Association of Maternal-Clinician Ethnic Concordance With Latinx Youth Receipt of Family-Centered Care

IMPORTANCE Disparities in medical home provisions, including receipt of family-centered care (FCC), have persisted for Latinx youths in the US. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between maternal-clinician ethnic concordance and receipt of FCC among US-born Latinx youths. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017, was conducted. Data analysis was performed from January 6 to February 3, 2020. Latinx youths (age, (cid:2) 17 years) born in the US who had a usual source of care and used care in the past year, their Latina mothers (age, 18-64 years), and youths’ health care clinician characteristics (eg, race, ethnicity, and sex) were evaluated using χ 2 tests and propensity-score matching methods. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Maternal reports on whether their youths’ clinician listened carefully to the parent, explained things in a way the parent could understand, showed respect, and spent enough time with the patient. RESULTS There were 2515 US-born Latinx youths with linked maternal characteristics during the study period; 51.67% (95% CI, 48.87%-54.45%) of the youths were male, mean (SD) age was 8.48 (0.17) years (30.86% [95% CI, 28.39%-33.44%] were between ages 5 and 9 years), 61.53% (95% CI, 57.15%-65.74%)hadpublicinsurancecoverage,and39.89%(95%CI,32.33%-47.89%)hadmothers who were ethnically concordant with the youths’ medical care clinician. We found that for youths with maternal-clinician ethnic concordance, the probabilities of reporting FCC were significantly higher than


Introduction
In recent decades, there has been an influx of immigrants, asylum seekers, and refugees from Latin America to the US. 1 Latinx individuals make up the largest ethnic group of youths in the US, and it is projected that by 2050 almost 30% of all youths in the US will be Latinx. 2 Nearly all (94%) of young Latinx individuals are US born. 3 At least half of all US-born Latinx youths have at least 1 immigrant parent, 4 which is associated with social disadvantages compared with US-born Latinx youths with US-born parents, such as a greater likelihood of being uninsured and lacking a usual source of care (eg, health care professional or site). 5,6 Medical homes are a model of primary care that is patient centered, is comprehensive, recognizes the family as a constant in a child's life, and emphasizes the partnership between health care professionals and families to improve health outcomes. 7 In addition to access-to-care disparities, US-born Latinx youths face disparities in accessing a medical home. For instance, a study using national data found that only a quarter of Latinx children had a medical home compared with two-thirds of non-Latinx White children. 8 A family's experience during a health care visit contributes to and is an important aspect of health care quality and health outcomes. 9 Third-generation (ie, US-born youths with US-born parents) Latinx youths have yet to reach parity with non-Latinx White youths in reports of the amount of time medical clinicians devote to their care and on clinicians' sensitivities to their families' values and customs. 10 Latinx families headed by immigrant parents also reported receiving less-specific health-related information than families of non-Latinx White youths. 10 Considering the demographic shifts discussed above, more attention is needed to explore health care experience disparities among US-born Latinx youths based on maternal and clinician characteristics.
Much of the parent-clinician concordance literature among Latinx youths has focused on language. [11][12][13] Parent-clinician language concordance may be beneficial in communication, but language concordance alone may not equate to reports of higher-quality well-child care, whereas cultural competency has been associated with family-centered care (FCC). 11 For instance, a clinician speaking Spanish alone may not be associated with the clinician spending more time with the patient, listening more carefully, or respecting familial values and customs-all constructs that are of importance for families. Two cross-sectional studies using regional data have examined the association between racial and ethnic parent-clinician concordance and FCC receipt and did not find that ethnic concordance contributed to ethnic differences in parent reports of youths receiving FCC. 12,13 To our knowledge, maternal-clinician ethnic concordance among Latinx youths has not been examined since then nor has it been examined using a nationally representative database.
There have been considerable publications on the association of patient-physician racial and ethnic concordance with satisfaction among adults with mixed findings. [14][15][16] Most recently, a randomized clinical trial observed that clinicians who were Black improved preventive health behaviors among Black patients and reduced the Black-White gap in cardiovascular mortality by 19%. 17 As the US becomes more racially and ethnically diverse, it faces a shortage of clinicians who identify as racial or ethnic minorities. 18,19 For instance, among active physicians in the US, only 5% are Black and 5.8% are Hispanic, which does not reflect the proportion of Black (13.4%) and Hispanic (18.5%) individuals in the US population. 20,21 This shortage has broader implications for the practice of medicine because clinicians from racial and ethnic minority groups are more likely to provide culturally competent care; provide care for underserved, underrepresented minority communities; and work in primary care settings. [21][22][23][24][25] To our knowledge, the association between maternal-clinician ethnic concordance and youth receipt of FCC among Latinx youths has not been recently examined. We examined the association between maternal-clinician ethnic concordance and receipt of FCC owing to the current clinician shortage in the US and because mothers are more likely than fathers to attend office visits 26 and respond to surveys on youth health care services. 27 We used the Andersen Model of Health Services 28 as a framework and hypothesized that maternal-clinician ethnic concordance would be associated with youth receipt of FCC, which has the potential to reduce disparities in the provision of medical homes for US-born Latinx youths.

Data Source
We obtained data on US-born Latinx youths, their mothers, and the youths' medical care clinicians from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017, from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) household data. The health insurance eligibility unit identifier in MEPS was used to link maternal characteristics to youth observations, resulting in a sample of 2515 US-born Latinx youths younger than 18 years whose mothers identified as Latina. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality administers MEPS, which is drawn from a nationally representative subsample of households that participated in the prior year's National Health Interview Survey. MEPS is a panel survey that allows for the understanding of how changes in a respondent's health status, income, and use of services are related and information on a person's demographic characteristics, access to care, satisfaction with care, and insurance coverage are collected. 29 The data for this study are publicly available and this study did not involve human participation; thus, the Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, indicated that the investigation did not require institutional review board approval and was exempt from the need for informed consent. This cross-sectional study followed the The main independent variable was maternal-clinician ethnic concordance, which was defined by the youth's medical care clinician characteristic variables, such as race and ethnicity, reported by their mothers. Mothers self-reported their own racial and ethnic identity and that of their youths' clinicians in MEPS. 29 We considered mothers to be ethnically concordant with the youth's clinicians if the clinician's ethnicity was classified as Hispanic in MEPS (ie, concordant). Conversely, we classified youth observations with reports of non-Hispanic clinicians as not ethnically concordant with Latina mothers (ie, nonconcordant).

Statistical Analysis
We used Stata, version 15 (StataCorp LLC), for all analyses. 33 Data analysis was performed from January 6 to February 3, 2020. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using χ 2 tests to assess differences in predisposing and enabling characteristics by maternal-clinician ethnic concordance.
We assessed differences in FCC outcomes by concordance through χ 2 tests and multivariable logistic regression. Some covariates may be associated with the likelihood of mothers being in concordant relationships; thus, we implemented propensity-score matching in attempts to minimize selection bias into the treatment category (eg, concordance)-a widely used method to estimate treatment outcomes when randomization is not feasible. 34,35 We used a series of propensity-score matching models to match youths based on the probability of concordance. Specifically, we examined the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) to estimate the potential association of concordance in youths with mothers who were ethnically concordant with clinicians. The ATET estimates differences in reports of FCC among youths with maternal-clinician concordance and what reports may have been had they not had concordant clinicians. Covariates that were balanced to estimate propensity scores were maternal language (English/English and Spanish or Spanish/other), maternal non-US-born status (born in the US: yes or no), youth insurance coverage status (private, public, or uninsured), and maternal insurance coverage status (private, public, or uninsured). We used 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching, and comparisons, associations, and average effects were considered significant at a 2-sided P < .05. All estimates were weighted to reflect the noninstitutionalized population of US-born Latinx youths and adjust for complex survey design.

Results
In our study sample of US-born Latinx youths, 48 There were no statistically significant differences in the bivariate association between FCC outcomes and maternal-clinician ethnic concordance (   A box plot of propensity scores before and after matching showed a raw or initial propensity toward nonconcordance with balance after matching (Figure). The ATET findings are presented in

Discussion
To our knowledge, the association between maternal-clinician ethnic concordance and youth receipt of FCC among US-born Latinx youths has not been examined in nearly 2 decades. 12,13 We observed an association between maternal-clinician ethnic concordance and reports of youths receiving FCC.
To protect against selection bias in concordance, we used propensity score-matching methods. After adjusting for maternal characteristics, we noted that concordance was associated with reports that the youth's clinician listened carefully to the parent, explained things in a way the parent could understand, showed respect for what the parent had to say, and spent enough time with a patient.
Previous research noted that receipt of FCC was associated with health care clinicians eliciting important youth health and developmental information. 36 For instance, parents of Latinx youths who received FCC had almost twice the odds of clinician elicitation of developmental concerns, which is vital for child development and long-term health outcomes.

Limitations and Strengths
Our study has limitations. First, clinician race and ethnicity were reported by the mothers, which is not optimal and can contribute to information bias, misidentification, and recall bias. For instance, a maternal respondent may have reported their youth's clinician as being non-Hispanic White, but the clinician may identify themselves as Hispanic. To date, certain sections in MEPS have undergone validity and reliability assessments but have not included the clinician's race and ethnicity measure, [45][46][47][48] and work is warranted in assessing this measure further with other data (eg, claims data that include clinician-reported race and ethnicity). Second, we do not have state identifiers and cannot control for state fixed effects that could explain whether there were any improvements in receipt of FCC for youths based on policy changes (eg, Medicaid expansion and increased insurance coverage for youths). Third, although we observed significant findings in maternal-clinician concordance, this study may be limited in power to determine differences in FCC component outcomes by clinician sex, which could also be associated with youth receipt of FCC. 49,50 Fourth, there may be measurement error in the FCC variables given that mothers may not remember the experience they had when their youths saw a clinician; thus, there may be an underestimation in the number of youths receiving FCC.
Although there are several limitations, the study also has strengths. First, to our knowledge, this was the first study in almost 20 years examining the association of maternal-clinician ethnic concordance and youth receipt of FCC. Second, the bivariate comparisons of FCC by concordance may appear insignificant; however, we believe that although small, these improvements are meaningful within a population health context.

Conclusions
This cross-sectional study noted an association between maternal-clinician ethnic concordance and receipt of FCC among US-born Latinx youths with Latina mothers. Clinicians from underrepresented racial and ethnic minority backgrounds may contribute to the attenuation of medical home provision Propensity score balance box plot before and after matching. Whiskers represent the 5th and 95th percentiles, boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, dots represent outliers, and horizontal lines inside the boxes are medians.