[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.202.44. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Original Investigation
    Cardiology
    February 26, 2020

    Outcomes Associated With Oral Anticoagulants Plus Antiplatelets in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • 2Aetion Inc, New York, New York
    • 3Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular & Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
    • 4Thrombosis Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
    • 5University of Besançon, Besançon, France
    • 6University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom
    • 7Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
    • 8Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 9Tokai University, Isehara, Japan
    • 10Formerly Department of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    • 11Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany
    • 12Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
    • 13McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • 14Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    • 15University College London, London, United Kingdom
    JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e200107. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0107
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  What outcomes are associated with combination therapy using oral anticoagulants (OAC) plus antiplatelet drugs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?

    Findings  This cohort study of 24 436 patients with de novo atrial fibrillation found that, after adjusting for baseline characteristics and comedications, patients treated with OAC plus antiplatelet drugs had significantly higher incidence rates of stroke and any bleeding event than those receiving OAC alone. Use of OAC plus antiplatelet drugs was not associated with reduced risk of experiencing acute coronary syndromes.

    Meaning  These findings suggest that patients with atrial fibrillation treated with OAC plus antiplatelet drugs may have significantly higher risk of stroke and bleeding compared with those receiving OAC alone.

    Abstract

    Importance  Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke should receive oral anticoagulants (OAC). However, approximately 1 in 8 patients in the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field (GARFIELD-AF) registry are treated with antiplatelet (AP) drugs in addition to OAC, with or without documented vascular disease or other indications for AP therapy.

    Objective  To investigate baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients who were prescribed OAC plus AP therapy vs OAC alone.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  Prospective cohort study of the GARFIELD-AF registry, an international, multicenter, observational study of adults aged 18 years and older with recently diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor for stroke enrolled between March 2010 and August 2016. Data were extracted for analysis in October 2017 and analyzed from April 2018 to June 2019.

    Exposure  Participants received either OAC plus AP or OAC alone.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Clinical outcomes were measured over 3 and 12 months. Outcomes were adjusted for 40 covariates, including baseline conditions and medications.

    Results  A total of 24 436 patients (13 438 [55.0%] male; median [interquartile range] age, 71 [64-78] years) were analyzed. Among eligible patients, those receiving OAC plus AP therapy had a greater prevalence of cardiovascular indications for AP, including acute coronary syndromes (22.0% vs 4.3%), coronary artery disease (39.1% vs 9.8%), and carotid occlusive disease (4.8% vs 2.0%). Over 1 year, patients treated with OAC plus AP had significantly higher incidence rates of stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01-2.20) and any bleeding event (aHR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.17-1.70) than those treated with OAC alone. These patients did not show evidence of reduced all-cause mortality (aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.98-1.51). Risk of acute coronary syndrome was not reduced in patients taking OAC plus AP compared with OAC alone (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.70-1.94). Patients treated with OAC plus AP also had higher rates of all clinical outcomes than those treated with OAC alone over the short term (3 months).

    Conclusions and Relevance  This study challenges the practice of coprescribing OAC plus AP unless there is a clear indication for adding AP to OAC therapy in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation.

    ×