Association of the Functional Medicine Model of Care With Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes | Complementary and Alternative Medicine | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Buttorff  C, Ruder  T, Bauman  M. Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2014.
2.
Paez  KA, Zhao  L, Hwang  W.  Rising out-of-pocket spending for chronic conditions: a ten-year trend.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(1):15-25. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.15PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Lehnert  T, Heider  D, Leicht  H,  et al.  Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions.  Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(4):387-420. doi:10.1177/1077558711399580PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Cuckler  GA, Sisko  AM, Poisal  JA,  et al.  National health expenditure projections, 2017-26: despite uncertainty, fundamentals primarily drive spending growth.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(3):482-492. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1655PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Eisenberg  DM, Burgess  JD.  Nutrition education in an era of global obesity and diabetes: thinking outside the box.  Acad Med. 2015;90(7):854-860. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000682PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Clarke  CA, Frates  J, Pegg Frates  E.  Optimizing lifestyle medicine health care delivery through enhanced interdisciplinary education.  Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016;10(6):401-405. doi:10.1177/1559827616661694PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Cresci  G, Beidelschies  M, Tebo  J, Hull  A.  Educating future physicians in nutritional science and practice: the time is now.  J Am Coll Nutr. 2019;38(5):387-394. doi:10.1080/07315724.2018.1551158PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Kris-Etherton  PM, Akabas  SR, Bales  CW,  et al.  The need to advance nutrition education in the training of health care professionals and recommended research to evaluate implementation and effectiveness.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(5)(suppl):1153S-1166S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.073502PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Devries  S, Agatston  A, Aggarwal  M,  et al.  A deficiency of nutrition education and practice in cardiology.  Am J Med. 2017;130(11):1298-1305. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.04.043PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Bland  J.  Defining function in the functional medicine model.  Integr Med (Encinitas). 2017;16(1):22-25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Institute for Functional Medicine. Functional medicine determines how and why illness occurs and restores health by addressing the root causes of disease for each individual. https://www.ifm.org/functional-medicine/. Accessed April 10, 2019.
12.
von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.  Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495-1499. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Katzan  I, Speck  M, Dopler  C,  et al.  The Knowledge Program: an innovative, comprehensive electronic data capture system and warehouse.  AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:683-692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Cella  D, Riley  W, Stone  A,  et al; PROMIS Cooperative Group.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179-1194. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Hays  RD, Bjorner  JB, Revicki  DA, Spritzer  KL, Cella  D.  Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global items.  Qual Life Res. 2009;18(7):873-880. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
National Institutes of Health. HealthMeasures. http://www.healthmeasures.net. Accessed September 20, 2018.
17.
Schalet  BD, Hays  RD, Jensen  SE, Beaumont  JL, Fries  JF, Cella  D.  Validity of PROMIS physical function measured in diverse clinical samples.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:112-118. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.039PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Hays  RD, Revicki  DA, Feeny  D, Fayers  P, Spritzer  KL, Cella  D.  Using linear equating to map PROMIS Global Health Items and the PROMIS-29 V2.0 Profile Measure to the Health Utilities Index Mark 3.  Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(10):1015-1022. doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0408-xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Yost  KJ, Eton  DT, Garcia  SF, Cella  D.  Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(5):507-516. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.018PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Norman  GR, Sloan  JA, Wyrwich  KW.  Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.  Med Care. 2003;41(5):582-592. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4CPubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
van Buuren  S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn  K.  Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R.  J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1-67. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03Google Scholar
22.
Austin  PC.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.  Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083-3107. doi:10.1002/sim.3697PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Plotnikoff  G, Barber  M.  Refractory depression, fatigue, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic pain: a functional medicine case report.  Perm J. 2016;20(4):15-242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Bergman  N, Riley  DS, Beidelschies  M.  Diet and lifestyle recommendations for the treatment of chronic cough and chronic disease.  BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:bcr-2017-223685. doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-223685PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Wang  DD, Hu  FB.  Precision nutrition for prevention and management of type 2 diabetes.  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(5):416-426. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30037-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Rippe  JM.  Lifestyle medicine: the health promoting power of daily habits and practices.  Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018;12(6):499-512. doi:10.1177/1559827618785554PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Bulaj  G, Ahern  MM, Kuhn  A, Judkins  ZS, Bowen  RC, Chen  Y.  Incorporating natural products, pharmaceutical drugs, self-care and digital/mobile health technologies into molecular-behavioral combination therapies for chronic diseases.  Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2016;11(2):128-145. doi:10.2174/1574884711666160603012237PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
National Research Council.  Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
29.
Collins  FS, Varmus  H.  A new initiative on precision medicine.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):793-795. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500523PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Sprangers  MA, Thong  MS, Bartels  M,  et al; GeneQol Consortium.  Biological pathways, candidate genes, and molecular markers associated with quality-of-life domains: an update.  Qual Life Res. 2014;23(7):1997-2013. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0656-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Pearson  ML, Mattke  S, Shaw  R, Ridgely  MS, Wiseman  SH. Patient self-management support programs: an evaluation. Final contract report (prepared by RAND Health under contract No. 282-00-0005): AHRQ publication No. 08-0011. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; November 2007.
32.
Hibbard  JH, Greene  J.  What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):207-214. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Hibbard  JH, Cunningham  PJ.  How engaged are consumers in their health and health care, and why does it matter?  Res Brief. 2008;8(8):1-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
34.
Hibbard  JH, Mahoney  ER, Stock  R, Tusler  M.  Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors?  Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1443-1463. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00669.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Leyton  E.  The Healing Relationship: Creating Effective Doctor-Patient Relationships. Gig Harbor, WA: Institute for Functional Medicine; 2010.
36.
Venetis  MK, Robinson  JD, Turkiewicz  KL, Allen  M.  An evidence base for patient-centered cancer care: a meta-analysis of studies of observed communication between cancer specialists and their patients.  Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(3):379-383. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Rathert  C, Wyrwich  MD, Boren  SA.  Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.  Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(4):351-379. doi:10.1177/1077558712465774PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Street  RL  Jr, Makoul  G, Arora  NK, Epstein  RM.  How does communication heal? pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes.  Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295-301. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Original Investigation
    Complementary and Alternative Medicine
    October 25, 2019

    Association of the Functional Medicine Model of Care With Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Center for Functional Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • 2Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • 3Institute for Functional Medicine, Federal Way, Washington
    • 4Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(10):e1914017. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14017
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  Is the functional medicine model of care associated with patient-reported health-related quality of life?

    Findings  In this cohort study of 7252 eligible patients (functional medicine center: 1595; family health center: 5657), functional medicine patients exhibited significantly larger improvements in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Global Physical Health at 6 months than propensity-matched patients at a family health center (398 matched pairs). Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Global Physical Health appeared to be sustained at 12 months but not significantly different from those at the family health center.

    Meaning  The findings of this study suggest that functional medicine may have the ability to improve global health in patients.

    Abstract

    Importance  The incidence of chronic disease is increasing along with health care–related costs. The functional medicine model of care provides a unique operating system to reverse illness, promote health, and optimize function. The association between this model of care and patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is unknown.

    Objective  To assess the association between functional medicine and patient-reported HRQoL using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global health measures.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare 7252 patients aged 18 years or older treated in a functional medicine setting with propensity score (PS)–matched patients in a primary care setting. Sensitivity analyses assessed improvement limited to patients seen at both 6 and 12 months. The study included patients who visited the Cleveland Clinic Center for Functional Medicine or a Cleveland Clinic family health center between April 1, 2015, and March 1, 2017.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was change in PROMIS Global Physical Health (GPH) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included PROMIS Global Mental Health (GMH) at 6 months and PROMIS GPH and GMH at 12 months. The PROMIS GPH and GMH scores were transformed to a T-score from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50. Higher scores indicate a better health-related quality of life.

    Results  Of the 7252 patients (functional medicine center: 1595; family health center: 5657), 4780 (65.9%) were women; mean (SD) age was 54.1 (16.0) years. At 6 months, functional medicine patients exhibited significantly larger improvements in PROMIS GPH T-score points than were seen in patients treated at a family health center (mean [SD] change, functional medicine center: 1.59 [6.29] vs family health center: 0.33 [6.09], P = .004 in 398 PS-matched pairs). At 12 months, functional medicine patients showed improvement similar to that observed at 6 months; however, comparisons with patients seen at the family health center were not significant. Patients in the functional medicine center with data at both 6 and 12 months demonstrated improvements in PROMIS GPH (mean [SD], 2.61 [6.53]) that were significantly larger compared with patients seen at a family health center (mean [SD], 0.25 [6.54]) (P = .02 in 91 PS-matched pairs).

    Conclusions and Relevance  In this study, the functional medicine model of care demonstrated beneficial and sustainable associations with patient-reported HRQoL. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

    ×