Comparison of Liver Transplant Wait-List Outcomes Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Public vs Private Medical Insurance | Gastroenterology | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.234.207.100. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
1.
Mikhail  S, Cosgrove  D, Zeidan  A.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: systemic therapies and future perspectives.  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014;14(10):1205-1218. doi:10.1586/14737140.2014.949246PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Njei  B, Rotman  Y, Ditah  I, Lim  JK.  Emerging trends in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and mortality.  Hepatology. 2015;61(1):191-199. doi:10.1002/hep.27388PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Shiina  S, Teratani  T, Obi  S,  et al.  A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation with ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma.  Gastroenterology. 2005;129(1):122-130. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Llovet  JM, Schwartz  M, Mazzaferro  V.  Resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.  Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25(2):181-200. doi:10.1055/s-2005-871198PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
White  DL, Thrift  AP, Kanwal  F, Davila  J, El-Serag  HB.  Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in all 50 United States, from 2000 through 2012.  Gastroenterology. 2017;152(4):812-820.e5. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.020PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Ha  J, Yan  M, Aguilar  M,  et al.  Race/ethnicity-specific disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma stage at diagnosis and its impact on receipt of curative therapies.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50(5):423-430. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000448PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Sobotka  LA, Hinton  A, Conteh  LF.  African Americans are less likely to receive curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.  World J Hepatol. 2018;10(11):849-855. doi:10.4254/wjh.v10.i11.849PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Dakhoul  L, Gawrieh  S, Jones  KR,  et al.  Racial disparities in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma are not explained by differences in comorbidities, liver disease severity, or tumor burden.  Hepatol Commun. 2018;3(1):52-62. doi:10.1002/hep4.1277PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Wang  J, Ha  J, Lopez  A, Bhuket  T, Liu  B, Wong  RJ.  Medicaid and uninsured hepatocellular carcinoma patients have more advanced tumor stage and are less likely to receive treatment.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52(5):437-443. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000859PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Yu  JC, Neugut  AI, Wang  S,  et al.  Racial and insurance disparities in the receipt of transplant among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.  Cancer. 2010;116(7):1801-1809. doi:10.1002/cncr.24936PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Sarpel  U, Suprun  M, Sofianou  A,  et al.  Disentangling the effects of race and socioeconomic factors on liver transplantation rates for hepatocellular carcinoma.  Clin Transplant. 2016;30(6):714-721. doi:10.1111/ctr.12739PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Zaydfudim  V, Whiteside  MA, Griffin  MR, Feurer  ID, Wright  JK, Pinson  CW.  Health insurance status affects staging and influences treatment strategies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3104-3111. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1181-2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Tumin  D, Beal  EW, Mumtaz  K,  et al.  Medicaid participation among liver transplant candidates after the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.  J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(2):173-180.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.05.004PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Tumin  D, Hayes  D  Jr, Washburn  WK, Tobias  JD, Black  SM.  Medicaid enrollment after liver transplantation: effects of Medicaid expansion.  Liver Transpl. 2016;22(8):1075-1084. doi:10.1002/lt.24480PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Mehta  N, Dodge  JL, Hirose  R, Roberts  JP, Yao  FY.  Increasing liver transplantation wait-list dropout for hepatocellular carcinoma with widening geographical disparities: implications for organ allocation.  Liver Transpl. 2018;24(10):1346-1356. doi:10.1002/lt.25317PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Levin  TR, Corley  DA, Jensen  CD,  et al.  Effects of organized colorectal cancer screening on cancer incidence and mortality in a large community-based population.  Gastroenterology. 2018;155(5):1383-1391.e5. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Washburn  K, Edwards  E, Harper  A, Freeman  R.  Hepatocellular carcinoma patients are advantaged in the current liver transplant allocation system.  Am J Transplant. 2010;10(7):1643-1648. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03127.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Freeman  RB  Jr, Wiesner  RH, Roberts  JP, McDiarmid  S, Dykstra  DM, Merion  RM.  Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD.  Am J Transplant. 2004;4(suppl 9):114-131. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6135.2004.00403.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Toso  C, Dupuis-Lozeron  E, Majno  P,  et al.  A model for dropout assessment of candidates with or without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list.  Hepatology. 2012;56(1):149-156. doi:10.1002/hep.25603PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Yao  FY, Bass  NM, Nikolai  B,  et al.  A follow-up analysis of the pattern and predictors of dropout from the waiting list for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the current organ allocation policy.  Liver Transpl. 2003;9(7):684-692. doi:10.1053/jlts.2003.50147PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Cucchetti  A, Cescon  M, Bigonzi  E,  et al.  Priority of candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation can be reduced after successful bridge therapy.  Liver Transpl. 2011;17(11):1344-1354. doi:10.1002/lt.22397PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Mehta  N, Dodge  JL, Goel  A, Roberts  JP, Hirose  R, Yao  FY.  Identification of liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma and a very low dropout risk: implications for the current organ allocation policy.  Liver Transpl. 2013;19(12):1343-1353. doi:10.1002/lt.23753PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
El-Serag  HB, Siegel  AB, Davila  JA,  et al.  Treatment and outcomes of treating of hepatocellular carcinoma among Medicare recipients in the United States: a population-based study.  J Hepatol. 2006;44(1):158-166. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Kemmer  N, Zacharias  V, Kaiser  TE, Neff  GW.  Access to liver transplantation in the MELD era: role of ethnicity and insurance.  Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54(8):1794-1797. doi:10.1007/s10620-008-0567-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Backus  L, Osmond  D, Grumbach  K, Vranizan  K, Phuong  L, Bindman  AB.  Specialists’ and primary care physicians’ participation in Medicaid managed care.  J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(12):815-821. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.01239.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Hoehn  RS, Hanseman  DJ, Jernigan  PL,  et al; Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS).  Disparities in care for patients with curable hepatocellular carcinoma.  HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(9):747-752. doi:10.1111/hpb.12427PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Virnig  BA.  Associating insurance status with cancer stage at diagnosis.  Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):189-191. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70043-3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Roundtable on Health Literacy.  A Proposed Framework for Integration of Quality Performance Measures for Health Literacy, Cultural Competence, and Language Access Services: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2018.
29.
United Network for Organ Sharing.  Making liver distribution more fair and equitablehttps://unos.org/policy/liver-distribution/. Accessed July 30, 2019.
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Disparities in health care
    Frederick Rivara, MD, MPH | University of Washington
    This paper raises some important concerns about potential disparities in health care based on the type of insurance patients who are candidates for liver transplant have. In this time of increasing disparities and appropriate attention to them, the causes for these disparities need to be determined and addressed.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Editor in Chief, JAMA Network Open
    Original Investigation
    Gastroenterology and Hepatology
    August 30, 2019

    Comparison of Liver Transplant Wait-List Outcomes Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Public vs Private Medical Insurance

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
    • 2Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
    • 3Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
    JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e1910326. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10326
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  Is type of insurance associated with liver transplant wait-list outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma?

    Findings  In this cohort study including 705 adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score exceptions at a single site initially wait-listed for liver transplant, 46.7% of patients with public medical insurance dropped out from the liver transplant wait-list compared with 28.7% of patients with Kaiser Permanente insurance and 33.8% of patients with other private medical insurance despite similar tumor-related characteristics.

    Meaning  Public insurance was associated with increased risk of waiting list dropout, and steps should be implemented to mitigate the increased risk of dropout among these patients.

    Abstract

    Importance  There are well-documented racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in access to health care among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, there are little data on the association of insurance type with liver transplant (LT) wait-list outcomes for patients with HCC.

    Objective  To examine LT wait-list outcomes for patients with HCC and public insurance compared with patients with private insurance.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This single-center cohort study included 705 adult patients with HCC who had Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exceptions and were included on a waiting list for LT from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016. Patients with Kaiser Permanente medical insurance, other private medical insurance, or public medical insurance were included. Data analysis was conducted from May 2018 to October 2018.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  The main outcome was cumulative incidence of LT waiting list dropout within 2 years of waiting list enrollment (baseline). Secondary outcomes included competing-risks analysis to identify risk factors associated with wait-list outcomes.

    Results  Among 705 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [57-65] years; 537 [76.2%] men) with HCC on an LT waiting list, 349 patients (49.5%) had Kaiser Permanente insurance, 157 patients (22.3%) had other private insurance, and 199 patients (28.2%) had public insurance. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 13.2 (7.8-18.7) months. Tumor characteristics were similar among insurance types. The cumulative incidence of dropout owing to tumor progression or death within 2 years of baseline was 21.8% (95% CI, 17.2%-26.7%) among the Kaiser Permanente insurance group, 25.5% (95% CI, 18.6%-33.0%) among the other private insurance group, and 35.5% (95% CI, 28.3%-42.7%) among the public insurance group (P < .001). The cumulative incidence of LT within 2 years of baseline was 67.3% (95% CI, 61.2%-72.6%) among the Kaiser Permanente insurance group, 64.1% (95% CI, 55.2%-71.7%) among the other private insurance group, and 48.5% (95% CI, 40.4%-56.1%) among the public insurance group (P < .001). In competing-risks multivariable analysis compared with patients with Kaiser Permanente insurance, patients with public insurance were associated with increased risk of dropout (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69 [95% CI, 1.17-2.43]; P = .005), but patients with other private insurance were not (HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.94-2.08]; P = .10). Waiting list dropout was also significantly associated with an α-fetoprotein level 100 ng/mL or higher (HR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.98-3.88]; P < .001), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at baseline (HR per point, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.09]; P < .001), and 3 or more lesions at baseline (HR vs 1 lesion of 2- to 3-cm diameter, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.27-3.37]; P = .004).

    Conclusions and Relevance  In this large cohort of patients with HCC on an LT waiting list, patients with public insurance were associated with worse wait-list outcomes compared with patients with Kaiser Permanente insurance or other private insurance, despite similar tumor-related characteristics at baseline. Improved health care coordination and delivery may be options to reduce these disparities.

    ×