[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 182
Correction
July 12, 2019

Errors in Key Points and Results Sections

JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e198352. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8352

In the Original Investigation titled “Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low Operative Risk,”1 published June 14, 2019, there was a typographical error in the Key Points section. In the Results section, in the second paragraph of the Characteristics and Outcomes of the Propensity Score–Matched Cohorts subsection, the 3-year survival rates were transposed and should have read “Three-year survival was similar in the study cohorts (85.7% vs 87.7% for TAVR and SAVR, respectively; P = .45).” This article has been corrected.1

References
1.
Virtanen  MPO, Eskola  M, Jalava  MP,  et al.  Comparison of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgical aortic valve replacement among patients with aortic stenosis at low operative risk.  JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):e195742. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5742Google ScholarCrossref
×