Factors Associated With Emergency Department Use by Patients With and Without Mental Health Diagnoses | Emergency Medicine | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.234.207.100. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
1.
Tang  N, Stein  J, Hsia  RY, Maselli  JH, Gonzales  R.  Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007.  JAMA. 2010;304(6):664-670. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1112PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Mann  C. Reducing nonurgent use of emergency departments and improving appropriate care in appropriate settings. https://www.medicaid.gov/Federal-Policy-Guidance/Downloads/CIB-01-16-14.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2016.
3.
Bayer  E. Innovations in reducing preventable hospital admissions, readmissions, and emergency room use. Washington, DC: AHIP; 2010. http://www.mahp.org/download/file/fid/56. Accessed March 10, 2016.
4.
Hunt  KA, Weber  EJ, Showstack  JA, Colby  DC, Callaham  ML.  Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments.  Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(1):1-8. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.030PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Sandoval  E, Smith  S, Walter  J,  et al.  A comparison of frequent and infrequent visitors to an urban emergency department.  J Emerg Med. 2010;38(2):115-121. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.042PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Johnson  TL, Rinehart  DJ, Durfee  J,  et al.  For many patients who use large amounts of health care services, the need is intense yet temporary.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(8):1312-1319. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1186PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Kushel  MB, Perry  S, Bangsberg  D, Clark  R, Moss  AR.  Emergency department use among the homeless and marginally housed: results from a community-based study.  Am J Public Health. 2002;92(5):778-784. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.5.778PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Althaus  F, Paroz  S, Hugli  O,  et al.  Effectiveness of interventions targeting frequent users of emergency departments: a systematic review.  Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(1):41-52.e42. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
American Hospital Association. Bringing behavioral health into the care continuum: opportunities to improve quality, costs and outcomes. http://www.aha.org/research/reports/tw/12jan-tw-behavhealth.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2016.
10.
Kathol  RG, Melek  S, Sargent  G. Mental health and substance use disorder services and professionals as a core part of health in clinically integrated networks. In: Yale  K, Bohn  J, Konschak  C, eds.  Clinical Integration: Accountable Care & Population Health. 3rd ed. Virginia Beach, VA: Convurgent Publishing; 2015.
11.
Bremer  RW, Scholle  SH, Keyser  D, Houtsinger  JV, Pincus  HA.  Pay for performance in behavioral health.  Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(12):1419-1429. doi:10.1176/ps.2008.59.12.1419PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Klein  S. Behavioral health integration: approaches from the field. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletters/quality-matters/2014/august-september/profiles. Accessed March 10, 2016.
13.
Hamblin  A, Soper  MH, Kuruna  T. Promising practices to integrate physical and mental health care for Medi-Cal members. http://www.chcs.org/media/BSCF-Brief_060716.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2016.
14.
von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.  Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-577. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Horrocks  D, Kinzer  D, Afzal  S, Alpern  J, Sharfstein  JM.  The adequacy of individual hospital data to identify high utilizers and assess community health.  JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(6):856-858. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1248PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. California Inpatient Data Reporting Manual: Medical Information Reporting for California. 7th ed. Sacramento, CA: Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development; 2017. https://oshpd.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IP-Reporting-Requirements.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2018.
17.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) for ICD-9-CM. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Accessed March 10, 2016.
18.
Coffey  R, Houchens  R, Chu  B,  et al. A severity-of-illness classification for mental and substance-use disorders for use with hospital administrative data. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/SOI.jsp. Accessed March 10, 2016.
19.
Pines  JM, Asplin  BR, Kaji  AH,  et al.  Frequent users of emergency department services: gaps in knowledge and a proposed research agenda.  Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(6):e64-e69. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01086.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Larkin  GL, Claassen  CA, Emond  JA, Pelletier  AJ, Camargo  CA.  Trends in U.S. emergency department visits for mental health conditions, 1992 to 2001.  Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56(6):671-677. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.6.671PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Zuckerman  S, Shen  YC.  Characteristics of occasional and frequent emergency department users: do insurance coverage and access to care matter?  Med Care. 2004;42(2):176-182. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000108747.51198.41PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Melek  SP, Norris  DT, Paulus  J.  Economic Impact of Integrated Medical-Behavioral Healthcare: Implications for Psychiatry. Denver, CO: Milliman Inc; 2014.
23.
Stata/MP [computer program]. Version 13.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2015.
24.
Wu  J, Grannis  SJ, Xu  H, Finnell  JT.  A practical method for predicting frequent use of emergency department care using routinely available electronic registration data.  BMC Emerg Med. 2016;16:12. doi:10.1186/s12873-016-0076-3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
LaCalle  E, Rabin  E.  Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications.  Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(1):42-48. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Stern  RS, Weissman  JS, Epstein  AM.  The emergency department as a pathway to admission for poor and high-cost patients.  JAMA. 1991;266(16):2238-2243. doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470160070034PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Capp  R, Rooks  SP, Wiler  JL, Zane  RD, Ginde  AA.  National study of health insurance type and reasons for emergency department use.  J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(4):621-627. doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2734-4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Nesper  AC, Morris  BA, Scher  LM, Holmes  JF.  Effect of decreasing county mental health services on the emergency department.  Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67(4):525-530. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Byrne  M, Murphy  AW, Plunkett  PK, McGee  HM, Murray  A, Bury  G.  Frequent attenders to an emergency department: a study of primary health care use, medical profile, and psychosocial characteristics.  Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(3):309-318. doi:10.1067/mem.2003.68PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Behr  JG, Diaz  R.  Emergency department frequent utilization for non-emergent presentments: results from a regional urban trauma center study.  PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147116. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147116PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Hazlett  SB, McCarthy  ML, Londner  MS, Onyike  CU.  Epidemiology of adult psychiatric visits to US emergency departments.  Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(2):193-195. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2003.09.014PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Kne  T, Young  R, Spillane  L.  Frequent ED users: patterns of use over time.  Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16(7):648-652. doi:10.1016/S0735-6757(98)90166-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Barry  CL, Goldman  HH, Huskamp  HA.  Federal parity in the evolving mental health and addiction care landscape.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(6):1009-1016. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1653PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Beronio  K, Glied  S, Frank  R.  How the affordable care act and mental health parity and addiction equity act greatly expand coverage of behavioral health care.  J Behav Health Serv Res. 2014;41(4):410-428. doi:10.1007/s11414-014-9412-0PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission. Chapter 4: behavioral health in the Medicaid program—people, use, and expenditures. In: Report to Congress on Medicaid and CHIP. Washington, DC: Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission; 2015.
36.
Fortney  J, Sullivan  G, Williams  K, Jackson  C, Morton  SC, Koegel  P.  Measuring continuity of care for clients of public mental health systems.  Health Serv Res. 2003;38(4):1157-1175. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.00168PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Unutzer  JHH, Schoenbaum  M, Druss  B. The collaborative care model: an approach for integrating physical and mental health care in Medicaid health homes. https://www.chcs.org/media/HH_IRC_Collaborative_Care_Model__052113_2.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2016.
38.
Shumway  M, Boccellari  A, O’Brien  K, Okin  RL.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial.  Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(2):155-164. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.021PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Raven  MC.  What we don’t know may hurt us: interventions for frequent emergency department users.  Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(1):53-55. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.04.009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Raven  MC.  Patient-centered medical homes may reduce emergency department use: what does this tell us?  Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(6):661-663. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Sadowski  LS, Kee  RA, VanderWeele  TJ, Buchanan  D.  Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial.  JAMA. 2009;301(17):1771-1778. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.561PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Davis  KA, Sudlow  CL, Hotopf  M.  Can mental health diagnoses in administrative data be used for research? a systematic review of the accuracy of routinely collected diagnoses.  BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:263. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0963-xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Original Investigation
    Emergency Medicine
    October 19, 2018

    Factors Associated With Emergency Department Use by Patients With and Without Mental Health Diagnoses

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Mathematica Policy Research, Oakland, California
    • 2Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
    • 3Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
    • 4Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
    • 5Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco
    JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(6):e183528. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3528
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  What factors are associated with higher emergency department (ED) use among patients with and without mental health diagnoses?

    Findings  This case-control study found that previous hospitalization and high rates of lagged ED visits were associated with higher future ED use. Mild, moderate, and severe mental health diagnoses were associated with increases of 2.9%, 12.1%, and 22.6%, respectively, in ED use.

    Meaning  Prior patient visit patterns and patient illness severity associated with mental health diagnoses could be important contributors to increased ED use.

    Abstract

    Importance  An association between frequent use of the emergency department (ED) and mental health diagnoses is frequently documented in the literature, but little has been done to more thoroughly understand why mental illness is associated with increased ED use.

    Objective  To determine which factors were associated with higher ED use in the near future among patients with and without mental health diagnoses.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  A retrospective case-control study of all patients presenting to the ED in California in 2013 using past ED data to predict future ED use. Data from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014, from California’s Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development were analyzed.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Factors associated with higher ED use in the year following an index visit for patients with vs without a mental health diagnosis.

    Results  Among the 3 446 338 individuals in the study (accounting for 7 678 706 ED visits), 44.6% (1 537 067) were male; 31.6% (1 089 043) were between the ages of 18 and 30 years, 40.3% (1 338 874) were between the ages of 31 and 50 years, and 28.1% (968 421) were between the ages of 51 and 64 years. The mean (SD) number of ED visits per patient per year was 1.69 (2.56), and 29.1% of patients (1 002 884) had at least 1 mental health diagnosis. Previous hospitalization and high rates of lagged ED visits were associated with higher future ED use. The severity of the mental health diagnosis (mild, moderate, or severe) was associated with increased ED visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.029; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04 for mild; IRR, 1.121; 95% CI, 1.11-1.13 for moderate; and IRR, 1.226; 95% CI, 1.22-1.24 for severe). Little evidence was found for interaction effects between mental health diagnoses and other diagnoses in predicting increased future ED use.

    Conclusions and Relevance  Certain classes of mental health diagnoses were associated with higher ED use. The presence of a mental illness diagnosis did not appear to interact with other patient-level factors in a way that meaningfully altered associations with future ED use.

    ×