The study population data were drawn from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a telephone survey administered by state health departments with assistance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fair or poor health was assessed with the question “Would you say that in general your health is” with response options of “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair,” “poor,” “don’t know/not sure,” or “refused.” Trends were modeled with yearly data using a generalized additive model with penalized splines with 3 df. The 95% CIs are extremely narrow because of the large sample size and thus are not depicted here.
Trends were modeled with yearly data using a generalized additive model with penalized splines with 3 df. The 95% CIs are extremely narrow because of the large sample size and thus are not depicted here. Household income was assessed through self-report.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Rehkopf DH, Furstenberg FF, Rowe JW. Trends in Mental and Physical Health-Related Quality of Life in Low-Income Older Persons in the United States, 2003 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12):e1917868. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17868
Several studies have documented increases in morbidity and mortality1 and decreases in mental health status2 in the United States for those aged 35 to 59 years, which may also have occurred in older adults.3 This cross-sectional study examines time trends in general health and in physical and mental health measured in US adults aged 60 years and older.
The study population data were drawn from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a telephone survey administered by state health departments with assistance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Verbal consent was obtained from participants contacted through randomly chosen telephone numbers. Personally identifiable information was not obtained and respondents were able to end the interview at any time. General, physical, and mental health were measures addressed in the survey.4 All individuals 60 years and older surveyed cross-sectionally between 2003 and 2017 who reported all 3 health measures (<3% missing) were included for a total sample size of 2 432 609. These cross-sectional samples were of the US population over time, not individuals followed over time. General health was assessed with the question, “Would you say that in general your health is” with response options of “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair,” “poor,” “don’t know/not sure,” or “refused.” Physical health was assessed with the question, “Now thinking about your physical health, which includes physical illness and injury, for how many days during the past 30 days was your physical health not good?” with response options in number of days. Mental health was assessed with the question: “Now thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good?” with response options in number of days.5 We estimated trends between cross-sectional measures of the 3 outcomes using generalized additive models with 3 df.6 Analyses were performed with R statistical software version 3.5.3 (R Foundation), and 2-tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant. With the large sample size, 95% CIs and SEs were very small and therefore not reported. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies and, although considered nonhuman participant research, was approved by the Panel on Medical Human Subjects at Stanford University.
In the study sample of 2 432 609 respondents, 62% were women, 6.5% were black individuals, 3.2% were Latinx individuals, 41% had a household income of less than or equal to $35 000 per year, and 10% of the sample had less than a high school education. These proportions were generally stable from 2003 to 2017. General health and physical health improved or were stable in all age groups 65 years and older from 2003 to 2017 (Figure 1). For example, the percentage of the population aged 65 to 69 years stating that they were in fair or poor general health was 23% for 2003 and 19% for 2017, and physical health, measured as days per month with illness, in those aged 65 to 69 years for 2003 was 4.9 days and for 2017 was 4.9 days. For individuals aged 60 to 64 years, trends were stable for general health (23% for 2003 and 23% for 2017) and slightly declined for physical health (5.0 days for 2003 and 5.4 days for 2017). A more substantial decrease in mental health, measured as days per month with illness, occurred for those in groupings aged 60 to 64 (2.9 days for 2003 and 3.6 days for 2017), 65 to 69 (2.3 days for 2003 and 3.0 days for 2017), and 70 to 74 (2.2 days for 2003 and 2.4 days for 2017). The groups aged 60 to 64 and 65 to 69 years had a significant decrease in mental health over this period (3.5% increase in number of mentally unhealthy days per year; t = 14.01 [P < .001]). The surveys did not include specific questions about memory decline, which may also be important.
Mental health trends varied by gender, income, and education across the range of the population aged 60 years and older (Figure 2). Decreases in reported mental health, measured as days per month of illness, were similar for men and women, but greater for those with lower levels of income and those with less than a high school level of education. For example, number of days of poor mental health per month for those with household income below $35 000 per year were 2.9 days in 2003 to 4.1 days in 2017. For those with head of household not having a high school diploma, number of days of poor mental health per month were 3.6 days in 2003 to 4.4 days in 2017.
We found that individuals in groups aged 60 to 64 and 65 to 69 years shared a pattern of decreasing mental health well recognized in individuals aged 35 to 59, which may be owing in part to decreases in economic opportunity.1 We also found trends in decreases in mental health were greater for those with lower income or lower education than those with higher income or higher educational level. These decreases, however, began before the Great Recession of 2007 to 2009. Thus, while the decreases do not seem to be associated with the Great Recession, the mental health decreases (but not physical health trends) are shared with younger cohorts, even though 60- to 69-year-olds are primarily out of the labor force. The decreases may be because the effects of labor market conditions continue as cohorts age, especially for populations with low income and low levels of education, who exhibit both the highest burden as well as the greatest deterioration of mental health over time. Alternatively, they may be due to non–labor force–related issues. These trends will likely have important implications for future life expectancy, disability, and the capacity of older persons to engage productively in society.7
Accepted for Publication: October 21, 2019.
Published: December 18, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17868
Correction: This article was corrected on January 22, 2020, to fix a wording error in the Results.
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Rehkopf DH et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: David H. Rehkopf, ScD, MPH, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1701 Page Mill Rd, Room 229, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1210 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Author Contributions: Dr Rehkopf had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Rehkopf, Rowe.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Rehkopf.
Obtained funding: Rowe.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Rehkopf.
Supervision: Furstenberg, Rowe.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Rowe reported receiving grants from John A. Hartford Foundation during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This work was supported by the John A. Hartford Foundation.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Additional Information: We thank The Research Network on an Aging Society. In addition to the authors, members of The Research Network on an Aging Society include Toni Antonucci, PhD (Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), Lisa Berkman, PhD (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts), Axel Börsch-Supan, PhD (Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich, Germany), Laura Carstensen, PhD (Stanford University, Stanford, California); Dana P. Goldman, PhD (University of California, Los Angeles), Linda Fried, MD, MPH (Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York), James Jackson, PhD (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), Martin Kohli, PhD (Emeritus, European University Institute, Florence, Italy), Jay Olshansky, PhD (University of Illinois at Chicago), John Rother, JD (National Coalition on Health Care), and Julie Zissimopoulos, PhD (University of Southern California, Los Angeles).
Create a personal account or sign in to: