[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1.  Flowchart of the 2 Study Groups
Flowchart of the 2 Study Groups

The oophorectomy cohort was identified by reviewing the medical records for women with a procedure code for bilateral oophorectomy (including second unilateral oophorectomy). Women in the bilateral oophorectomy group were matched to a reference group of women without bilateral oophorectomy from the same population. For all women, a search was done for diagnostic codes for restless legs syndrome (RLS) at any time in life through the end of the study period (ie, December 31, 2014). After manual review of their complete medical records was conducted to confirm the diagnosis, women were classified as having RLS before or after the index date. DSM-5 indicates Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition).

Figure 2.  Risk of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) After Premenopausal Bilateral Oophorectomy
Risk of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) After Premenopausal Bilateral Oophorectomy

Cumulative incidence curves for RLS in women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy compared with women who did not undergo this procedure (ie, the reference group), overall and in strata by age at index (ie, ≤45 years and 46-49 years) and surgical indication (ie, benign ovarian indication and no ovarian indication). HR indicates hazard ratio.

Table 1.  Baseline Characteristics
Baseline Characteristics
Table 2.  Associations of Bilateral Oophorectomy With Incident RLS
Associations of Bilateral Oophorectomy With Incident RLS
1.
Allen  RP, Picchietti  D, Hening  WA, Trenkwalder  C, Walters  AS, Miniplays  J; Restless Legs Syndrome Diagnosis and Epidemiology workshop at the National Institutes of Health; International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group.  Restless legs syndrome: diagnostic criteria, special considerations, and epidemiology: a report from the restless legs syndrome diagnosis and epidemiology workshop at the National Institutes of Health.   Sleep Med. 2003;4(2):101-119. doi:10.1016/S1389-9457(03)00010-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Trenkwalder  C, Allen  R, Högl  B, Paulus  W, Winkelmann  J.  Restless legs syndrome associated with major diseases: a systematic review and new concept.   Neurology. 2016;86(14):1336-1343. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002542 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Chen  SJ, Shi  L, Bao  YP,  et al.  Prevalence of restless legs syndrome during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Sleep Med Rev. 2018;40:43-54. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2017.10.003 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Gupta  R, Dhyani  M, Kendzerska  T,  et al.  Restless legs syndrome and pregnancy: prevalence, possible pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment.   Acta Neurol Scand. 2016;133(5):320-329. doi:10.1111/ane.12520 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Manconi  M, Ulfberg  J, Berger  K,  et al.  When gender matters: restless legs syndrome: report of the “RLS and woman” workshop endorsed by the European RLS Study Group.   Sleep Med Rev. 2012;16(4):297-307. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2011.08.006 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Asante  A, Whiteman  MK, Kulkarni  A, Cox  S, Marchbanks  PA, Jamieson  DJ.  Elective oophorectomy in the United States: trends and in-hospital complications, 1998-2006.   Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1088-1095. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f5ec9d PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Whiteman  MK, Hillis  SD, Jamieson  DJ,  et al.  Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.   Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34.e1-34.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Levine  ME, Lu  AT, Chen  BH,  et al.  Menopause accelerates biological aging.   Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(33):9327-9332. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604558113 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Horvath  S.  DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types.   Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Rocca  WA, Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM,  et al.  Increased risk of parkinsonism in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause.   Neurology. 2008;70(3):200-209. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000280573.30975.6a PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Zeydan  B, Tosakulwong  N, Schwarz  CG,  et al.  Association of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before menopause onset with medial temporal lobe neurodegeneration.   JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(1):95-100. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3057 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Rocca  WA, Grossardt  BR, Shuster  LT, Stewart  EA.  Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, estrogen, and the risk of dementia.   Neurodegener Dis. 2012;10(1-4):175-178. doi:10.1159/000334764 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Rocca  WA, Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM,  et al.  Increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause.   Neurology. 2007;69(11):1074-1083. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000276984.19542.e6 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Minn Stat §144.335 (2006). Accessed January 1, 2021. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2006/cite/144.335
15.
Rocca  WA, Gazzuola-Rocca  L, Smith  CY,  et al.  Accelerated accumulation of multimorbidity after bilateral oophorectomy: a population-based cohort study.   Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(11):1577-1589. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.08.002 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Rocca  WA, Gazzuola Rocca  L, Smith  CY,  et al.  Bilateral oophorectomy and accelerated aging: cause or effect?   J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(9):1213-1217. doi:10.1093/gerona/glx026 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Rocca  WA, Gazzuola Rocca  L, Smith  CY,  et al.  Cohort profile: the Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2 (MOA-2) in Olmsted County, Minnesota (USA).   BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018861. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018861 PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
World Health Organization.  International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). World Health Organization; 1977.
19.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Yawn  BP, Melton  LJ  III, Rocca  WA.  Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester Epidemiology Project.   Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(9):1059-1068. doi:10.1093/aje/kwq482 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Leibson  CL, Yawn  BP, Melton  LJ  III, Rocca  WA.  Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.   Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(2):151-160. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.009 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Rocca  WA, Yawn  BP, St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Melton  LJ  III.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population.   Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(12):1202-1213. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.08.012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Yawn  BP,  et al.  Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records–linkage system.   Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1614-1624. doi:10.1093/ije/dys195 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
World Health Organization.  International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision (ICD-8). World Health Organization; 1965.
24.
American Psychiatric Association.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
25.
Goodman  RA, Posner  SF, Huang  ES, Parekh  AK, Koh  HK.  Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice.   Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E66. doi:10.5888/pcd10.120239 PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Therneau  TM, Grambsch  PM. The Cox model. In:  Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Springer-Verlag; 2000:39-77. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8_3
27.
Rocca  WA, Grossardt  BR, Shuster  LT.  Oophorectomy, estrogen, and dementia: a 2014 update.   Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;389(1-2):7-12. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2014.01.020 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Allen  RP, Walters  AS, Montplaisir  J,  et al.  Restless legs syndrome prevalence and impact: REST general population study.   Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(11):1286-1292. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.11.1286 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Berger  K, Luedemann  J, Trenkwalder  C, John  U, Kessler  C.  Sex and the risk of restless legs syndrome in the general population.   Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(2):196-202. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.2.196 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Ulfberg  J, Nyström  B, Carter  N, Edling  C.  Restless legs syndrome among working-aged women.   Eur Neurol. 2001;46(1):17-19. doi:10.1159/000050750 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Ulfberg  J, Nyström  B, Carter  N, Edling  C.  Prevalence of restless legs syndrome among men aged 18 to 64 years: an association with somatic disease and neuropsychiatric symptoms.   Mov Disord. 2001;16(6):1159-1163. doi:10.1002/mds.1209 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Ohayon  MM, Roth  T.  Prevalence of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder in the general population.   J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(1):547-554. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00443-9 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Ohayon  MM, O’Hara  R, Vitiello  MV.  Epidemiology of restless legs syndrome: a synthesis of the literature.   Sleep Med Rev. 2012;16(4):283-295. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2011.05.002 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Wilt  TJ, MacDonald  R, Ouellette  J,  et al.  Pharmacologic therapy for primary restless legs syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):496-505. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3733 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Muth  CC.  Restless legs syndrome.   JAMA. 2017;317(7):780. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.21375 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Leranth  C, Roth  RH, Elsworth  JD, Naftolin  F, Horvath  TL, Redmond  DE  Jr.  Estrogen is essential for maintaining nigrostriatal dopamine neurons in primates: implications for Parkinson’s disease and memory.   J Neurosci. 2000;20(23):8604-8609. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-23-08604.2000 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Hill  RA, Pompolo  S, Jones  ME, Simpson  ER, Boon  WC.  Estrogen deficiency leads to apoptosis in dopaminergic neurons in the medial preoptic area and arcuate nucleus of male mice.   Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004;27(4):466-476. doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2004.04.012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Ibi  M, Sawada  H, Nakanishi  M,  et al.  Protective effects of 1 alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) against the neurotoxicity of glutamate and reactive oxygen species in mesencephalic culture.   Neuropharmacology. 2001;40(6):761-771. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00009-0 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Buchanan  JR, Santen  R, Cauffman  S, Cavaliere  A, Greer  RB, Demers  LM.  The effect of endogenous estrogen fluctuation on metabolism of 25-hydroxyvitamin D.   Calcif Tissue Int. 1986;39(3):139-144. doi:10.1007/BF02555109 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Szentkirályi  A, Völzke  H, Hoffmann  W, Trenkwalder  C, Berger  K.  Multimorbidity and the risk of restless legs syndrome in 2 prospective cohort studies.   Neurology. 2014;82(22):2026-2033. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000470 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Patatanian  E, Claborn  MK.  Drug-induced restless legs syndrome.   Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52(7):662-672. doi:10.1177/1060028018760296 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Kang  SG, Lee  HJ, Jung  SW,  et al.  Characteristics and clinical correlates of restless legs syndrome in schizophrenia.   Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007;31(5):1078-1083. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.03.011 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Thompson  TL, Certain  ME.  Estrogen mediated inhibition of dopamine transport in the striatum: regulation by G alpha i/o.   Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;511(2-3):121-126. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.02.005 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Budhiraja  P, Budhiraja  R, Goodwin  JL,  et al.  Incidence of restless legs syndrome and its correlates.   J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(2):119-124. doi:10.5664/jcsm.1756 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Theorell-Haglöw  J, Miller  CB, Bartlett  DJ, Yee  BJ, Openshaw  HD, Grunstein  RR.  Gender differences in obstructive sleep apnoea, insomnia and restless legs syndrome in adults — what do we know: a clinical update.   Sleep Med Rev. 2018;38:28-38. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2017.03.003 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Baker  JM, Hung  AY.  Movement disorders in women.   Semin Neurol. 2017;37(6):653-660. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1608845 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Fulda  S, Stalla  GK, Wetter  TC.  Prevalence of the restless legs syndrome in transsexual patients: the hormonal hypothesis revisited.   J Neurol. 2007;254(12):1748-1749. doi:10.1007/s00415-007-0624-6 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
Public Health
February 1, 2021

Association of Premenopausal Bilateral Oophorectomy With Restless Legs Syndrome

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 2Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 3Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 4Mayo Clinic Specialized Research Center of Excellence on Sex Differences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2036058. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36058
Key Points

Question  Is bilateral oophorectomy for a benign indication prior to natural menopause associated with risk of restless legs syndrome?

Findings  In this cohort study of 3306 women, those who underwent bilateral oophorectomy prior to natural menopause had a higher risk of restless legs syndrome than those who did not undergo such surgery. The increased risk was independent of multiple chronic conditions present at baseline, was greater among women without a benign ovarian condition, and did not differ by estrogen therapy.

Meaning  This study found that undergoing bilateral oophorectomy for a benign indication prior to natural menopause was associated with an increased risk of restless legs syndrome.

Abstract

Importance  Restless legs syndrome is a common neurologic disorder that is more prevalent in women than in men, and it has been suggested that female hormones may be involved in the disorder’s pathophysiology.

Objective  To determine whether women who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy were at increased risk of restless legs syndrome.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study was performed using data from the Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging–2 for a population in Olmsted County, Minnesota. There were 1653 women who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy before the age of 50 years for a benign indication between 1988 and 2007 and 1653 age-matched women (of same age plus or minus 1 year) in a reference group. Follow-up was conducted until the end of the study period (ie, December 31, 2014). Data were analyzed from January to July 2020.

Exposures  Undergoing bilateral oophorectomy, as shown in medical record documentation.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Diagnosis of restless legs syndrome, as defined using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria, was recorded.

Results  Among 3306 women, the median (interquartile range) age at baseline was 44.0 (40.0-47.0) years. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy, compared with women who did not undergo this procedure, had a greater number of chronic conditions at the index date (eg, 300 women [18.1%] vs 171 women [10.3%] with ≥3 chronic conditions; overall P < .001), were more likely to have obesity (576 women [34.8%] vs 442 women [27.1%]; overall P < .001), and were more likely to have a history of anemia of any type (573 women [34.7%] vs 225 women [13.6%]; P < .001), iron deficiency anemia (347 women [21.0%] vs 135 women [8.2%]; P < .001), and restless legs syndrome before the index date (32 women [1.9%] vs 14 women [0.8%]; P = .008). Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy prior to natural menopause had a higher risk of restless legs syndrome after the index date compared with women in the reference group (120 diagnoses vs 74 diagnoses), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.44 (95% CI, 1.08-1.92; P = .01). After stratification by indication for the bilateral oophorectomy, there was an increased risk of restless legs syndrome among women without a benign ovarian condition (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.03-2.25; P = .04) but not among women with a benign condition (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.80-1.96; P = .34). Treatment with estrogen therapy through the age of 46 years in women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy at younger ages was not associated with a difference in risk.

Conclusions and Relevance  This cohort study found that risk of restless legs syndrome was increased among women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy prior to menopause, especially those without a benign ovarian indication.

Introduction

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder associated with an irresistible desire to move the legs in response to uncomfortable feelings and unpleasant sensations.1 Although the mechanisms of RLS are not fully understood, some diseases and conditions, such as diabetes, kidney disease, Parkinson disease, iron deficiency, and pregnancy, are associated with RLS.2,3

Given the higher prevalence of RLS among women, the role of estrogen in the development of RLS has been examined. The prevalence of RLS is significantly increased among pregnant women compared with women who are not pregnant, and estrogen levels are higher during pregnancy; a woman’s risk of RLS later in life increases with each pregnancy.3,4 Thus, these studies suggest that high levels of estrogen may be associated with increased risk of RLS. By contrast, the prevalence of RLS is increased among women who have reached menopause, when the level of circulating estrogen decreases; however, the use of estrogen therapy in women who have reached menopause is not associated with reduced risk of RLS.5 Thus, additional studies are needed to examine risk factors associated with RLS among women.

Hysterectomy is one of the most common gynecologic surgical treatments in the United States.6,7 Women undergoing hysterectomy commonly are offered bilateral oophorectomy at the same time or later for ovarian cancer prevention.6 It is estimated that 1 in 8 US women have their ovaries removed before reaching natural menopause. There is increasing evidence that the ovarian hormone deprivation caused by bilateral oophorectomy is associated with accelerated aging and several neurological disorders.8-13 In this study, we used a population-based cohort design to investigate the association between premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy and risk of RLS.

Methods

The Mayo Clinic and Olmsted Medical Center institutional review boards approved all research activities in this cohort study and waived informed consent as per Minnesota state privacy law, Statute §144.335.14 This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

Data Source and Study Population

The Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2 (MOA-2) includes a cohort of 1653 women who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy from 1988 through 2007 and 1653 age-matched women in a reference group. The study sample and methods were previously described.15-17 Briefly, we included in MOA-2 all women who resided in Olmsted County, Minnesota, and received a procedure code from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)18 for second unilateral (65.3 × and 65.4 ×) or bilateral (65.5 × and 65.6 ×) oophorectomy from January 1, 1988, to December 31, 2007, using the electronic indexes of the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) (Figure 1). We excluded women who had bilateral oophorectomy due to ovarian or other estrogen-sensitive cancers or due to a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer. The date of the surgical procedure was considered the index date. We used simple random sampling to match each woman who underwent bilateral oophorectomy 1:1 to a woman of the same age (plus or minus 1 year) as a reference at index date. Women in the reference group had not undergone bilateral oophorectomy before the index date. The cohorts were followed up passively using the REP medical record linkage system.17,19-22

Main Outcome and Measures

The main outcome of interest was the cumulative incidence of RLS. The medical records for all women with International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision (ICD-8)23 or ICD-9 diagnosis codes for RLS (333.94), myoclonus (333.2), and extrapyramidal disease (333.90 and 333.99) were reviewed by a physician (L.G.R.). The date the patient received a diagnosis of RLS meeting the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5)24 was recorded. To meet these criteria, a woman must report an urge to move her legs, usually accompanied by, or in response to, uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs, with all of the following characterizations true: (1) The urge to move the legs begins or worsens during periods of rest or inactivity. (2) The urge to move the legs is partially or totally relieved by movement. (3) The urge to move the legs is worse in the evening or at night than during the day or occurs only in the evening or at night. These symptoms must occur at least 3 times per week, must have persisted for at least 3 months, and must be accompanied by significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, educational, academic, behavioral, or other important areas of functioning. However, the symptoms should not be attributable to another mental disorder or medical condition (eg, arthritis), better explained by a behavioral condition (eg, positional discomfort), or attributable to physiological outcomes associated with a drug of abuse or a medication (eg, akathisia).24

Other Variables

Demographic and clinical characteristics were determined at the index date and included age, education, race/ethnicity, household income, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), smoking status, and history of anemia of any type or iron deficiency anemia. Women needed to have at least 1 corresponding diagnostic code (from ICD-8 or ICD-9) to be classified as having history of anemia of any type or history of iron deficiency anemia. In addition, we considered 18 of the 20 chronic conditions used by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to define multimorbidity: depression, anxiety, substance abuse disorders, dementia, schizophrenia or psychosis, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, cardiac arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, arthritis, cancer, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease. All chronic conditions were assessed using ICD-8 or ICD-9 diagnosis codes from the REP diagnostic indexes before the index date.25 Women needed to have at least 2 diagnostic codes in a given category separated by more than 30 days.17 Indications and pathology results for the bilateral oophorectomy were defined by the gynecologist and pathologist at the time of surgery. Extensive clinical information was manually abstracted from the medical records, including reproductive characteristics and use of systemic estrogen therapy after the date of the surgical procedure (ie, index date).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive characteristics at the index date were compared between the bilateral oophorectomy group and the reference group using χ2 tests. Women who met DSM-5 criteria for RLS before the index date were excluded. Women were followed up from the index date to RLS diagnosis or were censored at the earliest of 3 end points: date of death, last visit with a REP provider, or the end of the study (ie, December 31, 2014). Data were analyzed from January to July 2020. Inverse probability weights derived from a logistic regression model were used to adjust for age at index date, calendar year, race/ethnicity (ie, White vs other race/ethnicity), BMI (ie, <30 vs ≥30), years of education (ie, ≤12, 13-16, or >16), quartiles of yearly household income (ie, <$42 000, $42 000-$56 999, $57 000-$71 999, or ≥$72 000), smoking status (ie, current or former smoker vs never smoked), and status at baseline for 18 chronic conditions. The balance of characteristics before and after inverse probability weighting is shown in the eFigure in the Supplement. After the inverse probability weight adjustment, the standardized differences for conditions or characteristics were below the recommended threshold of 0.10 (ie, negligible imbalance between the 2 cohorts). These adjustments were done overall and separately in each stratum to maximize the balance at the index date.

The cumulative risk of RLS after bilateral oophorectomy (or index) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method adjusted using inverse probability weighting. Differences between the 2 cohorts were measured using the absolute risk increase or absolute risk reduction obtained by subtracting the 2 absolute risks. Cox proportional hazards regression models using age as the time scale and inverse probability weighting were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for RLS. The proportional hazards assumptions were checked using time-dependent covariates added to the Cox models and with graphical methods; assumptions were satisfied.26

The analyses were conducted in the overall sample and stratified by age at the date of the surgical procedure (ie, index date; ≤45 years vs 46-49 years), ovarian indication (ie, benign vs none), and estrogen therapy status (ie, age ≤45 years at index date and estrogen therapy continued up to age 46 years vs otherwise and age 46-49 years at index date and estrogen therapy continued up to age 50 years vs otherwise).

We performed 4 sets of sensitivity analyses. First, we censored at the date of surgery those women in the reference group who underwent bilateral oophorectomy after the index date and before age 50 years. Second, because some chronic diseases and medications are associated with RLS, we repeated the analyses after excluding women who at the index date, had any of the 18 HHS chronic diseases considered. Third, because iron deficiency anemia is associated with RLS,2 we repeated the analyses after excluding outcomes for women who had iron deficiency anemia at the time of RLS diagnosis. Fourth, we adjusted for history of anemia of any type at baseline.

Analyses were conducted using SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute), and tests of statistical significance were conducted at the 2-tailed α-level of .05. Because of the risk of spurious significant findings due to multiple comparisons, all sensitivity analyses should be considered exploratory.

Results
Characteristics at Index Date

Among 3306 women, the median (interquartile range) age at baseline was 44.0 (40.0-47.0) years. Figure 1 shows detailed flowcharts for the 2 cohorts, and Table 1 displays characteristics for the oophorectomy and reference groups. There were 1653 women in the bilateral oophorectomy group and 1653 age-matched women in the reference group. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) length of follow-up was 14.5 (10.3-19.1) years among women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy and 14.4 (10.4-19.3) years among women in the reference group. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy, compared with women in the reference group, had a greater number of chronic conditions at the index date (eg, 300 women [18.1%] vs 171 women [10.3%] with ≥3 chronic conditions; overall P < .001), were more likely to have obesity (576 women [34.8%] vs 442 women [27.1%]; overall P < .001), and were more likely to have received a diagnosis of anemia of any type (573 women [34.7%] vs 225 women [13.6%]; P < .001), iron deficiency anemia (347 women [21.0%] vs 135 women [8.2%]; P < .001), and RLS (32 women [1.9%] vs 14 women [0.8%]; P = .008) before the date of the surgical procedure (ie, index date) (Table 1). Almost all of the women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy also underwent hysterectomy, either concurrent with oophorectomy (1472 women [89.1%]) or before oophorectomy (157 women [9.5%]).

Bilateral Oophorectomy and Risk of RLS

Of 1653 women in the bilateral oophorectomy group, 32 women (1.9%) were diagnosed with RLS that met DSM-5 criteria before the index date and 120 women (9.1% cumulative incidence at 20 years) were diagnosed after the index date (Table 2; Figure 2). Of 1653 women in the reference group, 14 women (0.8%) were diagnosed with RLS before the index date and 74 women (6.8% cumulative incidence at 20 years) were diagnosed after the index date.

Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy had a higher risk of RLS in univariable models (unadjusted HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.25-2.21; P < .001) and in models adjusted using inverse probability weighting (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08-1.92; P = .01) (Table 2; Figure 2). The absolute risk of incident RLS 20 years after the index date was 9.1% (95% CI, 7.5%-11.2%) in the bilateral oophorectomy group and 6.8% (95% CI, 5.3%-8.7%) in the reference group (absolute risk increase, 2.3%). After stratification by indication, the HR was higher, but not significantly different, among women who underwent oophorectomy without an ovarian indication (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.03-2.25; P = .04; absolute risk increase, 2.8%) compared with women with benign ovarian conditions (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.80-1.96; P = .34; absolute risk increase, 1.3%; interaction P = .50). The most common ovarian indications were benign tumor, cyst, or endometriosis.

Among women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy before age 46 years, the HR of RLS was not significantly different for women who did not take estrogen therapy or stopped before their 46th birthday compared with women who received estrogen therapy through their 46th birthday. Similarly, among women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy between the ages of 46 and 49 years, the HR of RLS was not significantly different among women who did not take estrogen or stopped before their 50th birthday compared with women who received estrogen through their 50th birthday.

Sensitivity Analyses

First, we censored women in the reference group who underwent bilateral oophorectomy after the index date, but the results did not change (eTable 1 in the Supplement). Second, we excluded women who, at the index date, had any of the 18 HHS-defined chronic diseases we considered, but the results were not changed (eTable 2 in the Supplement). Third, analyses excluding outcomes for women who had iron deficiency anemia at the time of RLS diagnosis showed similar results as the analysis with those outcomes included (eTable 3 in the Supplement). Fourth, when we adjusted for history of anemia of any type at baseline, the association of bilateral oophorectomy with risk of RLS diagnosis remained (eTable 4 in the Supplement).

We also examined the association of anemia of any type and iron deficiency anemia with bilateral oophorectomy before and after the index date (ie, date of surgery). Before the index date, anemia of any type (odds ratio [OR], 3.68; 95% CI, 3.03-4.46; P < .001) and iron deficiency anemia (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 2.44-3.79; P < .001) were associated with bilateral oophorectomy using conditional logistic regression models. However, after the index date, there was no association between bilateral oophorectomy and risk of anemia of any type (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.97-1.31; P = .11) or risk of iron deficiency anemia (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.87-1.30; P = .55).

Discussion

In this cohort study, we investigated the association between premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy and risk of RLS using a large population-based group of 3306 women followed up longitudinally through a medical record linkage system. Our results suggest that the incidence of RLS was higher in women who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy compared with age-matched women who did not undergo this procedure. Moreover, the increase in risk was greatest among women who had no ovarian indication for surgery. Estrogen therapy was not associated with a significant change in the risk association. This study has several strengths. The bilateral oophorectomy and reference cohorts were representative of a well-defined population with up to 27 years of follow-up. Furthermore, bilateral oophorectomy and RLS were identified through medical record abstraction, thus limiting recall bias.

Studies from 2007,13 2012,12 and 201427 found that prophylactic premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy was associated with an increased risk of dementia, and a 2008 study10 found an association with Parkinson disease. Our study extends this research to also show an association between bilateral oophorectomy and risk of RLS, another common neurodegenerative condition. The prevalence of RLS in the general population ranges from 2% to 10%.28-31 The higher cumulative incidence we found of RLS among women with premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy compared with women in the reference group is worthy of attention from clinicians. A 200232 and a 201233 study found an increase in the prevalence of RLS associated with increasing age. One possible explanation for the increased risk of RLS among women who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy before 50 years of age is that the abrupt estrogen deprivation caused by the removal of both ovaries is associated with accelerated aging. Indeed, women who have undergone premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy have an increased risk of accelerated aging16 and dementia.10,11,13

The association of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy with changes in the dopaminergic system is another possible mechanism associated with the increased risk of RLS. Some studies have suggested that RLS is associated with basal ganglia dopamine levels, which contribute to the control of muscle activity and movement; treatments currently prescribed for RLS include dopamine agonists and alpha-2-delta calcium channel ligands.34,35 Notably, estrogen is essential for maintaining nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons.36,37 Women who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy, especially before age 46 years, have a higher risk of neurodegenerative diseases.10 In addition to the direct association of estrogen with changes in the dopaminergic system, estrogen may be indirectly associated through changes in vitamin D metabolism.38 For example, the abrupt decline in estrogen levels after premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy could be associated with vitamin D deficiency.39

Women in our study who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy had a greater number of chronic conditions at the index date compared with women in the reference group, and some of these conditions have been associated with increased risk of RLS.40 In addition, patients with multiple chronic conditions usually need several different medications, which may themselves be associated with RLS symptoms. For example, tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of RLS,41 likely associated with increased serotonin and norepinephrine activity and reduced dopaminergic activity.42 Because chronic health conditions are associated with bilateral oophorectomy and RLS, we conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding women who, at the index date, had any of 18 chronic conditions we considered, but the results were unchanged.

We did not observe a significant association between estrogen use through an individual’s 46th birthday and risk of RLS among women who underwent oophorectomy before age 46 years. This finding is in contrast to previous studies that suggested that estrogen therapy use was associated with an increased risk of developing RLS.43,44 However, there are complex associations among estrogens, dopamine, and movement disorders, and much remains unknown.45,46 For example, a 2007 study47 suggested that high estrogen levels are associated with a reduced risk of RLS. Therefore, studies examining the balance of risks and benefits of estrogen use after bilateral oophorectomy against the risk of subsequent RLS are needed.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, participants were predominantly White, and the study included only women residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Thus, results may not be generalizable to other populations. Second, we did not have information on blood iron levels prior to the date of surgery or during follow-up. However, we studied the effect of iron indirectly, using anemia of any type and iron deficiency anemia as surrogate variables. Although both were associated with bilateral oophorectomy at the index date (ie, date of surgery), bilateral oophorectomy was not associated with increased risk of de novo anemia of any type or of iron deficiency anemia during follow-up. Among women who developed RLS, the frequency of concomitant iron deficiency anemia (ie, iron deficiency anemia present at the time of RLS diagnosis) was lower in the oophorectomy group compared with the reference group. This difference was due to the removal of the uterus in conjunction with the bilateral oophorectomy. A reduction of uterine bleeding will result in a reduced risk of RLS associated with iron deficiency anemia. These results suggest that iron deficiency anemia cannot explain the association between bilateral oophorectomy and increased risk of subsequent RLS.

Third, the retrospective, observational nature of the study design limits causal inference. Women with clinically recognized multiple chronic conditions may be more likely to undergo bilateral oophorectomy in the context of a hysterectomy. However, we performed a sensitivity analysis to reduce such bias by excluding women with a documented history of chronic conditions before the index date, and the results did not change. Fourth, the sample size and the corresponding statistical power were inadequate to consider some specific strata of estrogen therapy separately.

Conclusions

This large cohort study found that the incidence of RLS was higher among women who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy compared with women who did not undergo this procedure. Physicians treating women with premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy need to be aware of their patients’ risk of RLS and create treatment-monitoring plans. These findings agree with the results of other studies showing associations of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy with the risk of multiple chronic conditions. In conjunction, those results may help women at average risk of ovarian cancer to better evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of undergoing the bilateral oophorectomy prior to natural menopause for ovarian cancer prevention.

Back to top
Article Information

Accepted for Publication: December 13, 2020.

Published: February 1, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36058

Correction: This article was corrected on March 10, 2021, to fix incorrect formatting and a typographical error in the Supplement.

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Huo N et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Michelle M. Mielke, PhD, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (mielke.michelle@mayo.edu).

Author Contributions: Dr Mielke and Ms Smith had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Rocca, Mielke.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Huo.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Huo, Smith.

Obtained funding: Rocca, Mielke.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Mielke.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Mielke reported receiving unrestricted research grants from Biogen and consulting fees from The Brain Protection Company outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported in part by grant No. R01 AG34676 from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, the Mayo Clinic Research Committee, and grant Nos. U54 AG44170 and RF1 AG55151 from the National Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders of the study had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References
1.
Allen  RP, Picchietti  D, Hening  WA, Trenkwalder  C, Walters  AS, Miniplays  J; Restless Legs Syndrome Diagnosis and Epidemiology workshop at the National Institutes of Health; International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group.  Restless legs syndrome: diagnostic criteria, special considerations, and epidemiology: a report from the restless legs syndrome diagnosis and epidemiology workshop at the National Institutes of Health.   Sleep Med. 2003;4(2):101-119. doi:10.1016/S1389-9457(03)00010-8PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Trenkwalder  C, Allen  R, Högl  B, Paulus  W, Winkelmann  J.  Restless legs syndrome associated with major diseases: a systematic review and new concept.   Neurology. 2016;86(14):1336-1343. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002542 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Chen  SJ, Shi  L, Bao  YP,  et al.  Prevalence of restless legs syndrome during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Sleep Med Rev. 2018;40:43-54. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2017.10.003 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Gupta  R, Dhyani  M, Kendzerska  T,  et al.  Restless legs syndrome and pregnancy: prevalence, possible pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment.   Acta Neurol Scand. 2016;133(5):320-329. doi:10.1111/ane.12520 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Manconi  M, Ulfberg  J, Berger  K,  et al.  When gender matters: restless legs syndrome: report of the “RLS and woman” workshop endorsed by the European RLS Study Group.   Sleep Med Rev. 2012;16(4):297-307. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2011.08.006 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Asante  A, Whiteman  MK, Kulkarni  A, Cox  S, Marchbanks  PA, Jamieson  DJ.  Elective oophorectomy in the United States: trends and in-hospital complications, 1998-2006.   Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1088-1095. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f5ec9d PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Whiteman  MK, Hillis  SD, Jamieson  DJ,  et al.  Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.   Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34.e1-34.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Levine  ME, Lu  AT, Chen  BH,  et al.  Menopause accelerates biological aging.   Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(33):9327-9332. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604558113 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Horvath  S.  DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types.   Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Rocca  WA, Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM,  et al.  Increased risk of parkinsonism in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause.   Neurology. 2008;70(3):200-209. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000280573.30975.6a PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Zeydan  B, Tosakulwong  N, Schwarz  CG,  et al.  Association of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before menopause onset with medial temporal lobe neurodegeneration.   JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(1):95-100. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3057 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Rocca  WA, Grossardt  BR, Shuster  LT, Stewart  EA.  Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, estrogen, and the risk of dementia.   Neurodegener Dis. 2012;10(1-4):175-178. doi:10.1159/000334764 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Rocca  WA, Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM,  et al.  Increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause.   Neurology. 2007;69(11):1074-1083. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000276984.19542.e6 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Minn Stat §144.335 (2006). Accessed January 1, 2021. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2006/cite/144.335
15.
Rocca  WA, Gazzuola-Rocca  L, Smith  CY,  et al.  Accelerated accumulation of multimorbidity after bilateral oophorectomy: a population-based cohort study.   Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(11):1577-1589. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.08.002 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Rocca  WA, Gazzuola Rocca  L, Smith  CY,  et al.  Bilateral oophorectomy and accelerated aging: cause or effect?   J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(9):1213-1217. doi:10.1093/gerona/glx026 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Rocca  WA, Gazzuola Rocca  L, Smith  CY,  et al.  Cohort profile: the Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2 (MOA-2) in Olmsted County, Minnesota (USA).   BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018861. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018861 PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
World Health Organization.  International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). World Health Organization; 1977.
19.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Yawn  BP, Melton  LJ  III, Rocca  WA.  Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester Epidemiology Project.   Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(9):1059-1068. doi:10.1093/aje/kwq482 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Leibson  CL, Yawn  BP, Melton  LJ  III, Rocca  WA.  Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.   Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(2):151-160. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.009 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Rocca  WA, Yawn  BP, St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Melton  LJ  III.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population.   Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(12):1202-1213. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.08.012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Yawn  BP,  et al.  Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records–linkage system.   Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1614-1624. doi:10.1093/ije/dys195 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
World Health Organization.  International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision (ICD-8). World Health Organization; 1965.
24.
American Psychiatric Association.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
25.
Goodman  RA, Posner  SF, Huang  ES, Parekh  AK, Koh  HK.  Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice.   Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E66. doi:10.5888/pcd10.120239 PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Therneau  TM, Grambsch  PM. The Cox model. In:  Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Springer-Verlag; 2000:39-77. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8_3
27.
Rocca  WA, Grossardt  BR, Shuster  LT.  Oophorectomy, estrogen, and dementia: a 2014 update.   Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;389(1-2):7-12. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2014.01.020 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Allen  RP, Walters  AS, Montplaisir  J,  et al.  Restless legs syndrome prevalence and impact: REST general population study.   Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(11):1286-1292. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.11.1286 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Berger  K, Luedemann  J, Trenkwalder  C, John  U, Kessler  C.  Sex and the risk of restless legs syndrome in the general population.   Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(2):196-202. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.2.196 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Ulfberg  J, Nyström  B, Carter  N, Edling  C.  Restless legs syndrome among working-aged women.   Eur Neurol. 2001;46(1):17-19. doi:10.1159/000050750 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Ulfberg  J, Nyström  B, Carter  N, Edling  C.  Prevalence of restless legs syndrome among men aged 18 to 64 years: an association with somatic disease and neuropsychiatric symptoms.   Mov Disord. 2001;16(6):1159-1163. doi:10.1002/mds.1209 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Ohayon  MM, Roth  T.  Prevalence of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder in the general population.   J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(1):547-554. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00443-9 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Ohayon  MM, O’Hara  R, Vitiello  MV.  Epidemiology of restless legs syndrome: a synthesis of the literature.   Sleep Med Rev. 2012;16(4):283-295. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2011.05.002 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Wilt  TJ, MacDonald  R, Ouellette  J,  et al.  Pharmacologic therapy for primary restless legs syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):496-505. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3733 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Muth  CC.  Restless legs syndrome.   JAMA. 2017;317(7):780. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.21375 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Leranth  C, Roth  RH, Elsworth  JD, Naftolin  F, Horvath  TL, Redmond  DE  Jr.  Estrogen is essential for maintaining nigrostriatal dopamine neurons in primates: implications for Parkinson’s disease and memory.   J Neurosci. 2000;20(23):8604-8609. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-23-08604.2000 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Hill  RA, Pompolo  S, Jones  ME, Simpson  ER, Boon  WC.  Estrogen deficiency leads to apoptosis in dopaminergic neurons in the medial preoptic area and arcuate nucleus of male mice.   Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004;27(4):466-476. doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2004.04.012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Ibi  M, Sawada  H, Nakanishi  M,  et al.  Protective effects of 1 alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) against the neurotoxicity of glutamate and reactive oxygen species in mesencephalic culture.   Neuropharmacology. 2001;40(6):761-771. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00009-0 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Buchanan  JR, Santen  R, Cauffman  S, Cavaliere  A, Greer  RB, Demers  LM.  The effect of endogenous estrogen fluctuation on metabolism of 25-hydroxyvitamin D.   Calcif Tissue Int. 1986;39(3):139-144. doi:10.1007/BF02555109 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Szentkirályi  A, Völzke  H, Hoffmann  W, Trenkwalder  C, Berger  K.  Multimorbidity and the risk of restless legs syndrome in 2 prospective cohort studies.   Neurology. 2014;82(22):2026-2033. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000470 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Patatanian  E, Claborn  MK.  Drug-induced restless legs syndrome.   Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52(7):662-672. doi:10.1177/1060028018760296 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Kang  SG, Lee  HJ, Jung  SW,  et al.  Characteristics and clinical correlates of restless legs syndrome in schizophrenia.   Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007;31(5):1078-1083. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.03.011 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Thompson  TL, Certain  ME.  Estrogen mediated inhibition of dopamine transport in the striatum: regulation by G alpha i/o.   Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;511(2-3):121-126. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.02.005 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Budhiraja  P, Budhiraja  R, Goodwin  JL,  et al.  Incidence of restless legs syndrome and its correlates.   J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(2):119-124. doi:10.5664/jcsm.1756 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Theorell-Haglöw  J, Miller  CB, Bartlett  DJ, Yee  BJ, Openshaw  HD, Grunstein  RR.  Gender differences in obstructive sleep apnoea, insomnia and restless legs syndrome in adults — what do we know: a clinical update.   Sleep Med Rev. 2018;38:28-38. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2017.03.003 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Baker  JM, Hung  AY.  Movement disorders in women.   Semin Neurol. 2017;37(6):653-660. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1608845 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Fulda  S, Stalla  GK, Wetter  TC.  Prevalence of the restless legs syndrome in transsexual patients: the hormonal hypothesis revisited.   J Neurol. 2007;254(12):1748-1749. doi:10.1007/s00415-007-0624-6 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×