[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
December 18, 2020

Notice of Retraction. Hodkinson et al. Accelerometer- and Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Interventions Among Adults With Cardiometabolic Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(10):e1912895.

Author Affiliations
  • 1National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton, United Kingdom
JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2032700. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32700

To the Editor We write to report a decision to retract the article “Accelerometer- and Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Interventions Among Adults With Cardiometabolic Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,”1 published in JAMA Network Open on October 9, 2019, based on our mistake in applying the intervention definition, which has affected the inclusion criteria for 9 of the 36 studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Our study objective was to assess the association of accelerometer- and pedometer-based interventions with increased activity and other improved health outcomes in adults with cardiometabolic conditions and to examine characteristics of the studies that could influence the association of both interventions in improving physical activity (PA). As we reported in the article, “Randomized clinical trials or cluster randomized clinical trials evaluating the use of wearable technology devices such as pedometers and accelerometers as motivating and monitoring tools for increasing PA were included.” In our systematic review, searches retrieved 5762 references, and following abstract and title screening of 1439 references and full-text screening of 107 studies, we reported that 36 randomized trials, comprising 5208 patients, met our inclusion criteria. However, as we reported in our PROSPERO registered protocol, “Step counters, accelerometers and pedometers used for monitoring walking speed (for example, steps per minute) or solely for assessing the effects of a lifestyle program on physical activity will be excluded.”2

This was a complex scenario in which these devices had to be used as motivating tools within the intervention arms as well as monitoring tools for the primary outcome (PA) in both arms of trials to be eligible for this analysis. In 9 of these trials,3-11 comprising 2911 patients, devices were only used as monitoring tools of PA in both arms and were not randomly assigned within the intervention arm as a motivating tool for physical activity, and these trials should not have been included in the analysis.

Thus, at the request of the editors, we are retracting our article. We apologize for this error. We aim to reconduct this meta-analysis without the data from these 9 trials and will prepare a new manuscript for consideration.

Back to top
Article Information

Published: December 18, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32700

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Hodkinson A et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Alexander Hodkinson, PhD, Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom (alexander.hodkinson@manchester.ac.uk).

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Bower reported grants from the National Institute for Health Research during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Hodkinson  A, Kontopantelis  E, Adeniji  C,  et al.  Accelerometer- and pedometer-based physical activity interventions among adults with cardiometabolic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(10):e1912895. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12895PubMedGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health Research. Using pedometers and accelerometers to increase physical activity and improve health in patients with diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PROSPERO. July 18, 2018. Accessed November 7, 2020. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=104448
Baillot  A, Vallée  CA, Mampuya  WM,  et al.  Effects of a pre-surgery supervised exercise training 1 year after bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled study.   Obes Surg. 2018;28(4):955-962. doi:10.1007/s11695-017-2943-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Christle  JW, Schlumberger  A, Haller  B, Gloeckl  R, Halle  M, Pressler  A.  Individualized vs. group exercise in improving quality of life and physical activity in patients with cardiac disease and low exercise capacity: results from the DOPPELHERZ trial.   Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(25):2566-2571. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1242174PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cowie  A, Thow  MK, Granat  MH, Mitchell  SL.  A comparison of home and hospital-based exercise training in heart failure: immediate and long-term effects upon physical activity level.   Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011;18(2):158-166. doi:10.1177/1741826710389389PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Devi  R, Powell  J, Singh  S.  A web-based program improves physical activity outcomes in a primary care angina population: randomized controlled trial.   J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(9):e186. doi:10.2196/jmir.3340PubMedGoogle Scholar
Holliday  A, Burgin  A, Fernandez  EV, Fenton  SAM, Thielecke  F, Blannin  AK.  Points-based physical activity: a novel approach to facilitate changes in body composition in inactive women with overweight and obesity.   BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):261. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5125-2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Ribeiro  F, Oliveira  NL, Silva  G,  et al.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation increases daily physical activity of patients following myocardial infarction: subanalysis of two randomised controlled trials.   Physiotherapy. 2017;103(1):59-65. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2015.12.002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Unick  JL, Gaussoin  SA, Hill  JO,  et al.  Four-year physical activity levels among intervention participants with type 2 diabetes.   Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(12):2437-2445. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001054PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Unick  JL, Gaussoin  SA, Hill  JO,  et al; Look AHEAD Research Group.  Objectively assessed physical activity and weight loss maintenance among individuals enrolled in a lifestyle intervention.   Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017;25(11):1903-1909. doi:10.1002/oby.21971PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Young  DR, Jerome  GJ, Chen  C, Laferriere  D, Vollmer  WM.  Patterns of physical activity among overweight and obese adults.   Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6(3):A90.PubMedGoogle Scholar