Association of Variation in Consultant Use Among Hospitalist Physicians With Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries | Health Care Workforce | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Mafi  JN, Russell  K, Bortz  BA, Dachary  M, Hazel  WA  Jr, Fendrick  AM.  Low-cost, high-volume health services contribute the most to unnecessary health spending.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(10):1701-1704. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0385PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Fendrick  AM, Smith  DG, Chernew  ME.  Applying value-based insurance design to low-value health services.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(11):2017-2021. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0878PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Schwartz  AL, Landon  BE, Elshaug  AG, Chernew  ME, McWilliams  JM.  Measuring low-value care in Medicare.  JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(7):1067-1076. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1541PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Beaudin-Seiler  B, Ciarametaro  M, Dubois  RW, Lee  J, Fendrick  AM. Reducing low-value care. Health Affairs. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20160920.056666/full/. Published September 20, 2016. Accessed March 27, 2019.
5.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. National health expenditures 2017 highlights. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/highlights.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed March 15, 2019.
6.
Kacik  A. Not-for-profit hospital operating margins continue to contract. Modern Healthcare. https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20180920/NEWS/180929982/not-for-profit-hospital-operating-margins-continue-to-contract. Published September 20, 2018. Accessed March 15, 2019.
7.
Badgery-Parker  T, Pearson  SA, Dunn  S, Elshaug  AG.  Measuring hospital-acquired complications associated with low-value care.  JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(4):499-505. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7464PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Ward  MJ, Eckman  MH, Schauer  DP, Raja  AS, Collins  S.  Cost-effectiveness of telemetry for hospitalized patients with low-risk chest pain.  Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(3):279-286. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01008.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Durairaj  L, Reilly  B, Das  K,  et al.  Emergency department admissions to inpatient cardiac telemetry beds: a prospective cohort study of risk stratification and outcomes.  Am J Med. 2001;110(1):7-11. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00640-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Wang  TJ, Mort  EA, Nordberg  P,  et al.  A utilization management intervention to reduce unnecessary testing in the coronary care unit.  Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(16):1885-1890. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.16.1885PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Graat  ME, Stoker  J, Vroom  MB, Schultz  MJ.  Can we abandon daily routine chest radiography in intensive care patients?  J Intensive Care Med. 2005;20(4):238-246. doi:10.1177/0885066605277212PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Eaton  KP, Levy  K, Soong  C,  et al.  Evidence-based guidelines to eliminate repetitive laboratory testing.  JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(12):1833-1839. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5152PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Price  MB, Grant  MJ, Welkie  K.  Financial impact of elimination of routine chest radiographs in a pediatric intensive care unit.  Crit Care Med. 1999;27(8):1588-1593. doi:10.1097/00003246-199908000-00033PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Stevens  JP, Nyweide  DJ, Maresh  S, Hatfield  LA, Howell  MD, Landon  BE.  Comparison of hospital resource use and outcomes among hospitalists, primary care physicians, and other generalists.  JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(12):1781-1787. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5824PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Stevens  JP, Nyweide  D, Maresh  S,  et al.  Variation in inpatient consultation among older adults in the United States.  J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(7):992-999. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3216-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Honda  H, Krauss  MJ, Jones  JC, Olsen  MA, Warren  DK.  The value of infectious diseases consultation in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.  Am J Med. 2010;123(7):631-637. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.01.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Ciemins  EL, Blum  L, Nunley  M, Lasher  A, Newman  JM.  The economic and clinical impact of an inpatient palliative care consultation service: a multifaceted approach.  J Palliat Med. 2007;10(6):1347-1355. doi:10.1089/jpm.2007.0065PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Classen  DC, Burke  JP, Wenzel  RP.  Infectious diseases consultation: impact on outcomes for hospitalized patients and results of a preliminary study.  Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(3):468-470. doi:10.1093/clinids/24.3.468PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Ahmed  A, Allman  RM, Kiefe  CI,  et al.  Association of consultation between generalists and cardiologists with quality and outcomes of heart failure care.  Am Heart J. 2003;145(6):1086-1093. doi:10.1016/S0002-8703(02)94778-2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Kuo  YF, Sharma  G, Freeman  JL, Goodwin  JS.  Growth in the care of older patients by hospitalists in the United States.  N Engl J Med. 2009;360(11):1102-1112. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0802381PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Research Data Assistance Center. Claim attending physician NPI number (FFS). https://www.resdac.org/cms-data/variables/claim-attending-physician-npi-number-ffs. Accessed December 20, 2019.
22.
American Hospital Association Linkage Files. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/ahalinkage/aha_linkage.jsp. Updated November 2019. Accessed December 20, 2019.
23.
Gade  G, Venohr  I, Conner  D,  et al.  Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial.  J Palliat Med. 2008;11(2):180-190. doi:10.1089/jpm.2007.0055PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Cohen  HJ, Feussner  JR, Weinberger  M,  et al.  A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management.  N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):905-912. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa010285PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Kunishima  H, Yamamoto  N, Kobayashi  T,  et al.  Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Japanese community hospital: 5-year experience.  J Infect Chemother. 2010;16(6):414-417. doi:10.1007/s10156-010-0076-2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Lesprit  P, Landelle  C, Brun-Buisson  C.  Clinical impact of unsolicited post-prescription antibiotic review in surgical and medical wards: a randomized controlled trial.  Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(2):E91-E97. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12062PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Bini  EJ, Weinshel  EH, Generoso  R,  et al.  Impact of gastroenterology consultation on the outcomes of patients admitted to the hospital with decompensated cirrhosis.  Hepatology. 2001;34(6):1089-1095. doi:10.1053/jhep.2001.29204PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Sellier  E, Pavese  P, Gennai  S, Stahl  JP, Labarère  J, François  P.  Factors and outcomes associated with physicians’ adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations for inpatients.  J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(1):156-162. doi:10.1093/jac/dkp406PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Jena  AB, Prasad  V, Goldman  DP, Romley  J.  Mortality and treatment patterns among patients hospitalized with acute cardiovascular conditions during dates of national cardiology meetings.  JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(2):237-244. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6781PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Original Investigation
    Health Policy
    February 21, 2020

    Association of Variation in Consultant Use Among Hospitalist Physicians With Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 2Division for Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 3Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 4Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland
    • 5Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
    JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e1921750. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21750
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  Are hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries who are exposed to higher rates of specialty consultation associated with outcomes such as greater resource use, length of stay, readmissions, and mortality?

    Findings  In this cohort study of 711 654 inpatient medical admissions, hospitalists who used specialty consultation more than their colleagues at the same institution used more resources without a difference in patient mortality. Compared with patients treated by other hospitalists, the patients of high-consulting hospitalists had longer lengths of stay, were less likely to go home, and were more likely to see a specialist within 90 days after discharge, but there was no significant difference in their mortality at 30 days or their likelihood of all-cause readmission.

    Meaning  A decrease in the frequency of specialty consultation may be an opportunity for hospitals to reduce complexity and costs in patient care without adversely affecting patients.

    Abstract

    Importance  Evidence is lacking on the consequences of high rates of inpatient consultation.

    Objective  To examine outcomes and resource use of patients cared for by hospitalists who use more inpatient consultation than their colleagues.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  A retrospective cohort study of medical admissions to hospitalists among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries was conducted. Hospitalist consultation tendency was identified from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014; admissions were calculated in 2013; and outcomes were measured in 2014. Data were analyzed from January 31, 2017, to May 9, 2019. A total of 711 654 admissions with patients receiving care from 14 584 hospitalists at 737 hospitals were included.

    Exposure  Admission to high-consulting hospitalists, considered to be those who were in the top 25% of the distribution of consulting frequency at their own hospital (adjusted for patient case mix).

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Outcomes included length of stay, Medicare Part B inpatient charges, discharge destination, all-cause 7- and 30-day readmissions, 90-day outpatient specialist visits, and 30-day mortality.

    Results  The 711 654 hospital admissions included 408 489 women (57.4%); mean (SD) age of the population was 80 (8.5) years. Length of stay of patients cared for by high-consulting hospitalists was longer compared with other hospitalists (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05). The admissions resulted in a mean of $137.91 (95% CI, $118.89-$156.93) more in Medicare Part B charges and were less likely to end with the patient going home (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) compared with patients cared for by other hospitalists in the cohort. Patients cared for by high-consulting hospitalists also were 7% more likely than patients cared for by other hospitalists to see an outpatient specialist at 90 days (aOR 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.09), with no significant differences in 30-day mortality (aOR 1.01, 95% CI, 0.98-1.03) or readmissions (7-day readmissions: aOR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98-1.03; 30-day readmissions: aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03).

    Conclusions and Relevance  Hospitalists who obtain consultations more than their colleagues at the same institution were associated with greater use of health care resources without apparent mortality benefit. Further investigation should identify whether reducing high rates of consultation can reduce resource use without harming patients.

    ×