More Evidence of the Association of Diet With Human Testicular Function—Fish Oil Supplements | Complementary and Alternative Medicine | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Views 4,354
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
Public Health
January 17, 2020

More Evidence of the Association of Diet With Human Testicular Function—Fish Oil Supplements

Author Affiliations
  • 1Andrology and IVF Laboratory, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1919569. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19569

Human semen quality (ie, sperm count and concentration) has declined worldwide,1 and this decrease is greater in certain geographic regions, specifically in developed and industrialized countries.2 Current data suggest that this decline is associated with environmental and lifestyle factors, such as pollution, smoking, alcohol consumption, lack of physical activity, stress, and unhealthy diets.

The evidence supporting an association of diet with sperm quality is growing very rapidly. In fact, dozens of observational studies have concluded that diets rich in foods such as fish, shellfish and seafood, poultry, cereals, vegetables and fruits, low-fat dairy, and skim milk were positively associated with several sperm quality parameters.3 In the case of specific foods, data come primarily from observational studies; however, in case of nutrients, the evidence comes more from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), sometimes of doubtful statistical power. To overcome this issue and to assess the precise association of nutrients with sperm quality parameters, a 2018 meta-analysis was published.4 This study found that the administration of ω-3 fatty acid supplements (ie, 1 g/d of docosahexaenoic acid and 1 g/d of eicosapentaenoic acid for 10-32 weeks) improved total sperm count (mean difference, 18.70 × 106 spermatozoa; 95% CI, 16.89  × 106 to 20.51  × 106 spermatozoa), sperm concentration (mean difference, 10.98 × 106 spermatozoa/mL; 95% CI, 10.25  × 106 to 11.72 × 106 spermatozoa/mL), total motility (mean difference, 7.55%; 95% CI, 7.09% to 8.01%), and morphology (mean difference, 0.91%; 95% CI, 0.69% to 1.13%). However, these results must be cautiously interpreted because of the limited sample size of the meta-analyzed studies.5,6 Although RCTs represent the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine, when the observational evidence is not well determined, a well-designed RCT is extremely difficult to conceive.

An important study by Jensen et al7 provides further observational evidence of the potential associations of fish oil supplements (theoretically rich in ω-3, although the authors did not obtain information about the actual content of this fatty acid in the supplements mentioned) with better semen quality and sex hormone concentration. Although the authors tried to describe more associations between the proper function of spermatogenesis and different dietary supplements (ie, vitamin D, vitamin C, or multivitamins), only fish oil supplements reached statistical significance.7 Specifically, the authors found that men with a higher consumption of fish oil supplements had larger testicular size, greater sperm volume, greater total sperm count, lower follicle-stimulating hormone concentration, lower luteinizing hormone concentration, and a higher ratio of free testosterone to luteinizing hormone than men who did not use any supplements.7 While the data do not provide clear proof of dose-response associations because the authors only provided 2 cutoffs (ie, <60 or ≥60 days of supplementation),7 the association with sperm parameters and hormonal levels adds more information to the literature regarding the association of male diet with the spermatogenesis process.

This is the first well-designed study from a general population and including healthy individuals published to date, making the findings more interesting. Another strength of the study is the number of individuals analyzed (ie, 1679). Furthermore, the study by Jensen et al7 included an adequate phenotypic evaluation of the men, which is uncommon in similar articles. It is important that future studies consider phenotypic and lifestyle characteristics, including but not limited to diet, obesity, medications, smoking, and physical activity, as Jensen et al7 did.

However, this study7 also has some limitations. The main limitation is the lack of information about the diet questionnaire and its completion. If the participants filled out a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire, was it filled out by the participants at home? Was it checked by nutritionist-dietitian practitioners? Moreover, the cross-sectional nature of the study makes it impossible to determine causality in the results.

While these limitations are significant, the study is meaningful and insightful. Jensen et al7 are to be commended for their creative study. Moreover, the article contains very interesting observational data that could affect assisted reproductive clinics if the findings are reproduced in the future by well-designed RCTs. Despite the study by Jensen et al,7 much work is still required to examine the complex association between dietary supplements and semen quality and to determine whether such an association could help to improve fecundity or fecundability and the results of assisted reproductive techniques. Even more important, could the described associations affect the future generations and/or offspring health through epigenetic modification? It will be exciting to see.

Back to top
Article Information

Published: January 17, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19569

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Salas-Huetos A. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Albert Salas-Huetos, MSc, PhD, Andrology and IVF Laboratory, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 (albert.salas@utah.edu).

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
Levine  H, Jørgensen  N, Martino-Andrade  A,  et al.  Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.  Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6):646-659. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmx022PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Swan  SH, Elkin  EP, Fenster  L.  The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934-1996.  Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(10):961-966. doi:10.1289/ehp.00108961PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Salas-Huetos  A, Bulló  M, Salas-Salvadó  J.  Dietary patterns, foods and nutrients in male fertility parameters and fecundability: a systematic review of observational studies.  Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(4):371-389. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmx006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Salas-Huetos  A, Rosique-Esteban  N, Becerra-Tomás  N, Vizmanos  B, Bulló  M, Salas-Salvadó  J.  The effect of nutrients and dietary supplements on sperm quality parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.  Adv Nutr. 2018;9(6):833-848. doi:10.1093/advances/nmy057PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Martínez-Soto  JC, Domingo  JC, Cordobilla  B,  et al.  Dietary supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) improves seminal antioxidant status and decreases sperm DNA fragmentation.  Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016;62(6):387-395. doi:10.1080/19396368.2016.1246623PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Safarinejad  MR.  Effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on semen profile and enzymatic anti-oxidant capacity of seminal plasma in infertile men with idiopathic oligoasthenoteratospermia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study.  Andrologia. 2011;43(1):38-47. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.01013.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Jensen  TK, Priskorn  L, Holmboe  SA,  et al.  Associations of fish oil supplement use with testicular function in young men.  JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1919462. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19462Google Scholar
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×