Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Saad AM, Elmatboly AM, Gad MM, et al. Association of Brain Cancer With Risk of Suicide. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e203862. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3862
It was estimated that there would be 23 820 new cases of central nervous system tumors in the US in 2019, along with 17 760 deaths.1 In our previous work,2 we found that compared with the general population, suicide rates within the first year of cancer diagnosis are significantly higher, particularly in cancers with poor prognosis. This new work aims to investigate the increase in suicide rate associated with diagnosis with brain cancer.
Data for patients diagnosed with brain cancers between 2000 and 2016 were collected from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registries,3 accessed and analyzed in June 2019. An event was defined as death due to suicide following a brain cancer diagnosis. The observed to expected (O/E) event ratio was calculated to determine the change in suicide risk following diagnosis in comparison with the general population, in which expected number of events is the number of people estimated to die of the same cause in a demographically similar general population within the same period. Mortality data for the general US population were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics.3 All statistical tests were 2-sided, and P < .05 was used as a cutoff for statistical significance. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines and was exempted from institutional review board approval because the SEER data are anonymized and considered non–human participant research.
A total of 87 785 patients with brain cancer diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2016 were included in the analysis, of whom 29 patients (0.03%) died by suicide and 33 993 (38.7%) died of cancer and other causes within the first year of their diagnosis. Most patients who died of suicide were men (27 [93.1%]), were older than 44 years (24 [82.8%]), were white (26 [89.9%]), and had a glioblastoma (18 [62.1%]). The risk of suicide increased significantly within the first year following a diagnosis of brain cancer, with an O/E of 3.05 (95% CI, 2.04-4.37). Although 48 908 diagnoses (55.2%) were in men, 27 patients (93.1%) who committed suicide were men, with a significant increase in risk to an O/E of 3.38 (95% CI, 2.23-4.92). The increase in suicide risk was highest among patients older than 64 years, who had an O/E of 5.04 (95% CI, 2.60-8.80). White patients also showed an increased risk, with an O/E of 2.91 (95% CI, 1.90-4.26) (Table).
The results of this study show that diagnosis with brain cancer is associated with an increased risk of suicide within the first year following diagnosis. This increase was not uniform across all subgroups, with male patients with glioblastoma multiform (GBM) having the highest increase in risk. Diagnosis of GBM may result in profound consequences on patients’ quality of life, not only because it is an aggressive terminal illness but also owing to the nature and sensitive location of these malignant neoplasms. Varying tumor factors, such as lesion size and location within the central nervous system, may affect neurocognitive functions4 and result in debilitations that can impair quality of life. For example, loss of motor function or aphasia can significantly affect patients’ ability to work or care for themselves. Radiation or surgery may result in more local damage and can worsen neurologic manifestations. The implications of these impairments include early retirement or unemployment, loss of independence, feeling like a burden to caregivers, and instability of interpersonal relationships, all of which may also explain the higher rates of depression and suicide among older male patients with brain cancer.5,6 Our study has several limitations, including the potential for bias given the retrospective nature of the analysis, along with the absence of data on anxiety and depression after a cancer diagnosis.
In this study, patients diagnosed with brain cancers showed a higher incidence of suicide within the first year following their diagnosis compared with the general population. Integrating comprehensive active psychiatric care plans into the management protocols of these patients could improve their quality of life and reduce suicide rates.
Accepted for Publication: March 2, 2020.
Published: May 1, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3862
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Saad AM et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: Ahmad Samir Alfaar, MBBCh, MSc, Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Author Contributions: Dr Saad had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Saad, Elmatboly, Gad, Al-Husseini, Alzuabi, Alfaar.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Saad, Elmatboly, Gad, Al-Husseini, Jazieh, Alfaar.
Drafting of the manuscript: Saad, Elmatboly, Gad, Alfaar.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Saad, Gad, Al-Husseini.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Elmatboly, Gad, Al-Husseini, Alfaar.
Supervision: Gad, Al-Husseini, Alfaar.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Funding/Support: Dr Alfaar is supported by grant 57147166 from The German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). Leipzig University provided support for open-access publishing.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Additional Contributions: We thank Mrs Katrin Brüggemann for her help during the final steps.
Additional Information: Files from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program used for this study are available on Zenodo e-Repository (https://search.datacite.org/works/10.5281/zenodo.3404224).
Create a personal account or sign in to: