Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Patel MS, Polsky D, Kennedy EH, et al. Smartphones vs Wearable Devices for Remotely Monitoring Physical Activity After Hospital Discharge: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e1920677. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20677
Nearly 80% of US adults own a smartphone,1 which accurately tracks physical activity.2 Wearable devices are growing in adoption and can track other biometrics.2-4 However, it is unknown whether smartphones or wearables are more sustainable for remotely monitoring patients over longer-term periods. The objective of this study was to compare the duration of remotely monitoring physical activity from smartphones vs wearables in the 6 months after hospital discharge.
This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial was approved by the University of Pennsylvania institutional review board and followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting guideline. Data were obtained from an ongoing trial that enrolled patients from January 23, 2017, to January 7, 2019.5 Patients provided written informed consent to participate in the trial.
Create a personal account or sign in to: