Oxygen supplementation in individual patients (n = 9) and matched controls (n = 18).
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
van de Veerdonk FL, Kouijzer IJE, de Nooijer AH, et al. Outcomes Associated With Use of a Kinin B2 Receptor Antagonist Among Patients With COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2017708. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17708
Pulmonary edema is a prominent feature in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enters the cell via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).1 ACE2 is involved in degrading the kinin des-Arg9-bradykinin, a potent vasoactive peptide that can cause vascular leakage. Loss of ACE2 might lead to plasma leakage and further activation of the plasma kallikrein-kinin system with more bradykinin formation that could contribute to pulmonary angioedema via stimulation of bradykinin 2 receptors.2 We investigated whether treatment with the bradykinin 2 receptor antagonist icatibant in patients with COVID-19 could be used as a treatment strategy.
This case-control study was approved by CMO region Arnhem-Nijmegen, the local ethical committee, which granted a waiver of consent because treatment concerned a licensed drug that would be given in an off-label setting. Informed consent was obtained in all patients. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. Patients with COVID-19 were admitted from March to May 2020. We included 10 patients for treatment with 3 doses of 30 mg of icatibant (Firazyr; Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited) by subcutaneous injection at 6-hour intervals.3 Patients were eligible for icatibant treatment if they had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction assay, an oxygen saturation of less than 90% without supplemental oxygen, needed 3 L/min supplemental oxygen or more, and had a computed tomography severity score of 7 or greater.4 Patients with acute ischemic events at time of eligibility were excluded. For 9 patients who received icatibant on the ward, 2 matched control patients admitted prior to approval of this treatment were selected. Control patients with COVID-19 were matched on the factors sex, age, body mass index, and day of illness. One patient started receiving icatibant in the intensive care unit and was transferred to the ward with high-flow oxygen supplementation within 24 hours and discharged on day 7. We did not identify a matched control for this patient, so we were not able to evaluate the association of icatibant with outcomes for this individual. A change in oxygen need and oxygenation expressed as absolute number of liters per hour served as the primary outcome variable. Secondary outcomes included changes in D-dimer (dimerized plasmin fragment D), fever, and safety.
Nine cases were matched to 18 controls. The mean (SD) age was 55 (12.8) years for cases and 58 (10.5) years for controls. Most cases (9 of 10 [90%]) and controls (16 of 18 [90%]) were men. Patient and matched control characteristics are shown in the Table. Nine patients were prescribed icatibant on the ward. In all 9 patients, there was a marked decrease in oxygen supplementation (Figure). After 3 injections of icatibant, 4 patients (44%) were no longer oxygen dependent within 10 to 35 hours. In 5 patients (56%), there was a substantial decrease of oxygen supplementation after treatment with icatibant (Figure). Overall, in 8 of 9 patients (89%) treated with icatibant, a reduction of 3 L/min in oxygen supplementation or greater after 24 hours was observed (Figure). Of 18 matched controls, only 3 (17%) showed a spontaneous reduction in oxygen supplementation of 3 L/min or greater within 24 hours. We noted that in 3 patients treated with icatibant there was a resurgence in the need for oxygen supplementation. Icatibant treatment was well tolerated in all 10 patients who received the drug. There were no severe adverse events. There was no clear association with D-dimer concentrations and fever.
This study found evidence of an association between receipt of icatibant and improved oxygenation, suggesting that targeting the kallikrein-kinin system in patients with COVID-19, especially in the early stages of disease when patients are hypoxic and are admitted to the hospital, might be beneficial. An important limitation of the current study is that it is exploratory and not a randomized clinical trial. The observed resurgence of oxygen need in some patients after icatibant may be due to icatibant’s short half life of about 2 hours.3 We propose that treatment strategies targeting the kallikrein-kinin system should be investigated in randomized trials for patients with COVID-19.
Accepted for Publication: July 11, 2020.
Published: August 13, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17708
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 van de Veerdonk FL et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: Frank L. van de Veerdonk, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Author Contributions: Drs van de Veerdonk and Kouijzer had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs van de Veerdonk and Kouijzer share first authorship.
Concept and design: van de Veerdonk, Kouijzer, Maas, Netea, Brüggemann.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: van de Veerdonk, Kouijzer, de Nooijer, van der Hoeven, Brüggemann.
Drafting of the manuscript: van de Veerdonk, Kouijzer, de Nooijer, Brüggemann.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: van de Veerdonk, van der Hoeven, Maas, Netea, Brüggemann.
Statistical analysis: Kouijzer, Brüggemann.
Administrative, technical, or material support: de Nooijer, Brüggemann.
Supervision: van de Veerdonk, van der Hoeven, Netea, Brüggemann.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Netea reported serving as scientific founder for TTxD outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Additional Contributions: The authors would like to thank Nico A. F. Janssen, MD; Inge Grondman, MD; Jos W. M. van der Meer, MD, PhD; Marcel van Deuren, MD, PhD; Rosanne van Crevel, MSc; Leo A. B. Joosten, PhD; Matthias Prokop, MD, PhD; Heiman F. L. Wertheim, MD, PhD; Jeanette C. Rahamat-Langendoen, MD, PhD; David M. Burger, PharmDl, PhD; Monique H. E. Reijers, MD, PhD; Peter Pickkers, MD, PhD; Lennie P. G. Derde, MD, PhD; Steven de Maat, PhD; Quirjin de Mast, MD, PhD; Arjan van Laarhoven, MD, PhD; Anna Simon, MD, PhD; Jacobien J. Hoogerwerf, MD, PhD; Meta Michels, MD, PhD; Michelle Gompelman, MD, PhD; Olivier Richel, MD, PhD; Simone Smits, PhD; Wouter Hoefsloot, MD, PhD; Kit Roes, PhD; and C. M. Mulders-Manders for their contribution to this proof-of-concept study. We also thank the RCI COVID-19 research team. They were not compensated for their contributions.
Create a personal account or sign in to: