[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1916

BLOOD UREA DETERMINATIONS IN 211 CASES

Author Affiliations
BUTTE, MONT.
Arch Intern Med (Chic). 1916;XVII(1):42-77. doi:10.1001/archinte.1916.00080070060005
Abstract

Increased urea in the blood was first demonstrated in 1823 by Prevost and Dumas,1 while working with nephrectomized animals. Bostock,2 in 1829, noticed an increase in the blood urea of certain albuminuries. Richard Bright3 with his co-workers—Prout, Babbington, and Christison (1836)—confirmed this observation and recognized it to be of clinical importance in nephritis. Babbington and Christison also made estimations of urea in body fluids.

Following the qualitative demonstration of blood urea, quantitative determinations were attempted by both French and German clinicians. Picard4 (1856) was the first to determine that the amount of blood urea varies with the nitrogen intake.

Interest in the subject abated about this time, and for a period of forty years the references in the literature were infrequent. Schöndorf5 (1899) revived the subject by an examination of the previous work, adding to it his own more accurate results, which confirmed the

References
1.
Prevost and Dumas:  Ann. de chimie et de physique , 1823, xxiii, 90.
2.
Bostock:  Edinburg Med. and Surg. Jour. , 1829, xxxii, 28.
3.
Bright, Babbington, and Christison:  Guy's Hosp. Rep. , 1836, i, 360.
4.
Picard: Thèse de Strassburg, 1856.
5.
Schöndorff:  Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol. (Pflüger's) , 1899, lxxiv, 358.
6.
Ascoli:  Pfluger's Arch. f. path. Anat , 1901, lxxvii, 103.Crossref
7.
Strauss:  Die Chronische Niereutzündungen in ihrer Einwirkung auf die Blutflüssigkeit und deren Behandlung , Hirschwald, Berlin, 1902.
8.
Müller:  Verhandl. der deutsch, path. Gesellsch. , 1904-5, vii-ix, (Supplement 80) .
9.
Widal and Javal:  Semaine méd. , 1905, xxv, 313.
10.
Von Noorden:  Metabolism and Practical Medicine , 1907, ii, 486.
11.
Obermayer and Popper:  Ztschr. f. klin. Med. , 1911, lxxii, 332.
12.
Hohlweg:  Deutsch. Arch. f. klin. Med. , 1912, civ, 216.
13.
Widal:  Bull. et. mém. Soc. méd. d. hôp. de Paris , 1911, xxxii, 627.
14.
Foster:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1912, x, 414.Crossref
15.
Rowntree and Fitz:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1913, xi, 258.Crossref
16.
Frothingham, Fitz, Folin, and Denis:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1913, xii, 245.Crossref
17.
Siegel:  Ztschr. f. exper. Path. u. Therap. , 1907, iv, 561.Crossref
18.
Pearce, Hill, and Eisenbrey:  Jour. Exper. Med. , 1910, xii, 196.Crossref
19.
Austin and Eisenbrey:  Jour. Exper. Med. , 1911, xiv, 366.Crossref
20.
Folin, Karsner, Howard, and Denis:  Jour. Exper. Med. , 1912, xvi, 789.Crossref
21.
Mosenthal:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1914, xiv, 844.Crossref
22.
Karsner and Denis:  Jour. Exper. Med. , 1914, xix, 63.
23.
Soper and Granat:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1914, xiii, 131.Crossref
24.
Folin, Denis, and Seymour:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1914, xiii, 224.Crossref
25.
Agnew:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1914, xiii, 485.Crossref
26.
Folin and Denis:  Jour. Biol. Chem. , 1913, xiv, 29.
27.
Frothingham and Smillie:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1914, xiv, 541.Crossref
28.
Tileston and Comfort:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1914, xiv, 620.Crossref
29.
Ovsiannikova:  Russk. Vrach. , 1914, xiii, 253.
30.
Widal, Weill, and Radot:  Presse, méd. , 1914, xxii, 565.
31.
Farr and Krumbhaar:  Jour. Am. Med. Assn. , 1914, lxiii, 2214.Crossref
32.
Morel and Mouriquand:  Bull. et. mém. Soc. méd. d. hôp. de Paris , 1913, xxxv, 266.
33.
Foster:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1915, xv, 356.Crossref
34.
Rowntree, Marshall, and Baetjer:  The Archives Int. Med. , 1915, xv, 543.Crossref
35.
Marshall:  Jour. Biol. Chem. , 1913, xiv, 283;
36.
Marshall:  Jour. Biol. Chem. 1913, xv, 487.
37.
Cullen and Ellis:  Jour. Biol. Chem. , 1915, xx, 511.
×