[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.238.190.122. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    3 Comments for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    Gender differences?
    Ron M, MS1 | Medical Student
    In the methodology, we are told that "Nurses, women, those working in Wuhan, and frontline workers reported more severe symptoms on all measurements." However, what of the psychosocial aspects of self-reporting depression? The question of bias in data collection, particularly the fact that women are more likely to be open about feelings of depression than men (be it down to machoism or what not), has not been sufficiently addressed.

    On that basis alone, I find the conclusion problematic: "Special interventions to promote mental well-being in health care workers exposed to COVID-19 need to be immediately implemented, with women ...
    requiring particular attention."
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    "On the Nature of Things"
    Paolo Mazzarello, MD and Emanuela Ciuchi, MD |
    “For their sense of duty and listening to the weak as well as plaintive voice of the patients, [Care Workers] dropped with fatigue and ran the risk of getting infected themselves.”
    Lucretius (1st century BC), “On the Nature of Things”: The Plague of Athens, VI, 1248-50.

    The commented survey is precise and concerns several case histories. However, we agree with Ron M.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    Immediate vs longer term follow up
    Hussain Maqbool Ahmed Khuwaja, BSc Nursing | Aga Khan University School of Nursing and Midwifery
    This is an amazing piece of evidence for other countries to assess status of mental health for their front-line health care workers as well as general population.

    The sample size calculated for this study has used the estimates of stress one year after SARS epidemic. On the contrary, the current study is assessing the stress level of participant immediately after the surge of COVID19 pandemic. I suggest that the sample must have been assessed for all outcomes that have been assessed not merely stress.

    In methods section, the outcome variable of depression is assessed using PHQ-9
    and the scores are mentioned as normal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), and severe (15-21) depression. At the start of this paragraph, the range of possible PHQ-9 scores is mentioned as 0-27. I think the ranges mentioned in categories needs some correction because the range of 22 to 27 is not falling in any category. Moreover, the study that has been cited at 10 in references says that the cut-off for PHQ-9 is suggested to be 11 in Chinese population instead of 10. However, international studies do suggest to use the cut-off value of 10 or more for depression.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    Original Investigation
    Psychiatry
    March 23, 2020

    Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    • 2Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
    • 3Department of Psychiatry, Wuhan Youfu Hospital, Wuhan, China
    • 4Department of Psychiatry, Jingmen No. 2 People’s Hospital, Jingmen, China
    • 5Department of Psychiatry, Wuhan Wudong Hospital, Wuhan, China
    • 6Department of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
    JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e203976. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  What factors are associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers in China who are treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?

    Findings  In this cross-sectional study of 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals equipped with fever clinics or wards for patients with COVID-19 in multiple regions of China, a considerable proportion of health care workers reported experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress, especially women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers directly engaged in diagnosing, treating, or providing nursing care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.

    Meaning  These findings suggest that, among Chinese health care workers exposed to COVID-19, women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers have a high risk of developing unfavorable mental health outcomes and may need psychological support or interventions.

    Abstract

    Importance  Health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could be psychologically stressed.

    Objective  To assess the magnitude of mental health outcomes and associated factors among health care workers treating patients exposed to COVID-19 in China.

    Design, Settings, and Participants  This cross-sectional, survey-based, region-stratified study collected demographic data and mental health measurements from 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals from January 29, 2020, to February 3, 2020, in China. Health care workers in hospitals equipped with fever clinics or wards for patients with COVID-19 were eligible.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  The degree of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress was assessed by the Chinese versions of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, the 7-item Insomnia Severity Index, and the 22-item Impact of Event Scale–Revised, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mental health outcomes.

    Results  A total of 1257 of 1830 contacted individuals completed the survey, with a participation rate of 68.7%. A total of 813 (64.7%) were aged 26 to 40 years, and 964 (76.7%) were women. Of all participants, 764 (60.8%) were nurses, and 493 (39.2%) were physicians; 760 (60.5%) worked in hospitals in Wuhan, and 522 (41.5%) were frontline health care workers. A considerable proportion of participants reported symptoms of depression (634 [50.4%]), anxiety (560 [44.6%]), insomnia (427 [34.0%]), and distress (899 [71.5%]). Nurses, women, frontline health care workers, and those working in Wuhan, China, reported more severe degrees of all measurements of mental health symptoms than other health care workers (eg, median [IQR] Patient Health Questionnaire scores among physicians vs nurses: 4.0 [1.0-7.0] vs 5.0 [2.0-8.0]; P = .007; median [interquartile range {IQR}] Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale scores among men vs women: 2.0 [0-6.0] vs 4.0 [1.0-7.0]; P < .001; median [IQR] Insomnia Severity Index scores among frontline vs second-line workers: 6.0 [2.0-11.0] vs 4.0 [1.0-8.0]; P < .001; median [IQR] Impact of Event Scale–Revised scores among those in Wuhan vs those in Hubei outside Wuhan and those outside Hubei: 21.0 [8.5-34.5] vs 18.0 [6.0-28.0] in Hubei outside Wuhan and 15.0 [4.0-26.0] outside Hubei; P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed participants from outside Hubei province were associated with lower risk of experiencing symptoms of distress compared with those in Wuhan (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.88; P = .008). Frontline health care workers engaged in direct diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with COVID-19 were associated with a higher risk of symptoms of depression (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.11-2.09; P = .01), anxiety (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.22-2.02; P < .001), insomnia (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.92-4.60; P < .001), and distress (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.25-2.04; P < .001).

    Conclusions and Relevance  In this survey of heath care workers in hospitals equipped with fever clinics or wards for patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan and other regions in China, participants reported experiencing psychological burden, especially nurses, women, those in Wuhan, and frontline health care workers directly engaged in the diagnosis, treatment, and care for patients with COVID-19.

    ×