC Andioedema of the intestine.  N Engl J Med. 1996;3341641Google ScholarCrossref
73.
Skidgel  RAErdös  EG Cleavage of peptide bonds by angiotensin I converting enzyme.  Agents Actions Suppl. 1987;22289- 296Google Scholar
74.
Slater  EEMerrill  DDGuess  HA  et al.  Clinical profile of angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.  JAMA. 1988;260967- 970Google ScholarCrossref
75.
Israili  ZHall  D Cough and angioneurotic edema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: a review of the literature and pathophysiology.  Ann Intern Med. 1992;117234- 242Google ScholarCrossref
76.
Inman  WHRawson  NSWilton  LVPearce  GLSpeirs  CJ Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril. I: results of prescription-event monitoring.  BMJ. 1988;297826- 829Google ScholarCrossref
77.
Jain  MArmstrong  LHall  J Predisposition to and late onset of upper airway obstruction following angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.  Chest. 1992;102 ((3)) 871- 874Google ScholarCrossref
78.
Kaplan  AP Urticaria and angioedema. Middleton  EEllis  EFYunginger  JWReed  CEAdkinson  NFBusse  WW Allergy Principles & Practice. 5th ed. St Louis, Mo Mosby–Year Book Inc1998;1104- 1122Google Scholar
79.
Shinzato  TNakamura  HKuniyoshi  T  et al.  Hereditary angioedema: a case with ascites yet no symptoms in the family.  Intern Med. 1992;31633- 635Google ScholarCrossref
80.
Nzeako  UCFrigas  ETremaine  WJ Hereditary angioedema as a cause of transient abdominal pain: case report and literature review.  J Clin Gastroenterol. Google Scholar
81.
Nielsen  WEJohansen  HTStraume  BMollnes  TE Effect of time, temperature and additives on a functional assay of C1 inhibitor.  J Immunol Methods. 1994;173245- 251Google ScholarCrossref
82.
Hara  TShiotani  AMatsunaka  H  et al.  Hereditary angioedema with gastrointestinal involvement: endoscopic appearance.  Endoscopy. 1999;31322- 324Google ScholarCrossref
83.
Molina  CBrun  JCoulet  MBetail  GWahl  DHartmann  L Diagnostic and therapeutic problems associated with hereditary deficiency of the C1 esterase inhibitor.  Clin Allergy. 1977;7127- 135Google ScholarCrossref
84.
Waytes  ATRosen  FSFrank  MM Treatment of hereditary angioedema with a vapor-heated C1 inhibitor concentrate.  N Engl J Med. 1996;3341630- 1634Google ScholarCrossref
85.
Alsenz  JLambris  JDBork  KLoos  M Acquired C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency type II: replacement therapy with C1-INH and analysis of patients' C1-INH and anti-C1-INH autoantibodies.  J Clin Invest. 1989;831794- 1799Google ScholarCrossref
86.
Markovic  SNInwards  DJFrigas  EPhyliky  RP Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency.  Ann Intern Med. 2000;132144- 150Google ScholarCrossref
87.
Sheffer  ALFearon  DTAusten  KF Clinical and biochemical effects of stanozolol therapy for hereditary angioedema.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981;68181- 187Google ScholarCrossref
88.
Gelfand  JASherins  RJAlling  DWFrank  MM Treatment of hereditary angioedema with danazol: reversal of clinical and biochemical abnormalities.  N Engl J Med. 1976;2951444- 1448Google ScholarCrossref
89.
Castaldo  AJ The case for oxandrolone (OxandrineTM) as an alternative for preventing attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE). Available at: http://www.hereditaryangioedema.com/oxscott.htm. Accessed December 8, 2000
90.
Agostini  ACicardi  M Hereditary and acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency: biological and clinical characteristics in 235 patients.  Medicine (Baltimore). 1992;71206- 215Google Scholar
91.
Cicardi  MCastelli  RZingale  LCAgostini  A Side effects of long-term prophylaxis with attenuated androgens in hereditary angioedema: comparison of treated and untreated patients.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99194- 196Google ScholarCrossref
92.
Bork  KPitton  MHarten  PKoch  P Hepatocellular adenomas in patients taking danazol for hereditary angio-oedema.  Lancet. 1999;3531066- 1067Google ScholarCrossref
93.
Crampon  DBarnoud  RDurand  M  et al.  Danazol therapy: an unusual aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma.  J Hepatol. 1998;291035- 1036Google ScholarCrossref
94.
Cicardi  MBisiani  GCugno  MSpath  PAgostini  A Autoimmune C1 inhibitor deficiency: report of eight patients.  Am J Med. 1993;95169- 175Google ScholarCrossref
95.
Cugno  MCicardi  MAgostini  A Activation of the contact system and fibrinolysis in autoimmune acquired angioedema: a rationale for prophylactic use of tranexamic acid.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994;93870- 876Google ScholarCrossref
96.
Nomura  HTsugawa  YKoni  I  et al.  Hereditary angioedema complicated with chronic renal failure: report of sibling cases.  Intern Med. 1992;3194- 97Google ScholarCrossref
97.
Ewald  GAEisenberg  PR Plasmin-mediated activation of contact system in response to pharmacological thrombolysis.  Circulation. 1995;9128- 36Google ScholarCrossref
98.
Lynch  MPentecost  BLLittler  WAStockley  RA Why do patients develop reactions to streptokinase?  Clin Exp Immunol. 1993;94279- 285Google ScholarCrossref
99.
Francis  CWBrenner  BLeddy  JPMarger  VJ Angioedema during therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.  Br J Haematol. 1991;77562- 563Google Scholar
100.
Rais  MUnzeitig  JGrant  JA Refractory exacerbations of hereditary angioedema with associated Helicobacter pylori infection.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103713- 714Google ScholarCrossref
Review
November 12, 2001

Hereditary Angioedema: A Broad Review for Clinicians

Author Affiliations

From the Divisions of Gastroenterology (Drs Nzeako and Tremaine), Hepatology (Drs Nzeako and Tremaine), and Allergy (Dr Frigas), Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minn.

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(20):2417-2429. doi:10.1001/archinte.161.20.2417
Abstract

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant disease that afflicts 1 in 10 000 to 1 in 150 000 persons; HAE has been reported in all races, and no sex predominance has been found. It manifests as recurrent attacks of intense, massive, localized edema without concomitant pruritus, often resulting from one of several known triggers. However, attacks can occur in the absence of any identifiable initiating event. Historically, 2 types of HAE have been described. However, a variant, possibly X-linked, inherited angioedema has recently been described, and tentatively it has been named "type 3" HAE. Signs and symptoms are identical in all types of HAE. Skin and visceral organs may be involved by the typically massive local edema. The most commonly involved viscera are the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. Involvement of the upper airways can result in severe life-threatening symptoms, including the risk of asphyxiation, unless appropriate interventions are taken. Quantitative and functional analyses of C1 esterase inhibitor and complement components C4 and C1q should be performed when HAE is suspected. Acute exacerbations of the disease should be treated with intravenous purified C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate, where available. Intravenous administration of fresh frozen plasma is also useful in acute HAE; however, it occasionally exacerbates symptoms. Corticosteroids, antihistamines, and epinephrine can be useful adjuncts but typically are not efficacious in aborting acute attacks. Prophylactic management involves long-term use of attenuated androgens or antifibrinolytic agents. Clinicians should keep this disorder in their differential diagnosis of unexplained, episodic cutaneous angioedema or abdominal pain.

Angioedema is an intense, usually disfiguring, temporary swelling of a localized body area. It most commonly occurs as part of an allergic response to exogenous substances and conditions. Such substances may be dietary in origin, eg, shellfish and other seafood, or may be environmental, as is the case with temperature-related angioedema. The sporadic exogenous phenomena that result in angioedema may be prevalent in up to 10% of the population.1 Use of some drugs prescribed for common ailments, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for hypertension, renal disease, and cardiac disease, can also induce an adverse reaction in apparently healthy individuals and result in angioedema.

In a few individuals, angioedema occurs because of an intrinsic defect that abolishes one of the body's several safeguards against such occurrences. This defect allows a cascade of events that culminates in symptoms. This form of angioedema occurs as a result of either an inherited defect in C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) activity or an acquired deficiency of C1-INH. The inherited form of the disease, known as hereditary angioedema (HAE), is rare, although it is more common than acquired angioedema (AAE).

Traditionally, 2 types of HAE have been described. Type 1 HAE, which is estimated to occur in 80% to 85% of patients, is caused by the decreased production of C1-INH, resulting in subnormal blood and tissue inhibitor activity. In type 2 HAE, which occurs in the remaining 15% to 20% of patients, normal or elevated quantities of functionally impaired C1-INH are produced. Recently, a third type of HAE in which C1-INH levels and function are normal has been described, so far only in women.2

All types of HAE have identical symptoms characterized by edema of 1 or several organ systems. The skin, gastrointestinal tract, and respiratory tract are most commonly involved. Cutaneous angioedema involves deeper layers such as the inner dermis and subcutaneous tissue, unlike urticaria, which is common in angioedema from other causes and involves the epidermis and upper dermis. The absence of pruritus, and the often-present associated visceral symptoms, makes angioedema distinguishable from urticaria.

History of hae

J. L. Milton first described angioedema in 1876.3 The subsequent article by Quincke in 18824 was the first to assign the name angioneurotic edema to the disease. A review of the literature suggests that the word neurotic was used as part of the name in an attempt to describe the observed effect of mental stress on exacerbations of this disease. In 1888, William Osler5 published the first article describing a hereditary form of angioneurotic edema; however, discovery of the biochemical basis for the disease did not occur until several decades later. A seminal study published in 1963 by Donaldson and Evans6 first described the biochemical abnormality responsible for HAE: the absence of C1-INH in patients with the disease. Since that study, the body of knowledge regarding the clinical manifestations, spectrum, pathophysiology, and genetic basis of the various forms of angioedema has broadened considerably.

Clinical presentation

Symptoms of HAE are usually mild or nonexistent during early childhood, typically first manifesting during the second decade of life. However, a few patients present during their first decade. Although some attacks lack an identifiable trigger, most are associated with trauma, medical procedures, emotional stress, menstruation, oral contraceptive use, infections, or the use of medications such as ACE inhibitors.7

Typically, acute HAE manifests as marked diffuse edema involving all skin layers and layers of the walls of hollow visceral organs and solid organs. Most visceral organs are susceptible and can be affected singly or in any combination. Typical attacks of angioedema last approximately 2 to 5 days before resolving spontaneously. Skin edema is nonpitting, with ill-defined margins, and most commonly affects areas of the face, extremities, and genitals. Facial areas typically involved are the lips, eyelids, and tongue. More often, genital edema occurs as a result of trauma during intercourse, parturition, and even horseback riding.8,9 During acute attacks, patients may develop a rash similar to that seen in urticaria. Unlike urticaria, however, the skin lesions associated with HAE are erythematous but not warm, painful, or pruritic.

When edema occurs in the walls of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract systems, the most ominous and distressing symptoms of HAE occur. Thus, laryngeal, nasal, and sinus edema may lead to respiratory tract compromise and death from suffocation. In such circumstances, tracheostomy can be lifesaving because the edema associated with acute episodes typically occurs at, or above, the larynx. If undiagnosed, mortality from HAE can be as high as 30% to 40%, mostly due to upper airway obstruction.10,11 Even in those with known HAE, unnecessary delay in seeking or administering appropriate medical treatment has often resulted in asphyxiation. Asphyxiation can occur at any age and has been documented in individuals as young as 4 weeks and as old as 78 years. Patients with no previous history of upper airway involvement during acute HAE exacerbations still run a risk of asphyxiating. In a recent study,11 5 of 6 individuals who asphyxiated during acute HAE had never experienced upper airway involvement during previous attacks. The time from symptom onset to asphyxiation also varies, ranging from as little as 20 minutes to as long as 14 hours. Transient pleural effusions, sometimes with cough and mild pleuritic chest pain, can also occur.9

Gastrointestinal tract symptoms of HAE, caused by visceral edema, result in varying degrees of intestinal obstruction. Thus, typical symptoms of gastrointestinal tract involvement are anorexia, vomiting, and crampy abdominal pain that can be severe. The abdomen is typically tender to palpation, usually without guarding. Ascites, as a result of fluid extravasation into the peritoneal cavity, occurs occasionally. In one study,12 ascites from acute HAE was significant enough to cause hypovolemic shock; however, the concomitant vasodilation known to occur during acute exacerbations probably played an additive role. Diarrhea can also occur, particularly as the acute episode resolves. Gastrointestinal tract HAE presenting as severe cramps, nausea, and vomiting, and unaccompanied by cutaneous symptoms, can be mistaken for an acute abdomen. This occasionally leads to unnecessary surgical abdominal exploration and the excision of otherwise normal gallbladders and appendixes. In fact, without a high index of suspicion, gastrointestinal tract HAE may be undiagnosed for decades despite patients presenting repeatedly to the emergency department with these complaints. In such circumstances, symptoms have occasionally been attributed to psychosomatization, with patients inappropriately referred for psychiatric assessment. Attacks of gastrointestinal tract angioedema generally subside within 12 to 24 hours, whereas cutaneous angioedema persists for several days.13

Two case reports14,15 describe migrainelike and transient ischemic attack symptoms during acute HAE. Others9,16,17 have reported seizures and hemiparesis. These symptoms are thought to be caused by local cerebral edema and consequent cerebral hypoperfusion, caused by the acute HAE episode.

Fever and leukocytosis are unusual in acute HAE, and their presence during an attack in a person known to have HAE should raise suspicion that another process, such as infection or intra-abdominal catastrophe, may be the inciting event for the acute exacerbation.

Pregnancy has been associated with a decrease in serum C1-INH levels, even in women with no genetic evidence of HAE,18,19 but pregnancy does not increase the risk of attacks. In fact, pregnancy has often been associated with decreased attack frequency.9 These counterintuitive observations may be explained by the finding that the total amount of circulating C1-INH actually increases during pregnancy; however, a decrease in the measurable level occurs as a consequence of the significant physiologic increase in plasma volume that occurs concomitantly.18 A study20 of one kindred with HAE suggested that significantly more pregnant patients with HAE (60%) experienced premature labor than did pregnant family members without HAE; however, a causal relationship has not been established. Levels of C1-INH are also decreased further in some pregnant women with preeclampsia and eclampsia, and the role of low C1-INH levels in these conditions is currently being investigated.19,21 Increased attack frequency has been reported22 in association with menstruation and oral contraceptive use.

Epidemiologic characteristics

Data on the epidemiologic characteristics of HAE are sparse. Estimates of its incidence worldwide vary, from 1 in 10 00023 to 1 in 150 000 persons.24 Types 1 and 2 HAE have been reported in all races, and no sex predominance has been found. However, a recently described third type of inherited angioedema has been found only in women.2 Seventy-five percent of patients with HAE have cutaneous angioedema of an extremity as the first presenting sign of the disease. Recurrent abdominal pain and upper airway and facial edema occurred in 52% and 36%, respectively, of patients in one series.9 In 39% of these cases, patients could attribute their first episode to an identifiable traumatic event.9

Most patients with symptomatic untreated HAE experience at least 1 acute exacerbation per month, and because each attack typically lasts a few days before spontaneously subsiding, it is estimated that individual patients can be debilitated by their symptoms for 20 to 100 days per year.3

Pathophysiologic and immunologic features of types 1 and 2 hae

C1 esterase inhibitor, an α2-globulin of approximately 105 kd, belongs to the serine protease inhibitor family that includes α1-antitrypsin and antithrombin. It is encoded on chromosome 11 and is synthesized mainly by hepatocytes, although peripheral blood monocytes can also synthesize significant quantities. Skin fibroblasts have also been shown to synthesize this protein, but their contribution to the body's pool of C1-INH in physiologic circumstances in vivo is unknown.25 Cytokines, particularly interferon γ, can stimulate synthesis of C1-INH in these cells in vitro.25 Interleukin 6, an important proinflammatory cytokine, increases the release of C1-INH from HepG2 hepatoma cells in vitro. This action was potentiated by the presence of another proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin 1, which by itself has no effect on C1-INH synthesis or secretion.26,27 Thus, C1-INH synthesis in vivo can be regulated, at least in part, by these cytokines.

The major functions of C1-INH within the human body include the prevention of C1 complement autoactivation; inactivation of coagulation factors XIIa, XIIf, and XIa; and direct inhibition of activated kallikrein.22 Its role in factor XIa inactivation is a minor one, however, with α1-antitrypsin being primarily responsible for inactivating this factor. In general, the direct inhibitory effect of C1-INH is achieved by the formation of irreversible covalent bonds with these substrates, forming inactive C1-INH complexes.

To facilitate a clear understanding of the role of C1-INH in the inactivation of its various substrates, brief reviews of the classical pathway of complement activation and of the contact (kallikrein/kinin) system are necessary.

The Complement Cascade

Nine complement components (C1-C9), and 2 pathways of complement activation (classical and alternative) have been described. C1 complement is a trimolecular heteropentameric complex composed of 1 C1q, 2 C1r, and 2 C1s components,28 all of which are linked through calcium molecules. In the classical pathway, interaction between the immunoglobulin Fab fragment and its target antigen results in complement activation, initiated through the binding of C1q to the constant heavy regions of the immunoglobulin Fc fragment. C1r is subsequently recruited, and complexes first with bound C1q and then with C1s. This binding activates C1s, which acquires esterase activity and cleaves C4, thereby initiating a cascade of events that generates a complex of complement fragments termed the membrane attack complex. This complex is responsible for the cell membrane damage that results in lysis of cells targeted by the specific immunoglobulins. During this cascade, C3a, C4a, and C5a are generated, cause increased capillary permeability, and contribute to edema and swelling of skin and organs that may be seen with massive complement activation, as occurs during an attack of HAE (Figure 1).

In humans, it is believed that circulating C1 can undergo autoactivation and that it does so in increasing quantities when C1-INH is insufficient or absent. A discussion of evidence for such autoactivation is beyond the scope of this review; however, several detailed articles have been written on the subject.22,25,29-32 C1 esterase inhibitor prevents this autoactivation of C1 complement by causing dissociation of the C1q subunit and by forming an inactive C1r2-C1s2-(C1-INH)2 complex.22,25 This complex is unable to cleave and activate complement components C4 and C2, the usual substrates of activated C1, thus keeping the classical pathway quiescent (Figure 1).

The Contact (Kallikrein-Kinin) System

Results of quantitative kinetic experiments32,33 suggest that C1-INH activity is responsible for inactivating approximately 90% of factor XIIa and its metabolite factor XIIf (Figure 2). Approximately 42% of plasma kallikrein is inactivated by C1-INH activity,22 approximately 50% is inactivated by α2-macroglobulin, and the remaining 8% is inactivated by other minor inhibitors.

Inactive precursor components of the contact system include high-molecular-weight kininogen and prekallikrein. Factor XII is technically not a component of the contact system, but it plays a significant role in its activation. It is hypothesized that in healthy individuals, small quantities of factor XII are constantly autoactivated to factor XIIa, possibly by a multitude of contacts between circulating factor XII and negatively charged initiator surfaces within the body.33 Factor XIIa is cleaved during its metabolism to another active molecule, termed factor XIIf. Unopposed activation of even small quantities of factor XII to factors XIIa and XIIf result in an increasing positive feedback loop, with factor XIIa cleaving and activating further molecules of factor XII. Because C1-INH is the major inhibitor of factor XIIa, a decrease in its level and activity allows generation of significantly increased quantities of factors XIIa and XIIf. Trauma, such as that seen during surgery and dental manipulation, also exposes large areas of negatively charged tissue and endothelial surfaces, which also results in activation of circulating factor XII.9

Factor XIIa also cleaves prekallikrein to the active enzyme kallikrein. Kallikrein in turn cleaves high-molecular-weight plasma kininogens, resulting in excessive release of various kinins, especially bradykinin and kallidin. Subnormal C1-INH activity also results in loss of its direct inhibitory effect on kallikrein activity, thus further promoting bradykinin generation. The large quantity of bradykinin released during acute attacks of HAE or AAE is thought to be responsible for most symptoms by directly causing increased vascular permeability (edema, swelling, and ascites), vasodilation (congestion, erythema, and hypotension), and contraction of nonvascular smooth muscle (cramps, spasms, and pain). By increasing capillary permeability, C3a, C4a, and C5a may also contribute to local edema of skin and visceral organs, ascites, and intravascular volume depletion.

Kallikrein also cleaves plasminogen to the active enzyme plasmin. In addition to its better-known role of fibrin breakdown, plasmin also activates factor XII, cleaves prekallikrein to produce even more kallikrein, and activates C1 (Figure 3). At the tissue level, plasmin activity may play a role in acute exacerbations of HAE; however, its role in plasma is probably short-lived because of its rapid inactivation by α2-antiplasmin and α2-macroglobulin, its major inhibitors in plasma.22

Factor XIIf activates complement component C1, thus initiating the classic pathway. Together with the constant autoactivation of complement component C1 that occurs unchecked when C1-INH activity is subnormal, activation and consumption of C4 and C2 occur during acute HAE attacks, resulting in profoundly decreased serum levels. Levels of C4, and sometimes C2, are typically less than normal during symptomatic quiescence, showing ongoing low-grade consumption between attacks; however, these levels may return to normal in some patients between attacks.9,24,34

Recent studies35-38 have shown that bradykinin, not a C2 kininlike peptide, is responsible for most of the symptoms of acute HAE (Figure 2). Supporting data include the following: (1) large amounts of activated kallikrein are present in induced blister fluids of patients with HAE39; (2) levels of prekallikrein and high-molecular-weight kininogen are decreased during acute HAE exacerbations40; (3) plasma bradykinin levels increase significantly in persons with acute HAE and in those experiencing ACE inhibitor therapy– related angioedema35; and (4) venous blood bradykinin levels were significantly higher in samples taken from the affected vs unaffected arm of patients with localized HAE exacerbation.36

Typical HAE attacks usually subside spontaneously after 2 to 5 days. However, the risk of death from a vicious cycle of bradykinin and complement fragment production exists during every acute episode until appropriate therapy is administered to raise serum levels of active C1-INH or until spontaneous remission occurs. Spontaneous remission may occur because the rapid consumption of various substrates during the acute attack rapidly outstrips the body's ability to manufacture them.

In patients with angioedema from causes other than heredity, urticaria is a frequent accompanying symptom. Urticaria seems to be primarily a histamine-mediated event, whereas angioedema seems to be mediated primarily by bradykinin. This explains why patients with acute HAE typically have no urticaria. However, urinary histamine excretion is increased in 18% of patients with acute HAE, suggesting increased systemic histamine release during this process.41,42 Complement fragments C3a, C4a, and C5a, and small fragments of C2 and bradykinin, all of which are produced in large quantities during acute HAE attacks, can cause mast cell degranulation.23 Although total levels of complement component C3 usually remain normal during attacks, its turnover is increased (Figure 3).43

Associated diseases

Patients with HAE have an increased incidence of autoimmune diseases. An estimated 2% of patients also have systemic lupus erythematosus.44,45 This association has a strong female preponderance and, although patients seem to have less severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus overall, skin lesions are prominent.46 In one study,45 approximately 12% of patients with HAE had an associated autoimmune disorder. This high proportion mainly comprises arthritides, thyroiditis, glomerulonephritis, and inflammatory bowel disease, all of which have been reported to occur at a greater incidence in these patients. Rarely, Sjögren syndrome, drug-induced lupus, pernicious anemia, scleroderma, and autoimmune aortitis have also been associated with the disease.9,20,45

Variant ("type 3") hae

A recent German study2 described recurrent angioedema in 10 female probands and 26 of their female relatives in the setting of normal C1-INH level and function. These patients all manifested symptoms indistinguishable from types 1 and 2 HAE, such as recurring skin lesions, abdominal cramps, and laryngeal edema. Eighteen (50%) of these women had experienced at least 1 episode of laryngeal edema, whereas 15 had experienced multiple episodes (range, 2-200 episodes). Three of the women died of asphyxiation. Age at onset varied widely, but most patients developed initial symptoms in their second decade of life, as in the better-known types 1 and 2 HAE. Twenty-two (61%) of patients developed initial symptoms between ages 10 and 23 years, and 7 (19%) developed symptoms between 1 and 10 years of age. Like HAE, acute exacerbations of this variant have been linked to oral contraceptive use (10 patients [28%]).

In patients with this variant, C1-INH level and function and C4 levels are normal during active angioedema and when asymptomatic. This variant most likely represents a congenital deficiency of enzymes such as ACE, carboxypeptidase N, and α2-macroglobulin or a phenotypic decrease in the function of these enzymes. Another possibility is that these individuals produce an as yet unknown substance that is not regulated by C1-INH and that is capable of cleaving large quantities of high-molecular-weight kininogen to produce bradykinin. Because C1-INH exerts inhibitory actions on kallikrein and factors XIIa and XIIf and because C1-INH levels are normal in these patients, the physiological defect responsible for angioedema in these patients is probably downstream of kallikrein (Figure 3).

The absence of detectable abnormalities in C1-INH level or function, or in C4 levels, even during acute exacerbations of angioedema, makes it likely that this entity will receive its own unique nomenclature. So far, the defect has been found only in women, suggesting an X-linked–dominant pattern of inheritance, and X-linked angioedema may be an appropriate name.

Genetics of hae

The gene encoding C1-INH has been cloned. It is located on chromosome 11q11-q13.1, possesses 7 exons and approximately 7 introns, and contains multiple Alu repeat sequences.47,48 Hereditary angioedema has an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, although it is estimated that 20% to 25% of cases are the result of spontaneous mutations in persons with no family history of the disease.49,50 All patients described in the literature have been heterozygotes. Thus, by mendelian inheritance, affected individuals inherit one normal gene and one abnormal gene, and a child of an affected patient has a 50% chance of acquiring the abnormal allele. The abnormal gene is either nonfunctional and thus is not transcribed (type 1 HAE) or codes for the synthesis of normal quantities of an abnormal C1-INH protein (type 2 HAE).

Type 1 HAE is caused by a variety of mutations with deletions or insertions of single or multiple nucleotides in the C1INH gene, whereas type 2 HAE results from the synthesis of a dysfunctional C1-INH protein, usually caused by point mutations in the areas coding for the "reactive center" or "hinge region" of the C1-INH protein.51,52 The reactive center of C1-INH is the site that binds and cleaves target molecules. It is located at the Arg444-Thr445 site of the C1-INH molecule and requires an intact peptide bond between these 2 amino acids for proper function.25 Some mutations in the C1INH gene result in substitutions at Arg444 of the C1-INH protein, and such mutations have been estimated to account for up to 70% of those with type 2 HAE.51-53 Such mutations result in an amino acid change, from arginine to others such as cysteine or histidine at position 444. Other mutations within the reactive loop, but distant from the reactive center, have been described. One such mutation in a patient with type 2 HAE resulted in the substitution of threonine for alanine at position 436 of the C1-INH molecule.54 To date, more than 100 different C1-INH mutations have been identified in patients with HAE, and their varied effects on C1-INH protein synthesis and function may explain the observed clinical differences in disease severity in affected individuals.51,55 Homozygous C1-INH deficiency has not been described.

The exact chromosomal abnormality responsible for the recently described inherited variant, in which recurrent angioedema occurs in females with normal C1-INH and C4 levels and function, is unknown.2 No affected males were identified, and these women came from 10 different families, with 2 to 7 members affected in each family. Findings from pedigree studies2 of these families suggest an X-linked–dominant pattern of transmission; on occasion, the disease would skip one generation of females and affect the subsequent generation. Thus, the asymptomatic daughter of an affected woman may give birth to female offspring who ultimately manifest the disease.

Phenotypically, type 1 HAE manifests as subnormal C1-INH levels, as low as 5% to 30% of normal, with resultant decreased activity.22 Type 2 HAE results in synthesis of normal and mutant protein. The C1-INH functional activity of the mutant protein is impaired despite the presence of normal or supranormal serum levels. Because patients with type 2 HAE possess one normal and one abnormal allele, theoretically their pool of C1-INH should consist of 50% normal protein and 50% mutant protein. However, it has been found that levels of normal C1-INH protein in these patients are typically far below 50% (range, 5%-30%), despite evidence that synthesis of this normal protein in these patients occurs at approximately half the rate seen in individuals without HAE.56 Such low levels are thought to occur because the single normal allele cannot increase synthesis of normal C1-INH to a rate necessary to keep pace with its consumption.22 The finding that the fractional catabolic rate of normal C1-INH is increased by approximately 29% in patients with HAE lends support to this hypothesis.56,57

Acquired angioedema

Acute attacks of angioedema can also occur because of the acquired form of the disease. Acquired angioedema results from increased destruction or metabolism of C1-INH. Patients with AAE do not have the genetic mutations of HAE. Typically, the first exacerbations of HAE occur during the second decade of life or earlier, whereas AAE usually becomes symptomatic during or after the fourth decade.

Two types of AAE have been described. Type 1 AAE typically occurs in patients with rheumatologic disorders and B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases, including leukemia (chronic lymphocytic leukemia), lymphosarcoma, multiple myeloma, macroglobulinemia, and essential cryoglobulinemia.22 Rarely, it has been reported in association with carcinomas (rectal, gastric, and breast), lupus anticoagulant, Churg-Strauss vasculitis, erythrocyte sensitization, livedo reticularis, infections (human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, Echinococcus granulosus, and Helicobacter pylori), and, in one instance, T-cell lymphoma.13,58-60 These patients have circulating anti-idiotypic antibodies against specific immunoglobulins expressed on the surface of B cells. Thus, immune complexes are continually being formed between anti-idiotypic antibodies and surface immunoglobulins on the cell surface, and these complexes in turn are thought to continuously activate complement component C1. C1 esterase inhibitor is consumed as it inactivates these large quantities of C1, and, ultimately, because C1-INH synthesis cannot keep up with its consumption, levels decline below normal, setting the stage for acute attacks of angioedema.

In type 2 AAE, autoantibodies (typically IgG and sometimes IgA or IgM) directed against the C1-INH molecule are produced and released into the patient's circulation. These bind the active site of the C1-INH molecule, leading to its inactivation.35,61,62 After inactivation of the normal 105-kd C1-INH molecule through binding with autoantibody, an inactive 96-kd C1-INH fragment is cleaved from the bound C1-INH molecule and circulates in the patient's blood, where it can be measured. This fragment can lead to the finding of "normal" C1-INH levels on some laboratory assays, in the setting of markedly attenuated C1-INH activity. Once the 96-kd fragment is cleaved, the autoantibody dissociates from the C1-INH remnant to which it was bound and proceeds to bind with a fresh 105-kd C1-INH molecule. Thus, low levels of autoantibody can result in inactivation of large quantities of C1-INH.13 Analysis of autoantibodies to C1-INH has shown that patients produce antibodies that recognize different epitopes within the C1-INH molecule.

As described earlier in the section "The Complement Cascade," small amounts of C1 complement autoactivate on a continuous basis in humans. In unaffected individuals, normal levels of C1-INH inactivate these molecules and prevent full activation of the classic complement pathway. However, in patients with AAE, in whom C1-INH levels are already significantly decreased via consumption or inactivation, C1-INH is further consumed as it performs its housekeeping functions, including inactivation of autoactivated C1. In fact, the fractional catabolic rate of C1-INH in patients with AAE is more than twice that seen in unaffected individuals and approximately 1½ times that in individuals with HAE.57

Patients with AAE have significantly decreased serum levels of classic complement components, particularly C1q, C4, and C2. In particular, decreased serum C1q levels help distinguish AAE from HAE, in which C1q levels are usually normal. The decreased C1q levels seen in AAE but not in HAE reflect the central role of C1 autoactivation and consumption in driving the symptoms of AAE via C1-INH depletion and consequent contact system autoactivation.

A 12% prevalence of autoantibodies to C1-INH has also been reported in patients with liver cirrhosis.63 Although these patients had significantly lower quantitative C1-INH levels than those without autoantibodies, they did not develop acute angioedema.

Ace inhibitor therapy-induced angioedema

A variety of commonly prescribed medications have been associated with the occurrence of angioedema in healthy individuals, including antibiotics, narcotic and nonsteroidal analgesics, angiotensin II inhibitors (losartan potassium), and ACE inhibitors. Allergic phenomena seem to play a major role in all except ACE inhibitor therapy–related angioedema. Although allergic and immunologic mechanisms, such as the "hapten hypothesis" in the case of captopril, have been proposed to explain ACE inhibitor therapy–related angioedema, they do not explain the constellation of manifestations and laboratory findings seen in this condition. Urticaria, which sometimes occurs concomitantly in ACE inhibitor therapy–related angioedema, is more aptly explained by the hapten hypothesis than is angioedema.

Most of the structurally diverse ACE inhibitors on the market have been reported to cause angioedema (Table 1).1 Angiotensin-converting enzyme has 2 main substrates in the human body, angiotensin I and bradykinin, which it cleaves into smaller molecules. In the case of bradykinin, this cleavage inactivates the molecule.73 Because bradykinin excess has been implicated at the tissue level in HAE, ACE inhibitors may induce angioedema in susceptible individuals by causing bradykinin accumulation with resultant vasodilation, capillary leakage, and edema.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme, also called kininase II, is widely distributed in the human body. It is still unclear why only a few individuals develop angioedema from ACE inhibitor therapy, whereas most do not. Patients who develop angioedema while taking an ACE inhibitor may be those with a congenital or acquired impairment in carboxypeptidase N activity (also called kininase I, which degrades bradykinin), which would lead to significant accumulation of bradykinin once ACE activity is blocked.74

Use of ACE inhibitors has been associated with angioedema in approximately 0.1% to 0.5% of cases.1,75,76 No sex predominance has been noted in patients without gastrointestinal tract involvement. In contrast, all patients described in the literature of ACE inhibitor therapy–associated angioedema in whom gastrointestinal tract involvement has occurred have been women.64 This has led to speculation about a possible sex-linked susceptibility to gastrointestinal tract involvement.

Although the onset of angioedema typically occurs during the first week of therapy with these agents, symptoms have occurred as long as 2 to 3 years after the first medication use.1,65 Symptoms resolve within 24 to 48 hours of discontinuing the drug therapy and typically recur on rechallenge with the same, or another, ACE inhibitor. Upper airway obstruction rarely occurs in patients with angioedema secondary to ACE inhibitor use. One study77 has proposed that previous upper airway trauma, instrumentation, or manipulation may represent a risk factor for developing such upper airway obstruction secondary to ACE inhibitor therapy–related angioedema.

Findings on physical examination and radiologic testing are similar to those seen in HAE. However, unlike in HAE, a mild to moderate leukocytosis has been noted in some studies64,66-68 of ACE inhibitor therapy–related angioedema.

Angioedema resulting from ACE inhibitor use can be distinguished from HAE and AAE only by history, C1-INH levels, and complement assays. Most patients who develop ACE inhibitor use–related angioedema have normal C1-INH levels and function. However, ACE inhibitors trigger attacks when taken by individuals with HAE.

Treatment consists of discontinuing use of the ACE inhibitor. Antihistamines, anticholinergics, and corticosteroids are useful when urticaria occurs with angioedema but are ineffective if use of the ACE inhibitor is continued.67 Subcutaneous (1:1000 mixture) and nebulized epinephrine should be administered in cases in which the airway is threatened, as outlined in the "Management" section.

Chronic idiopathic angioedema

In some instances, chronic recurrent angioedema cannot be attributed to HAE, AAE, or any of the known drug-induced and physical causes. Patients with such symptoms have been deemed to have chronic idiopathic angioedema (CIA). This is an important differential diagnosis for such patients, because its management differs from that for HAE. In most instances, chronic urticaria is also present. The clinical presentations of CIA and HAE are similar, but pruritus typically accompanies CIA and laryngeal edema is rare.

Antihistamines and, in severe or refractory cases, corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy. Histamine1 receptor antagonists provide symptomatic relief in most instances, but the addition of histamine2 receptor antagonists seems to provide additional relief in a few patients. If use of antihistamines does not provide symptomatic control, corticosteroids may be administered. The details of management of CIA are well documented23,78 but are beyond the scope of this review.

Patients with CIA, particularly those with frequent and persistent episodes, should undergo annual general medical evaluation to investigate for any underlying occult disease.

Diagnosis

Hereditary angioedema is transmitted in an autosomal dominant pattern, and the parents, siblings, and offspring of patients with HAE should be tested and receive genetic counseling. Some individuals with biochemical findings consistent with HAE never experience an acute exacerbation of the disease.79 We80 described a patient with HAE whose 53-year-old father was asymptomatic despite having decreased C1-INH function (37%) in the setting of normal serum levels. Other patients do not manifest symptoms of the disease until as old as 70 years.23 In 20% to 25% of patients with HAE, there is no family history of the disease.16,49,50,79 Therefore, a positive family history of HAE is not a prerequisite for consideration of HAE in the differential diagnosis when typical symptoms are present.

In the patient with suspected HAE who is currently asymptomatic, serum C1-INH activity should be measured. If this is subnormal, then quantitation of C1-INH and C1q levels will help distinguish between HAE and AAE.3 Patients with HAE will have markedly decreased C1-INH activity and normal C1q levels, with decreased (type 1), normal, or supranormal (type 2) levels of C1-INH. Those with AAE will also show a marked decrease in C1-INH activity; however, C1q levels are concomitantly decreased below normal (Table 2).

During an acute presentation of symptoms consistent with HAE, C4 and C2 levels are markedly decreased, sometimes to undetectable levels, and therefore are useful confirmatory tests. Complement is chronically consumed in patients with HAE even between exacerbations, albeit at a much slower rate than that seen in acute exacerbations. The C4 level is persistently low in most, but not all, patients, whereas the C2 level may remain decreased in a smaller proportion of patients. In a few patients, C4 and C2 levels normalize in the absence of symptoms.9,24,34 There is no correlation between the magnitude of decrease in C1-INH level or activity and the severity or frequency of acute HAE attacks. In newly symptomatic middle-aged or older patients with biochemical findings of HAE, C1q quantitation should be performed to rule out AAE.

Heparinization, such as that attained during management of cardiac ischemia or cardiac bypass surgery, has been associated with spuriously elevated C1-INH activity.81 Thus, if C1-INH function is normal in a heparinized patient when the index of suspicion for HAE is high, the C1-INH functional assay should be repeated a week after the discontinuation of heparin therapy.

Diagnosis of the recently described HAE variant in the setting of recurrent angioedema requires a detailed personal and family history, pedigree analysis, and biochemical evidence of normal C4, C1q, and C1-INH levels and function during symptomatic and asymptomatic periods. The personal history must rule out all other causes of isolated angioedema, including drugs, food allergens, and environmental and topical allergens.

Patients with acute gastrointestinal tract HAE have been inadvertently subjected to endoscopy when the diagnosis is unknown. Any instrumentation of the oropharynx is relatively contraindicated when acute HAE is considered the leading differential diagnosis in a patient with acute abdominal pain because of the risk of inducing life-threatening laryngeal edema. If there are compelling reasons why upper endoscopy should be done in this circumstance, appropriate prophylaxis, as described in the "Management" section, is necessary. Nonetheless, the endoscopic appearance of gastrointestinal tract HAE has been described, with findings of diffuse mucosal edema and erythema, with bulging masses of gastric mucosa resembling a submucosal tumor.82 All the gastric lesions had resolved at second endoscopy 8 weeks later. Similar lesions noted along the small intestine on imaging studies are thought to be responsible for the radiographic appearance and obstructive symptoms seen during acute attacks.

Stomach mucosal biopsy samples taken during attacks of HAE show moderate nonspecific inflammatory cell infiltration and edema of the lamina propria.82,83 Plain radiographs and computed tomographic scans of the abdomen typically show varying degrees of ileus (sometimes with air-fluid levels) and small-bowel thickening, respectively. "Thumbprinting" and a stacked coin appearance, also signs of mucosal edema, may also be seen on radiographs. Mild or moderate ascites, which resolves after the acute attack, may also be seen on ultrasound.79 Patients typically are afebrile and have normal liver enzyme, bilirubin, amylase, and lipase levels during acute episodes. White blood cell counts may be normal or slightly elevated.

Ultrastructurally, gaps in the postcapillary venule endothelial cells, as are typically seen with the actions of vasoactive substances, are seen in tissue from affected areas.78 The resulting edema has minimal cellularity.

Management

Although approximately a quarter of HAE cases occur as a result of spontaneous mutations, most patients inherit the responsible mutation in an autosomal dominant pattern. Thus, genetic counseling of affected individuals, as well as their parents and siblings, is an important part of their overall treatment. These relatives of the proband, as well as their offspring, should be tested after genetic counseling is completed.

Where available, the treatment of choice for acute attacks of HAE or AAE is intravenous purified, vapor-heated C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate. If this is unavailable, then attenuated androgen administration (below) should be started immediately, particularly when there is upper airway involvement. After an infusion of C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate, serum levels of C1-INH increase immediately, followed 2 to 24 hours later by a slower increase in levels of C4.84 A randomized, placebo-controlled trial84 of therapy with C1 esterase inhibitor for acute attacks of HAE found that approximately 69% of acute attacks treated with the concentrate responded completely within 30 minutes of the infusion, and up to 95% of attacks responded within 4 hours. In comparison, only 12% of those who received placebo had their attacks subside by 4 hours. Patients who received C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate were monitored for 4 years after completion of the study, and none developed seroconversion for any blood-borne viral infection (human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B and C). Also, none developed autoantibodies to C1-INH as a result of the infusion of concentrate. Therapy with C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate is thus considered safe and effective for the management of acute HAE attacks. Currently, C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate is not available in the United States.

C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate, although recommended as the first line of therapy for acute AAE exacerbations, is not as effective for this condition as it is for HAE. The presence of large amounts of anti–C1-INH autoantibodies, which rapidly inactivate infused C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate in the serum of patients with type 2 AAE, is thought to be responsible for this decreased efficacy.85 For type 1 AAE, treatment of the underlying malignancy, lymphoproliferative or rheumatologic, disorder may result in resolution of clinical and laboratory abnormalities.13 C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate was ineffective in treating patients with the variant inherited angioedema.2

Intubation and ventilator support may be necessary for episodes associated with severe respiratory tract compromise from laryngeal edema. Most reports suggest that acute exacerbations of HAE or AAE typically do not respond to administration of antihistamines, glucocorticoids, or epinephrine. However, some researchers86 have reported success in the acute management of AAE using these agents, probably owing to control of the mast cell degranulation and histamine release. Proponents of this therapy suggest administration of nebulized racemic epinephrine (1:1000 mixture) and subcutaneous epinephrine (0.2-0.3 mL of 1:1000 concentration administered every 20-30 minutes up to a maximum of 3 doses).23 Administration of epinephrine early in an attack seems to produce better results. Symptomatic improvement has been reported for type 2 AAE using intravenous methylprednisolone, 500 to 1000 mg daily.62

Use of attenuated androgens (17-α alkylated androgens), such as danazol and stanozolol, can prevent symptomatic attacks in patients with HAE. Some patients with AAE, particularly type 1 disease, also respond to administration of these agents. Patients with type 2 AAE typically derive little benefit from androgen therapy. Androgens increase serum C1-INH, C4, and C2 levels.87,88 Methyltestosterone therapy is effective in men. In an anecdotal study,89 oxandrolone, a potent androgen, was used successfully as prophylaxis in a 13-year-old girl who had failed prophylactic therapy with high-dose danazol and ϵ-aminocaproic acid. The patient's symptoms were controlled with a daily dose approaching 7 mg.89

Some authors90,91 suggest that long-term prophylaxis should be offered to patients with 1 or more acute exacerbations monthly. However, in a recent study,11 5 of 6 patients with HAE who asphyxiated had experienced no more than 3 exacerbations per year. The risk of upper airway involvement, with the attendant risk of asphyxiation, is high with each attack regardless of which organ system was involved in previous attacks. Long-term prophylaxis should be considered in any patient with a previous history of acute HAE affecting any organ system, regardless of the number of previous attacks.

Attenuated androgens are used in the long-term prophylactic treatment of male and female patients because they are effective and have relatively mild adverse effects. Dosage ranges for danazol, stanozolol, and methyltestosterone are 200 to 800 mg/d, 2 to 12 mg/d, and 10 to 30 mg/d, respectively. A typical treatment regimen using the less expensive agent, stanozolol, is to start adult patients at a dosage of 4 mg 3 times daily for the initial 12 weeks, then tapering the dosage by 2 to 4 mg every 12 weeks until the lowest maintenance dose that provides symptomatic relief is reached (typically 2-6 mg/d). An alternative approach is to reduce the dosage as soon as symptomatic control is achieved. Maintenance using alternate-day administration of stanozolol is also effective. The lowest effective dose should be used for maintenance. Attenuated androgens are efficacious in the prophylaxis of central nervous system angioedema.15 Danazol doses as low as 200 mg every 2 or 3 days have been used successfully to reduce attack frequency.62 When surgery, dental manipulation, or another source of trauma is planned, prophylactic treatment is necessary using danazol, 600 mg, daily for 10 days before surgery, or equivalent doses of another androgenic agent.

The major contraindications to therapy with attenuated androgens are pregnancy and lactation, prostate cancer, and childhood. Potential adverse effects include increased hair growth, weight gain, seborrhea, acne, deepening of the voice, vasomotor symptoms, decreased breast size, menstrual irregularities, decreased libido, hepatic necrosis or cholestasis, hepatic neoplasms, hypertension, and possibly increased atherogenesis resulting from abnormal lipoprotein metabolism. Hepatocellular adenomas, and in one instance hepatocellular carcinoma, have been reported in patients taking danazol for 10 or more years.92,93 Abnormal liver enzyme levels, from chronic hepatitis, have been shown not to change significantly after initiation of therapy with these agents and should therefore not be considered an absolute contraindication to their use.91 Stanozolol therapy seems to have fewer adverse effects than does danazol therapy. Antiandrogens used in the treatment of prostate cancer may decrease the efficacy of these therapies.

Intravenous administration of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), which contains C1-esterase inhibitor, may help abort most episodes of acute HAE. However, a paradoxical exacerbation of symptoms occasionally occurs presumably because the excess C4 supplied in FFP acts as a substrate that fuels further tissue damage. Consequently, FFP infusion is not recommended as therapy for severe exacerbations, particularly for those already manifesting symptoms of laryngeal edema. Prophylactic FFP infusion before surgery and dental extraction may be useful in patients not receiving chronic prophylactic therapy with attenuated androgens. Such infusions result in a small and transient increase in C1-INH and C4 levels above baseline levels; however, this seems to be sufficient in preventing acute attacks.9 Levels typically return to baseline in 1 to 12 days. A typical regimen is to infuse 2 U of FFP 12 to 24 hours before the procedure begins.

Antifibrinolytic agents (plasmin inhibitors), such as tranexamic acid and ϵ-aminocaproic acid, are also used for prophylaxis against attacks; however, these do not seem to be as effective as attenuated androgens in the management of HAE. In children, antifibrinolytics have been used as first-line drugs because of the adverse effects of attenuated androgens.7 These agents produce better results than do attenuated androgens when used for long-term prophylaxis in AAE and may be used as first-line prophylactic agents in patients with this condition.94,95 Some patients with AAE who did not respond or responded suboptimally to androgen therapy may respond to adminstration of antifibrinolytic agents.23 After an initial oral loading dose of 5 g, typical dosages effective for management of HAE have ranged from 7 to 10 g/d.9 Myalgia, with or without elevated serum creatine phosphokinase or aldolase levels secondary to rhabdomyolysis, is a potential adverse effect of therapy with this class of agents.62 Muscle weakness, hypotension, and fatigue may also occur with the use of high doses.

The use of antihistamines and epinephrine was ineffective in the treatment of the variant angioedema. One patient responded to danazol therapy, whereas another did not. Use of antifibrinolytic agents was also ineffective.2

Cytotoxic and immunosuppressive therapy (typically with cyclophosphamide) and glucocorticoid therapy, with or without plasmapharesis, are beneficial in decreasing autoantibody production in type 2 AAE, thereby alleviating symptomatic attacks.13

Nafamostat mesylate, a serine protease inhibitor shown to exert inhibitory activity on enzymes in the kallikrein-kinin system, has been used rarely to treat HAE in Japan.69,96 However, its efficacy for this purpose has not been convincing.

Prophylactic administration of FFP, C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate, or oral 17-α alkylated androgens before any major surgical or dental procedure is necessary to prevent an acute episode of HAE.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are contraindicated in patients known to have HAE because they increase the half-life of bradykinin and can thus precipitate symptoms.91 Oral contraceptive agent use should also be avoided because it can precipitate attacks in some individuals with HAE. Prophylactic administration of C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate, FFP, or androgens should also be considered for affected individuals before administration of intravenous radiologic contrast, streptokinase, or tissue plasminogen activator because previous studies have suggested that these agents may decrease levels of CI-INH in these patients.97-99

On occasion, acute attacks may recur frequently despite maximal maintenance doses of attenuated androgens. In such instances, a search for ongoing environmental triggers and chronic infections may be prudent. In a recent case report,100 eradication of H pylori infection in a patient with recurrent acute HAE attacks unresponsive to 800 mg of danazol daily resulted in no further acute attacks and permitted a decrease in the daily maintenance dose of danazol to 400 mg.

Accepted for publication July 10, 2001.

Corresponding author: William J. Tremaine, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, E19B, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

References
1.
Hedner  TSamuelsson  OLunde  HLindholm  LAndren  LWiholm  BE Angioedema in relation to treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.  BMJ. 1992;304941- 946Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Bork  KBarnstedt  SKoch  PTraupe  H Hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor activity in women.  Lancet. 2000;356213- 217Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Cicardi  MAgostini  A Hereditary angioedema.  N Engl J Med. 1996;3341666- 1667Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Quincke  H Über akutes umschriebenes Hautodem.  Monatsh Prakt Dermatol. 1882;1129- 131Google Scholar
5.
Osler  W Hereditary angioneurotic oedema.  Am J Med Sci. 1888;95362- 367Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Donaldson  VHEvans  RR A biochemical abnormality in hereditary angioneurotic edema: absence of serum inhibitor of C1-esterase.  Am J Med. 1963;3537- 44Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Borum  MLHoward  DE Hereditary angioedema: complex symptoms can make diagnosis difficult.  Postgrad Med. 1998;103 (251) 255- 256Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Cunningham  DSJensen  JT Hereditary angioneurotic edema in the puerperium: a case report.  J Reprod Med. 1991;36312- 313Google Scholar
9.
Frank  MMGelfand  JAAtkinson  JP Hereditary angioedema: the clinical syndrome and its management.  Ann Intern Med. 1976;84580- 593Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Sofia  SCasali  ABolondi  L Sonographic findings in abdominal hereditary angioedema.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1999;27537- 540Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Bork  KSiedlecki  KBosch  SSchopf  RKreuz  W Asphyxiation by laryngeal edema in patients with hereditary angioedema.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75349- 354Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Bork  K Hypovolemic shock caused by ascites in hereditary angioedema [in German].  Med Klin. 1998;93554Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Heymann  WR Acquired angioedema.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36611- 615Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Krause  KHRentrop  UMehregan  U Cerebral manifestations in angioneurotic edema [author's translation; in German].  J Neurol Sci. 1979;42429- 435Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Brettle  RPDunmow  REMilne  LAYap  PL Angioneurotic oedema in the elderly.  Scott Med J. 1982;27309- 311Google Scholar
16.
Thorvaldsson  SESedlack  REGleich  GJRuddy  SJ Angioneurotic edema and deficiency of C′1 esterase inhibitor in a 61-year-old woman.  Ann Intern Med. 1969;71353- 357Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Landerman  NS Hereditary angioneurotic edema.  J Allergy. 1962;33316- 329Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Ogston  DWalker  JCampbell  DM C1 inactivator level in pregnancy.  Thromb Res. 1981;23453- 455Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Cohen  AJLaskin  CTarlo  S C1 esterase inhibitor in pregnancy.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;90412- 413Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Nielsen  EWGran  JTStraume  BMellbye  OJJohansen  HTMollnes  TE Hereditary angio-oedema: new clinical observations and autoimmune screening, complement and kallikrein-kinin analyses.  J Intern Med. 1996;239119- 130Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Halbmayer  WMHopmeier  PMannhalter  C  et al.  C1-esterase inhibitor in uncomplicated pregnancy and mild and moderate preeclampsia.  Thromb Haemost. 1991;65134- 138Google Scholar
22.
Davis  AE C1 inhibitor and hereditary angioneurotic edema.  Annu Rev Immunol. 1988;6595- 628Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Frank  MM Urticaria and angioedema. Goldman  LBennett  JC Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 21st ed. Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co2000;1440- 1445Google Scholar
24.
Talavera  ALarraona  JLRamos  JL  et al.  Hereditary angioedema: an infrequent cause of abdominal pain with ascites.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90471- 474Google Scholar
25.
Oltvai  ZNWong  ECCAtkinson  JPTung  KSK C1-inhibitor deficiency: molecular and immunological basis of hereditary and acquired angioedema.  Lab Invest. 1991;65381- 388Google Scholar
26.
Zuraw  BLLotz  M Regulation of the hepatic synthesis of C1 inhibitor by the hepatocyte stimulating factors interleukin 6 and interferon gamma.  J Biol Chem. 1990;26512664- 12670Google Scholar
27.
Falus  ARokita  HWalcz  EBrozik  MHidvegi  TMeretey  K Hormonal regulation of complement biosynthesis in human cell lines, II: upregulation of the biosynthesis of complement components C3, factor B and C1 inhibitor by interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 in human hepatoma cell line.  Mol Immunol. 1990;27197- 201Google ScholarCrossref
28.
Dobo  JGal  PSzilagyi  K  et al.  One active C1r subunit is sufficient for the activity of the complement C1 complex: stabilization of C1r in the zymogen form by point mutations.  J Immunol. 1999;1621108- 1112Google Scholar
29.
Ziccardi  RJ Spontaneous activation of the first component of human complement (C1) by an intramolecular autocatalytic mechanism.  J Immunol. 1982;1282500- 2504Google Scholar
30.
Ziccardi  RJ A new role for C1-inhibitor in homeostasis: control of activation of the first component of human complement.  J Immunol. 1982;1282505- 2508Google Scholar
31.
Ziccardi  RJ The first component of human complement (C1): activation and control.  Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1983;6213- 230Google Scholar
32.
Bianchino  ACPoon  PHSchumaker  VN A mechanism for the spontaneous activation of the first component of complement, C1, and its regulation by C1 inhibitor.  J Immunol. 1988;1413930- 3936Google Scholar
33.
Colman  RWSchmaier  AH Contact system: a vascular biology modulator with anticoagulant, profibrinolytic, antiadhesive, and proinflammatory attributes.  Blood. 1997;903819- 3843Google Scholar
34.
Grunewald  T Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency [letter].  Ann Intern Med. 2000;133837Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Nussberger  JCugno  MAmstutz  CCicardi  MPellacani  AAgostoni  A Plasma bradykinin in angio-oedema.  Lancet. 1998;3511693- 1697Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Nussberger  JCugno  MCicardi  MAgostini  A Local bradykinin generation in hereditary angioedema.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;1041321- 1322Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Cugno  MCicardi  MBottaso  B  et al.  Activation of the coagulation cascade in C1-inhibitor deficiencies.  Blood. 1997;893213- 3218Google Scholar
38.
Shoemaker  LRSchurman  SJDonaldson  VHDavis  AE Hereditary angioneurotic edema: characterization of plasma kinin and vascular permeability–enhancing activities.  Clin Exp Immunol. 1994;9522- 28Google ScholarCrossref
39.
Curd  JGPrograis  LJCochrane  CG Detection of active kallikrein in induced blister fluids of hereditary angioedema patients.  J Exp Med. 1980;152742- 747Google ScholarCrossref
40.
Schapira  MSilver  LDScott  CF  et al.  Prekallikrein activation and high-molecular-weight kininogen consumption in hereditary angioedema.  N Engl J Med. 1983;3081050- 1053Google ScholarCrossref
41.
Nielsen  EWJohansen  HTGaudesen  O  et al.  C3 is activated in hereditary angioedema, and C1/C1-inhibitor complexes rise during physical stress in untreated patients.  Scand J Immunol. 1995;42679- 685Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Brickman  CMFrank  MMKaliner  M Urine-histamine levels in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE).  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988;82403- 406Google ScholarCrossref
43.
Carpenter  CBRuddy  SShehadeh  IHMuller-Eberhard  HJMerrill  JPAusten  KF Complement metabolism in man: hypercatabolism of the fourth (C4) and third (C3) components in patients with renal allograft rejection and hereditary angioedema (HAE).  J Clin Invest. 1969;481495- 1505Google ScholarCrossref
44.
Donaldson  VHHess  EVMcAdams  AJ Lupus-erythematosus–like disease in three unrelated women with hereditary angioneurotic edema.  Ann Intern Med. 1977;86312- 313Google ScholarCrossref
45.
Brickman  CMTsokos  GCBalow  JE  et al.  Immunoregulatory disorders associated with hereditary angioedema, I: clinical manifestations of autoimmune disease.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;77749- 757Google ScholarCrossref
46.
Pacheco  TRWeston  WLGiclas  PC Three generations of patients with lupus erythematosus and hereditary angioedema.  Am J Med. 2000;109256- 257Google ScholarCrossref
47.
Theriault  AWhaley  KMcPhaden  ARBoyd  EConnor  JM Regional assignment of the human C1-inhibitor gene to 11q11-q13.1.  Hum Genet. 1990;84477- 479Google ScholarCrossref
48.
Carter  PEDunbar  BFothergill  JE Genomic and cDNA cloning of the human C1 inhibitor: intron-exon junctions and comparison with other serpins.  Eur J Biochem. 1988;173163- 169Google ScholarCrossref
49.
Eck  SLMorse  JHJanssen  DAEmerson  SGMarkovitz  DM Angioedema presenting as chronic gastrointestinal symptoms.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88436- 439Google Scholar
50.
Agostini  ACicardi  M Hereditary and acquired C-1 inhibitor deficiency: biological and clinical characteristics in 235 patients.  Medicine (Baltimore). 1992;71206- 215Google Scholar
51.
Zuraw  BLHerschbach  BA Detection of C1 inhibitor mutations in patients with hereditary angioedema.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105541- 546Google ScholarCrossref
52.
Aulak  KSPemberton  PARosen  FSCarrell  RWLachmann  PJHarrison  RA Dysfunctional C1-inhibitor(At), isolated from a type II hereditary angio-oedema plasma, contains a P1 "reactive centre" (Arg444 → His) mutation.  Biochem J. 1988;253615- 618Google Scholar
53.
Parad  RBKramer  JStrunk  RCRosen  FSDavis  AE Dysfunctional C1 inhibitor Ta: deletion of Lys-251 results in acquisition of an N-glycosylation site.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;876786- 6790Google ScholarCrossref
54.
Levy  NJRamesh  NCicardi  MHarrison  PADavis  AE Type II hereditary angioneurotic edema that may result from a single nucleotide change in the codon for alanine-436 in the C1 inhibitor gene.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87265- 268Google ScholarCrossref
55.
Tosi  M Molecular genetics of C1 inhibitor.  Immunobiology. 1998;199358- 365Google ScholarCrossref
56.
Quastel  MHarrison  RCicardi  MAlper  CARosen  FS Behavior in vivo of normal and dysfunctional C1 inhibitor in normal subjects and patients with hereditary angioneurotic edema.  J Clin Invest. 1983;711041- 1046Google ScholarCrossref
57.
Melamed  JAlper  CACicardi  MRosen  FS The metabolism of C1 inhibitor and C1q in patients with acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;77322- 326Google ScholarCrossref
58.
Farkas  HCsepregi  ANemesanszky  E  et al.  Acquired angioedema associated with chronic hepatitis C.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103711- 712Google ScholarCrossref
59.
Grace  RJJacob  AMainwaring  CJMcVerry  BA Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency as manifestation of T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder [letter].  Lancet. 1990;336118Google ScholarCrossref
60.
Markovic  SNInwards  DJFrigas  EAPhyliky  RP Acquired C1 esterase deficiency.  Ann Intern Med. 2000;132144- 150Google ScholarCrossref
61.
Jackson  JSim  RBWhelan  AFeighery  C An IgG autoantibody which inactivates C1-inhibitor.  Nature. 1986;323722- 724Google ScholarCrossref
62.
Laurent  JGuinnepain  MT Angioedema associated with C1 inhibitor deficiency.  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 1999;17513- 523Google ScholarCrossref
63.
Csepregi  ANemesanszky  E Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency.  Ann Intern Med. 2000;133838- 839Google ScholarCrossref
64.
Chase  MPFiarman  GSScholz  FJMacDermott  RP Angioedema of the small bowel due to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;31254- 257Google ScholarCrossref
65.
Byrne  TJDouglas  DDLandis  MEHeppell  JP Isolated visceral angioedema: an underdiagnosed complication of ACE inhibitors?  Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;751201- 1204Google ScholarCrossref
66.
Farraye  FAPeppercorn  MASteer  MLJoffe  NRees  M Acute small-bowel mucosal edema following enalapril use [letter].  JAMA. 1988;2593131Google ScholarCrossref
67.
Mullins  RJShanahan  TMDobson  RT Visceral angioedema related to treatment with an ACE inhibitor.  Med J Aust. 1996;165319- 321Google Scholar
68.
Abdelmalek  MFDouglas  DD Lisinopril-induced isolated visceral angioedema: review of ACE-inhibitor–induced small bowel angioedema.  Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42847- 850Google ScholarCrossref
69.
Matsumura  MHaruki  KKajinami  KTakada  T Angioedema likely related to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.  Intern Med. 1993;32424- 426Google ScholarCrossref
70.
Jacobs  RLHoberman  LJGoldstein  HM Angioedema of the small bowel caused by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89127- 128Google Scholar
71.
Guy  CCathebras  PRousset  H Suspected angioedema of abdominal viscera [letter].  Ann Intern Med. 1994;121900Google ScholarCrossref
72.
Gregory  KWDavis  RC Andioedema of the intestine.  N Engl J Med. 1996;3341641Google ScholarCrossref
73.
Skidgel  RAErdös  EG Cleavage of peptide bonds by angiotensin I converting enzyme.  Agents Actions Suppl. 1987;22289- 296Google Scholar
74.
Slater  EEMerrill  DDGuess  HA  et al.  Clinical profile of angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.  JAMA. 1988;260967- 970Google ScholarCrossref
75.
Israili  ZHall  D Cough and angioneurotic edema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: a review of the literature and pathophysiology.  Ann Intern Med. 1992;117234- 242Google ScholarCrossref
76.
Inman  WHRawson  NSWilton  LVPearce  GLSpeirs  CJ Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril. I: results of prescription-event monitoring.  BMJ. 1988;297826- 829Google ScholarCrossref
77.
Jain  MArmstrong  LHall  J Predisposition to and late onset of upper airway obstruction following angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.  Chest. 1992;102 ((3)) 871- 874Google ScholarCrossref
78.
Kaplan  AP Urticaria and angioedema. Middleton  EEllis  EFYunginger  JWReed  CEAdkinson  NFBusse  WW Allergy Principles & Practice. 5th ed. St Louis, Mo Mosby–Year Book Inc1998;1104- 1122Google Scholar
79.
Shinzato  TNakamura  HKuniyoshi  T  et al.  Hereditary angioedema: a case with ascites yet no symptoms in the family.  Intern Med. 1992;31633- 635Google ScholarCrossref
80.
Nzeako  UCFrigas  ETremaine  WJ Hereditary angioedema as a cause of transient abdominal pain: case report and literature review.  J Clin Gastroenterol. Google Scholar
81.
Nielsen  WEJohansen  HTStraume  BMollnes  TE Effect of time, temperature and additives on a functional assay of C1 inhibitor.  J Immunol Methods. 1994;173245- 251Google ScholarCrossref
82.
Hara  TShiotani  AMatsunaka  H  et al.  Hereditary angioedema with gastrointestinal involvement: endoscopic appearance.  Endoscopy. 1999;31322- 324Google ScholarCrossref
83.
Molina  CBrun  JCoulet  MBetail  GWahl  DHartmann  L Diagnostic and therapeutic problems associated with hereditary deficiency of the C1 esterase inhibitor.  Clin Allergy. 1977;7127- 135Google ScholarCrossref
84.
Waytes  ATRosen  FSFrank  MM Treatment of hereditary angioedema with a vapor-heated C1 inhibitor concentrate.  N Engl J Med. 1996;3341630- 1634Google ScholarCrossref
85.
Alsenz  JLambris  JDBork  KLoos  M Acquired C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency type II: replacement therapy with C1-INH and analysis of patients' C1-INH and anti-C1-INH autoantibodies.  J Clin Invest. 1989;831794- 1799Google ScholarCrossref
86.
Markovic  SNInwards  DJFrigas  EPhyliky  RP Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency.  Ann Intern Med. 2000;132144- 150Google ScholarCrossref
87.
Sheffer  ALFearon  DTAusten  KF Clinical and biochemical effects of stanozolol therapy for hereditary angioedema.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981;68181- 187Google ScholarCrossref
88.
Gelfand  JASherins  RJAlling  DWFrank  MM Treatment of hereditary angioedema with danazol: reversal of clinical and biochemical abnormalities.  N Engl J Med. 1976;2951444- 1448Google ScholarCrossref
89.
Castaldo  AJ The case for oxandrolone (OxandrineTM) as an alternative for preventing attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE). Available at: http://www.hereditaryangioedema.com/oxscott.htm. Accessed December 8, 2000
90.
Agostini  ACicardi  M Hereditary and acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency: biological and clinical characteristics in 235 patients.  Medicine (Baltimore). 1992;71206- 215Google Scholar
91.
Cicardi  MCastelli  RZingale  LCAgostini  A Side effects of long-term prophylaxis with attenuated androgens in hereditary angioedema: comparison of treated and untreated patients.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99194- 196Google ScholarCrossref
92.
Bork  KPitton  MHarten  PKoch  P Hepatocellular adenomas in patients taking danazol for hereditary angio-oedema.  Lancet. 1999;3531066- 1067Google ScholarCrossref
93.
Crampon  DBarnoud  RDurand  M  et al.  Danazol therapy: an unusual aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma.  J Hepatol. 1998;291035- 1036Google ScholarCrossref
94.
Cicardi  MBisiani  GCugno  MSpath  PAgostini  A Autoimmune C1 inhibitor deficiency: report of eight patients.  Am J Med. 1993;95169- 175Google ScholarCrossref
95.
Cugno  MCicardi  MAgostini  A Activation of the contact system and fibrinolysis in autoimmune acquired angioedema: a rationale for prophylactic use of tranexamic acid.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994;93870- 876Google ScholarCrossref
96.
Nomura  HTsugawa  YKoni  I  et al.  Hereditary angioedema complicated with chronic renal failure: report of sibling cases.  Intern Med. 1992;3194- 97Google ScholarCrossref
97.
Ewald  GAEisenberg  PR Plasmin-mediated activation of contact system in response to pharmacological thrombolysis.  Circulation. 1995;9128- 36Google ScholarCrossref
98.
Lynch  MPentecost  BLLittler  WAStockley  RA Why do patients develop reactions to streptokinase?  Clin Exp Immunol. 1993;94279- 285Google ScholarCrossref
99.
Francis  CWBrenner  BLeddy  JPMarger  VJ Angioedema during therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.  Br J Haematol. 1991;77562- 563Google Scholar
100.
Rais  MUnzeitig  JGrant  JA Refractory exacerbations of hereditary angioedema with associated Helicobacter pylori infection.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103713- 714Google ScholarCrossref
×