[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.232.62.209. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
1.
Ethgen  O, Bruyère  O, Richy  F, Dardennes  C, Reginster  JY.  Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature.   J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(5):963-974. doi:10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Zhang  W, Moskowitz  RW, Nuki  G,  et al.  OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines.   Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(2):137-162. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Daigle  ME, Weinstein  AM, Katz  JN, Losina  E.  The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review of published literature.   Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(5):649-658. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2012.07.013 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Cram  P, Lu  X, Kates  SL, Singh  JA, Li  Y, Wolf  BR.  Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010.   JAMA. 2012;308(12):1227-1236. doi:10.1001/2012.jama.11153 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Kurtz  S, Ong  K, Lau  E, Mowat  F, Halpern  M.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.   J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780-785. doi:10.2106/00004623-200704000-00012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Birkmeyer  JD, Reames  BN, McCulloch  P, Carr  AJ, Campbell  WB, Wennberg  JE.  Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery.   Lancet. 2013;382(9898):1121-1129. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Peterson  MG, Hollenberg  JP, Szatrowski  TP, Johanson  NA, Mancuso  CA, Charlson  ME.  Geographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States.   J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(10):1530-1539. doi:10.2106/00004623-199274100-00012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Katz  BP, Freund  DA, Heck  DA,  et al.  Demographic variation in the rate of knee replacement: a multi-year analysis.   Health Serv Res. 1996;31(2):125-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Skinner  J, Weinstein  JN, Sporer  SM, Wennberg  JE.  Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients.   N Engl J Med. 2003;349(14):1350-1359. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa021569 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Mahomed  NN, Barrett  J, Katz  JN, Baron  JA, Wright  J, Losina  E.  Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population.   J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1222-1228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Accessed November 28, 2018. http://www.dartmouthatlas.org
12.
Hawker  GA, Wright  JG, Coyte  PC,  et al.  Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients’ preferences.   Med Care. 2001;39(3):206-216. doi:10.1097/00005650-200103000-00002 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Mota  RE, Tarricone  R, Ciani  O, Bridges  JF, Drummond  M.  Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review.   BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:225. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-225 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Wright  JG, Hawker  GA, Bombardier  C,  et al.  Physician enthusiasm as an explanation for area variation in the utilization of knee replacement surgery.   Med Care. 1999;37(9):946-956. doi:10.1097/00005650-199909000-00010 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Mulley  AG.  Inconvenient truths about supplier induced demand and unwarranted variation in medical practice.   BMJ. 2009;339:b4073. doi:10.1136/bmj.b4073 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Dartmouth Atlas Project. Preference-sensitive care. Accessed May 29, 2019. http://www.archive.dartmouthatlas.org/downloads/reports/preference_sensitive.pdf
17.
Courtney  PM, Froimson  MI, Meneghini  RM, Lee  G-C, Della Valle  CJ.  Can total knee arthroplasty be performed safely as an outpatient in the Medicare population?   J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7S):S28-S31. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.003 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare geographic variation public use files. Accessed October 10, 2017. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Medicare-Geographic-Variation/GV_PUF.html
19.
Blagojevic  M, Jinks  C, Jeffery  A, Jordan  KP.  Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(1):24-33. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.010 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
United States Census Bureau. Summary file data, 2011. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data/summary-file.2011.html
21.
Dwyer-Lindgren  L, Freedman  G, Engell  RE,  et al.  Prevalence of physical activity and obesity in US counties, 2001-2011: a road map for action.   Popul Health Metr. 2013;11:7. doi:10.1186/1478-7954-11-7 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Dwyer-Lindgren  L, Mokdad  AH, Srebotnjak  T, Flaxman  AD, Hansen  GM, Murray  CJ.  Cigarette smoking prevalence in US counties: 1996-2012.   Popul Health Metr. 2014;12(1):5. doi:10.1186/1478-7954-12-5 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
United States Census Bureau. American community survey 5-year summary data (2009-2018). Accessed March 17, 2020. https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.html
24.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse: conditions categories. Accessed February 26, 2018. https://www.ccwdata.org/web/guest/condition-categories
25.
Hanchate  AD, Zhang  Y, Felson  DT, Ash  AS.  Exploring the determinants of racial and ethnic disparities in total knee arthroplasty: health insurance, income, and assets.   Med Care. 2008;46(5):481-488. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181621e9c PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Ward  MM.  Socioeconomic status and the incidence of ESRD.   Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(4):563-572. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.023 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Francis  ML, Scaife  SL, Zahnd  WE, Cook  EF, Schneeweiss  S.  Joint replacement surgeries among Medicare beneficiaries in rural compared with urban areas.   Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(12):3554-3562. doi:10.1002/art.25004 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Baicker  K, Chernew  ME, Robbins  JA.  The spillover effects of Medicare managed care: Medicare Advantage and hospital utilization.   J Health Econ. 2013;32(6):1289-1300. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.005 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Advantage/Part D Contract and Enrollment Data. Accessed October 30, 2017. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/MCRAdvPartDEnrolData/index.html
30.
Fehring  TK, Odum  SM, Troyer  JL, Iorio  R, Kurtz  SM, Lau  EC.  Joint replacement access in 2016: a supply side crisis.   J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(8):1175-1181. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.025PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Cross  WW  III, Saleh  KJ, Wilt  TJ, Kane  RL.  Agreement about indications for total knee arthroplasty.   Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446(446):34-39. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000214436.49527.5e PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Singh  JA, Lewallen  DG.  Medical and psychological comorbidity predicts poor pain outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.   Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(5):916-923. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes402 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Hogan  C, Bucknell  AL, King  KB.  The effect of diabetes mellitus on total joint arthroplasty outcomes.   JBJS Rev. 2016;4(2):e3. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00044 PubMedGoogle Scholar
34.
Taylor  DH  Jr, Fillenbaum  GG, Ezell  ME.  The accuracy of Medicare claims data in identifying Alzheimer’s disease.   J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(9):929-937. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00452-3 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Mell  MW, Pettinger  M, Proulx-Burns  L,  et al; WHI PVD Writing Workgroup.  Evaluation of Medicare claims data to ascertain peripheral vascular events in the Women’s Health Initiative.   J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(1):98-105. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.056 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Birman-Deych  E, Waterman  AD, Yan  Y, Nilasena  DS, Radford  MJ, Gage  BF.  Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors.   Med Care. 2005;43(5):480-485. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000160417.39497.a9 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Hwang  S, Jayadevappa  R, Zee  J,  et al.  Concordance between clinical diagnosis and Medicare claims of depression among older primary care patients.   Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;23(7):726-734. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.08.009 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Sohn  MW, Budiman-Mak  E, Stuck  RM, Siddiqui  F, Lee  TA.  Diagnostic accuracy of existing methods for identifying diabetic foot ulcers from inpatient and outpatient datasets.   J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3(1):27. doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-27 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Chan  L, Hart  LG, Goodman  DC.  Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries.   J Rural Health. 2006;22(2):140-146. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00022.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Francis  ML, Scaife  SL, Zahnd  WE.  Rural-urban differences in surgical procedures for Medicare beneficiaries.   Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):579-583. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.306 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Bederman  SS, Coyte  PC, Kreder  HJ, Mahomed  NN, McIsaac  WJ, Wright  JG.  Who’s in the driver’s seat? the influence of patient and physician enthusiasm on regional variation in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery: a population-based study.   Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(6):481-489. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d25e6f PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Original Investigation
    Health Policy
    April 28, 2020

    Regional Variation in Rates of Total Knee Arthroplasty Among Medicare Beneficiaries

    Author Affiliations
    • 1National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
    JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e203717. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3717
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  How variable are rates of total knee arthroplasty across the United States after accounting for the prevalence of knee arthritis and other patient risk factors?

    Findings  In this cohort study of more than 24 million Medicare beneficiaries annually from 2011 to 2015, observed to expected ratios for total knee arthroplasty ranged from 0.61 in Newark, New Jersey, to 1.82 in Idaho Falls, Idaho, suggesting areas of relative underuse and overuse. Regions with higher than expected rates were also associated with high rates among patients having relative contraindications to knee arthroplasty.

    Meaning  Decision-making thresholds for performing total knee arthroplasty appear to differ across the US in a pattern suggesting overuse in some regions.

    Abstract

    Importance  Rates of total knee arthroplasty vary widely across the United States. Whether this variation is associated with differences in patient characteristics or physician practice is unknown.

    Objectives  To determine regional variations in rates of total knee arthroplasty after accounting for the prevalence of knee arthritis and other potentially associated patient risk factors and to assess the correlation of these variations with measures of access to care and surgical indications.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This retrospective national cohort study used Medicare data on more than 24 million deidentified beneficiaries annually from 2011 to 2015. Individuals included had fee-for-service coverage, were 65 to 89 years of age, and resided in 1 of 306 health referral regions. Data were analyzed from September 13, 2018, to August 15, 2019.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Rate of primary total knee arthroplasty indexed to the national rate using observed to expected ratios. The expected numbers of arthroplasty procedures were derived from estimates based on beneficiaries’ demographic and clinical characteristics. Observed to expected ratios were confounded by race/ethnicity; thus race/ethnicity–stratified analyses were conducted.

    Results  In 2011, there were 218 282 total knee arthroplasty procedures among 24 583 706 white Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age 74.2 [6.9] years; 54.6% women). The rate of arthroplasty during the study period (5 years) was 9.3 per 1000 person-years. Adjustment for clinical characteristics reduced the spread in observed to expected ratios among regions by 29% compared with adjustment for age and sex alone. However, substantial variation remained, with observed to expected ratios that ranged from 0.61 in Newark, New Jersey, to 1.82 in Idaho Falls, Idaho. High ratios were primarily present in the upper Midwest, Great Plains, and Mountain West regions. Higher ratios were associated with regions where beneficiaries had fewer outpatient visits (Spearman correlation [r], −0.64; 95% CI, −0.70 to −0.56) and with regions having more surgeons per capita who performed knee arthroplasty (r = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.37). Higher ratios were associated with higher rates of arthroplasty procedures among beneficiaries with dementia (r = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.46), peripheral vascular disease (r = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42-0.61), and skin ulcers (r = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.32-0.53), which are relative contraindications to arthroplasty.

    Conclusions and Relevance  Substantial regional variation in rates of total knee arthroplasty remained after adjustment for patient characteristics. Coexistence of high observed to expected ratios and high rates among patients at greater surgical risk suggested overuse of knee arthroplasty in some regions.

    ×