[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.191.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    What is safety?
    Chad Todd |
    A profitable exercise is asking “What is safety?”. Ponder upon from Gene I. Rochlin one of the original researchers for high-reliability organization theory wrote a paper in 1999 called “Safe operation as a social construct.” Safety is something a system does, not something a system has (e.g. this includes EHR systems).

    “However intersubjective, socially constructed and collective these descriptors may be, they are central to understanding the role of agency in providing safety as a positive effect that is centrally important in understanding the reliable operation of complex, potentially hazardous socio-technical systems. To the extent that regulators, systems
    designers, and analysts continue to focus their attention on the avoidance of error and the control of risk, and to seek objective and positivistic indicators of performance, safety becomes marginalized as a residual property. This not only neglects the importance of expressed and perceived safety as a constitutive property of safe operation, but may actually interfere with the means and processes by which it is created and maintained. It is therefore important in practice, as well as in theory, to encourage continued and expanding research and enquiry into safety as an expression of myth and ritual, of agency as well as structure, and not just as a measurable, statistical property or organization, a reporting system for work team errors, or a way of expressing the avoidance of consequential accidents.”

    http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.475.2094&rep=rep1&type=pdf
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    Original Investigation
    Health Informatics
    May 29, 2020

    National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
    • 2Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 3Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 4Clinical and Quality Analysis, Partners Healthcare, Somerville, Massachusetts
    • 5The Leapfrog Group, Washington, DC
    • 6Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e205547. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5547
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  How did safety performance of electronic health record systems (EHRs) change in the US from 2009 to 2018?

    Findings  In this case series using 8657 hospital-year observations from adult hospitals nationwide that used the National Quality Forum Health IT Safety Measure, a computerized physician order entry and EHR safety test, from 2009 to 2018, mean scores on the overall test increased from 53.9% in 2009 to 65.6% in 2018. There was considerable variation in test performance by hospital and EHR vendor.

    Meaning  These findings suggest that, despite broad adoption and optimization of EHR systems in hospitals, wide variation in the safety performance of operational EHR systems remains across a large sample of hospitals and EHR vendors, and serious safety vulnerabilities persist in these operational EHRs.

    Abstract

    Importance  Despite the broad adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems across the continuum of care, safety problems persist.

    Objective  To measure the safety performance of operational EHRs in hospitals across the country during a 10-year period.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This case series included all US adult hospitals nationwide that used the National Quality Forum Health IT Safety Measure EHR computerized physician order entry safety test administered by the Leapfrog Group between 2009 and 2018. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2018 to December 1, 2019.

    Exposure  The Health IT Safety Measure test, which uses simulated medication orders that have either injured or killed patients previously to evaluate how well hospital EHRs could identify medication errors with potential for patient harm.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Descriptive statistics for performance on the assessment test over time were calculated at the overall test score level, type of decision support category level, and EHR vendor level.

    Results  Among 8657 hospital-years observed during the study, mean (SD) scores on the overall test increased from 53.9% (18.3%) in 2009 to 65.6% (15.4%) in 2018. Mean (SD) hospital score for the categories representing basic clinical decision support increased from 69.8% (20.8%) in 2009 to 85.6% (14.9%) in 2018. For the categories representing advanced clinical decision support, the mean (SD) score increased from 29.6% (22.4%) in 2009 to 46.1% (21.6%) in 2018. There was considerable variation in test performance by EHR.

    Conclusions and Relevance  These findings suggest that despite broad adoption and optimization of EHR systems in hospitals, wide variation in the safety performance of operational EHR systems remains across a large sample of hospitals and EHR vendors. Hospitals using some EHR vendors had significantly higher test scores. Overall, substantial safety risk persists in current hospital EHR systems.

    ×