[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.238.248.103. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Views 1,364
    Citations 0
    Original Investigation
    Cardiology
    July 14, 2020

    Estimation of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 2Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 3Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora
    • 4Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
    • 5Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium, Aurora
    • 6Landmark College, Putney, Vermont
    • 7Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 8Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia
    • 9Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
    • 10Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
    JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e208236. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8236
    Key Points español 中文 (chinese)

    Question  Are current risk prediction models accurate at estimating risk of initial atherosclerotic cardiovascular (ASCVD) events in veterans?

    Findings  In this cohort study of 1 672 336 veterans with an outpatient visit between 2002 and 2007, the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association model overestimated absolute risk of ASCVD during 5 years of follow-up. Statin use was associated with 7% lower relative risk of ASCVD and 25% lower relative risk of ASCVD mortality.

    Meaning  The findings of this study suggest that reestimation and the inclusion of statin use in ASCVD prediction models might be needed for their appropriate use in a health care system.

    Abstract

    Importance  Current guidelines recommend statin therapy for millions of US residents for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). It is unclear whether traditional prediction models that do not account for current widespread statin use are sufficient for risk assessment.

    Objectives  To examine the performance of the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) for 5-year ASCVD risk estimation in a contemporary cohort and to test the hypothesis that inclusion of statin therapy improves model performance.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study included adult patients in the Veterans Affairs health care system without baseline ASCVD. Using national electronic health record data, 3 Cox proportional hazards models were developed to estimate 5-year ASCVD risk, as follows: the variables and published β coefficients from the PCE (model 1), the PCE variables with cohort-derived β coefficients (model 2), and model 2 plus baseline statin use (model 3). Data were collected from January 2002 to December 2012 and analyzed from June 2016 to March 2020.

    Exposures  Traditional ASCVD risk factors from the PCE plus baseline statin use.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Incident ASCVD and ASCVD mortality.

    Results  Of 1 672 336 patients in the cohort (mean [SD] baseline age 58.0 [13.8] years, 1 575 163 [94.2%] men, 1 383 993 [82.8%] white), 312 155 (18.7%) were receiving statin therapy at baseline. During 5 years of follow-up, 66 605 (4.0%) experienced an ASCVD event, and 31 878 (1.9%) experienced ASCVD death. Compared with the original PCE, the cohort-derived model did not improve model discrimination in any of the 4 age-sex strata but did improve model calibration. The PCE overestimated ASCVD risk compared with the cohort-derived model; 211 237 of 1 136 161 white men (18.6%), 29 634 of 218 463 black men (13.6%), 1741 of 44 399 white women (3.9%), and 836 of 16 034 black women (5.2%) would be potentially eligible for statin therapy under the PCE but not the cohort-derived model. When added to the cohort-derived model, baseline statin therapy was associated with a 7% (95% CI, 5%-9%) lower relative risk of ASCVD and a 25% (95% CI, 23%-28%) lower relative risk for ASCVD death.

    Conclusions and Relevance  In this study, lower than expected rates of incident ASCVD events in a contemporary national cohort were observed. The PCE overestimated ASCVD risk, and more than 15% of patients would be potentially eligible for statin therapy based on the PCE but not on a cohort-derived model. In the statin era, health care professionals and systems should base ASCVD risk assessment on models calibrated to their patient populations.

    ×