OSS indicates Operative Stress Score and RAI, Risk Analysis Index.
eTable. OSS Scores for 565 CPT Codes
eFigure. Revised RAI Scoring
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Shinall MC, Youk A, Massarweh NN, et al. Association of Preoperative Frailty and Operative Stress With Mortality After Elective vs Emergency Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e2010358. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10358
Our group recently examined the associations among preoperative frailty, operative stress, and postoperative mortality in a retrospective cohort published in JAMA Surgery.1 Frail and very frail patients had high mortality rates at 30, 90, and 180 days even after low-stress operations, a finding that triggered questions about whether inclusion of patients undergoing emergency operations may have been associated with the high mortality rate. We hypothesized that postoperative mortality would increase with increasing frailty and increasing operative stress for both elective and emergent operations, with high levels of mortality for frail and very frail patients even after low-stress, elective operations.
The VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System institutional review board determined this analysis to be exempt because data were deidentified; thus, no consent was needed. This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.
This cohort study used data from the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program for noncardiac surgical procedures performed between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2014, for veterans with available 1-year postoperative vital status. Exposures of interest were urgency (emergent vs elective), frailty (measured by the Risk Analysis Index [RAI]), and operative stress (measured by the Operative Stress Score [OSS]). Operative urgency was defined by the binary Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program variable for emergent operations. The RAI is based on the accumulation of deficits model of frailty and uses demographic factors (including age), comorbidities, cognitive decline, residence in a facility, and activities of daily living to quantify frailty, with higher scores indicating greater frailty (eFigure in the Supplement).2-5 The OSS was developed using modified Delphi consensus methods to rate the 565 most common Current Procedural Terminology codes included in Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program on a scale of 1 to 5 by degree of physiologic stress experienced by patients, with higher scores indicating more stress (eTable in the Supplement).1 Patients were categorized as robust, normal, frail, and very fail by RAI score (RAI ≤20, 21-29, 30-39, and ≥40, respectively).1,3 The outcomes were mortality at 30, 90, and 180 days. P values were calculated at the 95% significance level. The χ2 test for trend was used to test for increasing mortality with increasing OSS level and frailty. All analyses were performed using STATA statistical software version 14 (StataCorp). Data analysis was performed from January 2020 to May 2020.
The data set included 432 828 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.0 [12.9] years; 401 453 male [92.8%]; 299 809 white [69.3%]), with a mean (SD) RAI score of 21.25 (7.34) (further demographic data are available in the original article).1 There were 21 748 (5.02%) emergent and 411 080 (94.98%) elective procedures. Emergent procedures constituted 7308 (3.66%), 7588 (4.05%), 4519 (12.35%), and 2333 (25.60%) of all procedures for robust, normal, frail, and very frail patients, respectively.
Although mortality after emergent operations was higher than that after elective operations, frail and very frail patients experienced significantly higher mortality than their more robust counterparts even after elective surgery (Table). For example, after the lowest-stress elective operations (OSS 1), 180-day mortality rates for frail and very frail patients were more than 10 times the rate among robust patients (9.14% [95% CI, 8.27%-10.06%] and 33.33% [95% CI, 28.745-38.18%] vs 0.52% [95% CI, 0.42%-0.63%], respectively). Findings were similar for the highest-stress elective operations (OSS 5), with 180-day mortality rates for frail and very frail patients of 19.01% (95% CI, 15.31%-23.18%) and 14.29% (95% CI, 9.17%-20.83%), respectively, compared with only 5.88% (95% CI, 4.06%-8.20%) for robust patients. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates (Figure) were also markedly increased among frail and very frail patients after elective operations with rates that mirror the mortality seen in the overall cohort including emergent operations.
Frail and very frail patients have substantial postoperative mortality after elective operations of any level of operative stress, with even higher rates of mortality after emergent operations. The previously demonstrated high levels of postoperative mortality for frail and very frail patients did not result solely from including emergent operations in the overall cohort. For both emergent and elective operations, mortality had a complex, nonlinear association with operative stress, suggesting selection effects by operating surgeons, especially with higher OSS and RAI levels. Frailty remains a primary factor associated with postoperative outcomes after elective operations. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the use of the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set, which may not represent the nonveteran population. Nevertheless, these results reinforce the need for frailty assessment at the point of care to achieve 4 important goals: (1) to risk-stratify patients for operations, especially operations perceived as being routine or low risk; (2) to help physicians and frail patients in both elective or emergent settings make informed decisions about surgical options, including palliative approaches; (3) to optimize care for these patients preoperatively whenever possible; and (4) to provide goal-concordant care, which may involve choosing to operate even when the risk of mortality is high if substantial improvements in quality of life are expected.
Accepted for Publication: May 2, 2020.
Published: July 13, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10358
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Shinall MC Jr et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: Myrick C. Shinall Jr, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave South, Rm D5203 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Author Contributions: Drs Youk and Hall had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Shinall, Massarweh, Arya, George, Hall.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Shinall, Youk.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Youk, George.
Obtained funding: Hall.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Shinall, Arya, George, Hall.
Supervision: Shireman, Arya, Hall.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Shinall reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Shireman reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health and grants from the Veterans Health Administration supporting the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Dr Hall reported receiving grants from the Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This research was supported in part by the US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development (grants I21 HX-002345 and XVA 72-909 to Dr Hall and grant CIN 13-413 to Dr Massarweh). Dr Shinall is supported by grant K12CA090625 from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Drs Hall and Shireman are supported by grant U01 TR002393 from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Arya is supported by grant 5R03AG050930 from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Create a personal account or sign in to: