Association of Health Conditions and Health Service Utilization With Intimate Partner Violence Identified via Routine Screening Among Middle-Aged and Older Women | Intimate Partner Violence | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Black  MC, Basile  KC, Breiding  MJ,  et al. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary Report. Accessed March 18, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
2.
Campbell  JC.  Health consequences of intimate partner violence.   Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1331-1336. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Bonomi  AE, Anderson  ML, Reid  RJ, Rivara  FP, Carrell  D, Thompson  RS.  Medical and psychosocial diagnoses in women with a history of intimate partner violence.   Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(18):1692-1697. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.292PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Musa  A, Chojenta  C, Geleto  A, Loxton  D.  The associations between intimate partner violence and maternal health care service utilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):36.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Bonomi  AE, Anderson  ML, Rivara  FP, Thompson  RS.  Health care utilization and costs associated with physical and nonphysical-only intimate partner violence.   Health Serv Res. 2009;44(3):1052-1067. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00955.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Rivara  FP, Anderson  ML, Fishman  P,  et al.  Healthcare utilization and costs for women with a history of intimate partner violence.   Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(2):89-96. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Sormanti  M, Shibusawa  T.  Intimate partner violence among midlife and older women: a descriptive analysis of women seeking medical services.   Health Soc Work. 2008;33(1):33-41. doi:10.1093/hsw/33.1.33PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Bonomi  AE, Anderson  ML, Reid  RJ,  et al.  Intimate partner violence in older women.   Gerontologist. 2007;47(1):34-41. doi:10.1093/geront/47.1.34PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Cook  JM, Dinnen  S, O’Donnell  C.  Older women survivors of physical and sexual violence: a systematic review of the quantitative literature.   J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(7):1075-1081. doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2279PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Fisher  BS, Regan  SL.  The extent and frequency of abuse in the lives of older women and their relationship with health outcomes.   Gerontologist. 2006;46(2):200-209. doi:10.1093/geront/46.2.200PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Phillips  LR.  Domestic violence and aging women.   Geriatr Nurs. 2000;21(4):188-193. doi:10.1067/mgn.2000.109584PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Curry  SJ, Krist  AH, Owens  DK,  et al; US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults: US Preventive Services Task Force final recommendation statement.   JAMA. 2018;320(16):1678-1687. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14741PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Mouton  CP, Rodabough  RJ, Rovi  SLD,  et al.  Prevalence and 3-year incidence of abuse among postmenopausal women.   Am J Public Health. 2004;94(4):605-612. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.4.605PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Kimerling  R, Iverson  KM, Dichter  ME, Rodriguez  AL, Wong  A, Pavao  J.  Prevalence of intimate partner violence among women veterans who utilize Veterans Health Administration primary care.   J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(8):888-894. doi:10.1007/s11606-016-3701-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Frayne  S, Phibbs  C, Saechao  F,  et al. Sourcebook: women veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Accessed March 18, 2020. https://www.womenshealth.va.gov/docs/sourcebook_Vol_3_FINAL.pdf
16.
Moyer  VA; US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.   Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(6):478-486. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-6-201303190-00588PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Chan  C, Chan  Y, Au  A, Cheung  G.  Reliability and validity of the “Extended - Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream” (E-Hits) screening tool in detecting intimate partner violence in hospital emergency departments in Hong Kong.   Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2010;17(2):109-117. doi:10.1177/102490791001700202Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Ortman  JM, Velkoff  VA, Hogan H. An aging nation: the older population in the United States. Accessed March 18, 2020. https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf
19.
von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.   J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-349. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Kimerling  R, Gima  K, Smith  MW, Street  A, Frayne  S.  The Veterans Health Administration and military sexual trauma.   Am J Public Health. 2007;97(12):2160-2166. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.092999PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Sherin  KM, Sinacore  JM, Li  XQ, Zitter  RE, Shakil  A.  HITS: a short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting.   Fam Med. 1998;30(7):508-512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Iverson  KM, King  MW, Gerber  MR,  et al.  Accuracy of an intimate partner violence screening tool for female VHA patients: a replication and extension.   J Trauma Stress. 2015;28(1):79-82. doi:10.1002/jts.21985PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Brignone  E, Sorrentino  AE, Roberts  CB, Dichter  ME.  Suicidal ideation and behaviors among women veterans with recent exposure to intimate partner violence.   Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018;55:60-64. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.10.006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Dichter  ME, Sorrentino  A, Bellamy  S, Medvedeva  E, Roberts  CB, Iverson  KM.  Disproportionate mental health burden associated with past-year intimate partner violence among women receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration.   J Trauma Stress. 2017;30(6):555-563. doi:10.1002/jts.22241PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Elixhauser  A, Steiner  C, Harris  DR, Coffey  RM.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.   Med Care. 1998;36(1):8-27. doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Quan  H, Sundararajan  V, Halfon  P,  et al.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.   Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130-1139. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) for ICD-9-CM. Accessed March 18, 2020. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp
28.
Ryan  ET, McGrath  AC, Creech  SK, Borsari  B.  Predicting utilization of healthcare services in the Veterans Health Administration by returning women veterans: the role of trauma exposure and symptoms of posttraumatic stress.   Psychol Serv. 2015;12(4):412-419. doi:10.1037/ser0000057PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Seal  KH, Metzler  TJ, Gima  KS, Bertenthal  D, Maguen  S, Marmar  CR.  Trends and risk factors for mental health diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans using Department of Veterans Affairs health care, 2002-2008.   Am J Public Health. 2009;99(9):1651-1658. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.150284PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Suris  A, Lind  L.  Military sexual trauma: a review of prevalence and associated health consequences in veterans.   Trauma Violence Abuse. 2008;9(4):250-269. doi:10.1177/1524838008324419PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Dichter  ME, Haywood  TN, Butler  AE, Bellamy  SL, Iverson  KM.  Intimate partner violence screening in the Veterans Health Administration: demographic and military service characteristics.   Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(6):761-768. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Cook  JM, Pilver  C, Dinnen  S, Schnurr  PP, Hoff  R.  Prevalence of physical and sexual assault and mental health disorders in older women: findings from a nationally representative sample.   Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(9):877-886. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.016PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Loxton  D, Schofield  M, Hussain  R.  Psychological health in midlife among women who have ever lived with a violent partner or spouse.   J Interpers Violence. 2006;21(8):1092-1107. doi:10.1177/0886260506290290PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Humphreys  J, Lee  KA.  Interpersonal violence is associated with depression and chronic physical health problems in midlife women.   Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2009;30(4):206-213. doi:10.1080/01612840802498136PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Loxton  D, Schofield  M, Hussain  R, Mishra  G.  History of domestic violence and physical health in midlife.   Violence Against Women. 2006;12(8):715-731. doi:10.1177/1077801206291483PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Gibson  CJ, Huang  AJ, McCaw  B, Subak  LL, Thom  DH, Van Den Eeden  SK.  Associations of intimate partner violence, sexual assault, and posttraumatic stress disorder with menopause symptoms among midlife and older women.   JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(1):80-87. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5233PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Cannell  MB, Weitlauf  JC, Garcia  L, Andresen  EM, Margolis  KL, Manini  TM.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal risk of physical impairment in a cohort of postmenopausal women who experience physical and verbal abuse.   BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:98. doi:10.1186/s12905-015-0258-2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Dichter  ME, Sorrentino  AE, Haywood  TN,  et al.  Women’s healthcare utilization following routine screening for past-year intimate partner violence in the Veterans Health Administration.   J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(6):936-941. doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4321-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Feltner  C, Wallace  I, Berkman  N,  et al.  Screening for intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.   JAMA. 2018;320(16):1688-1701. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13212PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Cooper  AL, Jiang  L, Yoon  J,  et al.  Dual-system use and intermediate health outcomes among veterans enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans.   Health Serv Res. 2015;50(6):1868-1890. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12303PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
West  AN, Charlton  ME, Vaughan-Sarrazin  M.  Dual use of VA and non-VA hospitals by veterans with multiple hospitalizations.   BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:431. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1069-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Dyer  CB, Pavlik  VN, Murphy  KP, Hyman  DJ.  The high prevalence of depression and dementia in elder abuse or neglect.   J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(2):205-208. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03913.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Lachs  MS, Pillemer  KA.  Elder abuse.   N Engl J Med. 2015;373(20):1947-1956. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1404688PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Dong  X, Simon  M, Rajan  K, Evans  DA.  Association of cognitive function and risk for elder abuse in a community-dwelling population.   Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;32(3):209-215. doi:10.1159/000334047PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Fulmer  T, Rodgers  RF, Pelger  A.  Verbal mistreatment of the elderly.   J Elder Abuse Negl. 2014;26(4):351-364. doi:10.1080/08946566.2013.801817PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Dichter  ME, Cerulli  C, Bossarte  RM.  Intimate partner violence victimization among women veterans and associated heart health risks.   Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(4)(suppl):S190-S194. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2011.04.008PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Cerulli  C, Bossarte  RM, Dichter  ME.  Exploring intimate partner violence status among male veterans and associated health outcomes.   Am J Mens Health. 2014;8(1):66-73. doi:10.1177/1557988313492558PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    WPSI and Coverage for Routine Screening of IPV
    Sarah Son, MPH | American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    On behalf of the Women’s Preventive Services Initiative (WPSI), we want to recognize the findings of the recent study published in JAMA Network Open, Association of Health Conditions and Health Service Utilization With Intimate Partner Violence Identified via Routine Screening Among Middle-Aged and Older Women, indicating high prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) among this age group and the importance of screening. WPSI recommends screening adolescents and women of all ages for interpersonal and domestic violence, at least annually, and, when needed, providing or referring for initial intervention services. All WPSI recommendations, including Screening for Interpersonal and Domestic Violence, are included among preventive services for women under provisions of the prevention service requirement of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010. These preventive service recommendations are similar to A-level and B-level recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and must be covered without cost-sharing by all private health plans. The Screening for Interpersonal and Domestic Violence recommendation includes screening women beginning at age 13, and intervention services that include, but are not limited to, counseling, education, harm reduction strategies, and referral to appropriate supportive services.(1) WPSI defines interpersonal and domestic violence as physical violence, sexual violence, stalking and psychological aggression (including coercion), reproductive coercion, neglect, and the threat of violence, abuse, or both.

    WPSI is a national coalition of 21 health professional organizations and patient representatives that develop, review, update, and disseminate evidence-based clinical recommendations for women’s preventive health care services in the United States. WPSI considers conditions that are unique, more common, or differ in women and focuses on gaps in current preventive services recommendations. It is supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA) and led by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. WPSI recommendations, once adopted by HRSA, are available without cost sharing, thus helping to ensure that women receive a comprehensive set of preventive services without having to pay a copayment, coinsurance, or deductible for most group and individual plans. WPSI summarized all currently covered preventive services recommendations for women from the WPSI, USPSTF, and Bright Futures in clinical summary tables for use in clinical practice.

    (1) Women’s Preventive Services Initiative: Accessed May 6, 2020 at: https://www.womenspreventivehealth.org/recommendations/screening-for-interpersonal-and-domestic-violence/
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Program Director for the Women's Preventive Services Initiative, a federally funded cooperative agreement with HRSA. Employee of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    READ MORE
    Original Investigation
    Geriatrics
    April 21, 2020

    Association of Health Conditions and Health Service Utilization With Intimate Partner Violence Identified via Routine Screening Among Middle-Aged and Older Women

    Author Affiliations
    • 1VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 2VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 3Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • 4Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • 5Temple University School of Social Work, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • 6VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e203138. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3138
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  How often do middle-aged and older women have positive results when undergoing routine screening for intimate partner violence (IPV), and what health-related outcomes are associated with positive results in these age groups?

    Findings  In this cohort study of 4481 female veterans aged 45 years and older who were screened for past-year IPV, 8.7% of those aged 45 to 59 years and 5.1% of those aged 60 years and older screened positive. Having screened positive for IPV was associated with mental and physical health outcomes as well as increased health service utilization over the subsequent 20 months.

    Meaning  Performing routine screening for IPV among women in middle age and older may improve detection and service delivery in this underserved population.

    Abstract

    Importance  The US Preventive Services Task Force recently determined that there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) in women who are middle-aged and older. Certain Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinics have been routinely screening women of all ages for IPV since 2014.

    Objectives  To examine the proportion of women older than childbearing age (ie, ≥45 years) who have positive results when routinely screened for past-year IPV at VHA clinics and to evaluate the associations of a positive screening result with health conditions and health service utilization.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study included 4481 women aged 45 years and older who were screened for past-year IPV in 13 VHA outpatient clinics in 11 states between April 2014 and April 2016. Data analysis was conducted from March 2019 to August 2019.

    Exposure  Positive screening result for past-year IPV.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Mental and physical health conditions (identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition [ICD-9] and ICD-10 codes from VHA medical record data) and VHA health services utilization (identified using inpatient and outpatient VHA encounter data) in the 20 months after screening.

    Results  In this study, 2937 of 4481 women (65.5%) were middle-aged (ie, aged 45 to 59 years), and 1544 (34.5%) were older (ie, aged ≥60 years), with 1955 (43.6%) black participants. A total of 255 middle-aged women (8.7%; mean [SD] age, 51 [4] years) and 79 older women (5.1%; mean [SD] age, 64 [5] years) screened positive for past-year IPV. In adjusted logistic regression models among middle-aged women, screening positive for IPV was associated with subsequent diagnoses of anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.00; 95% CI, 1.50-2.70; P < .001), depression (aOR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.80-3.00; P < .001), posttraumatic stress disorder (aOR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.80-3.00; P < .001), suicidal ideation and/or behavior (aOR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.10-6.90; P < .001), and substance use disorder (aOR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.80-3.50; P < .001). Similar but attenuated associations were seen for older women (eg, substance use disorder: aOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.10-4.40; P = .04). In adjusted negative binomial regression models among middle-aged women, screening positive for IPV was associated with a higher rate of subsequent psychosocial (eg, mental health) visits (adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 2.40; 95% CI, 2.00-2.90; P < .001), primary care visits (aRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30; P < .001), and emergency department visits (aRR, 1.50; 95% CI 1.20-1.80; P < .001). Older women screening positive for IPV had a higher rate of psychosocial visits (aRR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.30-2.70; P < .001) but not of other visit types.

    Conclusions and Relevance  To our knowledge, this study was the largest to evaluate routine screening for IPV among women aged 45 years and older, and it found that IPV remained prevalent and was associated with morbidity for these women. Screening for IPV in women older than 44 years may improve detection and provision of evidence-based services to this growing population.

    ×