Dots denote ORs and error bars denote 95% CIs.
eTable 1. Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Diagnosis of ASD in Children According to Continuous Parental Age (per 5-Year Increase) at Delivery
eTable 2. Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Diagnosis of ASD in Children According to Parental Age (Years) at Delivery (Restricted to Children Born 2000-2013)
eTable 3. Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Diagnosis of ASD in Children According to Paternal Age (Years) at Delivery, Further Adjustment of Paternal Education
eTable 4. Effect Estimate for Diagnosis of ASD in Children According to Continuous Grandparental Age (per 5-Year Increase) at Delivery
eTable 5. Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Diagnosis of ASD in Children According to Parental and Grandparental Age (years) at Delivery (Stratified by ASD Types)
eTable 6. Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Diagnosis of ASD in Children According to Parental and Grandparental Age (years) at Delivery (Stratified by Child’s Sex)
eTable 7. Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Diagnosis of ASD in Children According to Parental and Grandparental Age (Years) at Delivery (Stratified By Maternal or Grandmaternal Parity)
eTable 8. Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Diagnosis of ASD in Grandchildren According to Grandparental Age (Years) at Delivery (Extent Multigenerational Cohort to Parents Born 1942-1990 Relinked From CRS)
eFigure 1. The Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) for the Main Variables Included in the Analyses for Parental Age and ASD Risk in Children
eFigure 2. The Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) for the Main Variables Included in the Analyses for Grandparental Age and ASD Risk in Grandchildren
eFigure 3. Mean Age at Birth of the Parents and Grandparents in Parental Age Cohort and Multigenerational Cohort During the Study Period
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Gao Y, Yu Y, Xiao J, et al. Association of Grandparental and Parental Age at Childbirth With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e202868. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2868
Is grandparental age at the time of birth of the parent associated with the risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in the grandchildren?
This Danish national population-based cohort study across 3 generations observed transgenerational associations suggesting that ASD risk in children was elevated if their mothers were born to young (≤19 years) grandparents or if their fathers were born to young (≤19 years) and older (≥40 years) grandparents, compared with children whose parents were born to grandparents aged 25 to 29 years. These associations observed for grandparental hage were independent of possible parental age associations with ASD risk in children.
These findings suggest that the risk of ASD associated with young or advanced grandparental age might be transmitted across generations, which should be considered in future research of the causes of ASD.
Advanced parental age has been associated with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in children. However, little is known about the association between grandparental age at the time of birth of the parent and the risk of ASD in the grandchildren.
To estimate the associations between parental and grandparental age and ASD risk in children.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This population-based, multigenerational cohort study used data from Danish national health registries. A parental age cohort was constructed to evaluate the association between parental age and ASD in 1 476 783 singleton children born from 1990 to 2013, and a multigenerational cohort was also constructed including 362 438 fathers and 458 234 mothers born from 1973 to 1990 for whom information on grandparental age was available. Data analyses were conducted from November 1, 2018, through February 7, 2020.
Parental age at childbirth and grandparental age at the time of the birth of the parent.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Diagnoses of ASD in children were obtained from the Danish Psychiatric Central Register (1994-2017). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the associations between parental or grandparental age and ASD in children.
Of the 1 476 783 children born from 1990 to 2013, 758 066 (51.3%) were male, and 27 616 (1.9%) had ASD (20 467 [74.1%] were male). Advanced paternal or maternal age over 30 years was monotonically associated with increased ASD risk, with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.45-1.68) for maternal age 40 years and older and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.39-1.78) for paternal age 50 years and older, compared with parents aged 25 to 29 years. In the multigenerational cohort, 9364 grandchildren (1.7%) had ASD. This study found U-shaped associations, in that ASD risk was higher among grandchildren of younger (≤19 years) maternal grandmothers (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.52-1.85), younger maternal grandfathers (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.26-1.78), and younger paternal grandmothers (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04-1.34), and older (≥40 years) paternal grandmothers (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.90) compared with the grandchildren of grandparents who were aged 25 to 29 years at the time of giving birth to the parents.
Conclusions and Relevance
These findings corroborate previous studies suggesting that advanced parental age is independently associated with increased ASD risk in children. This study also found that children with young maternal grandparents and children with young and old paternal grandparents had elevated ASD risk. Possible transmission of ASD risk across generations should be considered in etiological research on ASD.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by communication deficiencies, language impairments, and repetitive patterns of behavior.1 The prevalence of ASD among children has been increasing during the past decades, and the prevalence is estimated to be approximately 1% to 2% across different regions.2 In the US, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that children born in 2006 had a more than 2-fold risk of ASD compared with those born a decade previously.3 This increase in prevalence may be attributed to a combination of factors, such as improved diagnostic efficiency and heightened awareness and/or a true increase.4 Although etiological research in ASD has focused predominantly on genetic factors, perinatal and environmental risk factors likely contribute to the increased ASD prevalence over time as well.5,6
In light of worldwide increasing trends regarding postponed parenthood, the possible association of parental age on child health has generated considerable interest.7 Research conducted in different study populations has suggested that advanced maternal and paternal age are independently associated with increased risk of ASD in children,8-11 for which different mechanisms have been proposed.12 Increased rates of de novo mutations and epigenetic alternations associated with increasing age are the most frequently cited mechanisms to explain the association between paternal age and ASD risk in children.13,14 Meanwhile, higher rates of chromosomal abnormalities, perinatal and obstetric complications, and potential genomic and/or epigenetic alterations induced by cumulative exposure to environmental toxins might account for the association between maternal age and ASD risk in children.15
More recently, hypotheses regarding the possibility of transgenerational exposure risk for ASD have been raised. An increasing number of animal experiments16,17 have indicated that intrauterine environmental exposures could lead to de novo and/or epigenetic alterations in the germline that could subsequently influence disease risk in future generations. Although most of these findings have come from animal studies,16-18 epidemiological evidence of transgenerational exposure effects on neurological diseases risk is also emerging.19-22 A UK birth cohort study19 found that grandmaternal smoking has been linked to ASD risk in granddaughters. In addition, grandmaternal intake of diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy has been associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis in the grandchildren, as reported in a US cohort.20 Advanced grandfather’s age was also found to be associated with increased risk for ASD and schizophrenia in 2 Swedish studies.21,22 We hypothesized that grandparental age at the time of birth of the parents might affect de novo and/or epigenetic alterations in the germline of the parents and subsequently be associated with ASD risk in the grandchildren. We conducted a population-based multigenerational cohort study and investigated whether ASD risk in children was associated with parental age at childbirth and also with grandparental age at the time of birth of the parents.
The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the institutional review board at Yale University. Informed consent was not required according to Danish law governing registry-based research studies with no participant contact.
The unique personal identification number assigned to all Danish residents allows the linkage across registers, including the Civil Registration System (CRS)23 and the Danish Medical Birth Register (DMBR).24 We constructed a parental age cohort by including 1 476 783 singleton children born from 1990 to 2013 in Denmark. The parental age cohort was constructed to investigate the association between parental age at delivery and ASD risk in children. The study period was selected to allow appropriate follow-up for ASD ascertainment using the Danish Psychiatric Central Register. We also constructed a multigenerational cohort by including all fathers and mothers born in Denmark from 1973 to 1990 to study the association between grandparental age and ASD risk in the grandchildren born from 1990 to 2013. A total of 362 438 and 458 234 singleton children had paternal or maternal grandparental age information, respectively, available for analyses. Children were followed from birth until December 31, 2017, for ASD status. The flowchart of the study participants’ selection is presented in Figure 1.
Diagnoses of ASD were ascertained from the DPCR25 using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), which has been used from 1994 to the present.26 Child psychiatrists who had mandatory training in the use of the ICD-10 were responsible for registry reporting.23 Autism spectrum disorders were typically diagnosed at ages 3 to 5 years.27 Children born in 1990 were approximately 4 years old in 1994, and children born in 2013 would be at least 3 years of age by the end of study follow-up in 2017. A child was considered to have ASD if he or she had received a diagnosis with at least 1 of the following ICD-10 codes: F84.0, F84.1, F84.5, F84.8, and F84.9.
We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for ASD risk in children and evaluated the associations of maternal age, paternal age, maternal grandparental age, and paternal grandparental age with ASD risk in children separately. Parental age was defined as the parent’s age at the time of the index child’s birth. Grandparental age was defined as the grandparent’s age at the time of birth of the parent. We first analyzed parental age and grandparental age as continuous variables and estimated the risk for ASD associated with a 5-year increase in age. An age square term was included in the model to evaluate for potential nonlinear response for continuous age variables and ASD risk. To facilitate comparisons with previous studies,8,10,21 age variables were grouped into 5-year intervals and categorized into the following 6 categories: younger than 20 years, 20 to 24 years, 25 to 29 years, 30 to 34 years, 35 to 39 years, and 40 years or older. The oldest age group was further classified into 40 to 49 years and 50 years or older for paternal age, and 45 years or older for grandpaternal age. The reference group was set to 25 to 29 years for categorical age analyses.
Potential confounders were selected a priori according to directed acyclic graphs (see eFigure 1 and eFigure 2 in the Supplement). The main covariate data included parity, the date of birth, and child’s sex retrieved from the DMBR, and parental age and maternal country of origin obtained from the CRS. Information on parental education was linked from the Integrated Database for Labour Market Research.28 In the analyses for parental age, we adjusted for child’s birth year, parity of the mother, maternal education, and maternal country of origin. In the analyses for grandparental age, we adjusted for birth year of the parents, parity of the grandmothers at the time of the parent’s birth, and grandmaternal education. We constructed a separate model that also adjusted for the age of the spouse in the analyses to disentangle the potential independent effect of age from 1 parent. However, spouse age was moderately to highly correlated in our data (Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.67 for parental age and 0.73 for grandparental age); thus, collinearity is possible, and decreased statistical precision are expected in the model after mutually adjusting for the spouse’s age.
Genetic confounding by mental illnesses might influence the association between parental age of delivery and ASD risk in children29; thus, we also performed sensitivity analyses to also adjust for the psychiatric history (ICD-10 codes F00-F99) of either parent before the child’s birth in the analyses for parental age. Because the information on ICD-10 diagnoses became available from 1994, we restricted the analyses with additional adjustment for parental psychiatric illnesses to parents who gave birth between 2000 and 2013, allowing at least 5 years for disease diagnosis before giving birth. Psychiatric history for grandparents before the birth of the parents were not available in the ICD-10 records, and only 4% of grandmothers had a country of origin other than Denmark; therefore, these covariates were not included for grandparental age analyses. In addition, because paternal education information was obtained for only 95% of fathers (5% missing) from the Integrated Database for Labour Market Research, we presented the results of paternal education adjustment as a sensitivity analysis. However, grandparental education is largely missing, and we were, thus, unable to adjust for grandparental education in grandpaternal age analyses. Furthermore, we performed stratified analyses and evaluated the potential effect measure modification by child’s sex in both parental and grandparental age analyses. We also evaluated the association of parental or grandparental age with specific ASD subtypes (eg, childhood autism [ICD-10 code F84.0], Asperger syndrome [ICD-10 code F84.5], or others) and performed analyses restricted to first-born children or first-born parents only.
Parental birth records registered in the DMBR since 1973 were available for only a subset of children (37.3%) born in 1990 to 2013 who were included in both study cohorts. Although the DMBR started in 1973, the CRS had parental age at birth information recorded starting from 1942. We conducted additional analyses by extending the multigenerational cohort to include fathers and mothers born in Denmark from 1942 to 1990 and reanalyzed the association between grandparental age and ASD in grandchildren. The increased sample size allowed us to further classify the oldest grandparental age group into 40 to 49 years and 50 years or more, which is comparable to parental age classification. Moreover, with an extended follow-up period, there was a sufficiently large number of children (90.3%) born from 1990 to 2013 who had both parental and grandparental age available, allowing us to evaluate whether the associations for grandparental age and ASD risk in grandchildren would change when parental age was also adjusted in the model. However, the birth year of the parents was the only covariate included in these analyses because variables such as grandmaternal education and parity obtained through DMBR were missing before 1973. All analyses were performed in SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute). Data analyses were conducted from November 1, 2018, through February 7, 2020.
Of the 1 476 783 children (758 066 [51.3%] male) born from 1990 to 2013 included in the parental age cohort, 27 616 (1.9%) had ASD (20 467 [74.1%] male); 9364 grandchildren (1.7%) in the multigenerational cohort had ASD. Most of the mothers were from Denmark (1 286 903 children [87.1%]) and most mothers had an upper secondary-level education or a bachelor’s degree or higher (1 135 683 children [76.9%]) (Table 1). The mean (SD) age at delivery was higher for the fathers compared with the mothers (32.5 [5.7] years vs 29.8 [4.9] years), and the age of delivery had increased considerably in similar rates for the fathers and mothers from 1990 to 2013 (eFigure 3 in the Supplement).
Among grandmothers, nearly all were from Denmark (783 665 women [95.5%]), and more than one-half (439 460 women [53.5%]) had an upper secondary-level education or a bachelor’s degree (Table 2). The mean (SD) age at delivery for the grandparents (maternal grandfathers, 28.7 [5.3] years; maternal grandmothers, 25.9 [4.6] years; paternal grandfathers, 28.7 [5.2] years; paternal grandmothers, 25.9 [4.6] years) was lower than those of the parents, which remained rather stable over time from 1973 to 1990 (eFigure 3 in the Supplement).
When parental age was analyzed continuously, we estimated that a 5-year increase in maternal or paternal age was associated with a 9% increase in odds for ASD in children, whereas the effect size attenuated to a 3% increase in odds for maternal age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05) and 7% (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06-1.09) for paternal age after mutually adjusting for the spouse’s age (eTable 1 in the Supplement).
In 5-year categorization of age, the proportion of ASD among children born to mothers or fathers at ages 25 to 30 years was 1.84% and 1.90%, respectively. Maternal and paternal age of 30 years or greater was associated with a monotonic increase in ASD risk in children (Table 3 and Figure 2A and B). The highest OR was observed for maternal age over 40 years (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.45-1.68), and paternal age greater than 50 years (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.39-1.78) compared with ages 25 to 29 years as the reference. Few parents gave birth at ages younger than 19 years in this cohort, whereas maternal age of 20 to 24 years also was associated with a small increased risk for ASD (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.08) compared with the reference. These effect estimates were slightly attenuated when spouse age was mutually adjusted in the model, but the overall associations remained (Table 3). The results did not change when we further adjusted for psychiatric history of the parents (eTable 2 in the Supplement). The association of paternal age with ASD in children was only slightly attenuated after additionally controlling for paternal education and the overall findings remain the same (eTable 3 in the Supplement).
The associations for grandparental age and ASD in the grandchildren followed a nonlinear pattern (eTable 4 in the Supplement). In 5-year categorization of age, the proportion of ASD among children born to maternal grandmother, maternal grandfather, paternal grandmother, and paternal grandfather at ages 25 to 30 years was 1.50%, 1.61%, 1.45%, and 1.49%, respectively. We observed U-shaped associations between paternal grandparental age and ASD risk in the grandchildren by the 5-year groups—that is, the risk of ASD in grandchildren was increased for those whose fathers were born to young (aged ≤19 years) grandmothers (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04-1.34) and grandfathers (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.93-1.50) or older (aged ≥40 years) grandmothers (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.90) and grandfathers (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94-1.31) compared with grandparents aged 25 to 29 years as the reference. Moreover, children of mothers born to young (aged ≤19 years) grandmothers (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.52-1.85) and grandfathers (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.26-1.78) also had elevated risk of ASD, but no apparent associations were observed for older maternal grandparents (Table 3 and Figure 2C-F). Mutual adjustment for spouse’s age attenuated some of the associations toward the null, especially for younger grandpaternal age, but the overall associations remained (Table 3).
There were no clear differences in the associations stratified by ASD subtypes, especially for the results regarding childhood autism and Asperger syndrome (eTable 5 in the Supplement). We did not find apparent differences by child’s sex either (eTable 6 in the Supplement). Results remained robust when we restricted the parental age analyses to first-born children, and also when we restricted the grandparental age analyses to first-born parents (eTable 7 in the Supplement).
When expanding birth year of the parents from 1942 to 1990 in the multigenerational cohort, attenuations of the younger grandparental age effect estimates and ASD risk in the grandchildren were noted, whereas the older maternal and paternal grandfather age effect estimates were strengthened (eTable 8 in the Supplement). Advanced paternal grandfather age effect estimates were slightly increased when spouse’s age was included in the model. The overall results for grandparental age and ASD risk in grandchildren were robust and only slightly attenuated when parental age was adjusted in the model (eTable 8 in the Supplement).
In this large, national, population-based cohort study across 3 generations, we found that both parental and grandparental ages at the time of birth of the children or the corresponding parents were associated with ASD risk in children. The associations between grandparental age and ASD risk in grandchildren persisted after adjusting for parental age.
Advanced parental age has already been considered as a potential risk factor for ASD.8,29,30 Our findings are consistent with those of previous large population-based studies,9,10,31,32 which indicated that both advanced maternal and paternal age were independently associated with increased risk of ASD in children. A newer hypothesis has recently been proposed that the association of parental age with the risk of ASD could persist across generations.29 One animal study17 has provided evidence that both the offspring and the second-generation offspring from older dams had altered sociability, grooming, and anxiety behaviors that were associated with the core symptoms of ASD. However, evidence from human studies is still lacking. Only 2 epidemiological studies21,33 have been conducted to investigate the association between grandparental age and ASD risk in grandchildren. The larger nested case-control study21 conducted in Sweden included 5936 individuals with childhood autism and reported that advanced grandpaternal age at the time of birth of the parent was associated with autism in grandchildren. However, the other smaller study33 from the UK with 86 ASD cases found that advanced maternal grandmother age was most significantly associated with ASD and autistic traits in the grandchildren. In our study, we did not find evidence to suggest that advanced maternal grandmother age was associated with ASD risk in grandchildren. Although we also observed an association of advanced paternal grandparental age and ASD risk in grandchildren, the estimated magnitude of effect is smaller than the reports from the Swedish study.21 However, we unexpectedly observed that the ASD risk in grandchildren was elevated for young grandparents in Denmark, especially among those who gave birth to parents before age 20 years.
Age at delivery is the result of diverse social and biological processes and might be a proxy for multiple risk factors that converge on ASD.29 Paternal age–related de novo mutations are widely assumed to be the underlying causal mechanism to neurodevelopmental disorders, including ASD and schizophrenia.21,22,34 However, genetic confounding has been raised as another plausible alternative explanation,35,36 as supported by a study37 reporting that women with a high genetic predisposition to schizophrenia also tended to have their first child at an early or later age. It is worth noting that the potential causes of delayed reproductive age might also influence ASD risk. Advanced age is associated with gamete dysfunction and fertility problems, which will delay reproduction.38 In addition, individuals with genetic liabilities may exhibit personality traits such as aloofness, rigidity, and anxiousness that would have adverse effects on their socioeconomic achievement, thereby delaying reproduction to an older age.29,39
The literature concerning mental health outcomes in young parenthood has been overshadowed by the interests of studying advanced parental age in modern society.40 Teenage parenthood is often associated with a less supportive and less stable home environment and impaired socioeconomic and educational status that could affect pregnancy and child health.41,42 Industrialization and increasing educational attainment in developed countries have led to delayed reproduction among adults and a decreased incidence of teenage parenthood over the past decades.43 However, young parenthood was common in Denmark during the grandparental generations. Therefore, ASD risk in the grandchildren associated with younger and older grandparental age could be attributable to different social and biological mechanisms.44,45
Our study has several strengths. First, we were able to construct nationwide population cohort samples in Denmark that spanned across 3 generations to evaluate the association between parental or grandparental age and risk of ASD in children. Information on sociodemographic characteristics of the parents and the grandparents was obtained from data routinely registered at birth in the DMBR and CRS, which eliminated recall bias. The latter is a major limitation for some previous multigenerational studies that have relied on self-reported grandparental exposures retrospectively. Ages of the mother and the father were both registered in the CRS, thus allowing comparisons of maternal and paternal origins of ASD risk. Furthermore, the sample size was sufficiently large to quantify risk associated with 6 or more categories of age classifications and to conduct coadjusted analyses of the spouse’s age. Diagnoses of ASD were ascertained from the Danish Psychiatric Central Register, which documents data with high validity.46 This outcome assessment approach also limited possible bias resulting from nonparticipation.
Several limitations of the present study should also be noted. First, our multigenerational cohort, following parents born from 1973 to 1990, did not have a complete follow-up of their reproductive age by the end of 2013 (ie, the follow-up is not sufficiently long to capture older parental age); therefore, bias associated with truncated data is likely to be introduced. We could not rule out that chance findings are possible, especially for the youngest and the oldest age categories with smaller sample sizes. In our analyses, by extending the study period of the multigenerational cohorts including parents born from 1942 to 1990 in Denmark, we observed some attenuations of the younger grandparental age effects, which could partially be explained by increased statistical precision with a large sample size. Results for advanced maternal and paternal grandfather age effect estimates were strengthened. Moreover, the grandparental age effects were largely unchanged in the model further accounting for parental age, suggesting that the observed grandparental age associations were independent of the potential parental age effects. Our findings should be replicated in future cohorts with complete distributions of prospective data from both grandparental age and parental age, which would allow an estimation of joint effect of both ages. Moreover, grandpaternal education was not available for adjustment; thus, residual confounding is possibly affecting our grandpaternal age analyses. In addition, confounding by genetic risk for ASD might also be possible. The information on previous psychiatric diagnoses of the grandparents was also not available; thus, we were not able to adjust for these factors that might be associated with an individual’s chance of having a child or delaying their parenthood. Additional adjustment for psychiatric history of the parent, however, did not change the associations between parental age and ASD risk in children.
These findings suggest that parental age of 30 years or greater is associated with an increased risk of ASD in the offspring. Younger or older age of grandparents at the time of the parent’s birth were also associated with ASD risk in grandchildren. Our findings enrich the current understanding of the complex causes of ASD. Our findings also highlight the potential adverse association of very young age at pregnancy and neurodevelopmental risk that has often been overlooked, particularly for the risk for ASD. Further studies on the role of transgenerational age effects may be important in understanding the role of reproductive age–related mechanisms in ASD and other related neurodevelopmental disorders.
Accepted for Publication: February 19, 2020.
Published: April 15, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2868
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Gao Y et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: Zeyan Liew, PhD, MPH, Yale Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 1 Church St, New Haven, CT 06510 (email@example.com).
Author Contributions: Dr Liew had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: J. Zhang, Olsen, Liew.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Gao, Yu, Xiao, Luo, Y. Zhang, Tian, Olsen, Li, Liew.
Drafting of the manuscript: Gao, Luo, Liew.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Yu, Xiao, Luo, Y. Zhang, Tian, J. Zhang, Olsen, Li, Liew.
Statistical analysis: Gao, Yu, Xiao, Luo, Y. Zhang, Liew.
Obtained funding: Li.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Yu, Luo, Tian, Olsen, Li, Liew.
Supervision: Y. Zhang, Olsen, Liew.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Funding/Support: Dr Liew was partly supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Pathway to Independence Award (grant K99ES026729/R00ES026729). Dr Gao was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81773387 and 81872629) and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (grant 17ZR1415800). Drs Yu and Li were supported by unrestricted grants from the Lundbeck Foundation (grants R232-2016-2462 and R265-2017-4069), the Danish Council for Independent Research and Independent Research Fund Denmark (grants DFF-6110-00019 and 9039-00010), the Karen Elise Jensens Fond, and Novo Nordisk Fonden (grants NNF18OC0052029).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Create a personal account or sign in to: