[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 1,637
Invited Commentary
Public Health
August 31, 2018

Rotavirus Vaccines in China: Improvement Still Required

Author Affiliations
  • 1Enteric and Diarrheal Disease, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington
JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(4):e181579. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1579

It is well recognized that rotavirus vaccines have had an enormous impact in improving child health morbidity and reducing diarrhea-associated mortality in every setting evaluated when introduced into the national immunization programs.1 Three rotavirus vaccines have now obtained World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification, ROTARIX (GlaxoSmithKline), RotaTeq (Merck), and ROTAVAC (Bharat Biotech), thus enabling their procurement by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) through Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. The 2 multinational vaccines prequalified in 2006 (ROTARIX and RotaTeq) are included in the national immunization programs or in phased subnational introductions in 95 countries across the globe. Substantial reductions in diarrhea-associated deaths and hospitalizations have been recorded from multiple countries in Africa, the Americas, and Europe.1 On the other hand, ROTAVAC is an indigenous, naturally attenuated monovalent G9P[11] rotavirus strain isolated at the All India Institute of Medicine and developed by Bharat Biotech with support from the local Department of Biotechnology, the Indo-US Vaccine Action Program, and PATH. ROTAVAC was licensed by the Drugs Controller General of India in 2015 and has been implemented in a staged introduction plan in India, where implementation first occurred in 4 states in 2016 and in an additional 5 states in 2017; Uttar Pradesh, India, is predicted to introduce ROTAVAC in 2018, thus providing rotavirus vaccination to almost 50% of the birth cohort. This vaccine achieved WHO prequalification in January 2018, enabling global use of the vaccine in other developing countries through Gavi-funded support.

As of mid-2018, 3 additional rotavirus vaccines have been licensed locally by national regulatory agencies. In Vietnam, Rotavin (POLYVAC), derived from a human G1P[8] strain, was licensed for use in 2012 based on a phase 2 immunogenicity study2 and is currently available in the private market. In India, the Serum Institute of India obtained Drugs Controller General of India approval for the licensure of their pentavalent bovine-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine, ROTASIIL, in 2017, following successful completion of 2 large phase 3 efficacy studies in India and Africa.3,4 The government of India has implemented this vaccine in Jarkhland in 2018. The third nationally licensed rotavirus vaccine is the Lanzhou lamb rotavirus (LLR) vaccine developed by Lanzhou Institute of Biological Products in China. This vaccine was licensed in 2000 and has been available on the Chinese private market with an estimated 60 million doses provided. A large case-control effectiveness study reported the LLR vaccine effectiveness at 35% against rotavirus gastroenteritis and 53% against moderate to severe diarrhea.5

The study by Fu and colleagues6 provides a population-based analysis of LLR vaccination coverage and its association with rotavirus gastroenteritis using several data sets from Guangzhou, China, from May 2007 to April 2016. Unfortunately, rotavirus vaccination is not included in China’s national immunization program, resulting in low coverage rates due to only private market use. The recommended schedule for LLR vaccination is as a single oral dose annually to infants 2 months to 3 years of age, and in Guangzhou the coverage rates ranged from 6.8% to 28.6% among 12 districts studied between 2009 and 2011. The vaccine costs approximately $24 per dose based on national tariffs.7

Importantly, despite the low vaccination coverage rates, districts with higher vaccination levels (>20%) were associated with a lower incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis compared with districts that had lower coverage (<14%). Vaccination was associated with a 32.4% reduced incidence rate ratio in areas of higher vaccination coverage among children younger than 4 years. However, no real impact on the overall rotavirus rates was observed, likely owing to the low vaccination coverage. Using rotavirus gastroenteritis and vaccination data collected during 9 seasons, the authors also reported a 4-month increase in median age at disease onset. This trend has been observed in other settings, but it is more difficult to interpret in this study because of the overall low coverage, the differences in immunization schedule patterns, and the likely socioeconomic differentiation of the children receiving the vaccine through parental influence rather than through the national immunization program.

The data do not mirror the often dramatic reductions in rotavirus-associated gastroenteritis observed in many countries in which rotavirus vaccination is included in national immunization programs (eg, Brazil, Mexico, United States, Belgium, Australia), highlighted in the systematic review of the first decade of postlicensure studies, which reported a 45% to 90% decline in rotavirus-associated hospitalizations among children younger than 5 years.1 This review also demonstrated that lower vaccine effectiveness occurred in countries with a higher level of child mortality compared with countries with low child mortality. However, the study confirmed that both ROTARIX and RotaTeq are effective against rotavirus gastroenteritis across a range of mortality settings, providing additional evidence for the WHO recommendation that all countries introduce rotavirus vaccination into their national immunization program.

China has a large birth cohort of approximately 16 million live births per year. Furthermore, the proportion of rotavirus-associated diarrhea resulting in hospitalization is high, with figures from 30% to 50% reported.8 The burden of rotavirus gastroenteritis in China is thus enormous and demonstrates that there would be significant health benefits as well as health cost savings if a national rotavirus immunization schedule was implemented. Several studies have demonstrated that a rotavirus vaccination program is highly cost-effective using the LLR vaccine as well as ROTARIX and RotaTeq,7 both of which have had clinical trials conducted in China. Interestingly, the RotaTeq vaccine showed 79% efficacy against moderate to severe rotavirus gastroenteritis.9

The study by Fu and colleagues reinforces the need and benefit of a universal immunization program with timely vaccine administration, similar to that recommended by WHO, to ensure maximum benefits with the first dose as soon as possible. Despite the well-characterized disease burden and the remarkable impact of rotavirus vaccination, vaccine introduction has been extremely slow across Asia. An analysis by Burnett and colleagues10 highlights an estimated reduction of nearly 50% in rotavirus-associated hospitalizations and a 40% reduction in rotavirus-associated deaths in Asia if rotavirus vaccines were more widely used in this region. Rotavirus vaccine implementation may have turned an important corner in Asia. India has commenced a staged rollout from 2016. Pakistan introduced rotavirus vaccine in several districts in Punjab in January 2017, and Bangladesh was approved for Gavi-supported introduction in 2018.

The data presented here provide a sense of hope that continued rotavirus vaccine use and improved uptake will lead to improved child health across China. China’s State Council’s new guidelines for the development, management, and recommendation of vaccines for use will hopefully lead to a strengthening of China’s Expanded Program on Immunization system so that immunization, including rotavirus vaccination, is at the forefront to protect children from vaccine-preventable diseases.

Back to top
Article Information

Published: August 31, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1579

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2018 Kirkwood CD et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Carl D. Kirkwood, PhD, Enteric and Diarrheal Disease, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 500 Fifth Ave, Seattle, WA 98102 (carl.kirkwood@gatesfoundation.org).

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kirkwood reported being issued patent EP13833197A for modified human rotaviruses and uses therefore. No other disclosures were reported.

References
1.
Jonesteller  CL, Burnett  E, Yen  C, Tate  JE, Parashar  UD.  Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination: a systematic review of the first decade of global postlicensure data, 2006-2016.  Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(5):840-850. doi:10.1093/cid/cix369PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Dang  DA, Nguyen  VT, Vu  DT,  et al; Rotavin-M1 Vaccine Trial Group.  A dose-escalation safety and immunogenicity study of a new live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine (Rotavin-M1) in Vietnamese children.  Vaccine. 2012;30(suppl 1):A114-A121. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.118PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Isanaka  S, Guindo  O, Langendorf  C,  et al.  Efficacy of a low-cost, heat-stable oral rotavirus vaccine in Niger.  N Engl J Med. 2017;376(12):1121-1130. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1609462PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Kulkarni  PS, Desai  S, Tewari  T,  et al; SII BRV-PV Author Group.  A randomized phase III clinical trial to assess the efficacy of a bovine-human reassortant pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants.  Vaccine. 2017;35(45):6228-6237. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.014PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Zhen  SS, Li  Y, Wang  SM,  et al.  Effectiveness of the live attenuated rotavirus vaccine produced by a domestic manufacturer in China studied using a population-based case-control design.  Emerg Microbes Infect. 2015;4(10):e64. doi:10.1038/emi.2015.64PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Fu  C, Dong  Z, Shen  J,  et al.  Rotavirus gastroenteritis infection among children vaccinated and unvaccinated with rotavirus vaccine in southern China: a population-based assessment.  JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(4):e181382. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1382Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Cui  S, Tobe  RG, Mo  X, Liu  X, Xu  L, Li  S.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in China: projected possibility of scale-up from the current domestic option.  BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):677. doi:10.1186/s12879-016-2013-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Wu  D, Yen  C, Yin  ZD,  et al.  The public health burden of rotavirus disease in children younger than five years and considerations for rotavirus vaccine introduction in China.  Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016;35(12):e392-e398. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000001327PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Mo  Z, Mo  Y, Li  M,  et al.  Efficacy and safety of a pentavalent live human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RV5) in healthy Chinese infants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.  Vaccine. 2017;35(43):5897-5904. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.081PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Burnett  E, Tate  JE, Kirkwood  CD,  et al.  Estimated impact of rotavirus vaccine on hospitalizations and deaths from rotavirus diarrhea among children <5 in Asia.  Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018;17(5):453-460. doi:10.1080/14760584.2018.1443008PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×